A Taste of Telework: Effects of Remote Work Arrangements During and After the Global Pandemic

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented changes in global work dynamics including mandating telework for most of the U.S. federal workforce to protect employees from health and safety hazards of the communicable virus. Although not ubiquitous, many federal employees had experience with these arrangements because they voluntarily chose telework prior to the pandemic through provisions in the Telework Enhancement Act of 2010. Using the 2020 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS), which focuses on telework perceptions and experiences, this study explores the effect of the involuntary telework mandate on employees’ attitudes toward telework after several months through a prospect theory framework. Findings demonstrate that several factors including previous telework experience and experiential learning may influence employees’ preference for and voluntary selection into telework moving forward. These dynamics suggest an endowment effect for telework among employees who gained telework experience before and during the pandemic. In addition, employees may choose telework as an alternative work arrangement when they are not satisfied with their organizations or jobs but want to maintain employment. These findings suggest that agencies should continue to offer robust telework opportunities to satisfy and retain employees.

Keywords

telework federal employee workplace safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Golden

T. D.

Shockley

K. M.

(2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273

Allen

Johnson

Kiburz

Shockley

(2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66, 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012

Bae

K. B.

Kim

(2016). The impact of decoupling of telework on job satisfaction in U.S. federal agencies: Does gender matter? The American Review of Public Administration, 46(3), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016637183

Bae

K. B.

Lee

Sohn

(2019). How to increase participation in telework programs in U.S. federal agencies: Examining the effects of being a female supervisor, supportive leadership, and diversity management. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019832920

Baekgaard

(2017). Prospect theory and public service outcomes: Examining risk preferences in relation to public sector reforms. Public Administration, 95(4), 927–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12324

Bailey

D. E.

Kurland

N. B.

(2002). A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.144

Barberis

N. C.

(2013). Thirty years of prospect theory in economics: A review and assessment. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 173–196.

Bellé

Cantarelli

Belardinelli

(2018). Prospect theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12960

Byrne

Z. S.

Hayes

T. L.

Holcombe

K. J.

(2017). Employee engagement using the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. Public Personnel Management, 46(4), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026017717242

10.

Caillier

J. G.

(2012). The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. federal government agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011409394

11.

Caillier

J. G.

(2013). Are teleworkers less likely to report leave intentions in the United States federal government than non-teleworkers are? The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011425084

12.

Caillier

J. G.

(2014). Do role clarity and job satisfaction mediate the relationship between telework and work effort? International Journal of Public Administration, 37(4), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.798813

13.

Chen

Ployhart

R. E.

Thomas

H. C.

Anderson

Bliese

P. D.

(2011). The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 54(1), 159–181.

14.

Clark

W. A.

Lisowski

(2017). Prospect theory and the decision to move or stay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), E7432–E7440.

15.

Collins

A. M.

Hislop

Cartwright

(2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12065

16.

Delanoeije

Verbruggen

(2020). Between-person and within-person effects of telework: A quasi-field experiment. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(6), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1774557

17.

Deslatte

Swann

W. L.

Feiock

R. C.

(2021). Performance, satisfaction, or loss aversion? A meso–micro assessment of local commitments to sustainability programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa021

18.

de Vries

Tummers

Bekkers

. (2019). The benefits of teleworking in the public sector: Reality or rhetoric? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(4), 570–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X18760124

19.

Dunatchik

Gerson

Glass

Jacobs

J. A.

Stritzel

(2021). Gender, parenting, and the rise of remote work during the pandemic: Implications for domestic inequality in the United States. Gender & Society, 35(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211001301

20.

Edelmann

Millard

(2021, October 6–8). Telework development before, during and after COVID-19, and its relevance for organizational change in the public sector [Conference session]. 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Athens, Greece. https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494252

21.

Edelmann

Schossboeck

Albrecht

(2021, June 9–11). Remote work in public sector organisations: Employees’ experiences in a pandemic context [Conference session]. DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, Omaha, NE, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463725

22.

Fleming

C. J.

Bodkin

C. P.

(2023). Non-compliant managers, judging citizens: An experiment of motives, identities, and public reaction to bureaucratic rule breaking. Public Integrity, 25(2), 189–206.

23.

Fonner

K. L.

Roloff

M. E.

(2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998

24.

George

Pandey

S. K.

(2017). We know the Yin—But where is the Yang? Toward a balanced approach on common source bias in public administration scholarship. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 37(2), 245–270.

25.

Golden

T. D.

(2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 319–340.

26.

Golden

T. D.

Veiga

J. F.

(2005). The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of Management, 31(2), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271768

27.

Houkes

Janssen

P. P.

de Jonge

Bakker

A. B.

(2003). Specific determinants of intrinsic work motivation, emotional exhaustion and turnover intention: A multisample longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(4), 427–450.

28.

Hur

Abner

(2024). What makes public employees want to leave their job? A meta-analysis of turnover intention predictors among public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 115–142.

29.

Kahneman

Knetsch

J. L.

Thaler

R. H.

(1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.193

30.

Lee

(2024). Benefit and hidden cost of organizational support for telework amid the COVID-19 pandemic on public employees’ job satisfaction and retention intention. Public Administration Review, 1–17.

31.

Kim

(2015). What increases public employees’ turnover intention? Public Personnel Management, 44(4), 496–519.

32.

Kim

Wiggins

M. E.

(2011). Family-friendly human resource policy: Is it still working in the public sector? Public Administration Review, 71(5), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02412.x

33.

Kirkwood

(2009). Motivational factors in a push-pull theory of entrepreneurship. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(5), 346–364. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410910968805

34.

Hur

(2014). The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: Integrated understanding based on social exchange theory. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12160

35.

Krantz-Kentkrantz

R. M.

(2019, July). Where did workers perform their jobs in the early 21st century? Monthly Labor Review, 1–10.

36.

Lapierre

L. M.

Allen

T. D.

(2006). Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.169

37.

Laumer

Maier

(2021). Why do people (not) want to work from home? An individual-focused literature review on telework. In Proceedings of the 2021 on Computers and People Research Conference (pp. 41–49). Association for Computing Machinery.

38.

Lee

Kim

S. Y.

(2018). A quasi-experimental examination of telework eligibility and participation in the U.S. federal government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16680269

39.

Lee

S.-Y.

Hong

J. H.

(2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 870–879.

40.

Lee

S. Y.

Whitford

A. B.

(2008). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 647–671.

41.

Lim

V. K. G.

Teo

T. S. H.

(2000). To work or not to work at home: An empirical investigation of factors affecting attitudes towards teleworking. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(6), 560–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010373392

42.

Madsen

S. R.

(2006). Work and family conflict: Can home-based teleworking make a difference? International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(3), 307–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-09-03-2006-B002

43.

Major

D. A.

Verive

J. M.

Joice

(2008). Telework as a dependent care solution: Examining current practice to improve telework management strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 11(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887150801967134

44.

Manokha

(2020). COVID-19: Teleworking, surveillance and 24/7 work. Some reflexions on the expected growth of remote work after the pandemic. Political Anthropological Research on International Social Sciences (PARISS), 1(2), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1163/25903276-BJA10009

45.

Martin

B. H.

MacDonnell

(2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211238820

46.

McAulay

B. J.

Zeitz

Blau

(2006). Testing a “push–pull” theory of work commitment among organizational professionals. The Social Science Journal, 43(4), 571–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2006.08.005

47.

Mele

Bellé

Cucciniello

(2021). Thanks, but no thanks: Preferences towards teleworking colleagues in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31, 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muab012

48.

Mokhtarian

P. L.

Bagley

M. N.

(2000). Modeling employees’ perceptions and proportional preferences of work locations: The regular workplace and telecommuting alternatives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34(4), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00002-6

49.

Morewedge

C. K.

Shu

L. L.

Gilbert

D. T.

Wilson

T. D.

(2009). Bad riddance or good rubbish? Ownership and not loss aversion causes the endowment effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 947–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.014

50.

Naqvi

S. H. B.

Salman

Hassan

Gull

Capraz

(2024). The role of administrative discretion in the coping behaviour of street-level bureaucrats in higher education institutions of Pakistan. Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 5(1), 135–159.

51.

Raghavan

Demircioglu

M. A.

Orazgaliyev

(2021). COVID-19 and the new normal of organizations and employees: An overview. Sustainability, 13(21), 11942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111942

52.

Reb

Connolly

(2007). Possession, feelings of ownership and the endowment effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(2), 107–114.

53.

Recker

(2020, March 24). Mayor Muriel Bowser is closing all non-essential businesses in DC. Washingtonian. https://www.washingtonian.com/2020/03/24/mayor-muriel-bowser-is-closing-all-non-essential-businesses-in-dc/

54.

Resh

Moldogaziev

Fernandez

Leslie

C. A.

(2021). Reversing the lens: Assessing the use of Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey in public administration research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 132–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19865012

55.

Saltzstein

A. L.

Ting

Saltzstein

G. H.

(2001). Work-family balance and job satisfaction: The impact of family-friendly policies on attitudes of federal government employees. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 452–467.

56.

Scheibe

De Bloom

Modderman

(2022). Resilience during crisis and the role of age: Involuntary telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031762

57.

Schjoedt

Shaver

K. G.

(2007). Deciding on an entrepreneurial career: A test of the pull and push hypotheses using the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics data. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(5), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00197.x

58.

Scott

Dam

Wilton

(2012). Investigating the effects of social influence on the choice to telework. Environment and Planning A, 44, 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43223

59.

Stephens

G. K.

Szajna

(1998). Perceptions and expectations: Why people choose a telecommuting work style. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1998.11518328

60.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122574

61.

Van Loon

N. M.

Heerema

Weggemans

Noordegraaf

. (2018). Speaking up and activism among frontline employees: How professional coping influences work engagement and intent to leave among teachers. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(4), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016682313

62.

Wadsworth

L. L.

Facer

R. L.

Arbon

C. A.

(2010). Alternative work schedules in local government: Cui bono? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(3), 322–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X10368223

63.

Whitford

A. B.

Lee

S. Y.

(2015). Exit, voice, and loyalty with multiple exit options: Evidence from the US federal workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 373–398.

64.

Wood

McKinley

Engstrom

C. L.

(2013). Endings and visions of new beginnings: The effects of source of unemployment and duration of unemployment on entrepreneurial intent. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(2), 171–206.