Stay or Exit: Why Do Nonprofits Maintain Collaborations With Government?

Abstract

Although the public-management literature has demonstrated a growing interest in public–nonprofit collaborations, it pays little attention to the sustainability of collaborations. This study proposes that nonprofits’ intentions to maintain collaborations with government are influenced by both instrumental and relational factors. Using a national sample of human service nonprofits, this study demonstrates that both nonprofits’ continuance commitment and affective commitment play a role in shaping their intentions to maintain collaborative relationships with government. Specifically, continuance commitment is driven by the presence of a formal agreement and the dependence on government funding, and affective commitment is shaped by distributive and procedural justice. The findings have implications for public managers to effectively manage their collaborations with nonprofits.

Keywords

public–nonprofit collaboration intention to continue collaboration commitment procedural justice distributive justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

(1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Berkowitz

(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267-299). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Alexander

Nank

Stivers

(1999). Implications of welfare reform: Do nonprofit survival strategies threaten civil society? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 452-475.

Allen

N. J.

Meyer

J. P.

(1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.

Ansell

Gash

(2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543-571.

Ariño

Ring

P. S.

(2010). The role of fairness in alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 1054-1087.

Baruch

Holtom

B. C.

(2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.

Bies

R. J.

Moag

J. S.

(1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki

R. J.

Sheppard

B. H.

Bazerman

M. H.

(Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Boris

E. T.

de Leon

Roeger

K. L.

Nikolova

(2010). Human service nonprofits and government collaboration: Findings from the 2010 national survey of nonprofit government contracting and grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

Bryson

J. M.

Crosby

B. C.

Stone

M. M.

(2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44-55.

10.

Colquitt

J. A.

(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.

11.

Colquitt

J. A.

Conlon

D. E.

Wesson

M. J.

Porter

C. O. L. H.

K. Y.

(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.

12.

Cook

K. S.

Emerson

R. M.

(1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.

13.

Cornforth

Hayes

J. P.

Vangen

(2015). Nonprofit–public collaborations: Understanding governance dynamics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44, 775-795.

14.

Cropper

(1996). Collaborative working and the issue of sustainability. In Huxbaum

(Ed.), Creating competitive advantage (pp. 80-100). London, UK: Sage.

15.

Cullen

J. B.

Johnson

J. L.

Sakano

(2000). Success through commitment and trust: The soft side of strategic alliance management. Journal of World Business, 35, 223-240.

16.

DeHoog

R. H.

(1984). Contracting out for human services: Economic, political, and organizational perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.

17.

Deutsch

(1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.

18.

Dwyer

F. R.

Schurr

P. H.

(1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.

19.

Flora

D. B.

Curran

P. J.

(2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466-491.

20.

Gazley

(2004). The purpose of partnership: A comparative study of Georgia local government and nonprofit service delivery collaboration (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens.

21.

Gazley

(2008). Beyond the contract: The scope and nature of informal government–nonprofit partnerships. Public Administration Review, 68, 141-154.

22.

Gazley

(2010). Why not partner with local government? Nonprofit managerial perceptions of collaborative disadvantage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 51-76.

23.

Gazley

Brudney

J. L.

(2007). The purpose (and perils) of government-nonprofit partnership. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 389-415.

24.

Girth

A. M.

Hefetz

Johnston

J. M.

Warner

M. E.

(2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72, 887-900.

25.

Granovetter

(1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.

26.

Greenberg

Folger

R. G.

(1983). Procedural justice, participation, and the fair process effect in groups and organizations. In Paulus

P. B.

(Ed.), Basic group processes (pp. 235-256). New York: Springer-Verlag.

27.

Grønbjerg

K. A.

Child

(2004). Indiana nonprofits: Affiliations, collaborations and competition. Bloomington: Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs.

28.

Griffith

D. A.

Harvey

M. G.

Lusch

R. F.

(2006). Social exchange in supply chain relationships: The resulting benefits of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Operations Management, 24, 85-98.

29.

Gundlach

G. T.

Achrol

R. S.

Mentzer

J. T.

(1995). The structure of commitment in exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59, 78-92.

30.

Heikkila

Gerlak

A. K.

(2016). Investigating collaborative processes over time: A 10-year study of the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 180-200.

31.

Hodge

M. M.

Piccolo

R. F.

(2005). Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16, 171-190.

32.

Homans

G. C.

(1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.

33.

Husted

B. W.

Folger

(2004). Fairness and transaction costs: The contribution of organizational justice theory to an integrative model of economic organization. Organization Science, 15, 719-729.

34.

Huxham

Vangen

(2013). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.

35.

Johnson

J. P.

Korsgaard

M. A.

Sapienza

H. J.

(2002). Perceived fairness, decision control, and commitment in international joint venture management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1141-1160.

36.

Kim

Frazier

G. L.

(1997). Measurement of distributor commitment in industrial channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 40, 139-154.

37.

