The experience of grace is currently attracting increased empirical interest. Validated instruments to assess aspects of the experience of grace in a secularized context are scarce which limits current psychological research on grace in other than highly religious populations. We present a bottom-up construction of the Experiencing Grace Scale (EGS) and evidence supporting its reliability and validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit for the four subscales: Appraising Grace, Giving Grace, Receiving Grace, and Divine Grace. Reliability analysis showed overall good internal consistency and test–retest stability. Convergent validity was demonstrated by means of expected associations between subscales of the EGS and other relevant measures. Predictive validity was confirmed by associations between subscales of the EGS at measurement Wave 1 with mental well-being scales at Wave 2. The EGS contributes to further research on the experience of grace and its relationship to other psychosocial variables in the field of positive psychology.
BassettR. L., & the Roberts Wesleyan College Psychology Research Group. (2013). An empirical consideration of grace and legalism within Christian experience. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 32, 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2014.906064
2.
BeckenbachJ.PatrickS.SellsJ. (2010). Relationship conflict and restoration model: A preliminary exploration of concepts and therapeutic utility. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 32, 290–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-010-9117-3
3.
BeinertW.FiorenzaF. S. (Eds.) (1995). Handbook of Catholic theology. Crossroad Publishing Company.
4.
BetzD.Browning DonS.JanowskiB.JüngelE. (2007). Religion past & present: Encyclopedia of theology and religion. Brill.
5.
BlackburnA. M.SisemoreT. A.SmithR. E.ReD. (2012). Hope and forgiveness as mediators of enacted grace in Christians: A survey with implications for psychotherapy [Paper presentation]. Meeting of the Christian Association for Psychological Studies, Washington, DC.
6.
BriggsS. R.CheekJ. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54(1), 106–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00391.x
7.
BronteJ. C.WadeJ. (2012). The experience of grace: Divine assistance in making a change. Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 44(2), 182–223.
BuffordR. K.SisemoreT. A.BlackburnA. M. (2017). Dimensions of grace: Factor analysis of three grace scales. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(1), Article 56. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rel0000064
10.
Catholic Encyclopedia (1909). Robert Appleton Company (Vol.5). The Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F.WeintraubJ. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267
13.
CaryP. (2008). Inner Grace: Augustine in the traditions of Plato and Paul. Oxford University Press.
CookD. A.BeckmanT. J. (2006). Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. The American Journal of Medicine, 119(2), 166–16.e7.
16.
CookJ. D. (2013). Relational Attitudes Conflict Exam (GRACE) Scale: An exploratory factor analysis [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University].
17.
CunninghamL. (2003). Grace can do more: Spiritual accompaniment and spiritual growth. Cistercian Studies Quarterly, 38(2), 234–236.
18.
DeAngelisR. T.EllisonC. G. (2017). Kept in his care: The role of perceived divine control in positive reappraisal coping. Religions, 8(8), Article 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8080133
19.
De LubacH. D. (1946). Surnaturel: études historiques/Supernatural: historical studies. Parijs.
20.
DeVellisR. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Sage.
21.
DezutterJ.RobertsonL.LuyckxK.HutsebautD. (2010). Life satisfaction in chronic pain patients: The stress-buffering role of the centrality of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(3), 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2010.01525.x
22.
DienerE. D.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
DudleyR. L. (1995). Grace, relevancy, and confidence in the future: Why Adventist young adults commit to the church. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 14, 215–227.
25.
EmmonsR. A.HillP. C.BarrettJ. L.KapicK. M. (2017). Psychological and theological reflections on grace and its relevance for science and practice. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(3), 276–284. dois:http://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000136
26.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (11.0 update, 4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
27.
GliemJ. A.GliemR. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales [Conference session]. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
28.
GoetzJ. L.KeltnerD.Simon-ThomasE. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018807
29.
GravesM. (2017). Grace and virtue: Theological and psychological dispositions and practices. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(3), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000129
HealeR.TwycrossA. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66–67.
33.
HermanG. (2002). Ritualised friendship and the Greek city. Cambridge University Press.
34.
HodgeA. S.HookJ. N.DavisD. E.Van TongerenD. R.BuffordR. K.BassettR. L.McMinnM. R. (2021). Experiencing grace: A review of the empirical literature. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 17, 375–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1858943
35.
HwangJ. Y.PlanteT.LackeyK. (2008). The development of the Santa Clara Brief Compassion Scale: An abbreviation of Sprecher and Fehr’s Compassionate Love Scale. Pastoral Psychology, 56, 421–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-008-0117-2
36.
JamesW. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. Longmans, Green.
37.
JulkunenJ.AhlströmR. (2006). Hostility, anger, and sense of coherence as predictors of health-related quality of life. Results of an ASCOT substudy. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 61(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.12.005
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
40.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
41.
LacosteJ.-Y.RiaudelO.BeauchampP. (2007). Dictionnaire critique de théologie/Theological Dictionary. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
42.
Lawler-RowK. A.ScottC. A.RainesR. L.Edlis-MatityahouM.MooreE. W. (2007). The varieties of forgiveness experience: Working toward a comprehensive definition of forgiveness. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(2), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-006-9077-y
43.
