Debates have been ongoing for decades about the efficiency of municipal services in centralized or decentralized systems. the fundamental argument for decentralization is that it shifts decisionmaking authority to local governments which are closer to citizens’ needs and preferences and thus are better to know what is wanted. This study contributes to the growing literature on measuring local government efficiency by using data from 79 Macedonian municipalities from 2008 to 2015 and assessing whether decentralization results in greater efficiency. the results indicate that more decentralized municipalities are, on average, more efficient than less decentralized ones. There was, however, a significant disparity in performance throughout the decentralization period, with small municipalities often under-performing relative to larger ones. These results indicate that decentralization has limited effects on the efficiency of municipal spending, and does not reduce disparities across municipalities. the evidence suggests that many of the inequalities could be alleviated by implementing equalization programs as a substantial part of a regional development strategy.
AfonsoA. and FernandesS. (2006) “Measuring local government spending efficiency: Evidence for the Lisbon region”, Regional Studies, 40(1):39–53.
2.
AfonsoA. and FernandesS (2008) “Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government”, Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5): 1946–1979.
3.
AielloF. and BonannoG. (2019) “Explaining Differences in Efficiency: A Meta-Study on local Government Literature”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(3):999–1027.
4.
AlanS., HonoréB.E., HuL. and Leth-PetersenS. (2014) “Estimation of panel data regression models with two-sided censoring or truncation”, Journal of Econometric Methods, 3(1):1–20.
5.
ArcelusF.J., ArocenaP.F., Cabases and PascualP. (2015) “On the cost-efficiency of service delivery in small municipalities”, Regional Studies, 49(9):1469–1480.
6.
AsatryanZ. and De WitteK. (2015) “Direct democracy and local government efficiency”, European Journal of Political Economy, 39(C):58–66.
7.
AsatryanZ., FeldL.P. and GeysB. (2015) “Partial fiscal decentralization and sub-national government fiscal discipline: empirical evidence from OECD countries”, Public Choice, 163(3):307–320.
8.
AthanassopoulosA.D. and TriantisK.P. (1998) “Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities”, Information Systems and Operational Research, 36(3):66–83.
9.
Balaguer-CollM.T., PriorD. and Tortosa-AusinaE. (2007) “On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage nonparametric approach”, European Economic Review, 51(2):425–451.
10.
Balaguer-CollM.T., PriorD. and Tortosa-AusinaE. (2010) “Decentralization and efficiency of local government”, The Annals of Regional Science, 45(3):571–601.
11.
Balaguer-CollM.T., PriorD. and Tortosa-AusinaE. (2013) “Output complexity, environmental conditions, and the efficiency of municipalities”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39(3):303–324.
12.
BoexJ (2009) “Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Finance Reform as an International Development Strategy”, IDG Working paper No. 2009–06, Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance.
13.
BoexJ. and YilmazS. (2010) “An Analytical Framework for Assessing Decentralized Local Governance and the Local Public Sector.” IDG Working Paper, No. 2010–06, Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance.
14.
CanaletaC.G., ArzozP.P. and GárateM.R. (2004) “Regional Economic Disparities and Decentralization”, Urban Studies, 41(1):71–94.
15.
CharnesA., CooperW.W. and RhodesE. (1978) “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6):429–444.
16.
CooperW.W., SeifordL.M. and ZhuJ. (2004) “Data envelopment analysis”, in: CooperW.W., SeifordL.M. and ZhuJ. (eds) Handbook on data envelopment analysis (vol. 164), Boston, MA: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 1–39.
17.
CorderoM.J, Pedraja-ChaparroF., PisafloresC.E. and PoloC. (2017) “Efficiency assessment of Portuguese municipalities using a conditional nonparametric approach”, Journal of Production Analysis, 48(1): 1–24.
18.
da CruzN.F. and MarquesR.C. (2014) “Revisiting the determinants of local government performance”, Omega, 44:91–103.
19.
DaraioC. and SimarL.. (2007) Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Application, Springer-Verlag, US.
20.
De BorgerB. and KerstensK. (1996) “Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(2): 145–170.
