Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-12
Do Transformational Leadership and Innovative Climate Always Enhance Employees’ Innovative Behavior? Focusing on the Moderated Mediating Role of Innovative Climate on Change-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Continuous improvement of administrative quality requires public organizations to adapt and embrace change. In this context, change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) has garnered attention because it enables exploring the micro components of organizational change rather than focusing on large-scale structural changes, underscoring the critical role of frontline employees and management in driving such continuous improvement. While previous studies have identified transformational leadership and innovative climate as key influencing factors for innovative behaviors like change-oriented OCB, the nuanced interactions between these elements have been insufficiently explored. To address this research gap, this study uses pooled cross-sectional data from Korean public employees to examine the moderated mediation effect of innovative climate on the relationship between transformational leadership and change-oriented OCB, with role conflict and ambiguity as mediators. The findings reveal that innovative climate positively moderates the impact of transformational leadership on change-oriented OCB. However, this positive effect of transformational leadership can diminish or even turn negative in a low-innovation climate. These results suggest that innovative contexts within an organization do not always enhance change-oriented OCB, providing valuable insights for scholars and practitioners.
AddaiP.AvorJ.OforiI. N.TweneboahD. N. (2019). Ethical leadership and productive work attitudes among micro financial institutions in Ghana: Moderating role of organizational climate. Management Research Review, 42(9), 1049–1061.
2.
Al-edenatM. (2018). Reinforcing innovation through transformational leadership: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(4), 810–838.
3.
AlharbiI. B. A. (2021). Innovative leadership: A literature review paper. Open Journal of Leadership, 10, 214–229.
4.
AsadM.KashifM.SheikhU. A.AsifM. U.GeorgeS.KhanG. U. H. (2022). Synergetic effect of safety culture and safety climate on safety performance in SMEs: Does transformation leadership have a moderating role?International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(3), 1858–1864.
5.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
6.
BassB. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
7.
BassB. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries?American Psychologist, 52(2), 130–139.
8.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden.
9.
BassB. M.RiggioR. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology Press.
10.
Bayiz AhmadA.LiuB.Saleem ButtA. (2020). Predictors and outcomes of change recipient proactivity in public organizations of the Kurdistan region of Iraq. International Public Management Journal, 23(6), 823–851.
11.
BayraktarS.JiménezA. (2020). Self-efficacy as a resource: A moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, extent of change and reactions to change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(2), 301–317.
12.
BednallT. C.RaffertyA. E.ShiptonH.SandersK.JacksonC. J. (2018). Innovative behaviour: How much transformational leadership do you need?British Journal of Management, 29(4), 796–816.
13.
BennerM. J.TushmanM. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238–256.
14.
BettencourtL. A. (2004). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: The direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing, 80(3), 165–180.
15.
BilalA. R.FatimaT.ImranM. K. (2019). Does shared leadership fosters taking charge behaviors? A post-heroic leadership perspective in the public sector higher educational institutes. International Journal of Public Leadership, 15(3), 137–154.
16.
BrounsT.RexinR.ExternbrinkK. (2021). Role conflict as mediator between transformational leadership and change-related outcomes. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 12(2), 99–110.
17.
BurnsG. N.KotrbaL. M.DenisonD. R. (2013). Leader–culture fit: Aligning leadership and corporate culture. In H. S. Leonard, R. Lewis, A. M. Freedman, & J. Passmore (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of leadership, change, and organizational development (pp. 113–128).
18.
BurnsJ. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
19.
CaillierJ. G. (2016). Linking transformational leadership to self-efficacy, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions in public agencies: The mediating role of goal clarity. Administration & Society, 48(7), 883–906.
20.
CampbellJ. W. (2015). Identification and performance management: An assessment of change-oriented behavior in public organizations. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 46–69.
21.
CampbellJ. W. (2018a). Efficiency, incentives, and transformational leadership: Understanding collaboration preferences in the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 41(2), 277–299.
22.
CampbellJ. W. (2018b). Felt responsibility for change in public organizations: General and sector-specific paths. Public Management Review, 20(2), 232–253.
23.
CampbellJ. W. (2024). Change management, performance feedback, and public service motivation: Cultivating change-oriented behaviour in public organisations. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–25. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2024.2382092
24.
CampbellJ. W. (2025). Job autonomy, Role ambiguity, and procedural justice: A multi-conditional process model of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 45, 145–171.
25.
CampbellJ. W.ImT. (2016). PSM and turnover intention in public organizations: Does change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior play a role?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(4), 323–346.
26.
