In charge of safeguarding the public interest: the role of goal clarity in shaping public service motivation and the acceptance of unethical behaviours
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2022
In charge of safeguarding the public interest: the role of goal clarity in shaping public service motivation and the acceptance of unethical behaviours
Ethics are important for personal, organizational and societal development. Although the literature has isolated some remedies and causes of unethical attitudes and behaviours, there is a still a need for further research. When focusing on the public context, it has been suggested that the motivation to serve the public interest has a negative relationship with different unethical outcomes. Thus, one interesting avenue of research is to explain how public service motivation can be enhanced by the outcome of certain managerial practices, which may also lead to ethical benefits indirectly. Using data collected from social workers in Catalonia (Spain), this article confirms that goal clarity directly increases the levels of public service motivation and indirectly reduces the acceptance of unethical behaviours by eliciting public service motivation. Research and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Points for practitioners
This study highlights the importance of public service-oriented institutional contexts in indirectly shaping unethical outcomes. The findings recommend to public managers and practitioners to provide goal clarity (through certain human-resource management practices such as appraisal or job design) because it increases public service motivation and indirectly reduces the acceptance of unethical behaviour.
AndersenLBBjørnholtBBroLL, et al. (2018)
Leadership and motivation: A qualitative study of transformational leadership and public service motivation.International Review of Administrative Sciences84(4): 675–691. DOI: 10.1177/0020852316654747.
2.
BelléNCantarelliP (2017)
What causes unethical behavior? A meta-analysis to set an agenda for public administration research.Public Administration Review 77(3): 327–339.
3.
BrewerGA (2013) Public management contributions for improving social service performance: Public values, public service motivation and rule functionality. In: Leisink P, Boselie P, van Bottenburg M and Hosking DM (eds), Managing Social Issues: A Public Values Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 19–36.
4.
BrewerGASeldenSC (1998)
Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory8(3): 413–440.
5.
CaillierJG (2016)
Does public service motivation mediate the relationship between goal clarity and both organizational commitment and extra-role behaviours?Public Management Review18(2): 300–318.
Cramwinckel FM, De Cremer D and van Dijke M (2013) Dirty Hands Make Dirty Leaders?! The Effects of Touching Dirty Objects on Rewarding Unethical Subordinates as a Function of a Leader’s Self-Interest. Journal of Business Ethics 115(1): 93–100.
8.
DilulioJD (1994)
Principled agents: The cultural bases of behavior in a federal government bureaucracy.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory4(3): 277–318.
9.
GrimmelikhuijsenSJilkeSOlsenAL, et al. (2016)
Behavioral public administration: Combining insights from public administration and psychology.Public Administration Review77(1): 45–56.
10.
HortonS (2008) History and persistence of an idea and an ideal. In: Perry J. L. and Hondeghem A. (eds), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17–32.
11.
HuLBentlerPM (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6(1): 1–55.
12.
HubertsLWJC (2018)
Integrity: What it is and why it is important.Public Integrity20(sup1): S18–S32.
13.
JørgensenTBBozemanB (2007)
Public values: An inventory.Administration & Society39(3): 354–381.
14.
Kim S and Vandenabeele W (2010) A Strategy for Building Public Service Motivation Research Internationally. Public Administration Review 70(5): 701–709.
15.
KimSVandenabeeleWWrightBE, et al. (2013)
Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23(1): 79–102.
16.
KlineRB (2015) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling: Fourth Edition.
New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
17.
KlockarsCB (1999) Some really cheap ways of measuring what really matters. In: Langworthy R. H. (ed.), Measuring What Matters: Proceedings from the Policing Research Institute Meetings. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, pp. 195–214.
18.
KolthoffEMacaulayMAnechiaricoF (2013)
Introduction: Integrity systems for safeguarding ethics and integrity of governance.International Review of Administrative Sciences79(4): 593–596.
19.
KovenSG (2015) Public Sector Ethics: Theory and Applications.
Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press.
20.
LasthuizenKHubertsLHeresL (2011)
How to measure integrity violations.Public Management Review13(3): 383–408.
