A Study of Interracial Differences in Turnover Intentions: The Mitigating Role of Pro-Diversity and Justice-Oriented Management

Abstract

Enhancing racial justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion are the core values of public administration and critical to the functions of public-sector strategic human resources management. However, very limited empirical research has delved into the interracial differences in public sector employees’ turnover intentions and its mitigating factors. Using the 2006–2017 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey data, the present study aims to contribute toward filling this gap in the literature. The theoretical arguments and empirical findings of this study show that when compared with White employees, Federal Black, Indigenous, and Employees of Color (BIEOC) are significantly more likely to intend to leave their current organizations. However, the likelihood of turnover intentions of Federal employees, particularly, BIEOC can be reduced through institutional interventions anchored in pro-diversity management (e.g., commitment to fostering a racially representative workforce), distributive justice in employment outcomes (e.g., in pay and promotions) and procedural justice in organizational processes (e.g., anti-discrimination practices).

Keywords

Black Indigenous and Employees of Color White employees racial differences turnover intentions distributive justice procedural justice pro-diversity management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

(2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–99). Academic Press.

African American Workgroup Report. (2013, March). The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/federal/reports/aawg.cfm

Al-Faham

Davis

A. M.

Ernst

(2019.). Intersectionality: From theory to practice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 247–265.

Asian American and Pacific Islander Work Group Report. (2008, December 21). U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/federal/reports/aapi.html

Avery

D. R.

McKay

P. F.

Wilson

D. C.

Tonidandel

(2007). Unequal attendance: The relationships between race, organizational diversity cues, and absenteeism. Personnel Psychology, 60(4), 875–902.

Banaji

M. R.

Greenwald

A. G.

(2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. Delacorte Press.

Blessett

Dodge

Edmond

Goerdel

H. T.

Gooden

S. T.

Headley

A. M.

Riccucci

N. M.

Williams

B. N.

(2019). Social equity in public administration: A call to action. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(4), 283–299.

Brassey

Mahtani

Heneghan

(2017, July 20). Wrong sample size bias. Catalog of Bias. https://catalogofbias.org/biases/wrong-sample-size-bias/

10.

Cameron

A. C.

Trivedi

P. K.

(2010). Microeconometrics using Stata: Revised edition. Stata Press.

11.

Cantarelli

Belardinelli

Belle

(2015). A meta-analysis of job satisfaction correlates in the public administration literature. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 36, 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15578534

12.

Cheung

H. K.

King

Lindsey

Membere

Markell

H. M.

Kilcullen

(2016). Understanding and reducing workplace discrimination. Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 34, pp. 101–152). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

13.

Cho

Y. J.

Sai

(2013). Does organizational justice matter in the federal workplace? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(3), 227–251.

14.

Choi

(2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 603–630.

15.

Choi

(2011a). Diversity and representation in the U.S. federal government: Analysis of the trends of federal employment. Public Personnel Management, 40(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601104000103

16.

Choi

(2011b). Organizational justice and employee work attitudes: The federal case. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 185–204.

17.

Chordiya

(2019). Are federal child care programs sufficient for employee retention? Critical examination from a gendered perspective. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3): 338–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804662

18.

Chordiya

(2020, July). Organizational inclusion and turnover intentions of federal employees with disabilities. Review of Public Personnel Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20942305

19.

Chugh

Bazerman

M. H.

Banaji

M. R.

(2005). Bounded ethicality as a psychological barrier to recognizing conflicts of interest. In Moore

D. A.

Cain

D. M.

Loewenstein

Bazerman

M. H.

(Eds.), Conflicts of interest: Challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy (pp. 74–95). Cambridge University Press.

20.

Cohen-Charash

Spector

P. E.

(2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.

21.

Colquitt

J. A.

Conlon

D. E.

Wesson

M. J.

Porter

C. O.

K. Y.

(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445.

22.

Cox

Jr . (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.

23.

Crenshaw

(1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989. Article 8. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8

24.

Cropanzano

Ambrose

M. L.

(2002). Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic perspective and a research agenda. In Greenberg

Cropanzano

(Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 119–151). Stanford University Press.

25.

Favero

Bullock

J. B.

(2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 285–308.

26.

Fay

D. L.

Fryar

A. H.

Meier

K. J.

Wilkins

(2020). Intersectionality and equity: Dynamic bureaucratic representation in higher education. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12691

27.

Federal Sector Reports. (n.d.). The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/federal/reports/index.cfm

28.

Ferdman

B. M.

Avigdor

Braun

Konkin

Kuzmycz

(2010). Collective experience of inclusion, diversity, and performance in work groups. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 11(3), 6–26.

29.

Frankena

W. K.

(1962). The concept of social justice. In Brandt

R. B.

(Ed.), Social justice (pp. 1–29). Prentice Hall.

30.

Gooden

S. T.

(2015.). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government: 2014: A nervous area of government. Routledge.

31.

Gooden

S. T.

(2020). A message from Wilder School dean, Susan T. Gooden. Virginia Commonwealth University. https://wilder.vcu.edu/news-and-events/news-articles/a-message-from-wilder-school-dean-susan-t-gooden.html

32.