CampbellJ. W.LeeH.ImT. (2016). At the expense of others: Altruistic helping behaviour, performance management and transformational leadership. Public Management Review, 18(6), 795–818.
27.
CarterM. Z.MossholderK. W.FeildH. S.ArmenakisA. A. (2014). Transformational leadership, interactional justice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of racial and gender dissimilarity between supervisors and subordinates. Group & Organization Management, 39(6), 691–719.
28.
Charbonnier-VoirinA.El AkremiA.VandenbergheC. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699–726.
29.
ChenC. A.BrudneyJ. L. (2009). A cross-sector comparison of using nonstandard workers: Explaining use and impacts on the employment relationship. Administration & Society, 41(3), 313–339.
30.
ChenC.DuanJ.PengY. (2024). How does sense of power influence change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior? Evidence from China. Public Performance & Management Review, 47, 732–760.
31.
ChenD.ZhangY.AhmadA. B.LiuB. (2023). How to fuel public employees’ change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A two-wave moderated mediation study. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 185–208.
32.
ChoY. J.SongH. J. (2021). How to facilitate innovative behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from public employees in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 509–537.
33.
ChoiJ. N. (2007). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Effects of work environment characteristics and intervening psychological processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 28(4), 467–484.
34.
ChordiyaR. (2022). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(1), 60–87.
35.
ChurchillG. A.Jr.FordN. M.HartleyS. W.WalkerO. C.Jr. (1985). The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 103–118.
36.
De ClercqD. (2019). Getting creative with resources: How resilience, task interdependence, and emotion sharing mitigate the damage of employee role ambiguity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 55(3), 369–391.
37.
De ClercqD.BelausteguigoitiaI. (2017). Overcoming the dark side of task conflict: Buffering roles of transformational leadership, tenacity, and passion for work. European Management Journal, 35(1), 78–90.
38.
De ClercqD.PereiraR. (2023). When does role ambiguity escalate into diminished change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior?Journal of General Management, 1–14.
39.
de GeusC. J.IngramsA.TummersL.PandeyS. K. (2020). Organizational citizenship behavior in the public sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 259–270.
40.
De VriesH.BekkersV.TummersL. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
41.
DuJ.ChoiJ. N. (2013). Leadership effectiveness in China: The moderating role of change climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(9), 1571–1583.
42.
DubinskyA. J.YammarinoF. J.JolsonM. A.SpanglerW. D. (1995). Transformational leadership: An initial investigation in sales management. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 15(2), 17–31.
43.
DustS. B.ResickC. J.MawritzM. B. (2014). Transformational leadership, psychological empowerment, and the moderating role of mechanistic–organic contexts. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 413–433.
44.
FarmerC. (2012). Demystifying moderators and mediators in intellectual and developmental disabilities research: A primer and review of the literature. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(12), 1148–1160.
45.
FaveroN.BullockJ. B. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308.
46.
FernandezS.RaineyH. G. (2006). Managing successful organizational change in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 66(2), 168–176.
47.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
48.
GeorgeB.PandeyS. K. (2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.
49.
Günzel-JensenF.HansenJ. R.JakobsenM. L. F.WulffJ. (2018). A two-pronged approach? Combined leadership styles and innovative behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(12), 957–970.
50.
HairJ. F.Jr.HowardM. C.NitzlC. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110.
51.
HairJ. F.HultG. T. M.RingleC. M.SarstedtM. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
52.
HarmanH. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago press.
53.
HayesA. F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1–22.
54.
HayesA. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
55.
HofmannD. A.MorgesonF. P.GerrasS. J. (2003). Climate as a moderator of the relationship between leader-member exchange and content specific citizenship: Safety climate as an exemplar. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 170–178.
56.
HombergF.VogelR.WeiherlJ. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1), 28–47.
57.
HouseR. J.RizzoJ. R. (1972). Role conflict and ambiguity as critical variables in a model of organizational behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(3), 467–505.
58.
HurS. (2017). Leadership type, public service motivation, organizational citizenship behavior: Moderating effect of role conflict. Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 21(3), 495–515.
59.
ImranR.Anis-ul-HaqueM. (2011). Mediating effect of organizational climate between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 26(2), 183–199.
60.
IqbalZ.GhazanfarF.HameedF.MujtabaG.SwatiM. A. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: Mediating role of psychological safety. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2279.
61.
JacksonS. E.SchulerR. S. (1985). A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(1), 16–78.
62.
JamesL. A.JamesL. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 739–751.
63.
JamesL. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229.
64.