LöwΟ. (1908). ΧΑΡΙΣ. Dissertation. Marburg.
44.
MacLachlanB. (1993). The age of grace: Charis in early greek poetry. Princeton University Press.
45.
MarksD. C. (2010). The mind under grace: Why theology is an essential nutrient for spiritual growth.(Cover story). Christianity Today, 54(3), 22.
46.
McCulloughM. E.EmmonsR. A.TsangJ. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112–127. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112
47.
McMinnM. R. (2010). Sin and grace in Christian counseling: An integrative paradigm. InterVarsity Press.
48.
McMinnM. R.RuizJ. N.MarxD.WrightJ. B.GilbertN. B. (2006). Professional psychology and the doctrines of sin and grace: Christian leaders’ perspectives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.37.3.295
49.
MeissnerW. W. (1966). Foundations for a psychology of grace. Paulist Press.
50.
NeffK. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
51.
NeffK. D.RudeS. S.KirkpatrickK. L. (2007). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 908–916. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.002
52.
New Catholic Encyclopedia. (1967). MacGraw-Hill.
53.
OakesE. T. (2016). A theology of grace in six controversies. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
54.
PatrickS.BeckenbachJ.SellsJ.ReardonR. F. (2013). An empirical investigation into justice, grace, and forgiveness: Paths to relationship satisfaction. The Family Journal, 21(2), 146–153.
55.
PaytonJ. T.SpradlinJ. D.BuffordR. K. (2000, March). A measure of grace: Preliminary development of a grace scale [Paper presentation]. Christian Association for Psychological Studies annual meetings, Tulsa, OK.
56.
PerinettiG. (2018). StaTips Part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South European Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research, 5(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr5-17434
RahnerK. (1954). Über das Verhältnis von Natur und Gnade. Schriften zur Theologie, 1, 323–345.
59.
RaoM. A.DonaldsonS. I. (2015). Expanding opportunities for diversity in positive psychology: An examination of gender, race, and ethnicity. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 56(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000036
60.
RoachK. E. (2006). Measurement of health outcomes: Reliability, validity and responsiveness. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 18(6), 8–12.
61.
RogersC. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Houghton Mifflin.
62.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more. Version 0.5–12 (BETA). Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
63.
RushC. L.MastersK. S.WooldridgeJ. S.RanbyK. W. (2023). Is grace amazing or old wine in a new bottle? Psychometric development of the Perceptions and Experiences of Grace Scale (PEGS). Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 15, 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000465
SchellekensT.DillenA.DezutterJ. (2020). Experiencing grace: A thematic network analysis of person-level narratives. Open Theology, 6(1), 360–373. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0108
66.
Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74. http://www.mpr-online.de
67.
SchillebeeckxE. (1977). Gerechtigheid en Liefde, Genade en Bevrijding/Justice and Love, Grace and Liberation. Bloemendaal.
68.
SellsJ. N.BeckenbachJ.PatrickS. (2009). Pain and defense versus grace and justice: The relational conflict and restoration model. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 17(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480709337802
69.
SisemoreT. A.ArbuckleM.KillianM.MortellaroE.SwansonM.FisherR.McGinnisJ. (2011). Grace and Christian Psychology-Part 1: Preliminary measurement, relationships, and implications for practice. Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Christian Psychology, 4(2).
70.
SnyderC. R.LopezS. J. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford university press.
71.
SpradlinJ. D. (2002). Shame, grace, and spirituality: A comparison of measures [Doctoral dissertation, George Fox University].
ToussaintL.FriedmanP. (2009). Forgiveness, gratitude, and well-being: The mediating role of affect and beliefs. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 635–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-008-9111-8gr
74.
ToussaintL. L.WorthingtonE. L. J.WilliamsD. R. (2015). Forgiveness and health. Springer Netherlands.
75.
Van de VeldeS.LevecqueK.BrackeP. (2009). Measurement equivalence of the CES-D 8 in the general population in Belgium: A gender perspective. Archives of Public Health, 67(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1186/0778-7367-67-1-15
76.
VersteegenT. J. M. (2013). Geleefde genade: Een bijdrage aan de theologie van genade vanuit ervaringen van katholieke vrouwen [Doctoral dissertation, Narratio].
77.
WahkingH. (1992). Spiritual growth through grace and forgiveness. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 198–206.
WatsonP. J.ChenZ.SisemoreT. A. (2011). Grace and Christian psychology—Pt. 2: Psychometric refinements and relationships with self-compassion, depression, beliefs about sin, and religious orientation. Edification: The Transdisciplinary Journal of Christian Psychology, 4, 64–72.
80.
WatsonP. J.HoodR. W.Jr.MorrisR. J.HallJ. R. (1985). Religiosity, sin, and self-esteem. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 13, 116–128.
81.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J.HoodR. W.Jr. (1988a). Sin and self-functioning, Pt. 1: Grace, guilt, and self-consciousness. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 16, 254–269.
82.
WatsonP. J.MorrisR. J.HoodR. W.Jr. (1988b). Sin and self-functioning, Pt. 2: Grace, guilt, and psychological adjustment. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 16, 270–281.
WorthingtonR. L.WhittakerT. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0011000006288127
