This study applied an output-oriented variable returns-to-scale (VRS) data envelopment analysis (DEA) technique to New York City (NYC) agencies to illustrate its usefulness in assessing and estimating organizational efficiency with respect to workforce diversity. Financial, personnel, and labor inputs of 38 agencies were analyzed in relation to the level of workforce diversity achieved by each decision-making unit (DMU). The Simpson index of diversity (D = 1 − Σp2) was used to measure the level of age, ethnic, and gender diversity in each agency. The findings suggest that the majority of the agencies have inefficient human resource (HR) recruiting and hiring processes (constant returns-to-scale [CRS] > 1.000 and Σλ > 1.000). The findings also suggest that the inefficient agencies would exhibit decreasing returns-to-scale (DRS) if the level of inputs were to be increased.
AsmildM.ParadiJ. C.PastorJ. T. (2012). DEA based models for reallocations of police personnel. OR Spectrum, 34, 924-941.
2.
BarrosC. P. (2007). The city and the police force: Analyzing relative efficiency in city police precincts with data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 9, 164-182.
3.
BermanE. M.BowmanJ. S.WestJ. P.Van WartM. R. (2013). Human resources management in the public sector: Paradoxes, processes, and problems (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
5.
BowlinW. F.RennerC. J.RivesJ. M. (2003). A DEA study of gender equity in executive compensation. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 751-757.
6.
ChoiS. (2011). Diversity and representation in the U.S. federal government: Analysis of the trends of federal employment. Public Personnel Management, 40, 25-46.
7.
ChouJ.ShiehC.HuangK. (2012). A study of the performance on human resource management strategy in tourism industry with data envelopment analysis. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 28, 735-741.
8.
CoatesD. C.LamdinD. J. (2002). School performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis. Public Finance and Management, 2, 566-591.
CooperW. W.SeifordL. M.ToneK. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references, and DEA-solver software (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
11.
CornwellC.KelloughJ. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54, 265-270.
12.
Fitz-enzJ.DavisonB. (2002). How to measure human resources management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13.
FrisbyW. (1986). Measuring the organizational effectiveness of national sport governing bodies. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences, 11, 94-99.
14.
GanleyJ. A.CubbinJ. S. (1992). Public sector efficiency measurement: Applications of data envelopment analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
15.
GormanM. F.RuggieroJ. (2008). Evaluating US state police performance using data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 113, 1031-1037.
16.
GuajardoS. A. (1999). Workforce diversity: Monitoring employment trends in public organizations. Public Personnel Management, 28, 63-85.
17.
GuajardoS. A. (2013). Workforce diversity: An application of diversity and integration indices to small agencies. Public Personnel Management, 42, 27-40.
18.
GuajardoS. A. (2014a). Workforce diversity: Downsizing in the NYPD and its effect on minority integration. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 16, 155-167.
19.
GuajardoS. A. (2014b). Workforce diversity: Ethnicity and gender diversity and disparity in the New York City Police Department. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 12, 93-115.
20.
GustafsonJ. (2013). Diversity in municipal police agencies: A national examination of minority hiring and promotion. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 36, 719-736.
21.
HammanJ. A.DesaiU.MitchellT. (1993). Competing for talented diversity in local government personnel: Recruitment practices in Illinois local government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13, 22-37.
22.
JordanW. T.FridellL.FaggianiD.KubuB. (2009). Attracting females and racial/ethnic minorities to law enforcement. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 333-341.
23.
KelloughJ. E. (1990). Integration in the public workplace: Determinants of minority and female employment in federal agencies. Public Administration Review, 50, 557-566.
24.
KelloughJ. E.ElliottE. (1992). Demographic and organizational influences on racial/ethnic and gender integration. Social Science Quarterly, 73, 1-11.
25.
KimP. S. (1993). Racial integration in the American federal government: With special reference to Asian-Americans. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 13, 52-66.
26.
KimS.O’ConnerJ. G. (2009). Assessing electronic recruitment implementation in state governments: Issues and challenges. Public Personnel Management, 38, 47-66.
27.
LanC.ChuangL.ChangC. (2007). An efficiency-based approach on human resource management: A case study of Tainan county fire branches in Taiwan. Public Personnel Management, 36, 143-164.
28.
LiebersonS. (1969). Measuring population diversity. American Sociological Review, 34, 850-862.
29.
MancebonM. J.MolineroC. M. (2000). Performance in primary schools. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 843-854.
30.
ManoharanT. R.MuralidharanD.DeshmukhS. G. (2009). Employee performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis: A case study. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 17, 92-111.
31.
MarzulliJ. (2010, January22). Heat turned up on FDNY to pay for bias against minorities denied jobs. Newsday. Available from http://www.nydailynews.com
32.
McCluskeyC. P.McCluskeyJ. D. (2004). Diversity in Policing: Latino representation in law enforcement. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 2(3), 67-81.
33.
MladenkaK. R. (1991). Public employee unions, reformism, and Black employment in 1200 cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 532-548.
34.
PittsD. W. (2005). Diversity, representation, and performance: Evidence about race and ethnicity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 615-631.
35.
PittsD. W. (2006). Modeling the impact of diversity management. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 245-268.
36.
ProvanK. G. (1980). Board power and organizational effectiveness among human services agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 221-236.
37.
ReeseL.OhrenJ. (1987). The impact of collective bargaining in four cities: The diversity thesis revisited. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 8, 68-81.
38.
RiccucciN. M. (1986). Female and minority employment in city government: The role of unions. Policy Studies Journal, 15, 3-15.
39.
RiccucciN. M.SaldivarK. (2014). The status of employment discrimination suits in police and fire departments across the United States. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 263-288.
40.
SaltzsteinG. H. (1986). Female mayors and women in municipal jobs. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 140-164.
41.
SeifordL. M.ZhuJ. (2002). Value judgment versus allocative efficiency: A case of Tennessee county jails. The Journal of Management Science & Regional Development, 4, 89-98.
42.
ShirouyehzadH.LotfiH.AryanezhadM. B.DabestaniR. (2012). A data envelopment analysis approach for measuring the efficiency of employees: A case study. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 23, 191-201.
43.
SimpsonE. H. (1949). Measuring diversity. Nature, 163.
44.
StarksG. L. (2009). Minority representation in senior positions in U.S. federal agencies: A paradox of underrepresentation. Public Personnel Management, 38, 79-90.
45.
ThanassoulisE. (1996a). Assessing the effectiveness of schools with pupils of different ability using data envelopment analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 84-97.
46.
ThanassoulisE. (1996b). Altering the bias in differential school effectiveness using data envelopment analysis. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 882-894.
47.
ThanassoulisE.DunstanP. (1994). Guiding schools to improved performance using data envelopment analysis: An illustration with data from a local education authority. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45, 1247-1262.
48.
Von BergenC. W.SoperB.FosterT. (2002). Unintended negative effects of diversity management. Public Personnel Management, 31, 239-251.
49.
WarnerR. L.SteelB. S.LovrichN. P. (1989). Conditions associated with the advent of representative bureaucracy: The case of women in policing. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 562-578.
50.
WickerP.BreuerC. (2013). Understanding the importance of organizational resources to explain organizational problems: Evidence from nonprofit sports clubs in Germany. Voluntas, 24, 461-484.
51.
ZhaoJ. S.HeN.LovrichN. P. (2006). Pursuing gender diversity in police organizations in the 1990s: A longitudinal analysis of factors associated with the hiring of female officers. Police Quarterly, 9(4), 463-485.
52.
ZhuJ. (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. New York, NY: Springer.
53.
ZhuJ. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Let the data speak for themselves. Lexington, KY: CreateSpace.