JamesL. R.ChoiC. C.KoC. H. E.McNeilP. K.MintonM. K.WrightM. A.KimK. I. (2008). Organizational and psychological climate: A review of theory and research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 17(1), 5–32.
65.
JansenJ. J.Van Den BoschF. A.VolberdaH. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674.
66.
JensenU. T.BroL. L. (2018). How transformational leadership supports intrinsic motivation and public service motivation: The mediating role of basic need satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 535–549.
67.
JeongY.KimE.KimM.ZhangJ. J. (2019). Exploring relationships among organizational culture, empowerment, and organizational citizenship behavior in the South Korean professional sport industry. Sustainability, 11(19), 5412.
68.
JinJ. (2015). The role of leadership in job stress. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 53(2), 209–235.
69.
JungD. D.WuA.ChowC. W. (2008). Towards understanding the direct and indirect effects of CEOs’ transformational leadership on firm innovation. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 582–594.
70.
KadirA.WirawanH.SalamR.HattabS.DaswatiD. (2024). Abusive supervision in public service organisations: Investigating the moderating effect of attribution styles. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(2), 184–209.
71.
KahnR. L.WolfeD. M.QuinnR. P.SnoekJ. D.RosenthalR. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. John Wiley.
72.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
73.
KangI. G.KimN.BichelmeyerB. A. (2023). Racial/ethnic differences in employee perceived organizational performance, job satisfaction, and diversity management among the US federal public health agencies. Public Personnel Management, 52(1), 70–90.
74.
KaoR. H. (2017). The relationship between work characteristics and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A multi-level study on transformational leadership and organizational climate in immigration workers. Personnel Review, 46(8), 1890–1914.
75.
KatzD. (1964). The motivational basis of organizational behavior. Behavioral Science, 9(2), 131–146.
76.
KimH. (2014). Transformational leadership, organizational clan culture, organizational affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: A case of South Korea’s public sector. Public Organization Review, 14, 397–417.
77.
KimS. (2022, June). Shifting focus from proactive administration to public service culture innovation: The personnel management agency to develop innovation indicators. Gongsanggongsadotcom. https://www.public25.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=11196
78.
KimS.ShinM. (2019). Transformational leadership behaviors, the empowering process, and organizational commitment: Investigating the moderating role of organizational structure in Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(2), 251–275.
79.
KwonK. (2024, May). Central and local governments to strengthen innovation capacity. . . MOI to hold central and local government innovation workshop in 2024. The Aju Business Daily. https://www.ajunews.com/view/20240507095809959
80.
KyeongK.ImT. (2021). In-depth analysis of organizational citizenship behavior formation: Focusing on a moderated mediation model of procedural justice. Korean Public Administration Review, 55(1), 161–194.
81.
KyeongK.KimM. (2024). Why and how are millennials sensitive to unfairness? Focusing on the moderated mediating role of generation on turnover intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(3), 291–314.
82.
LagowskaU.SobralF.TavaresG. (2022). Joint effects of shared and transformational leadership on performance in street-level bureaucracies: Evidence from the educational sector. Public Administration Review, 82(6), 1042–1057.
83.
LawrenceE. R.KacmarK. M. (2012). Leader-member exchange and stress: The mediating role of job involvement and role conflict. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(1), 39–52.
84.
LeeJ.KimM. (2009). An study on the relationships between organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: Focusing on moderating effects of leadership. Korean Journal of Human Resources Development, 12(2), 31–49.
85.
LeeK. L.LowG. T. (2016). Leadership styles and organisational citizenship behaviour: Role ambiguity as a mediating construct. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(4), 1557–1577.
86.
LiY.XieW. (2022). Linking change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior to turnover intention: Effects of servant leadership and career commitment. Public Personnel Management, 51(1), 3–23.
87.
LiuB. C.ChenD. X. (2019). How to make more taking-charge street-level cadres: A framework of strategic human resource management. Journal of Public Administration, 12(6), 6–19.
88.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 9–32). Rand McNally.
89.
López-DomínguezM.EnacheM.SallanJ. M.SimoP. (2013). Transformational leadership as an antecedent of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2147–2152.
90.
MalikP. (2024). Individual-focused transformational leadership and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: mediating and moderating mechanisms of job crafting and employee resilience. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 11(1), 90–113.
91.
MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffP. M.RichG. A. (2001). Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115–134.
92.
Martínez-DíazA.Mañas-RodríguezM. A.Díaz-FúnezP. A.Aguilar-ParraJ. M. (2021). Leading the challenge: Leader support modifies the effect of role ambiguity on engagement and extra-role behaviors in public employees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8408, 1–14.
