We examined detection and direction determination of auditory cues from a pedestrian environment among a sample of older and younger adults. Review of relevant research suggests normal aging is associated with declines in physical, cognitive, and perceptual abilities. Relatively, few studies have examined the impact of such developmental changes on pedestrian safety among older adults, and none have examined such factors in relation to use of auditory cues. Thirty-five younger and 35 older adults completed cognitive measures and a pedestrian auditory detection task. Some results by speed were similar to past research that examined younger samples. Interactions were discovered between age and speed conditions within the auditory task. Results are discussed in the context of past research and with regard to informing future injury prevention efforts.
Ampofo-BoatengK.ThomsonJ. A. (1990) Child pedestrian accidents: A case for preventive medicine. Health Education Research5(2): 265–274.
2.
AndersonP.AndersonV.NorthamE.TaylorH. (2000) Standardization of the contingency naming test for school-aged children: A new measure of reactive flexibility. Clinical Neuropsychological Assessment1: 247–273.
3.
Ashmead, D., Guth, D., Wall, R., Long, R., & Ponchillia, P. (2005). Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131, 812--821.
4.
BartonB. K. (2006) Integrating selective attention into developmental pedestrian safety research. Canadian Psychology47(3): 203–210.
5.
BartonB. K.LewR.KovesdiC.CottrellN. D.UlrichT. (2013) Developmental differences in auditory detection and localization of approaching vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention53(1): 1–8.
6.
BartonB. K.UlrichT. A.LewR. (2012) Auditory detection and localization of approaching vehicles. Accident Analysis & Prevention49: 347–353.
7.
BirrenJ. E.RiegelK. F.MorrisonD. F. (1962) Age differences in response speed as a function of controlled variations of stimulus conditions: Evidence of a general speed factor. Gerontology6(1): 1–18.
DemetreJ. D.LeeD. N.PitcairnT. K.GrieveR.ThomsonJ. A.Ampofo-BoatengK. (1992) Errors in young children’s decisions about traffic gaps: Experiments with roadside simulations. British Journal of Psychology83: 189–202.
10.
Dunbar, G., Holland, C. A., & Maylor, E. A. (2004). Older pedestrians: A critical review of the literature, Road Safety Research Report No. 37, London, UK.
11.
EmersonR. W.SauerburgerD. (2008) Detecting approaching vehicles at streets with no traffic control. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness102(12): 747.
12.
GuthD. A.HillE. W.RieserJ. J. (1989) Tests of blind pedestrians’ use of traffic sounds for street-crossing alignment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness83: 461–468.
13.
GuthD. A.LongR. G.EmersonR. S. W.PonchilliaP. E.AshmeadD. H. (2013) Blind and sighted pedestrians’ road-crossing judgments at a single-lane roundabout. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society55(3): 632–642.
14.
KovesdiC. R.BartonB. K. (2013) The role of non-verbal working memory in pedestrian visual search. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour19: 31–39.
15.
KutasM.McCarthyG.DonchinE. (1977) Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science197(4305): 792–795.
16.
Langevin, S., Dommes, A., Cavallo, V., Oxley, J., & Vienne, F. (2011). Cognitive, perceptual and motor decline as predictors of risky street-crossing decisions in older pedestrians. In Driving Assessment 2011: 6th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
17.
LaScalaE. A.GerberD.GruenewaldP. J. (2000) Demographic and environmental correlates of pedestrian injury collisions: A spatial analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention32: 651–658.
18.
LeeD. N.YoungD. S.McLaughlinC. M. (1984) A roadside simulation of road crossing for children. Ergonomics27: 1271–1281.
19.
LobjoisR.CavalloV. (2007) Age-related differences in street-crossing decisions: The effects of vehicle speed and time constraints on gap selection in an estimation task. Accident Analysis & Prevention39(5): 934–943.
20.
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. (2014). WISQARS™ (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/.
21.
Oxley, J. (2002, May). Elderly pedestrian issues. In Pedestrian Safety Seminar, Sydney, 2002.
22.
Oxley, J., Fildes, B., & Dewar, R. (1999). Safety of older pedestrians. In Proceedings of the Conference Transportation in an aging society: A decade of experience (pp. 167–191), Bethesda, MD.
23.
OxleyJ. A.IhsenE.FildesB. N.CharltonJ. L.DayR. H. (2005) Crossing roads safely: An experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention37(5): 962–971.
24.
RobertsI.NortonR.JacksonR.DunnR.HassallI. (1995) Effect of environmental factors on risk of injury of child pedestrians by motor vehicles: A case-control study. British Medical Journal310: 91–94.
25.
Rodrigues, J., Pinto, M., Dommes, A., Cavallo, V., & Vienne, F. (January 2012). Simulated traffic and auditory information: The impact on street crossing in young and old adults. In Proceedings of the driving simulation conference (pp. 1--7).
26.
RubinG. S.RocheK. B.Prasada-RaoP.FriedL. P. (1994) Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optometry & Vision Science71(12): 750–760.
27.
SalthouseT. A.BabcockR. L. (1991) Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology27(5): 763–776.
28.
UlrichT.BartonK. B.LewR. (2014) Detection and localization of approaching vehicles in the presence of competing vehicle noise. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour26: 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2014.07.003.
