This article reports on a survey study into provisional career determinants of masters in public administration (MPA) students and masters in business administration (MBA) students (N = 131) in the Netherlands. The survey measures whether both student groups hold different values, motivations, and sector perceptions and how these, in turn, determine provisional sector choices right before they graduate. Differences between both groups are larger and more classical than current literature and previous studies suggest: MPA students hold public values, have high levels of public service motivation (PSM), positive public sector perceptions and negative private sector perceptions, and opt without exception for a public sector career. For MBA students, the results are completely opposite. Arguably, both groups have a rather nullified image of professional lives in both sectors, reinforced by their respective degree programs. Implications are offered for future debates on public and private sector differences and the relation between attraction and socialization of different people types by both sectors.
AllisonG. T. (1979, November). Public and private management: Are they fundamentally alike in all unimportant respects?Proceedings of the Public Management Research Conference, Washington, DC, pp. 27-38.
2.
BlauP. M.DuncanO. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York, NY: Wiley.
3.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference?Journal of Management Studies, 39, 97-122.
4.
BozemanB. (2004). All organizations are public. Bridging public and private organizational theories (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BuelensM.van den BroeckH. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67, 65-74.
6.
ChristieP. M. J.KwonI. G.StoeberlP. A.BaumhartR. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ethical attitudes of business managers: India, Korea and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 263-287.
7.
de GraafN. D.de GraafP. M. (1996). De invloed van socialisatie op leefstijlen: Tellen restricties uit het verleden ook mee? [The influence of socialization on lifestyles: Do past restrictions count?] In GanzeboomH. B. G.LindenbergS. (Eds.), verklarende sociologie: Opstellen voor Reinhard Wippler (pp. 329-341). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Thesis Publishers.
8.
De Volkskrant (2009, March31). Ethiek leeft niet op MBA-scholen VS [Ethics not alive at MBA-schools US]. Thijs Plug, p. 8.
9.
EliasR. Z. (2004). An examination of business students’ perception of corporate social responsibilities before and after bankruptcies. Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 267-281.
10.
FortanierF.KolkA. (2007). On the economic dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Exploring fortune global 250 reports. Business & Society, 46, 457-478.
11.
FowlerF. J. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). London, England: Sage.
12.
FredericksonH. G. (2005). Public ethics and the new managerialism: An axiomatic theory. In FredericksonH. G.GhereR. K. (Eds.), Ethics in public management (pp. 165-183). New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
13.
GabrisG. T.DavisT. J. (2009, June6-8). Measuring public service motivation in MPA students: Does the construct influence student perception toward the application of management techniques and role behavior in the public sector?Paper presented at the IPSM Conference, Bloomington, IN.
14.
GregoryR. J. (1999). Social capital theory and administrative reform: Maintaining ethical probity in public service. Public Administration Review, 59, 63-76.
15.
GrünbaumL. (1997). Attitudes of future managers towards business ethics: A comparison of Finnish and American business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 451-463.
16.
InfeldD. L.QiG.AdamsW. C.LinA. (2009, June6-8). Work values and career choices of public administration and public policy students in the U.S. and China. Paper presented at the IPSM Conference, Bloomington, IN.
17.
KarlK. A.SuttonC. L. (1998). Job values in today’s workface: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Public Personnel Management, 27, 515-527.
18.
KickertW. J. M. (Ed.). (1993). Veranderingen in Management en Organisatie bij de Rijksoverheid [Changes in management and organization in federal government]. Alphen aan de Rijn, Netherlands: Samson.
19.
LentD.WijnenP. W. (2007). “War for talent.” Alleen bij het grote geld. Retrieved from http://www.nrc.nl/economie
20.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2005, April6-8). Is the public service ethic in decline?Paper presented at the Ninth International Research Symposium on Public Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
21.
LyonsS. T.DuxburyL. E.HigginsC. A. (2006). A comparison of the values and commitment of private sector, public sector, and parapublic sector employees. Public Administration Review, 66, 605-618.
22.
PageM.OldfieldC.UrstadB. (2008). Why not teach “diversity” to public sector managers?International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 368-382.
23.
PerryJ. L. (1997). Antecedents of public service motivation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 181-197.
24.
PerryJ. L.HondeghemA. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation in public management. The call of public service. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
PerryJ. L.MeschD.PaarlbergL. (2006). Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review, 66, 505-514.
26.
PollittC.van ThielS.HomburgV. (Eds.). (2007). New public management in Europe. Adaption and alternatives. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
PosnerB. Z.SchmidtW. H. (1993). Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 341-347.
28.
PosnerB. Z.SchmidtW. H. (1996). The values of business and federal government executives: More different than alike. Public Personnel Management, 25, 277-289.
29.
RaineyH. G.BozemanB. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 447-470.
30.
Redman-SimmonsL. M. (2008, September). Graduate students’ attraction to government public service professions. Paper presented at Minnowbrook III Conference, Lake Placid, NY.
31.
RichardsC. H.GilbertJ.HarrisJ. R. (2002). Assessing ethics education needs in the MBA program. Teaching Business Ethics, 6, 447-476.
32.
StackmanR. W.ConnorP. E.BeckerB.W. (2006). Sectoral ethos: An comparison of the personal values systems of female and male managers in the public and private sectors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 577-597.
33.
SteijnA. J. (2006). Ambtenaren dienen graag een publiek belang [Public servants happily serve the public interest]. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit.
34.
VandenabeeleW. (2008). Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice. Public Administration, 86, 1089-1105.
35.
van der WalZ. (2008). Value solidity. Differences, similarities and conflicts between the organizational values of government and business. Amsterdam, Netherlands: VU University.
36.
van der WalZ.de GraafG. (2006-2007). The bureaucrat, the businessperson, and the perception of each other’s values. Empirical notions on the other sector’s most important organizational values. Public Integrity, 9, 45-62.
37.
van der WalZ.de GraafG.LasthuizenK. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86, 465-482.
38.
van HooftE. A. J. (2004). Job seeking as planned behavior: In search of group differences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). VU Amsterdam, Netherlands.
39.
RWI. (2008) Loopbaanoriëntatie en -begeleiding mee laten wegen bij kwaliteitsbeoordeling scholen RWI: arbeidsmarkt vraagt om betere studie- en beroepskeuze. Available from www.ezpress.eu
