Research has shown that levels of public service motivation (PSM) among public employees tend to decrease in their early years of employment in Korea. This study examines specific managerial functions in maintaining and enhancing PSM among early-career public servants. It utilizes a sample of 5,627 public servants with less than 5 years of service, drawn from pooled cross-sectional data from three annual surveys (2022–2024) of the Public Employee Perception Survey in Korea. The results indicate that goal clarity, performance feedback, autonomy, and supervisory support are positively associated with PSM. However, these relationships vary across government levels. Goal clarity and performance feedback are positively associated with PSM at all levels of government, operating through both direct and indirect pathways. In contrast, autonomy and supervisory support are positively associated with PSM only in the central government context, and their effects operate entirely through indirect pathways mediated by value congruence, job satisfaction, and career satisfaction. These findings suggest that informational managerial functions have universal applicability, while the effectiveness of relational managerial functions is contingent on institutional context. The implications and limitations of this study are discussed.
AlonsoP.LewisG. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363–380.
2.
AndersenL. B.BjørnholtB.BroL. L.Holm-PetersenC. (2018). Leadership and motivation: A qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 675–691.
3.
AwanS.BelG.EsteveM. (2020). The benefits of PSM: An oasis or a mirage?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 619–635.
4.
BakkerA. B. (2015). A job demands–resources approach to public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 723–732.
5.
BassB. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
6.
BreaughJ. A.BeckerA. S. (1987). Further examination of the work autonomy scales: Three studies. Human Relations, 40(6), 381–400.
7.
CaillierJ. G. (2016). Does public service motivation mediate the relationship between goal clarity and both organizational commitment and extra-role behaviours?Public Management Review, 18(2), 300–318.
8.
CamilleriE. (2007). Antecedents affecting public service motivation. Personnel Review, 36(3), 356–377.
9.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
10.
ChoE.KimS. (2015). Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well known but poorly understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207–230.
11.
ChoJ. (2024). Problem of increasing retirement of newly appointed public servants (Research report, Issues and Perspectives, No. 2023), National Assembly Research Service.
12.
ChoW.KimD.ParkA. Y. S. (2023). Local government’s resource commitment to environmental sustainability: Capacity, conservatism, and contractual dynamics. Urban Affairs Review, 59(2), 447–475.
13.
ChoY. J.SongH. J. (2021). How to facilitate innovative behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from public employees in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 509–537.
14.
ChristensenR. K.PaarlbergL.PerryJ. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
16.
DeNisiA. S.KlugerA. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved?Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(1), 129–139.
17.
GiauqueD.Anderfuhren-BigetS.VaroneF. (2015). HRM practices sustaining PSM: When values congruency matters. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(3), 202–220.
18.
GreenhausJ. H.ParasuramanS.WormleyW. M. (1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86.
19.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison-Wesley.
20.
HairJ. F.Jr.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
21.
HameduddinT.EngbersT. (2022). Leadership and public service motivation: A systematic synthesis. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 86–119.
22.
HeroldD. M.LidenR. C.LeatherwoodM. L. (1987). Using multiple attributes to assess sources of performance feedback. Academy of Management Journal, 30(4), 826–835.
23.
HurH.AbnerG. (2024). What makes public employees want to leave their job? A meta-analysis of turnover intention predictors among public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 115–142.
24.
JacobsonW. S. (2011). Creating a motivated workforce: How organizations can enhance and develop public service motivation (PSM). Public Personnel Management, 40(3), 215–238.
25.
JensenU. T.AndersenL. B.JacobsenC. B. (2019). Only when we agree! How value congruence moderates the impact of goal-oriented leadership on public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 79(1), 12–24.
26.
JensenU. T.VestergaardC. F. (2017). Public service motivation and public service behaviors: Testing the moderating effect of tenure. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 52–67.
27.
JungC. S.RaineyH. G. (2011). Organizational goal characteristics and public duty motivation in US federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), 28–47.
28.
JungC. S.RyuS. (2020). Public service motivation in Korea. In MoonC.MoonM. J. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of Korean politics and public administration (pp. 275–294). Routledge.
29.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245–261.
30.
KimS. (2010). Position islands on the career sea: An evaluation of the open competitive position system in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 39(3), 243–258.
31.
KimS. (2017a). Comparison of a multidimensional to a unidimensional measure of public service motivation: Predicting work attitudes. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(6): 1–12.
32.
KimS. (2017b). Developing an item pool and testing measurement invariance for measuring public service motivation in Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 22(3), 231–244.
33.
KimY.JeongY. A. (2023). The role of local governments in South Korea’s COVID-19 response. Public Administration and Development, 43(2), 120–128.
34.
