In this study a sample of non-abstinent untreated amphetamine users’ accounts of lifestyles, living conditions and efforts to change were described and analyzed. The objective was to inductively identify the qualitative characteristics of their potential distance to the treatment system. The analysis focused how self presentations and descriptions of reality were related to views on treatment and lifestyle change. Results showed that respondents distanced themselves from the individuals and practices of several social contexts, which was interpreted as indicating a limbo between substance abuse and conventional life. Yet, to solve acute predicaments the substance abusers were confronted with the demands of the supposedly condemning treatment system. It is suggested in the article that the Swedish treatment system develop further “low threshold” interventions that address life problems as identified by the clients themselves. This should enable less motivated substance abusers to acquire stable living conditions that may facilitate lifestyle change efforts.
BaborT.F. & Del BocaF.K. (eds.) (2003) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BergmarkA. & OscarssonL. (1988) Drug abuse and treatment—a study of social conditions and contextual strategies. Stockholm Studies in Social Work 4. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
3.
BlomqvistJ. (2002) Recovery with and without treatment: A comparison of resolutions of alcohol and drug problems.Addiction Research & Theory,10:119–158.
4.
BlomqvistJ. (2004) Sweden's ‘war on drugs’ in the light of addicts’ own experiences. In RosenqvistP., BlomqvistJ., Koski-JännesA. & ÖjesjöL. (eds.) Addiction and Life Course, pp. 139–171. NAD publication 44. Helsinki: Hakapaino Oy.
5.
Boekhoet van SolingeT. (1997) The Swedish drug control system.Amsterdam: Jan Mets, CEDRO.
6.
CAN (2005) Drogutvecklingen i Sverige. [Drug trends in Sweden] CAN, Rapport nr 91. Stockholm: Centralförbundet for alkohol- och narkotikaupplysning.
7.
CloudW. & GranfieldR. (2004) A life course perspective on exiting addiction: The relevance of recovery capital in treatment. In RosenqvistP., BlomqvistJ., Koski-JännesA. & ÖjesjöL. (eds.) Addiction and Life Course, pp. 185–202. NAD publication 44. Helsinki: Hakapaino Oy.
8.
CooneyN.L., BaborT.F., DiClementeC.C. & Del BocaF.K. (2003) Clinical and scientific implications of Project MATCH. In BaborT.F. & Del BocaF.K. (eds.) Treatment Matching in Alcoholism, pp. 222–237. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CopelandJ. (1997) A qualitative study of barriers to formal treatment among women who self-managed change in addictive behaviours.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,14:183–190.
10.
EkendahlM. (2006a) Time to change—an exploratory study of motivation among untreated and treated substance abusers.Addiction Research & Theory. (accepted manuscript).
11.
EkendahlM. (2006b) Will and skill—an exploratory study of substance abusers’ attitudes towards lifestyle change.European Addiction Research. (accepted manuscript).
12.
ElsterJ. & SkogO.-J. (1999) Introduction, In ElsterJ. & SkogO.-J. (eds.) Getting Hooked: Rationality and addiction, pp. 1–29. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
FingaretteH. (1988) Heavy drinking: The myth of alcoholism as a disease.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14.
JoeG.W., SimpsonD.D. & BroomeK.M. (1998) Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process.Addiction,93:1177–1190.
15.
MelloN.K. & MendelsonJ.H. (1966) Experimental analysis of drinking behaviour of chronic alcoholics.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,133:823–845.
16.
MillerW.R. (1985) Motivation for treatment: A review with special emphasis on alcoholism.Psychological Bulletin,98:84–107.
17.
MillsC.W. (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive.American Sociological Review,5:904–913.
18.
OrfordJ., HodgsonR., CopelloA., JohnB., SmithM., BlackR., FryerK., HandforthL., AlwynT., KerrC., ThistlethwaiteG. & SleggG.on behalf of the UKATT Research Team (2006) The clients’ perspective on change during treatment for an alcohol problem: Qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial.Addiction,101:60–68.
19.
PetryN.M. (2000) Effects of increasing income on polydrug use: a comparison of heroin, cocaine and alcohol abusers.Addiction,95:705–717.
20.
PotterJ. & WetherellM. (1987) Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behaviour.London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
21.
ProchaskaJ.O., DiClementeC.C. & NorcrossJ.C. (1992) In search of how people change—applications to addictive behaviours.American Psychologist,47:1102–1114.
22.
SimpsonD.D. (2001) Editorial. Modeling treatment process and outcomes.Addiction,96:207–211.
23.
SwiftW., CopelandJ. & HallW. (1996) Characteristics of women with alcohol and other drug problems: Findings of an Australian survey.Addiction,91:1141–1150.
24.
TuckerJ.A. (2001) Resolving problems associated with alcohol and drug misuse: Understanding relations between addictive behaviour change and the use of services.Substance Use & Misuse,36:1501–1518.
25.
TuckerJ.A., VuchinichR.E. & RippensP.D. (2004) A factor analytic study of influences on patterns of help-seeking among treated and untreated alcohol dependent persons.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,26:237–242.
26.
WestR.T. (2005) Editorial. Time for a change: Putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest.Addiction,100:1036–1039.
