This study examines how the public perceives the use of diversity training in public service organizations through the lens of neutral and charged language in a politicized context. This study explores whether framing affects levels of agreement regarding the use of diversity training. Data were collected from a sample of more than 700 undergraduate political science students, and findings indicate that individuals, overall, demonstrate more agreement with the use of diversity training when framed through the lens of neutral language rather than charged language. The data also show that factors such as political ideology, gender, and race are predictors of agreement.
BelléN.CantarelliP.BelardinelliP. (2018). Prospect theory goes public: Experimental evidence on cognitive biases in public policy and management decisions. Public Administration Review, 78(6), 828–840.
2.
ChoiS.RaineyH. G. (2010). Managing diversity in US federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 109–121.
3.
CombsG. M. (2002). Meeting the leadership challenge of a diverse and pluralistic workplace: Implications of self-efficacy for diversity training. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(4), 1–16.
4.
CundiffN. L.NadlerJ. T.SwanA. (2009). The influence of cultural empathy and gender on perceptions of diversity programs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 97–110.
5.
De MeuseK. P.HostagerT. J. (2001). Developing an instrument for measuring attitudes toward and perceptions of workplace diversity: An initial report. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(1), 33–51.
6.
Executive Order 13985, 86 Fed. Reg. 7009 (2021, January20).
7.
Executive Order 13950, 85 Fed. Reg. 60683 (2020, September22).
8.
FeingoldJ. (2022). Reclaiming CRT: How regressive laws can advance progressive ends. South Carolina Law Review, 73(1), 723–757.
GreenD.CallandsT. A.RadcliffeA. M.LuebbeA. M.KlonoffE. A. (2009). Clinical psychology students’ perceptions of diversity training: A study of exposure and satisfaction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(10), 1056–1070.
HolladayC. L.KnightJ. L.PaigeD. L.QuiñonesM. A. (2003). The influence of framing on attitudes toward diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 14(3), 245–263.
13.
HuberG. A.ParisC. (2013). Assessing the programmatic equivalence assumption in question wording experiments: Understanding why Americans like assistance to the poor more than welfare. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(1), 385–397.
14.
IsraelT.BettergarciaJ. N.DelucioK.AvellarT. R.HarknessA.GoodmanJ. A. (2017). Reactions of law enforcement to LGBTQ diversity training. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 28(2), 197–226.
15.
IyengarS. (1990). Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Political Behavior, 12(1), 19–40.
16.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.
17.
LevinI. P.SchneiderS. L.GaethG. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.
18.
NelsonT. E.KinderD. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055–1078.
19.
NishishibaM. (2012). Local government diversity initiatives in Oregon: An exploratory study. State and Local Government Review, 44(1), 55–66.
20.
NoonM. (2018). Pointless diversity training: Unconscious bias, new racism and agency. Work, Employment and Society, 32(1), 198–209.
21.
PittsD. W. (2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from US federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338.
22.
PittsD. W.HicklinA. K.HawesD. P.MeltonE. (2010). What drives the implementation of diversity management programs? Evidence from public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 867–886.
23.
PittsD. W.Recascino WiseL. (2010). Workforce diversity in the new millennium: Prospects for research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 44–69.
24.
RasinskiK. A. (1989). The effect of question wording on public support for government spending. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(3), 388–394.
RiccucciN. M. (2002). Managing diversity in the public sector workforces. Westview Press.
27.
RiccucciN. M. (2012). Diversity and cultural competency. In KlingnerD.LorensJ.J.NalbandianJ. (Eds.), Public personnel management (pp. 50–59). Routledge.
28.
RiceM. F. (2004). Organizational culture, social equity, and diversity: Teaching public administration education in the postmodern era. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 143–154.
29.
RiceM. F. (2007). Promoting cultural competency in public administration and public service delivery: Utilizing self-assessment tools and performance measures. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 13(1), 41–57.
SeldenC. S.SeldenF. (2001). Rethinking diversity in public organizations for the 21st century: Moving toward a multicultural model. Administration & Society, 33(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990122019785
32.
SmithT. W. (1987). That which we call welfare by any other name would smell sweeter an analysis of the impact of question wording on response patterns. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51(1), 75–83.
33.
SparksJ. (2020). Going beyond a positive–negative dichotomy in judgment and decision-making research: Insights for framing, counterfactual thinking, and ambivalence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(2), Article e12519.
WaldmanD. A.SparrJ. L. (2022). Rethinking diversity strategies: An application of paradox and positive organization behavior theories. Academy of Management Perspectives. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2021.0183
