“Women and Men in Swedish Alcohol and Drug Treatment” studies how people with alcohol and drug problems come to treatment. The focus is on different alcohol- and drug-related life events in the year prior to treatment and whether or not these events contributed to treatment entry. The importance of these events is also studied in relation to level of marginalization. The representative cross-sectional sample includes 1865 clients (71% men) interviewed inperson when entering inpatient and outpatient treatment facilities. Most respondents reported events in the year prior to treatment and these were also perceived as contributors to treatment. Events related to significant others and health workers seem to be of greatest importance for treatment entry. These events happen to a lot of the problematic alcohol and drug users and are viewed as strong contributing factors by the respondents. More marginalized people and misusers with more severe addiction problems experience more events. A curvilinear relationship (somewhat U-shaped) was found between level of marginalization and events as contributors to treatment: the least marginalized people are most likely to report events as contributors, people in between are the least likely and the most marginalized people are likely to report events as contributors to treatment, given that they have experienced the event.
BerendsL., & RichardsJ. (2003). Consumer perspective on treatment. In BerendsL.RitterA. (Eds.), Background Papers: A review of the Victorian drug treatment service system (pp. 3–37). Fitzroy, Victoria: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
2.
BlomqvistJ. (1999a). Treated and untreated recovery from alcohol misuse: Environmental influences and perceived reasons for change. Substance Use and Misuse, 34(10), 1371–1406.
3.
BlomqvistJ. (1999b). Inte bara behandling—vägar ut ur alkoholmissbruk [Not only treatment: Pathways out of alcohol abuse]. Vaxholm: Bjurner och Bruno.
4.
BlomqvistJ. (2002a). Recovery with and without treatment: A comparison of resolutions of alcohol and drug problems. Addiction Research and Theory, 10(2), 119–158.
5.
BlomqvistJ. (2002b). Att sluta med narkotika—med och utan behandling [To stop using drugs—with and without treatment]. Stockholm: Socialtjänstförvaltningen, Forsknings- och utvecklingsenheten.
6.
BlomqvistJ.PalmJ. & StorbjörkJ. (forthcoming). “More cure and less control” or “More care and lower costs”? Recent changes in services for problem drug users in Stockholm and Sweden. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy (forthcoming). First published online June 10, 2009.
7.
BrownV.MelchiorL.PanterA.SlaughterR., & HubaG. (2000). Women's steps of change and entry into drug abuse treatment. A multidimensional stages of change model. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 231–240.
8.
CunninghamJ.SobellL.SobellM.AgrawalS. & ToneattoT. (1993) Barriers to treatment: Why alcohol and drug abusers delay or never seek treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 18(3), 347–353.
9.
FinneyJ., & MoosR. (1995). Entering treatment for alcohol abuse: A stress and coping model. Addiction, 90(9), 1223–1240.
10.
GerdnerA., & HolmbergA. (2000). Factors affecting motivation to treatment in severely dependent alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61(4), 548–560.
11.
GoldbergT. (1999). Demystifying drugs: A psychosocial perspective. New York & Basingstoke, UK: Macmillian.
12.
HserY-I.MaglioneM.PolinskyM., & AnglinD. (1998). Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment-seeking individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(3), 213–220.
13.
HübnerL. (2001) Narkotika och alkohol i den allmänna opinionen [Drugs and alcohol in public opinion]. Rapport nr 99. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Institutionen för socialt arbete.
14.
JancaA.ÜstünT., & SartoriusN. (1994). New version of World Health Organization instruments for the assessment of mental disorders. Acta Psychiatria Scandinavica, 90, 73–83.
15.
KlingemannH. (1991). The motivation for change from problem alcohol and heroin use. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 727–744.
16.
KlingemannH. (1992). Coping and maintenance strategies of spontaneous remitters from problem use of alcohol and heroin in Switzerland. International Journal of the Addictions, 27(12), 1359–1388.
17.
KlingemannH., & HuntG. (Eds.). (1998). Drug treatment systems in an international perspective: Drugs, demons, and delinquents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
KlingemannH.TakalaJ-P. & HuntG. (Eds.). (1992). Cure, care or control. Alcoholism treatment in sixteen countries. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
MarloweD.KirbyK.BonieskieL.GlassD.DoddsL.HusbandS.PlattJ. & FestingerD. (1996). Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressure to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 42, 77–84.
20.
MarloweD.MerikleE.KirbyK.FestingerD., & McLellanT. (2001). Multidimensional assessment of perceived treatment-entry pressures among substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 37–108.
21.
O'DohertyF., & DaviesJ. (1987). Life events and addiction: A critical review. British Journal of Addiction, 82(2), 127–137.
22.
ÖjesjöL. (2004). Turnings in alcoholism: A thematic analysis of life histories from the Lundby alcohol subset (pp. 267–274). In RosenqvistP.BlomqvistJ.Koski-JännesA., & ÖjesjöL. (Eds.). Addiction and life course. NAD publication 44. Helsinki: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.
23.
OppenheimerE.SheehanM., & TaylorC. (1988). Letting the client speak: Drug misusers and the process of help seeking. British Journal of Addiction, 83, 653–647.
24.
RoomR.PalmJ.RomelsjöA.SteniusK. & StorbjörkJ. (2003). Kvinnor och män i svensk missbruksbehandling—beskrivning av en studie i Stockholms län. [Women and men in Swedish addiction treatment: A description of a study in Stockholm County]Nordisk alkohol- och narkotikatidskrift, 20(2–3), 91–112. (available in English: www.stakes.fi/nat).
25.
SheehanM.OppenheimerE., & TaylorC. (1986). Why drug users sought help from one London drug clinic. British Journal of Addiction, 81, 765–775.
26.
StorbjörkJ. (2003). Orsaker till att inte söka vård: En studie i Stockholms läns beroendevård. [Causes for not seeking treatment: A study in Stockholm County's addiction treatment services.]. Nordisk alkohol-och narkotikatidskrift, 20(2–3), 113–127.
27.
StorbjörkJ. (2006a). The social ecology of alcohol and drug treatment: Client experiences in context. SoRAD dissertation series 6. Stockholm, Stockholm University: Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs (SoRAD).
28.
StorbjörkJ. (2006b). The interplay between perceived self-choice and reported informal, formal and legal pressures in treatment entry. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(4), 611–643.
29.
StorbjörkJ., & RoomR. (2008). The two worlds of alcohol problems: Who is in treatment and who is not?Addiction Research & Theory, 16(1), 67–84.
30.
ThamH. (Ed.). (2003). Researchers on Swedish drug policy. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Criminology.
31.
ThomB. (1987). Sex differences in help-seeking for alcohol problems—2. Entry into treatment. British Journal of Addiction, 82, 989–997.
32.
TuckerJ.VuchinichR., & GladsjoJ. (1994). Environmental events surrounding natural recovery from alcohol-related problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 401–411.
33.
WeisnerC. (1987). Paths to treatment. A study of critical events (Dr. P.H. dissertation). Berkeley, School of Public Health, University of California.
34.
WeisnerC. (1990a). The alcohol treatment-seeking process from a problem perspective: Response to events. British Journal of Addiction, 85(4), 561–569.
35.
WeisnerC. (1990b). Role of alcohol-related problematic events in treatment entry. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 26(2), 93–102.
36.
WildT.C.CunninghamJ., & RyanR. (2006). Social pressure, coercion, and client engagement at treatment entry: A self-determination theory perspective. Addictive Behaviors, 31(9), 1858–1872.