21.
de MelloL.R.Jr. (2000) “Fiscal decentralization and intergovernmental fiscal relations: A cross-country analysis”, World Development, 28(2):365–380.
22.
de MelloL.R.Jr. and BarensteinM. (2001) “Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis”, JJVIF Working Paper, WP 01/71. The International Monetary Fund.
23.
del GranadoA., JavierF., Martinez-VazquezJ. and McNabR.M. (2018) “Decentralized governance, expenditure composition, and preferences for public goods”, Public Finance Review46(3):359–388.
24.
DrewJ., KorttM. and DolleryB. (2015) “What determines efficiency in local government? A DEA analysis of NSW local government”, Economic Papers, 34(4):243–256.
25.
EeckautP., TulkensV.H. and JamarM.-A. (1993) “Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities”, in: FriedHarold O., SchmidtShelton S., Knox LovellC.A. (eds) The measurement of productive Efficiency—Techniques and applications, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 300–334.
26.
EbelR.D. and YilmazS. (2002) “Concept of fiscal decentralization and worldwide overview”, The World Bank Institute, #30346.
27.
FeruglioN., Martinez-VazquezJ. and TimofeevA. (2008) “An assessment of fiscal decentralization in Macedonia”, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University: International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series.
28.
FogartyJ. and MugeraA. (2013) “Local government efficiency: Evidence from Western Australia”, Australian Economic Review, 46(3):300–311.
29.
GavrilutàV., FlorentinaA. and OpreaF. (2017) “Fiscal Decentralization Determinants and Local Economic Development in EU Countries”, EURINT Proceedings, 2017.
30.
GeysB (2006) “Looking across borders: A test of spatial policy interdependence using local government efficiency ratings”, WZB Markets and Politics Discussion Paper No SP II 2006–03.
31.
GeysB., HeinemannF. and KalbA. (2010) “Voter involvement, fiscal autonomy and public sector efficiency: Evidence from German municipalities”, WZB Markets and Politics Discussion Paper No. 08-024.
32.
GeysB. and MoesenW. (2009) “Exploring sources of local government technical inefficiency: Evidence from Flemish municipalities”, Public Finance and Management, 9(1): 1–29.
33.
GimenezV.M. and PriorD. (2007) “Long- and short-term cost efficiency frontier evaluation: Evidence from Spanish local governments”, Fiscal Studies, 28(1): 121–139.
34.
GovernatoriM. and YimD. (2012) “Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Outcomes.” European Economy-Economic Papers, 468, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DGECFIN), European Commission.
35.
HughesN.P.A. and EdwardsM.E. (2000) “Leviathan vs. Lilliputian: A Data Envelopment Analysis of Government Efficiency”, Journal of Regional Studies, 40(4):649–669.
36.
Hong VoD (2010) “The Economics of Fiscal Decentralization”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4):657–679.
37.
JacobsR., SmithP.C. and StreetA. (2006) Measuring efficiency in health care: analytic techniques and health policy, Cambridge University Press.
38.
KimbleD., BoexJ. and KapitanovaG. (2012) “Making Decentralization Work in Developing Countries: transforming Local government Entities into High-Performing Local government Organizations”, IDG Policy Brief, November 2012, Urban Institute Center on International Development and Governance.
39.
KyriacouA., Muinelo-GalloP.L. and Roca-SagalesO. (2015) “Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance”, Papers in Regional Science, 94(1):89–107.
40.
Lago-PeñasS., Fernández-LeiceagaX. and Vaquero-GarcíaA. (2018) “Spanish fiscal decentralization: A successful (but still unfinished) process”, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8): 1509–1525.
41.
LevitasA. (2011) Local government finances and the status of fiscal decentralization in Macedonia: A statistical review. Washington, DC: Urban Institute on International Development and Governance.
42.
LevitasA. (2009) Local government finances in Macedonia today: Possible reforms for tomorrow, Washington, DC: Urban Institute on International Development and Governance.
43.
LyonA. (2012) “Between integration and accommodation of ethnic differences: Decentralization in Republic of Macedonia”, Journal of Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 11(3):80–103.
44.
LoikkanenH.A. and SusilotoI. (2005) “Cost efficiency of Finnish municipalities in basic service provision 1994–2002”, Urban Public Economics Review, 4:39–64.