Korsgaard

M. A.

Schweiger

D. M.

Sapienza

H. J.

(1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.

38.

Kort

Klijn

E. H.

(2011). Public–private partnerships in urban regeneration projects: Organizational form or managerial capacity? Public Administration Review, 71, 618-626.

39.

Kumar

Scheer

L. K.

Steenkamp

J.-B. E. M.

(1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 54-65.

40.

Lee

Benoit-Bryan

Johnson

T. P.

(2012). Survey research in public administration: Assessing mainstream journals with a total survey error framework. Public Administration Review, 72, 87-97.

41.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In Berkowitz

Walster

(Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91-131). New York, NY: Academic Press.

42.

Leventhal

G. S.

(1980). What should be done with equity theory? In Gergen

K. J.

Greenberg

M. S.

Willis

R. H.

(Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

43.

Lind

E. A.

Kanfer

Earley

P. C.

(1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 59, 952-959.

44.

Lind

E. A.

Tyler

T. R.

(1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.

45.

Liu

Huang

Luo

Zhao

(2012). How does justice matter in achieving buyer–supplier relationship performance? Journal of Operations Management, 30, 355-367.

46.

(2015). Which nonprofit gets more government funding? Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25, 297-312.

47.

(2016). The performance of performance-based contracting in human services: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 277-293.

48.

Luo

(2005). How important are shared perceptions of procedural justice in cooperative alliances? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 695-709.

49.

Luo

(2007). The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 644-664.

50.

Macneil

I. R.

(1974). The many futures of contract. Southern California Law Review, 47, 691-816.

51.

Meyer

J. P.

Allen

N. J.

(1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.

52.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

(2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of public administration research and theory, 10, 359-380.

53.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

54.

Nikolic

S. J. S.

Koontz

T. M.

(2007). Nonprofit organizations in environmental management: A comparative analysis of government impacts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 441-463.

55.

O’Leary

Vij

(2012). Collaborative public management: Where have we been and where are we going? The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 507-522.

56.

Pettijohn

S. L.

Boris

E. T.

De Vita

C. J.

Fyffe

S. D.

(2013). Nonprofit-government contracts and grants: Findings from the 2013 national survey. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

57.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

58.

Provan

K. G.

Huang

Milward

H. B.

(2009). The evolution of structural embeddedness and organizational social outcomes in a centrally governed health and human services network. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 873-893.

59.

Provan

K. G.

Kenis

(2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 229-252.

60.

Raab

Mannak

R. S.

Cambré

(2013). Combining structure, governance, and context: A configurational approach to network effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 479-511.

61.

Reis

H. T.

(1986). Levels of interest in the study of interpersonal justice. In Bierhoff

H. W.

Cohen

R. L.

Greenberg

(Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 187-210). New York, NY: Plenum Press.

62.

Ring

P. S.

Van de Ven

A. H.

(1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19, 90-118.

63.

Rowley

T. J.

Greve

H. R.

Rao

Baum

J. A. C.

Shipilov

A. V.

(2005). Time to break up: Social and instrumental antecedents of firm exits from exchange cliques. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 499-520.

64.

Salamon

L. M.

(1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

65.

Shaw

M. M.

(2003). Successful collaboration between the nonprofit and public sectors. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 107-120.

66.

Smith

S. R.

(1996). Transforming public services: Contracting for social and health services in the US. Public Administration, 74, 113-127.

67.

Suárez

D. F.

Esparza

(2017). Institutional change and management of public–nonprofit partnerships. The American Review of Public Administration, 47, 648-660.

68.

Sweeney

P. D.

McFarlin

D. B.

(1993). Workers’ evaluations of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40.

69.

Takahashi

L. M.

Smutny

(2002). Collaborative windows and organizational governance: Exploring the formation and demise of social service partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 165-185.

70.

Thibaut

J. W.

Walker

(1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

71.

Thomson

A. M.

Perry

J. L.

Miller

T. K.

(2008). Linking collaboration processes and outcomes: Foundations for advancing empirical theory. In Bingham

L. B.

O’Leary

(Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 97-120). New York, NY: Routledge.

72.

Tomaskovic-Devey

Leiter

Thompson

(1994). Organizational survey nonresponse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 439-457.

73.

Turrini

Cristofoli

Frosini

Nasi

(2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88, 528-550.

74.

Tyler

T. R.

Rasinski

K. A.

Spodick

(1985). Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.

75.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Nonprofit sector: Treatment and reimbursement of indirect costs vary among grants, and depend significantly on federal, state, and local government practices (GAO-10-477). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-477

76.

Van Slyke

D. M.

(2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63, 296-315.

77.

Van Slyke

D. M.

(2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157-187.

78.

Verschuere

De Corte

(2014). The impact of public resource dependence on the autonomy of NPOs in their strategic decision making. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43, 293-313.

79.

Walster

G. W.

Berscheid

(1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

80.

Wang

(2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

81.

Williamson

O. E.

(1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.

82.

C. Y.

(2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.