21.
Lawton A, Lasthuizen K and Rayner J (2013) Ethics and Management in the Public Sector. Oxford: Routledge.
22.
Le Grand J (2010) Knights and Knaves Return: Public Service Motivation and the Delivery of Public Services. International Public Management Journal 13(1): 56–71.
23.
LockeEALathamGP (1990) A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
24.
MaesschalckJVan der WalZHubertsL (2008) Public service motivation and ethical conduct. In: Perry J. L. and Hondeghem A. (eds), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–176.
25.
MintzbergH (1983) Power in and Around Organizations.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
26.
MooreMH (1995) Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government.
Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
27.
MoynihanDPPandeySK (2007)
Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment.Administration & Society39(7): 803–832.
28.
PedersenMJ (2015)
Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment.Public Administration Review75(5): 734–746.
29.
PedersenMJStritchJM (2018)
RNICE model: Evaluating the contribution of replication studies in public administration and management research.Public Administration Review78(4): 606–612.
30.
PerryJLVandenabeeleW (2008) Behavioral dynamics: Institutions, identities, and self-regulation. In: Perry J. L. and Hondeghem A. (eds), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–79.
31.
PerryJLWiseLR (1990)
The motivational bases of public service.Public Administration Review50(3): 367–373.
32.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al. (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
33.
RestJR (1986) Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory.
New York, NY:
Praeger.
34.
RipollG (2019)
Disentangling the relationship between public service motivation and ethics: An interdisciplinary approach.Perspectives on Public Management and Governance2(1): 21–37.
35.
RipollGBallartX (2019)
Judging unethical behavior: The different effects of external and public service motivation.International Public Management Journal. DOI:10.1080/10967494.2019.1588811.
36.
RipollGBreaughJ (2019)
At their wits’ end? Economic stress, motivation and unethical judgement of public servants.Public Management Review 21(10): 1516–1537.
37.
Ritz A, Brewer GA and Neumann O (2016) Public Service Motivation: A Systematic Literature Review and Outlook. Public Administration Review 76 (3): 414–26.
38.
Schott C and Ritz A (2018) The Dark Sides of Public Service Motivation: A Multi-level Theoretical Framework. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 1(1): 29–42.
39.
Schott C, Neumann O, Baertschi M, et al. (2019) Public Service Motivation, Prosocial Motivation and Altruism: Towards Disentanglement and Conceptual Clarity. International Journal of Public Administration. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1588302
40.
SixFLawtonA (2013)
Towards a theory of integrity systems: A configurational approach.International Review of Administrative Sciences79(4): 639–658.
41.
StazykECDavisRS (2015)
Taking the ‘high road’: Does public service motivation alter ethical decision making processes?Public Administration93(3): 627–645.
42.
StritchJMChristensenRK (2014)
Looking at a job’s social impact through PSM-tinted lenses: Probing the motivation–perception relationship. Public Administration92(4): 826–842.
VandenabeeleW (2007)
Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation.Public Management Review9(4): 545–556.
45.
VandenabeeleW (2014)
Explaining public service motivation: The role of leadership and basic needs satisfaction.Review of Public Personnel Administration34(2): 153–173.
46.
VandenabeeleWRitzANeumannO (2018) Public service motivation: State of the art and conceptual cleanup. In: Ongaro E. and van Thiel S. (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 261–278.
47.
Van der WalZDe GraafGLasthuizenK (2008)
What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector.Public Administration86(2): 465–482.
48.
WeissJAPideritSK (1999)
The value of mission statements in public agencies.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory9(2): 193–224.
49.
WrightBE (2008) Methodological challenges associated with public service motivation research. In: Perry J. L. and Hondeghem A. (eds), Motivation in Public Management: The Call of Public Service. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 80–98.
50.
WrightBEMoynihanDPPandeySK (2012)
Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence.Public Administration Review72(2): 206–215.
51.
WrightBEHassanSParkJ (2016)
Does a public service ethic encourage ethical behaviour? Public service motivation, ethical leadership and the willingness to report ethical problems.Public Administration94(3): 647–663.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
