Motivational research has become one of the major topics in public administration. However, public administration researchers have focused disproportionately on public service motivation in accounting for behaviors/attitudes in the public sphere. Somewhat neglected are the different, but no less important, motivations that impact the everyday operations of government employees. To narrow the gap, this study examines the effect of motivations based on organizational mission (mission match) and perceived organizational reputation. Using a large-N sample of U.S. federal employees, results show that mission-matched employees are more likely to be satisfied with their organization. This relationship is mediated through perceived organizational reputation. This study discuss the contributions of introducing organizational reputation as a contextual factor that intervenes in bureaucratic motivation and raise questions for further inquiry.
AhnY.CampbellJ. W. (2022). Red Tape, Rule Legitimacy, and Public Service Motivation: Experimental Evidence From KoreanCitizens. Administration and Society, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211069046
2.
AhnY.ReshW. (2022). Bureaucratic Motivations in Political Economy: An Overview. In DavisR.StazykE. (Eds.), Research Handbook on Motivation in Public Administration (pp. 10–27). Edward Elgar.
3.
AnS. H.MeierK. J.LadenburgJ.Westergård-NielsenN. (2020). Leadership and job satisfaction: Addressing endogeneity with panel data from a field experiment. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(4), 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19839180
BermanJ. Z.SmallD. A. (2012). Self-interest without selfishness: The hedonic benefit of imposed self-interest. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1193–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612441222
6.
BertelliA. M.LewisD. E. (2013). Policy influence, agency-specific expertise, and exit in the federal service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus044
BozemanB.SuX. (2015). Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 700–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12248
9.
BrownW. A.YoshiokaC. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.18
10.
BusuiocE. M.LodgeM. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161
11.
CaillierJ. G. (2015). Towards a better understanding of public service motivation and mission valence in public agencies. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1217–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.895033
12.
CaillierJ. G. (2016). Do transformational leaders affect turnover intentions and extra-role behaviors through mission valence?The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014551751
13.
CantarelliP.BelardinelliP.BelleN. (2016). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36(2), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15578534
14.
CarpenterD. P. (2001). The clerical state: Obstacles to bureaucratic autonomy in nineteenth-century America. Princeton University Press.
15.
CarpenterD. P. (2002). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy formation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214078
16.
CarpenterD. P. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press.
17.
CarpenterD. P.ChattopadhyayJ.MoffittS.NallC. (2012). The complications of controlling agency time discretion: FDA review deadlines and postmarket drug safety. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00544.x
CarpenterJ.GongE. (2016). Motivating agents: How much does the mission matter?Journal of Labor Economics, 34(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1086/682345
20.
CartonA. M. (2018). “I’m not mopping the floors, I’m putting a man on the moon”: How NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63(2), 323–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839217713748
21.
CassaraL. (2019). Job mission as a substitute for monetary incentives: Benefits and limits. Management Science, 65(2), 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2903
22.
ChatmanJ. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279063
23.
ChoiS. (2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 603–630. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mun010
24.
DaleyD. M. (1992). When Bureaucrats Get the Blues: A Replication and Extension of the Rusbult and Lowery Analysis of Federal Employee Responses to Job Dissatisfaction. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(3), 233–246. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article-abstract/2/3/233/959462
25.
Dehart-DavisL.DavisR. S.MohrZ. (2015). Green Tape and Job Satisfaction: Can Organizational Rules Make Employees Happy?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(3), 849–876. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu038
26.
DeVellisR. F.ThorpeC. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.
27.
DuttonJ. E.DukerichJ. M.HarquailC. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
28.
EsteveM.SchusterC. (2020). Motivating public employees (elements in public and nonprofit administration). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559720
29.
FeeneyM. K.BoardmanC. (2011). Organizational confidence: An empirical assessment of highly positive public managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 673–697. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq044
30.
FehrlerS.KosfeldM. (2014). Pro-social missions and worker motivation: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 100, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.010
31.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
32.
GerhardsL. (2015). The incentive effects of missions-evidence from experiments with NGO employees and students. European Economic Review, 79, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.07.012
33.
GerringJ. (1999). What makes a concept good? A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31(3), 357–393. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235246
34.
