Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-3
The effect of perceived organizational reputation on job satisfaction in US federal agencies: Exploring the mediating role of perceived organizational identity
Although organizational reputation research is growing, scholarly attention has exclusively focused on external dynamics. We focus on reputation’s internal consequences, examining how it is captured by public employees and translated into individual-level outcomes. Drawing on insights from the social identity approach, we investigate the perceived organizational reputation–job satisfaction relationship among US federal employees, focusing on perceived organizational identity's mediating role. Empirical results show that how employees perceive their organization's reputation affects their job satisfaction and is mediated by their perceived organizational identity. We conclude by discussing the theoretical and practical implications.
Points for practitioners:
• External cues shape self-definition via organizational identity; make credible outsider evaluations visible and frame them around ‘who we are’, so identity channels reputation into higher job satisfaction. This means that reputation management should not be seen solely as an outward-facing strategy for legitimacy or public trust.
• To build a better organization, it is important to treat reputation and identity as linked levers. Managers should translate favorable reputational signals into identity-building practices that convert reputation into stronger attachment and satisfaction.
AakerJL (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research34(3): 347–356.
2.
AndrewsRBoyneGAWalkerRM (2006) Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In: BoyneGAMeierKJO’TooleLJ, et al. (eds) Public Services Performance: Perspectives on Measurement and Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
ArandaAMVaaraEEtchanchuH, et al. (2025) Discursive struggles and contested stigma extensions: Explaining the gradual stigmatization of the U.S. tobacco industry. Organization Science36(4): 1384–1415.
4.
AshforthBEMaelF (1989) Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review14(1): 20–39.
5.
AugustineGLPiazzaA (2022) Category evolution under conditions of stigma: The segregation of abortion provision into specialist clinics in the United States. Organization Science33(2): 624–649.
6.
BankinsSWaterhouseJ (2019) Organizational identity, image, and reputation: Examining the influence on perceptions of employer attractiveness in public sector organizations. International Journal of Public Administration42(3): 218–229.
7.
CarpenterD (2010) Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
ChangSJ, Van WitteloostuijnAEdenL (2010) From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies41: 174–184.
9.
ChristensenTGornitzkaÅ (2019) Reputation management in public agencies: The relevance of time, sector, audience, and tasks. Administration & Society51(6): 885–914.
10.
CouplandCBrownAD (2004) Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Management Studies41(8): 1325–1347.
11.
Dantas CabralAPeciAVan RyzinGG (2022) Representation, reputation and expectations towards bureaucracy: experimental findings from a favela in Brazil. Public Management Review24(9): 1452–1477.
12.
DuttonJEDukerichJM (1991) Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal34(3): 517–554.
13.
DuttonJEDukerichJMHarquailCV (1994) Organizational images and member identification. Administration Science Quarterly39(2): 239–263.
FernandezSKomaSLeeH (2018) Establishing the link between representative bureaucracy and performance: The South African case. Governance31(3): 535–553.
16.
FernandezSMoldogazievT (2011) Empowering public sector employees to improve performance: Does it work?The American Review of Public Administration41(1): 23–47.
17.
FletcherLBaileyCAlfesK, et al. (2020) Mind the context gap: A critical review of engagement within the public sector and an agenda for future research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management31(1): 6–46.
18.
FuchsCDiamantopoulosA (2009) Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft69(2): 195–210.
19.
FullerJBMarlerLHesterK, et al. (2006) Construed external image and organizational identification: A test of the moderating influence of need for self-esteem. The Journal of Social Psychology146(6): 701–716.
20.
GarrettRSThurberJAFritschlerAL, et al. (2006) Assessing the impact of bureaucracy bashing by electoral campaigns. Public Administration Review66(2): 228–240.
21.
GiladSBen-Nun BloomPAssoulineM (2018) Bureaucrats’ processing of organizational reputation signals. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration1(1): 1–11.
22.
GioiaDASchultzMCorleyKG (2000) Organizational identity, image, and adaptive instability. Academy of Management Review25(1): 63–81.
23.
HameduddinTLeeS (2021) Employee engagement among public employees: Examining the role of organizational images. Public Management Review23(3): 422–446.
24.
HeHBrownAD (2013) Organizational identity and organizational identification: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research. Group & Organization Management38(1): 3–35.
25.
HelmS (2013) A matter of reputation and pride: Associations between perceived external reputation, pride in membership, job satisfaction and turnover intentions. British Journal of Management24(4): 542–556.
26.
HerrbachOMignonacKGatignonA (2004) Exploring the role of perceived external prestige in managers’ turnover intentions. The International Journal of Human Resource Management15(8): 1390–1407.
27.
HoggMTerryD (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25(1): 121–140.
28.
JordanJSTurnerBA (2008) The feasibility of single-item measures for organizational justice. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science12(4): 237–257.
29.
KennyDAKashyDBolgerN (1998) Data analysis in social psychology. In: GilbertDFiskeSTLindzeyG (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. 4th ed.New York: Oxford University Press, pp.233–265.
30.
KettlDF (2017) Can Governments Earn Our Trust?Cambridge: Polity Books.
31.
LeeDVan RyzinGG (2019) Measuring bureaucratic reputation: Scale development and validation. Governance32(1): 177–192.
32.
LievensFVan HoyeGAnseelF (2007) Organizational identity and employer image: Toward a unifying framework. British Journal of Management18(S1): S45–S59.
33.
LockeEA (1976) The nature and consequences of job satisfaction. In: DunnetteMD (ed) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally, pp.1297–1349.
34.
LockertASBjørnåHKraneMS (2020) Policy transfer of branding and reputation management: Motivations, challenges, and opportunities for a small rural municipality. Public Performance & Management Review43(2): 461–482.
35.
MaorM (2014) Theorizing bureaucratic reputation. In: WæraasAMaorM (eds) Organizational Reputation in the Public Sector. New York: Routledge, pp.17–36.
36.
MatthewsRAPineaultLHongYH (2022) Normalizing the use of single-item measures: Validation of the single-item compendium for organizational psychology. Journal of Business and Psychology37(4): 639–673.
37.
McNeishDMStapletonLM (2016) The effect of small sample size on two-level model estimates: A review and illustration. Educational Psychology Review28(2): 295–314.
38.
OvermanSBusuiocMWoodM (2020) A multidimensional reputation barometer for public agencies: A validated instrument. Public Administration Review80(3): 415–425.
39.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
RhoEYunTLeeK (2015) Does organizational image matter? Image, identification, and employee behaviors in public and nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review75(3): 421–431.
41.
RimkutėD (2018) Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs. Public Administration96(1): 70–83.
42.
ScarpelloVCampbellJP (1983) Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there?Personnel Psychology36(3): 577–600.
43.
SchreursBDruartCProostK, et al. (2009) Symbolic attributes and organizational attractiveness: The moderating effects of applicant personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment17(1): 35–46.
44.
SpectorP (2019) Do not cross me: Optimizing the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology34(2): 125–137.
45.
SpectorP (2022) Job satisfaction: From Assessment to Intervention. New York: Routledge.
46.
SzydlowskiGde BoerNTummersL (2022) Compassion, bureaucrat bashing, and public administration. Public Administration Review82(4): 619–633.
47.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1985) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: WorchelSAustinWG (eds) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. 2nd ed.Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
48.
TurnerJC (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: TajfelH (ed) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press, 15–40.
49.
TurnerJC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: A social-cognitive theory of group behavior. In: LawlerEJ (ed) Advances in Group processes: Theory and Research, Vol. 2.Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp.77–122.
50.
WanousJPReichersAEHudyMJ (1997) Overall job satisfaction: How good are the single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology82(2): 247–252.
51.
WhettenDMackeyA (2002) A social actor conception of organizational identity and its implications for the study of organizational reputation. Business & Society41(4): 393–414.
52.
WæraasAByrkjeflotH (2012) Public sector organizations and reputation management: Five problems. International Public Management Journal15(2): 186–206.
53.
WæraasAMaorM (eds) (2015) Organizational Reputation in the Public Sector.Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