KimG. J.KiN.YoonT. (2023). Untangling the association between goal clarity and public service motivation with the moderating role of value congruence. American Review of Public Administration, 53(3–4), 159–172.
35.
KimS.RohJ. (2018). Public service motivation of public employees and human resources management. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review, 17(3), 145–174.
36.
KimS.VandenabeeleW. (2010). A strategy for building public service motivation research internationally. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 701–709.
37.
KimS.VandenabeeleW.WrightB. E.AndersenL. B.CeraseF. P.ChristensenR. K.DesmaraisC.KoumentaM.LeisinkP.LiuB.PalidauskaiteJ.PedersenL. H.PerryJ. L.RitzA.TaylorJ.De VivoP. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79–102.
38.
KiyakB.KarkinN. (2023). Job characteristics and public service motivation among highly-qualified public employees. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 316–333.
39.
KjeldsenA. M.JacobsenC. B. (2013). Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(4), 899–926.
40.
KlattT.FairholmM. (2023). Promote or deter: How organizations influence public service motivation. Public Personnel Management, 52(1), 48–69.
41.
KlineR. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford publications.
42.
KlugerA. N.DeNisiA. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
43.
LimJ. Y.MoonK. K. (2025). The public service motivation’s impact on turnover intention in Korean public organizations: Do perceived organizational politics matter?Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 474.
44.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th Anniversary Edition). Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
MorgesonF. P.HumphreyS. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339.
46.
MostafaA. M. S.Gould-WilliamsJ. S.BottomleyP. (2015). High-performance human resource practices and employee outcomes: The mediating role of public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 747–757.
47.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). The role of organizations in fostering public service motivation. Public Administration Review, 67(1), 40–53.
48.
NaffK. C.CrumJ. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5–16.
49.
PaarlbergL. E.PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). From theory to practice: Strategies for applying public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 268–293). Oxford University Press.
50.
PandeyS. K.StazykE. C. (2008). Antecedents and correlates of public service motivation. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. 101–117). Oxford University Press.
51.
ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11(1), 109–142.
52.
ParkerS. K.MorgesonF. P.JohnsG. (2017). One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 403–420.
53.
ParolaH. R.HarariM. B.HerstD. E.PrysmakovaP. (2019). Demographic determinants of public service motivation: A meta-analysis of PSM-age and -gender relationships. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1397–1419.
54.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
55.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (2008). Preface. In PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds), Motivation in public management: The call of public service (pp. vii–x). Oxford University Press.
56.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367–373.
57.
PodsakoffP. M.PodsakoffN. P.WilliamsL. J.HuangC.YangJ. (2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17–61.
58.
PratamaA. B.AhsaniR. D. P.WulandariC. (2025). Does citizen feedback influence public service motivation? Evidence from a survey experiment in the context of urban service provisions. Public Personnel Management, 54(1), 3–23.
59.
RaineyH. G.PandeyS.BozemanB. (1995). Research note: Public and private managers’ perceptions of red tape. Public Administration Review, 55(6), 567–574.
60.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426.
61.
RitzA.GiauqueD.VaroneF.Anderfuhren-BigetS. (2014). From leadership to citizenship behavior in public organizations: When values matter. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 128–152.
62.
SchottC.PronkJ. L. J. (2014). Investigating and explaining organizational antecedents of PSM. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 2(1), 28–56.
63.
SchottC.SteenT.Van KleefD. D. (2019). Reality shock and public service motivation: A longitudinal, qualitative study among Dutch veterinary inspectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(6), 468–481.
64.
SchwarzG.NewmanA.CooperB.EvaN. (2016). Servant leadership and follower job performance: The mediating effect of public service motivation. Public Administration, 94(4), 1025–1041.
65.
SeldenS. C.BrewerG. A. (2000). Work motivation in the senior executive service: Testing the high performance cycle theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(3), 531–550.
66.
SeoB. K.JooY. M. (2019). Innovation or episodes? Multi-scalar analysis of governance change in urban regeneration policy in South Korea. Cities, 92, 27–35.
67.
ShimD. C.ParkH. H. (2019). Public service motivation in a work group: Role of ethical climate and servant leadership. Public Personnel Management, 48(2), 203–225.
68.
Van DoorenW.BouckaertG.HalliganJ. (2015). Performance management in the public sector. Routledge.
69.
VandenabeeleW. (2014). Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 153–173.
70.
WardK. D. (2014). Cultivating public service motivation through AmeriCorps service: A longitudinal study. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 114–125.
71.
WooH.KimS. (2024). Public service motivation and public sector employment in Korea. Public Administration Review, 84(5), 966–981.
72.
WrightB. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter?Public Administration Review, 67(1), 54–64.
73.
WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215.
74.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person-organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521.
