Like other quantitative social scientists, network researchers benefit from pooling information from multiple observed variables to infer underlying (latent) attributes or social processes. Appropriate network data for this task is increasingly available. The inherent dependencies in relational data, however, pose unique challenges. This is especially true for the ascendant tasks of cross-network comparisons and multilevel network analysis. The author draws on item response theory and multilevel (mixed effects) modeling to propose a methodological approach that accounts for these dependencies and allows the analyst to model variation of latent dyadic traits across relations, actors, and groups precisely and parsimoniously. Examples demonstrate the approach’s utility for three important research areas: tie strength in adolescent friendships, group differences in how discussing personal problems relates to tie strength, and the analysis of multiple relations.
BearmanPeterParigiPaolo. 2004. “Cloning Headless Frogs and Other Important Matters: Conversation Topics and Network Structure.”Social Forces83(2):535–57.
2.
BleiDavid M.KucukelbirAlpMcAuliffeJon D.2017. “Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticians.”Journal of the American Statistical Association112(518):859–77.
3.
BuerknerPaul-Christian. 2016. “Brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan.”Journal of Statistical Software80(1):1–28.
4.
BurtRonald S.1997. “A Note on Social Capital and Network Content.”Social Networks19(4):355–73.
5.
ButtsCarter T.2003. “Network Inference, Error, and Informant (In) Accuracy: A Bayesian Approach.”Social Networks25(2):103–40.
6.
de BoeckPaulWilsonMark. 2004. Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach. New York: Springer.
7.
DouglasJeffrey A.RoussosLouis A.StoutWilliam. 1996. “Item-Bundle DIF Hypothesis Testing: Identifying Suspect Bundles and Assessing Their Differential Functioning.”Journal of Educational Measurement33(4):465–84.
8.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1985a. “Measurement and Structure: Strategies for the Design and Analysis of Subjective Survey Data.” Pp. 179–229 in Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 1, edited by TurnerC. F.MartinE.New York: Russell Sage.
9.
DuncanOtis Dudley. 1985b. “Rasch Measurement: Further Examples and Discussion.” Pp. 367–403 in Surveying Subjective Phenomena, Vol. 2, edited by TurnerC. F.MartinE.New York: Russell Sage.
10.
EaglyAlice H.SteffenValerie J.1984. “Gender Stereotypes Stem from the Distribution of Women and Men into Social Roles.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology46(4):735.
11.
EmbretsonSusan E.1996. “The New Rules of Measurement.”Psychological Assessment8(4):341–49.
12.
FerligojAnuškaHlebecValentina. 1995. “Reliability of Network Measurements.” Pp. 219–32 in Contributions to Methodology and Statistics: Proceedings of the International Conference on Statistics and Methodology, Bled, Slovenia, September 13–15, 1993, edited by FerligojA.KrambergerA.Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana Press.
13.
FerligojAnuškaHlebecValentina. 1999. “Evaluation of Social Network Measurement Instruments.”Social Networks21(2):111–30.
14.
FischerClaude S.1982. “What Do We Mean by ‘Friend’? An Inductive Study.”Social Networks3(4):287–306.
15.
FoxJean-Paul. 2010. Bayesian Item Response Modeling: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer.
16.
FoxJean-PaulGlasCees A. W.2001. “Bayesian Estimation of a Multilevel IRT Model Using Gibbs Sampling.”Psychometrika66(2):271–88.
17.
FrankKenneth A.MullerChandraMuellerAnna S.2013. “The Embeddedness of Adolescent Friendship Nominations: The Formation of Social Capital in Emergent Network Structures.”American Journal of Sociology119(1):216–53.
18.
GranovetterMark S.1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.”American Journal of Sociology78(6):1360–80.
19.
HoffPeter D.2005. “Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data.”Journal of the American Statistical Association100(469):286–95.
20.
HoffPeter D.2009. “Multiplicative Latent Factor Models for Description and Prediction of Social Networks.”Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory15(4):261–72.
21.
HoffPeterFosdickBaileyVolfovskyAlexStovelKatherine. 2013. “Likelihoods for Fixed Rank Nomination Networks.”Network Science1(3):253–77.
22.
HoffmanMatthew D.GelmanAndrew. 2014. “The No-U-Turn Sampler: Adaptively Setting Path Lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo.”Journal of Machine Learning Research15(1):1593–1623.
23.
IacobucciDawnNeelameghamR.HopkinsNigel. 1999. “Measurement Quality Issues in Dyadic Models of Relationships.”Social Networks21(3):211–37.
24.
JeonMinjeongde BoeckPaul. 2016. “A Generalized Item Response Tree Model for Psychological Assessments.”Behavior Research Methods48(3):1070–85.
KogovšekTinaFerligojAnuškaCoendersGermaSarisWillem E.2002. “Estimating the Reliability and Validity of Personal Support Measures: Full Information ML Estimation with Planned Incomplete Data.”Social Networks24(1):1–20.
27.
KrackhardtDavid. 1987. “Cognitive Social Structures.”Social Networks9(2):109–34.
28.
KreagerDerek A.HaynieDana L.2011. “Dangerous Liaisons? Dating and Drinking Diffusion in Adolescent Peer Networks.”American Sociological Review76(5):737–63.
29.
LazegaEmmanuelvan DuijnMarijtje. 1997. “Position in Formal Structure, Personal Characteristics and Choices of Advisors in a Law Firm: A Logistic Regression Model for Dyadic Network Data.”Social Networks19(4):375–97.
