A number of studies suggest that the lack of “gender sensitive” drug treatment services for women represents a pressing social problem, second only to the problem of “women's substance abuse” itself. This article interrogates these “problem representations” by asking on what basis they are considered uniquely problematic. Through a critical analysis of research on women published between 1990–2012 in relevant high impact journals, the article identifies a dominant view of women in the drug field as a “special population” with “unique treatment needs.” The article suggests that this view not only reinforces a limited understanding of the harms associated with women's substance abuse, but might also paradoxically enable programs and services for women to remain as “add-ons” and/or narrow the range of “gender sensitive” approaches adopted.
AdamD. (2002). Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature, 415(6873), 726–729.
2.
AlexanderS. A.FrohlichK. L.FuscoC. (2012, October 18). A critical discourse analysis of Canadian public health documents addressing chidren's play. Poster presentation presented at the Third Biennial Bilingual Conference of the Canadian Society for the Sociology of Health, Ottawa, Ontario.
3.
AndersonT. (2005). Dimensions of women's power in the illicit drug economy. Theoretical Criminology, 9(4), 371–400.
4.
AndersonT. (Ed.). (2008). Neither villain nor victim: Empowerment and agency among women substance abusers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
5.
AstonS. (2009). Identities under construction: Women hailed as addicts. Health, 13(6), 611–628.
6.
BacchiC. (1999). Women, policy and politics. London: Sage.
BacchiC. (2010). Taking problems apart. In KrookM.L.ChildsS. (Eds.), Women, gender and politics: A reader (pp. 263–266). New York: Oxford University Press.
BancroftA. (2009). Drugs, intoxication and society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
11.
BoothB. M.McLaughlinY. S. (2000). Barriers to and need for alcohol services for women in rural populations. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(8), 1267–1275.
12.
BoydS. C. (1999). Mothers and illicit drugs: Transcending the myths. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
13.
BraunV.ClarkeC. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
14.
CampbellN. D. (1999). Regulating “maternal instinct”: Governing mentalities of late twentieth-century U.S. illicit drug policy. Signs, 24(4), 895–923.
15.
CampbellN. D.EttorreE. (2011). Gendering addiction: The politics of drug treatment in a neurochemical world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
16.
CarrE. S. (2011). Scripting addiction: The politics of therapeutic talk and American sobriety. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
EttorreE. (1992). Women and substance use. London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
18.
EttorreE. (2007). Revisioning women and drug use: Gender, power and the body. Houndsmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
19.
EttorreE. (2008). Seeing women, power and drugs through the lens of embodiment. In AndersonT. (Ed.), Neither villain nor victim: Empowerment and agency among women substance users (pp. 33–48). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
20.
EttorreE. (2010). Bodies, drugs and reproductive regimes. In EttorreE. (Ed.), Culture, bodies and the sociology of health (pp. 155–172). Farnham: Ashgate.
21.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (SheridanA., Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
22.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. (GordonC., Ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
23.
FoucaultM. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
24.
FraserS.MooreD. (2011). Governing through problems: The formulation of policy on amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) in Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 498–506.
25.
GomartE. (2002). Methadone: Six effects in search of a substance. Social Studies of Science, 32(1), 93–135.
26.
GreavesL.PooleN. (2008). Bringing sex and gender into women's substance use treatment programs. Substance Use & Misuse, 43(8–9), 1271–1273.
27.
GreenfieldS. F.BrooksA. J.GordonS. M.GreenC. A.KroppF.McHughR. K. (2007). Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86(1), 1–21.
28.
HartC. (2013). High price: Drugs, neuroscience, and discovering myself. New York: HarperCollins.
29.
HowellE.HeiserN.HarringtonM. (1999). A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16(3), 195–219. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(98)00032-4
30.
KeaneH. (2000). Women and substance abuse: Problems of visibility and empowerment. In UssherJ. (Ed.), Women's Health: Contemporary International Perspectives (pp. 76–82). Leicester: British Psychological Association.
31.
KeaneH.MooreD.FraserS. (2011). Addiction and dependence: Making realities in the DSM. Addiction, 106(5), 868–897.
32.
LabontéR. (2012). The austerity agenda: How did we get here and where do we go next?Critical Public Health, 22(3), 257–265. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.687508
33.
LawJ.UrryJ. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.
34.
LuptonD. (2012). “Precious cargo”: Foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3), 329–340. doi:10.1080/09581596.2012.657612
35.
LutharS. S.WalshK. G. (1995). Treatment needs of drug-addicted mothers. Integrated parenting psychotherapy interventions. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12(5), 341–348.