93.
MokhberM.bin Wan IsmailW. K.VakilbashiA. (2015). Effect of transformational leadership and its components on organizational innovation. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 8(2), 221–241.
94.
MorrisonE. W.PhelpsC. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 403–419.
95.
MowdayR. T.SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
96.
NaumanS.MusawirA. U.MunirH.RasheedI. (2022). Enhancing the impact of transformational leadership and team-building on project success: The moderating role of empowerment climate. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(2), 423–447.
97.
NieminenL.Biermeier-HansonB.DenisonD. (2013). Aligning leadership and organizational culture: The leader–culture fit framework for coaching organizational leaders. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(3), 177–198.
98.
OkeA.MunshiN.WalumbwaF. O. (2009). The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics, 38(1), 64–72.
99.
OrganD. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington Books/D. C. Heath and Com.
100.
ParkH. (2021). The link between transformational leadership and proactive administration: A moderating role of change-driven organizational climate. Modern Society and Public Administration, 31(4), 1–28.
101.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
102.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PaineJ. B.BachrachD. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513–563.
103.
PotipiroonW.ThawornprasertW. (2024). Local government managers’ change-oriented leadership and employees’ change-supportive behaviour during COVID-19: Utilizing the theory of planned behaviour. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(2), 139–158.
104.
PotipiroonW.WongpreedeeA. (2021). Ethical climate and whistleblowing intentions: Testing the mediating roles of public service motivation and psychological safety among local government employees. Public Personnel Management, 50(3), 327–355.
105.
RaineyH. G.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 447–470.
106.
RenF.ZhangJ. (2015). Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees’ innovative behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 27(1), 16–23.
107.
SchmittA.Den HartogD. N.BelschakF. D. (2016). Transformational leadership and proactive work behaviour: A moderated mediation model including work engagement and job strain. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(3), 588–610.
108.
SchwarzG.EvaN.NewmanA. (2020). Can public leadership increase public service motivation and job performance?Public Administration Review, 80(4), 543–554.
109.
ScottS. G.BruceR. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
110.
ShamirB.HowellJ. M. (1999). Organizational and contextual influences on the emergence and effectiveness of charismatic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 257–283.
111.
ShimD. C.RohrbaughJ. (2014). An explanation of differences between government offices in employees’ organizational citizenship behaviour. Public Management Review, 16(6), 807–829.
112.
SmithC. A. O. D. W. N. J. P.OrganD. W.NearJ. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663.
113.
StawB. M.BoettgerR. D. (1990). Task revision: A neglected form of work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 534–559.
114.
SungW.KimC. (2021). A study on the effect of change management on organizational innovation: Focusing on the mediating effect of members’ innovative behavior. Sustainability, 13(4), 2079.
115.
TangY. T.ChangC. H. (2010). Impact of role ambiguity and role conflict on employee creativity. African Journal of Business Management, 4(6), 869–881.
116.
TsuiA. S.EganT. D.O’ReillyC. A.III. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549–579.
117.
Van der VoetJ.KuipersB. S.GroeneveldS. (2016). Implementing change in public organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context. Public Management Review, 18(6), 842–865.
118.
Van DyneL.CummingsL. L.McLean ParksJ. (1995). Extra-role behaviors: In pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 215–285). JAI Press.
119.
Vigoda-GadotE. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(2), 285–305.
120.
Vigoda-GadotE.BeeriI. (2012). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public administration: The power of leadership and the cost of organizational politics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), 573–596.
121.
WangH. J.DemeroutiE.Le BlancP. (2017). Transformational leadership, adaptability, and job crafting: The moderating role of organizational identification. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 185–195.
122.
WangP. (2020). Core job characteristic and uncertainty avoidance: Into the black box of transformational leadership effect on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 311–322.
123.
WangP.RodeJ. C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations, 63(8), 1105–1128.
124.
WangS.ZhangX.MartocchioJ. (2011). Thinking outside of the box when the box is missing: Role ambiguity and its linkage to creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 23(3), 211–221.
125.
WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.LidenR. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82–111.
126.
WeimanC. (1978). A Study of Occupational Stressors. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 19, 119–122.
127.
WeissD. J.DawisR. V.EnglandG. W. (1967). Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation. Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. University of Minnesota.
128.
WooldridgeJ. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
129.
ZhouQ.MartinezL. F.FerreiraA. I.RodriguesP. (2016). Supervisor support, role ambiguity and productivity associated with presenteeism: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3380–3387.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