GiladS.Alon-BarkatS. (2018). Enhancing democracy via bureaucracy: Senior managers’ social identities and motivation for policy change. Governance, 31(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12300
35.
GiladS.Ben-Nun BloomP.AssoulineM. (2018). Bureaucrats’ processing of organizational reputation signals. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30636/jbpa.11.11
36.
GoldenM. M. (2000). What motivates bureaucrats?: Politics and administration during the Reagan years. Columbia University Press.
37.
GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyJ.KeiserL. (2012). Does my Boss’s gender matter? explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 649–673. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus004
38.
GuerreroS.ChênevertD. (2021). Municipal employees’ performance and neglect: The effects of mission valence. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(3), 447–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19896013
39.
HameduddinT.LeeS. (2021). Employee engagement among public employees: Examining the role of organizational images. Public Management Review, 23(3), 422–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1695879
40.
HarrisonD. A.NewmanD. A.RothP. L. (2006). How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20786077
41.
HassanS. (2013). The importance of role clarification in workgroups: Effects on perceived role clarity, work satisfaction, and turnover rates. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12100
42.
HayesM. S.StazykE. C. (2019). Mission congruence: To agree or not to agree, and its implications for public employee turnover. Public Personnel Management, 48(4), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019829847
43.
HecloH. (1978). Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment. In KingA. (Ed.), The New American Political System (pp. 262–287). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
HoffmanB. J.BynumB. H.PiccoloR. F.SuttonW. (2011). Person-organization value congruence: How transformational leaders influence work group effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 779–796.
46.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
47.
Jason AnastasopoulosL.WhitfordA. B. (2019). Machine learning for public administration research, with application to organizational reputation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy060
48.
JungC. S. (2014). Extending the theory of goal ambiguity to programs: Examining the relationship between goal ambiguity and performance. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12176
49.
KallebergA. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.2307/2117735
KangI. G.CroftB.BichelmeyerB. A. (2021). Predictors of turnover intention in U.S. federal government workforce: Machine learning evidence that perceived comprehensive HR practices predict turnover intention. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 538–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026020977562
52.
KimS. (2012). Does person-organization fit matter in the public sector? Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 830–840. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02572.x
53.
KimS. E.LeeJ. W. (2007). Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? An empirical analysis of a nonprofit human services agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X06295791
54.
KlineR. E. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.
55.
KnottJ. H.MillerG. J. (2008). When ambition checks ambition: Bureaucratic trustees and the separation of powers. American Review of Public Administration, 38(4), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008317154
KoppelH.RegnerT. (2019). What drives motivated agents: The “right” mission or sharing it with the principal?Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 83(January), 101463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.101463
58.
KrauseG. A.CorderJ. K. (2007). Explaining bureaucratic optimism: Theory and evidence from U.S. executive agency macroeconomic forecasts. American Political Science Review, 101(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055407070074
59.
KrauseG. A.DouglasJ. W. (2005). Institutional design versus reputational effects on bureaucratic performance: Evidence from U.S. government macroeconomic and fiscal projections. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui038
60.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
61.
Kristof-brownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
62.
LangerJ.FeeneyM. K.LeeS. E. (2019). Employee fit and job satisfaction in bureaucratic and entrepreneurial work environments. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X17693056
63.
LeeD.Van RyzinG. G. (2020). Bureaucratic reputation in the eyes of citizens: An analysis of US federal agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318769127
64.
LeeS. Y.WhitfordA. B. (2008). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum029
65.
LiedtkaJ. M. (1989). Value congruence: The interplay of individual and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383780
66.
LightP. C. (2019). The government-industrial complex: The true size of the federal government, 1984-2018. Oxford University Press.
67.
LiuB. C.TangT. L. P. (2011). Does the Love of Money Moderate the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Job Satisfaction? The Case of Chinese Professionals in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 718–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02411.x
68.
MaorM. (2015). Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In WæraasA.MaorM. (Eds.), Organisational reputation in the public sector (pp. 17–36). Routledge.
69.
MathieuJ. E.ZajacD. M. (1990). A Review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
70.
McCormickL.DonohueR. (2019). Antecedents of affective and normative commitment of organisational volunteers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(18), 2581–2604. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1166388
71.
MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.JrO’TooleL. J. (2006). Bureaucracy in a democratic state: A governance perspective (1st ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
72.
MillerG. J.WhitfordA. B. (2018). Above politics: Bureaucratic discretion and credible commitment. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017688
73.
MoeT. M. (1989). The Politics of Bureaucratic Structure. In Paul E.PetersonChubbJ. E. (Eds.), Can the Government Govern? (pp. 285–323). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
74.
MoffittS. L. (2010). Promoting agency reputation through public advice: Advisory committee use in the FDA. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002238161000023X
75.
MowdayR. T.SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
76.
MoynihanD. P. (2022). Public management for populists: Trump’s schedule F executive order and the future of the civil service. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 174–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13433
77.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2008). The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum013
O’ReillyC. A.ChatmanJ.CaldwellD. F. (1991). People and Organizational Culture : A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person- Organization Fit Author(s): Charles A . O ’ Reilly III, Jennifer Chatman and David F . Caldwell Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL :http://www.jstor.o. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
80.
PandeyS. K. (2021). The Psychological Process View of Bureaucratic Red Tape. In KniesE.SteijnB. (Eds.), (Forthcoming) Research Handbook Human resource management in the public sector. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27579.85283
81.
PandeyS. K.WrightB. E.MoynihanD. P. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72(2), 206–215.
82.
ParkJ. H.AhnY. (2022). Government Employees’ Experience and Expectation of COVID-19 Hardships: The Moderating Role of Gender and Race in the United States. American Review of Public Administration, 52(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740211049280
83.
PashaO.PoisterT. H.WrightB. E.ThomasJ. C. (2017). Transformational leadership and mission valence of employees: The varying effects by organizational level. Public Performance and Management Review, 40(4), 722–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1335220
84.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The Motivational Bases of Public Service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
85.
PetersonR. A.KimY. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030767
86.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper and Row.
87.
PodsakoffN. P.LepineJ. A.LepineM. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438
88.
PosnerB. Z.SchmidtW. H. (1993). Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(5), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00882023
89.
RaineyH. G. (2014). Understanding and managing public organizations (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass, a Wiley brand.
90.
RaineyH. G.SteinbauerP. (1999). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024401
ReshW.MarvelJ.WenB. (2018). The persistence of work effort as a function of mission match: An online lab experiment. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12882.116
93.
RhoE.YunT.LeeK. (2015). Does organizational image matter? Image, identification, and employee behaviors in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12338
94.
RönkköM.ChoE. (2022). An updated guideline for assessing discriminant validity. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968614
95.
RubinE. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum035
96.
SalomonsenH. H.BoyeS.BoonJ. (2021). Caught up or protected by the past? How reputational histories matter for agencies’ media reputations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 506–522. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa056
97.
SimonH. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.
98.
SmithJ. (2016). The motivational effects of mission matching: A lab-experimental test of a moderated mediation model. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12514.that
99.
SomersM. J. (2010). Patterns of attachment to organizations: Commitment profiles and work outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 443–453. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X424060
100.
SongM.MeierK. J. (2022). Walking the walk: Does perceptual congruence between managers and employees promote employee job satisfaction?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 42(2), 195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20966646
101.
SpectorP. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences. SAGE.
102.
SteijnB. (2004). Human resource management and job satisfaction in the Dutch public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X04269187
103.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.057
104.
TeodoroM. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. Johns Hopkins University Press.
105.
VinzantJ. (1998). Where values collide: Motivation and role conflict in child and adult protective services. The American Review of Public Administration, 28(4), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/027507409802800402
106.
WæraasA.ByrkjeflotH. (2012). Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal, 15(2), 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.702590
WentzelK. R.BrophyJ. E. (2014). Motivating students to learn (4th ed.). Routledge.
109.
WhitfordA. B.LeeS. Y. (2014). Exit, voice, and loyalty with multiple exit options: Evidence from the US federal workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu004
110.
WillemsJ.FaulkL.BoenigkS. (2021). Reputation shocks and recovery in public-serving organizations: The moderating effect of mission valence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa041
WrightB. E.DavisB. S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: The role of the work environment. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 70–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074002250254
113.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person—Organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40(5), 502–521.
114.
WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter?Administration & Society, 43(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710386303