36.
MaherL. (1997). Sexed work: Gender, race, and resistance in a Brooklyn drug market. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MartinF. (2011). Deep entanglements: Identity, embodiment and the complexities of disengaging from injecting drug use in the lives of young mothers. Contemporary Drug Problems, 38(3), 335–366.
39.
McAuleyL.PhamB.TugwellP.MoherD. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?The Lancet, 356(9237), 1228–1231.
40.
MeashamF. (2002). “Doing gender”-“Doing drugs”: Conceptualizing the gendering of drugs cultures. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29, 335–373.
41.
MillerB. A.WilsnackS. C.CunradiC. B. (2000). Family violence and victimization: Treatment issues for women with alcohol problems. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(8), 1287–1297.
42.
MooreD. (2008). Erasing pleasure from public discourse on illicit drugs: On the creation and reproduction of an absence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(5), 353–358.
43.
MooreK.MeashamF. (2013). Exploring emerging perspectives on gender and drug use. In MistralW. (Ed.), Emerging Perspectives on Substance Misuse (pp. 80–97). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
MurphyS.RosenbaumM. (1999). Pregnant women on drugs: Combatting stigma and stereotypes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
45.
NajavitsL. M. (2002). Seeking safety: A treatment manual for PTSD and substance abuse. New York: Guilford Press.
46.
O'BrienC. P.VolkowN.LiT.K. (2006). What's in a word? Addiction versus dependence in DSM-V. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(5), 764–765.
47.
RamosH. (2013). From ethnicity to race in the Canadian Review of Sociology, 1964 to 2010. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie, 50(3), 337–356.
48.
RawsonR. A.GonzalesR.BrethenP. (2002). Treatment of methamphetamine use disorders: An update. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23(2), 145–150.
49.
RhodesT.CoomberR. (2010). Qualitative methods and theory in addictions research. In MillerP. G.StrangJ.MillerP.M. (Eds.), Addiction research methods (pp. 59–78). Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell/Addiction Press.
50.
RhodesT.StimsonG. V.MooreD.BourgoisP. (2010). Qualitative social research in addictions publishing: Creating an enabling journal environment. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 21(6), 441.
51.
RosenbaumM. (1981). Women on heroin. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University.
52.
SacksJ. Y.McKendrickK.BanksS. (2008). The impact of early trauma and abuse on residential substance abuse treatment outcomes for women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34(1), 90–100.
53.
SallazJ. J.ZaviscaJ. (2007). Bourdieu in American sociology, 1980–2004. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 21–41.
54.
SanguinettiJ. (1998). An adventure in ‘postmodern’ action research: Performativity, professionalism and power. In SanguinettiJ.RhodesJ. (Eds.), Research at work: Perspectives, case studies and innovative strategies (p. 232–249). London: Routledge.
55.
SeddonT. (2010). Let's not talk about drugs. Drugs and Alcohol Today, 10(3), 21–23.
56.
SimpsonM.McNultyJ. (2008). Different needs: Women's drug use and treatment in the U.K. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(2), 169–175.
57.
SinhaR.O'MalleyS. S. (2000). Alcohol and eating disorders: Implications for alcohol treatment and health services research. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 24(8), 1312–1319.
58.
StevensA. (2011). Drugs, crime and public health: The political economy of drug policy. Abingdon: Routledge.
59.
SunA. P. (2006). Program factors related to women's substance abuse treatment retention and other outcomes: A review and critique. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 30(1), 1–20.
60.
TaylorA. (1993). Women drug users: An ethnography of a female injecting community. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
61.
TeschR. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer Press.
62.
UssherJ. M. (2006). Managing the monstrous feminine: Regulating the reproductive body. UK: Psychology Press.
63.
ValentineK.FraserS. (2008). Trauma, damage and pleasure: Rethinking problematic drug use. International Journal of Drug Policy, 19(5), 410–416.
64.
VitelloneN. (2003). The syringe as a prosthetic. Body & Society, 9(3), 37–52.
65.
WeirL. (1999). Recent developments in the government of pregnancy. Economy and Society, 25(3), 372–392.
66.
WelleD.FalkinG. P.JainchillN. (1998). Current approaches to drug treatment for women offenders. Project WORTH. Women's Options for Recovery, Treatment, and Health. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(2), 151–163.
67.
WinklbaurB.KopfN.EbnerN.JungE.ThauK.FischerG. (2008). Treating pregnant women dependent on opioids is not the same as treating pregnancy and opioid dependence: A knowledge synthesis for better treatment for women and neonates. Addiction, 103(9), 1429–1440.