30.
LeeFrancisButtsCarter T.2018. “Mutual Assent or Unilateral Nomination? A Performance Comparison of Intersection and Union Rules for Integrating Self-Reports of Social Relationships.”Social Networks55:55–62.
31.
LewandowskiDanielKurowickaDorotaJoeHarry. 2009. “Generating Random Correlation Matrices Based on Vines and Extended Onion Method.”Journal of Multivariate Analysis100(9):1989–2001.
32.
MacCallumRobert C.BrowneMichael W.SugawaraHazuki M.1996. “Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling.”Psychological Methods1(2):130.
33.
MarcumChristopher StevenBevcChristine A.ButtsCarter T.2012. “Mechanisms of Control in Emergent Interorganizational Networks.”Policy Studies Journal40(3):516–46.
34.
MarsdenPeter V.CampbellKaren E.1984. “Measuring Tie Strength.”Social Forces63(2):482–501.
McFarlandDaniel A.MoodyJamesDiehlDavidSmithJeffrey A.ThomasReuben J.2014. “Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure.”American Sociological Review79(6):1088–1121.
37.
McNellesLaurie R.ConnollyJennifer A.1999. “Intimacy between Adolescent Friends: Age and Gender Differences in Intimate Affect and Intimate Behaviors.”Journal of Research on Adolescence9(2):143.
38.
McPhersonMillerSmith-LovinLynnBrashearsMatthew E.2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.”American Sociological Review71(3):353–75.
39.
MeadGeorge H.1967. Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
MeuldersMichelXieYiyu. 2004. “Person-by-Item Predictors.” Pp. 213–40 in Explanatory Item Response Models: A Generalized Linear and Nonlinear Approach, edited by de BoeckP.WilsonM.New York: Springer.
41.
NewmanM.E.J.2018. “Network Structure from Rich but Noisy Data.”Nature Physics14(6):542.
42.
PayneDanielle C.CornwellBenjamin. 2007. “Reconsidering Peer Influences on Delinquency: Do Less Proximate Contacts Matter?”Journal of Quantitative Criminology23(2):127–49.
43.
PolsonNicholas G.ScottJames G.2012. “On the Half-Cauchy Prior for a Global Scale Parameter.”Bayesian Analysis7(4):887–902.
44.
RaudenbushStephen W.JohnsonChristopherSampsonRobert J.2003. “A Multivariate, Multilevel Rasch Model with Application to Self-Reported Criminal Behavior.”Sociological Methodology33(1):169–211.
45.
RaudenbushStephen W.SampsonRobert J.1999. “Ecometrics: Toward a Science of Assessing Ecological Settings, with Application to the Systematic Social Observation of Neighborhoods.”Sociological Methodology29(1):1–41.
46.
RoseAmanda J.RudolphKaren D.2006. “A Review of Sex Differences in Peer Relationship Processes: Potential Trade-Offs for the Emotional and Behavioral Development of Girls and Boys.”Psychological Bulletin132(1):98–131.
47.
RueHåvardMartinoSaraChopinNicolas. 2009. “Approximate Bayesian Inference for Latent Gaussian Models by Using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)71(2):319–92.
48.
RueHåvardRieblerAndreaSørbyeSigrunn H.IllianJanine B.SimpsonDaniel P.LindgrenFinn K.2017. “Bayesian Computing with INLA: A Review.”Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application4(1):395–421.
49.
RuschThomasLowryPaul BenjaminMairPatrickTreiblmaierHorst. 2017. “Breaking Free from the Limitations of Classical Test Theory: Developing and Measuring Information Systems Scales Using Item Response Theory.”Information & Management54(2):189–203.
50.
SmallMario Luis. 2013. “Weak Ties and the Core Discussion Network: Why People Regularly Discuss Important Matters with Unimportant Alters.”Social Networks35(3):470–83.
51.
SmithSanneMcFarlandDaniel A.Van TubergenFrankMaasIneke. 2016. “Ethnic Composition and Friendship Segregation: Differential Effects for Adolescent Natives and Immigrants.”American Journal of Sociology121(4):1223–72.
52.
SnijdersTom A. B.2016. “The Multiple Flavours of Multilevel Issues for Networks.” Pp. 15–46 in Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
53.
SnijdersTom A. B.KennyDavid A.1999. “The Social Relations Model for Family Data: A Multilevel Approach.”Personal Relationships6(4):471–86.
van den NoortgateWimde BoeckPaul. 2005. “Assessing and Explaining Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Mixed Models.”Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics30(4):443–64.
56.
van DuijnMarijtjeSnijdersTom A. B.ZijlstraBonne J. H.2004. “P2: A Random Effects Model with Covariates for Directed Graphs.”Statistica Neerlandica58(2):234–54.
57.
VerbruggeLois M.1979. “Multiplexity in Adult Friendships.”Social Forces57(4):1286–1309.
WarnerRebecca M.KennyDavid A.StotoMichael. 1979. “A New Round Robin Analysis of Variance for Social Interaction Data.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology37(10):1742–57.
60.
ZablockiBenjamin David. 1980. Alienation and Charisma: A Study of Contemporary American Communes. New York: Free Press.
61.
ZijlstraBonne J. H.van DuijnMarijtje A. J.SnijdersTom A. B.2006. “The Multilevel P2 Model: A Random Effects Model for the Analysis of Multiple Social Networks.”Methodology2(1):42–47.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