Greenhaus

J. H.

Parasuraman

Wormley

W. M.

(1990). Effects of race on organizational experiences, job performance evaluations, and career outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 64–86.

33.

Groeneveld

Verbeek

(2012). Diversity policies in public and private sector organizations: An empirical comparison of incidence and effectiveness. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(4), 353–381.

34.

Guy

M. E.

McCandless

S. A.

(2012). Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review, 72(Suppl. 1), S5–S13.

35.

Hanisch

K. A.

Hulin

C. L.

(1990). Job attitudes and organizational withdrawal: An examination of retirement and other voluntary withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(1), 60–78.

36.

Harro

(2018). Cycle of socialization. In Adams

, et al. (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (4th ed., pp. 27–33). Routledge.

37.

Hays-Thomas

(2016). Managing workplace diversity and inclusion: A psychological perspective. Routledge.

38.

Hebl

M. R.

Foster

J. B.

Mannix

L. M.

Dovidio

J. F.

(2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 815–825.

39.

Heckler

Ronquillo

J. C.

(2019). Racist fake news in united states’ history: Lessons for public administration. Public Integrity, 21, 477–490. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10999922.2019.1626696

40.

Hispanic Work Group Report. (2008, October 23). Text. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/federal/reports/hwg.html#_Toc471524073.

41.

(2015). Monte Carlo methods and their applications in big data analysis. In Chen

L. M.

Jiang

(Eds.), Mathematical problems in data science: Theoretical and practical methods (pp. 125–139). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

42.

Johnson

R. G.

III . (2012). Promoting social equity in public administration: A much needed topic in the twenty-first century. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 471–473.

43.

Jones

J. R.

Wilson

D. C.

(2009). Comparative effects of race/ethnicity and employee engagement on withdrawal behavior. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 195–215.

44.

Jones

K. P.

Peddie

C. I.

Gilrane

V. L.

King

E. B.

Gray

A. L.

(2016). Not so subtle: A meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1588–1613.

45.

Kendi

I. X.

(2019.). How to be an antiracist. One World.

46.

Kessler

R. C.

Mickelson

K. D.

Williams

D. R.

(1999). The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(3), 208–230.

47.

Hur

(2014). The impacts of employee benefits, procedural justice, and managerial trustworthiness on work attitudes: Integrated understanding based on social exchange theory. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 176–187.

48.

Lambert

Hogan

(2009). The importance of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in shaping turnover intent: A test of a causal model. Criminal Justice Review, 34(1), 96–118.

49.

Lee

S.-Y.

Hong

J. H.

(2011). Does family-friendly policy matter? Testing its impact on turnover and performance. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 870–879.

50.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In Gergen

K. J.

Greenberg

Willis

(Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Plenum Press.

51.

Lewis

Gunn

(2007). Workplace bullying in the public sector: Understanding the racial dimension. Public Administration, 85(3), 641–665.

52.

Long

(2016, May 18). New methods of interpretation using marginal effects for nonlinear models. Presented at the EUSMEX 2016: Mexican Stata Users Group. https://www.stata.com/meeting/mexico16/slides/Mexico16_Long.pdf

53.

Marchiondo

Ran

Cortina

(2018). Modern discrimination. In Colella

A. J.

King

E. B.

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199363643.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199363643-e-15

54.

Martin

C. L.

Bennett

(1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Management, 21(1), 84–104.

55.

McCandless

Zavattaro

S. M.

(2020). Editors’ introduction: Since last we spoke . . . Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(3), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1799665

56.

McDonald

(2015). Organizational communication meets queer theory: Theorizing relations of “difference” differently. Communication Theory, 25(3), 310–329.

57.

McKay

P. F.

Avery

D. R.

(2005). Warning! Diversity recruitment could backfire. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 330–336.

58.

McKay

P. F.

Avery

D. R.

Tonidandel

Morris

M. A.

Hernandez

Hebl

M. R.

(2007.). Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key? Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 35–62.

59.

Naylor

L. A.

(2020). Social equity and LGBTQ rights: Dismantling discrimination and expanding civil rights. Routledge.

60.

Ortega

Plagens

G. K.

Stephens

Berry-James

R. M.

(2012). Mexican American public sector professionals: Perceptions of affirmative action policies and workplace discrimination. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(1), 24–44.

61.

Parker

C. P.

Baltes

B. B.

Christiansen

N. D.

(1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial–ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 376–389.

62.

Partnership for Public Service. (2019). Best places to work in the federal government. https://bestplacestowork.org/rankings/overall/mid

63.

Pitts

(2009). Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. Federal Agencies. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 328–338.

64.

Pitts

(2011). A little less conversation, a little more action: Using empirical research to promote social equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 77–82.

65.

Pitts

Marvel

Fernandez

(2011). So hard to say goodbye? Turnover intention among U.S. Federal Employees. Public Administration Review, 71(5), 751–760.

66.

Podestà

(2002). Recent developments in quantitative comparative methodology: The case of pooled time series cross-section analysis (DSS Papers Soc 3-02). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f758/6d1e4e69d60938a8c30d5046a827dea391da.pdf

67.