45.
Martinez-VazquezJ., Lago-PeñasS. and SacchiA. (2017) “The Impact of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4): 1095–1129.
46.
MartinezY.U., ArzozP.P. and ApezteguíaLB. (2018) “Does Decentralization contribute to efficiency? Evidence from OECD countries”, Applied Economics, 50(7):726–742.
47.
MausseS. and RazafimahefaI. (2017) “Fiscal Decentralization and Fiscal Policy Performance”, IMF Working Paper, WP/17/64, International Monetary Fund.
MorozovB (2018) “Decentralization and Economic Growth: Specification, Measurement, and Direction of Causal Relationship”, International Journal of Public Administration, 41(9):684–699.
50.
MusgraveR. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
Narbon-PerpiñáI. and De WitteK. (2018) “Local governments' efficiency: A systematic literature review—part I”, International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2):431–468.
52.
NikolovM. (2004) “Fiscal decentralization in Macedonia: Recent developments and challenges”, Center for Economic Analyses Working Papers.
53.
NikolovM. and BrosioG. (2015) “Efficient delivery of local public services in ethnically fragmented municipalities”, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self Government, 13(3):299–313.
54.
NikolovM. and HrovatinN. (2013) “Cost efficiency of Macedonian municipalities in service delivery: Does ethnic fragmentation matter?”, Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self Government, 11(3):743–775.
55.
OatesW. (2005) “Toward A Second-Generation Theory of Fiscal Federalism”, International Tax and Public Finance, 12(4):349–373.
56.
OSCE (2014) “Analytical report in the decentralization process”, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Mission to Skopje.
57.
PaddisonR. (1999) “Decoding Decentralization: The Marketing of Urban Local Power?”, Urban Studies, 36(1):107–119.
58.
Perez-LopezG., PriorD. and Zafra-GómezJ.L. (2015) “Rethinking New Public Management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4): 1157–1183.
59.
PrudhommeR. (1995) “The Dangers of Decentralization”, World Bank Research Observer, 10(2):201–220.
60.
ReesC.J. and HossainF. (2010) “Perspectives on Decentralization and Local Governance in Developing and Transitional Countries”, International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12–13):581–587.
61.
SimarL. and WilsonP.W. (2000) “Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of art”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1):49–78.
62.
SørensenR.J. (2014) “Political competition, party polarization, and government performance”, Public Choice, 161(3–4):427–450.
63.
State Statistical Office (2018) Regions of the Republic of Macedonia, 2018, Regional Yearbook.Skopje, Makstat, ISSN 1857-6141.
64.
TanziV. (1995) “Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization: A Review of Some Efficiency and Macroeconomic Aspects”, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, pp. 298–316.
65.
The World Bank (2015) “FYR Macedonia public expenditure review: Fiscal policy for growth”, World Bank Group.
66.
TieboutC (1956) “A Pure theory of Local Expenditures”, Journal of Political Economy, 64(5):416–424.
67.
TodorovskiI (2001) “Local government in the Macedonia”, in KandevaEmilia (ed) Stabilization of local governments, Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative Open Society Institute, pp. 241–289.
68.
ThiebenU (2003) “Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries”, Fiscal Studies, 24(3):237–274.
69.
UmaimaA. and EatzazA. (2017) “Growth Effects of Fiscal Decentralization: The Role of Macroeconomic Stability and Governance Institutions”, FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1):276–289.
70.
WorthingtonA.C. (2000) “Cost efficiency in Australian local government: A comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometrical approaches”, Financial Accountability and Management, 16(3):201–223.
71.
WorthingtonA.C. and DolleryB.E. (2001) “Measuring efficiency in local government: An analysis of New South Wales municipalities' domestic waste management function”, Policy Studies Journal, 29(2):232–249.
72.
Zafra-GómezJ.L. and Muñz-PerezM.A. (2010) “Overcoming cost-inefficiencies within small municipalities: Improve financial condition or reduce the quality of public services?”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(4): 232–249.
73.
ZhuJ (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Let the data speak for themselves.Joe Zhu (CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform).