Podsakoff

N. P.

LePine

J. A.

LePine

M. A.

(2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 438–454.

68.

Protonentis

Chordiya

ObeySumner

(2021). Centering the margins: Restorative and transformative justice as our path to social equity. Administrative Theory & Praxis, February, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159

69.

Quillian

(2006). New approaches to understanding racial prejudice and discrimination. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 299–328.

70.

Riccucci

(2002). Managing diversity in public sector workforces. Westview Press.

71.

Riccucci

N. M.

(2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382.

72.

Sabharwal

(2014). Is diversity management sufficient? organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.

73.

Sabharwal

(2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426.

74.

Scanlon

S. A.

Zupsansky

D. M.

Sawicki

Mitchell

A. W.

(2018, January 22). Four major global recruiting trends from LinkedIn. Hunt Scanlon Media. https://huntscanlon.com/four-major-global-recruiting-trends-linkedin/

75.

Settoon

R. P.

Bennett

Liden

R. C.

(1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.

76.

Shen

Dhanani

(2018). Measuring and defining discrimination. In Colella

A. J.

King

E. B.

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of workplace discrimination. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199363643.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199363643-e-22

77.

Singletary

S. L. B.

(2009). The differential impact of formal and interpersonal discrimination on job performance [Masters’ thesis]. Rice University. https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/61816/3362407.PDF?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

78.

Starke

A. M.

Heckler

Mackey

(2018). Administrative racism: Public administration education and race. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 24(4), 469–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2018.1426428

79.

StataCorp. (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16. StataCorp LLC.

80.

Stata.com. (n.d). Simulate — monte carlo simulations. stata.com. https://www.stata.com/manuals13/rsimulate.pdf

81.

Stazyk

E. C.

Davis

R. S.

Portillo

(2017). More dissimilar than alike? Public values preferences across US minority and White managers. Public Administration, 95(3), 605–622.

82.

Sue

D. W.

(2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. John Wiley.

83.

Sue

D. W.

(2018). Microaggressions, marginality, and oppression: An introduction. In Adams

(Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (4th ed., pp. 22–26). Routledge.

84.

Svara

J. H.

Brunet

J. R.

(2020). The importance of social equity to prevent a hollow public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(4–5), 352–357.

85.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2019, April 10). EEOC Releases fiscal year 2018 enforcement and litigation data. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-10-19.cfm

86.

The U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (2008). The federal government: A model employer or a work in progress [A Report to the President and the Congress of the United States].

87.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2015). 2015 federal employee viewpoint survey: Employees influencing change [Governmentwide Management Report]. http://www.fedview.opm.gov/2015FILES/2015_FEVS_Gwide_Final_Report.PDF

88.

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (n.d.). OPM.Gov. U.S. Office of Personnel Management. https://www.opm.gov/fevs/

89.

Theus

(2018, January 30). Rethinking how we define and track workforce diversity. Leadership and Management. SmartBrief. http://smartbrief.com/original/2018/01/rethinking-how-we-define-and-track-workforce-diversity

90.

Thomas

D. A.

Ely

R. J.

(1996, September 1). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1996/09/making-differences-matter-a-new-paradigm-for-managing-diversity

91.

Thomas

R. R.

(1990, March 1). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1990/03/from-affirmative-action-to-affirming-diversity

92.

Tourangeau

(2003). Recurring surveys: Issues and opportunities [A report to the national science foundation based on a workshop held on March 28-29, 2003]. https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/ses/mms/nsf04_211a.pdf

93.

Truxillo

D. M.

Bauer

T. N.

(1999). Applicant reactions to test score banding in entry-level and promotional contexts. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 322–339.

94.

UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.—a). How can i draw a random sample of my data?—Stata FAQ. UCLA: Institute for Digital Research and Education. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/faq/how-can-i-draw-a-random-sample-of-my-data/

95.

UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (n.d.—b). How can i perform a factor analysis with categorical (or categorical and continuous) variables?—Stata FAQ. UCLA: Institute for Digital Research and Education. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/faq/how-can-i-perform-a-factor-analysis-with-categorical-or-categorical-and-continuous-variables/

96.

Volpone

S. D.

Avery

D. R.

(2013.). It’s self defense: How perceived discrimination promotes employee withdrawal. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(4), 430–448.

97.

Weiss

H. M.

Suckow

Russell

(1999). Effects of justice conditions on discrete emotions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 786–794.

98.

Wooldridge

Gooden

(2009). The epic of social equity. Administrative Theory & Praxis (M.E. Sharpe), 31(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806310205

99.

Wynen

de Beeck

S. O.

Hondeghem

(2013). Interorganizational mobility within the U.S. Federal Government: Examining the effect of individual and organizational factors. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 869–881.

100.

Zinn

(2003). A people’s history of the United States. HarperCollins.

101.

Zurbrügg

Miner

K. N.

(2016). Gender, sexual orientation, and workplace incivility: Who is most targeted and who is most harmed? Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00565

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB