To minimize survey nonresponse, psychological characteristics of respondents should be taken into consideration. One characteristic that could be related to survey response is procrastination, that is, the tendency to delay intended and necessary important activities. We applied exploratory factor analysis and IRT analysis to assess the dimensionality, reliability, and validity of a short procrastination scale (PFS-4, see Glöckner-Rist et al., 2014) in a general population telephone survey in Germany. Furthermore, we used logistic regression to determine what activities were interrupted in order to participate in the survey and whether procrastination played a role in this regard. Procrastination can be measured economically and easily in telephone surveys and is an important predictor of survey participation when individuals are engaged in work activities or satisfying basic needs when they are called. This knowledge may help to develop strategies to further reduce nonresponse in population surveys conducted on landline and mobile phones.
AitkenME (1982) A Personality Profile of the College Student Procrastinator. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Dissertation Abstracts International43: 722.
2.
AndersenEB (1973) A Goodness of Fit Test for the Rasch Model. Psychometrika38(1): 123–140.
3.
BentlerP (1990) Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin107(2): 238–246.
4.
BethlehemJGCobbenFSchoutenB (2011) Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
5.
BeullensKLoosveldtGVandenplasCStoopI (2018) Response Rates in the European Social Survey: Increasing, Decreasing, or a Matter of Fieldwork Efforts?Survey Methods: Insights from the Field. Available at: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=9673
6.
BeutelMEKleinEMAufenangerSBrählerEDreierMMüllerKW (2016) Procrastination, Distress and Life Satisfaction across the Age Range – A German Representative Community Study. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0148054.
BrannickMT (1995) Critical Comments on Applying Covariance Structure Modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior16(3): 201–213. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030160303
9.
BrickJMWilliamsD (2013) Explaining Rising Nonresponse Rates in Cross-Sectional Surveys. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science645(1): 36–59. DOI: 10.1177/0002716212456834
10.
BrustOAHäderSHäderM (2016) Is the Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-S) Applicable for Use in Telephone Surveys?Journal of Official Statistics32(3): 601–618. DOI: 10.1515/JOS-2016-0031
11.
ChangLKrosnickJ (2009) National Surveys Via RDD Telephone Interviewing vs. the Internet: Comparing Sample Representativeness and Response Quality. Public Opinion Quarterly73(4): 641–678.
12.
ChenFF (2007) Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling14(3): 464–504.
13.
CheungGWRensvoldRB (1999) Testing Factorial Invariance Across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method. Journal of Management25(1): 1–27.
14.
DayVMensinkDO’SullivanM (2000) Patterns of Academic Procrastination. Journal of College Reading and Learning30(2): 120–134.
15.
De LeeuwEHoxJLuitenA (2018) International Nonresponse Trends across Countries and Years: An Analysis of 36 Years of Labour Force Survey Data. Survey Methods: Insights From the Field. Available at: https://surveyinsights.org/?p=10452
16.
DillmanDASmythJDChristianLM (2009) The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
17.
DunneMPMartinNGBailyJMHeathACBucholzKKMaddenPFStathamDJ (1997) Participation Bias in a Sexuality Survey: Psychological and Behavioural Characteristics of Responders and Non-Responders. International Journal of Epidemiology26(4): 844–854.
18.
EngelUSchmidtBO (2019) Unit- und Item-Nonreponse. In: BaurNBlasiusNHandbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (Handbook Methods of Empirical Social Research). Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 383–404.
19.
EllisAKnausWJ (1977) Overcoming Procrastination. New York: Signet Books.
20.
EysenckHJ (1967) The Biological Basis of Personality Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
21.
FerrariJREmmonsRA (1995) Methods of Procrastination and their Relation to Self-Control and Self-Reinforcement: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality10(1): 135–142.
22.
FerrariJRJohnsonJLMcCownWG (1995) Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research and Treatment. New York: Plenum.
23.
FerrariJRO’CallaghanJNewbeginI (2005) Prevalence of Procrastination in the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia: Arousal and Avoidance Delays Among Adults. North American Journal of Psychology7(1): 2–6.
24.
FloraDBCurranPJ (2004) An Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Methods of Estimation for Confirmatory Factor Analysis With Ordinal Data. Psychological Methods9(4): 466–491.
25.
FoxCMJonesJA (1998) Uses of Rasch Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research. Journal of Counseling Psychology45(1): 30–45.
26.
GablerSHäderSLehnhoffIMardianE (2012) Weighting for Unequal Inclusion Probabilities and Nonresponse in Dual Frame Telephone Surveys. In: HäderSHäderMKühneM (Eds.) Telephone Surveys in Europe. Research and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 147–167.
27.
GablerSHäderS (2016) Special Challenges of Sampling for Comparative Surveys. In: WolfCJoyeDSmithTWFuYC (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Los Angeles: Sage, 346–355.
28.
Glöckner-RistAEngberdingMHöckerARistF (2014) Prokrastinationsfragebogen für Studierende (PFS). In: DannerDGlöckner-RistA (eds) Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. DOI: 10.6102/zis140
29.
GrovesRMDillmanDASingerECorningA (2000) Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation. Description and an Illustration. Public Opinion Quarterly64(3): 299–308.
30.
GrovesRMFowlerFJCouperMPLepkowskiJMSingerE.TourangeauR (2009) Survey Methodology. Second edition. New York: John Wiley.
31.
HäderMHäderS (2009) Telefonbefragungen über das Mobilfunknetz. Konzept, Design und Umsetzung einer Strategie zur Datenerhebung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
32.
HäderMKühneMSchlinzigT (2009) Mode-Effekte bei telefonischen Befragungen über Festnetz und Mobilfunk: Auswirkungen auf die Datenqualität. In: HäderMHäderS (eds) Telefonbefragungen über das Mobilfunknetz. Konzept, Design und Umsetzung einer Strategie zur Datenerhebung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 45–62.
33.
HäderM (2012) Data Quality in Telephone Surveys via Mobile and Landline Phone. In: HäderSHäderMKühneM (eds) Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice. Berlin: Springer, 247–264.
34.
HäderMKühneM (2009) Mode-Effekte. In: HäderMHäderS (eds) Telefonbefragungen über das Festnetz. Konzept, Design und Umsetzung einer Strategie zur Datenerhebung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 165–174.
35.
HäderS (2016) Sampling in practice. GESIS Survey Guidelines. Mannheim, Germany: GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences. DOI: 10.15465/gesis-sg_en_014
HeckhausenJHeckhausenH (2018) Motivation und Handeln. 5. Auflage. Berlin: Springer
38.
HinschCSheldonKM (2013) The Impact of Frequent Social Internet Consumption: Increased Procrastination and Lower Life Satisfaction. J. Consumer Behav. 12(6): 496–505.
39.
HuLBentlerPM (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling6(1): 1–55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
40.
IBM Corp. (2017) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
41.
KalilASchweingruberHASeefeldtKS (2001) Correlates of Employment Among Welfare Recipients: Do Psychological Characteristics and Attitudes Matter?American Journal of Community Psychology29(5): 701–723.
42.
KasperDLFauciASHauserSLLongoDLJamesonJLLoscalzoJ (2015) Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 19th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
43.
KlingerE (1996) The Contents of Thoughts: Interference as the Downside of Adaptive Normal Mechanisms in Thought Flow. In: SarasonIGPierceGRSarasonBR (eds) Cognitive Interference: Theories, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 3–23.
44.
KlingerE (1999) Thought Flow: Properties and Mechanisms Underlying Shifts in Content. In: SingerJASaloveyP (eds) At Play in the Fields of Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Jerome L. Singer. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 29–50.
45.
KlingsieckK (2013) Procrastination in Different Life-Domains: Is Procrastination Domain-Specific?Current Psychology32(2): 175–185.
46.
LangFRJohnDLüdtkeOSchuppJWagnerGB (2011) Short Assessment of the Big Five: Robust Across Survey Methods Except Telephone Interviewing. Behavior Research Methods43(2): 548–567. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z
MalhortaNKrosnickJA (2007) The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples. Political Analyses15(3): 286–323.
49.
MarshHWBallaJRMcDonaldRP (1988) Goodness of Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size. Psychological Bulletin103: 391–410. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
50.
MarshHWHauKTWenZ (2004) In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers of Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings. Structural Equation Modeling11(3): 320–341. DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
51.
MarshHWMuthénBAsparouhovALüdtkeORobitzschAMorinAJSTrautweinU (2009) Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching. Structural Equation Modeling16(3): 439–476. DOI: 10.1080/10705510903008220
52.
MarshHWNagengastBMorinAJS (2013) Measurement Invariance of Big-Five Factors over the Life Span: ESEM Test of Gender, Age, Plasticity, Maturity, and la Dolce Vita Effects. Developmental Psychology49(6): 1194–1218. DOI: 10.1037/a0026913
53.
MastersGN (1982) A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring. Psychometrika47(2): 149–174.
54.
MeierAReineckeLMeltzerCE (2016) ‘Facebocrastination’? Predictors of Using Facebook for Procrastination and its Effects on Students’ Well-Being. Computers in Human Behavior64: 65–76.
MuthénLKMuthénBO (2012) Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
58.
PasekJKrosnickJA (2011) Measuring Intent to Participate and Participation in the 2010 Census and their Correlates and Trends. Comparisons of RDD Telephone and Non-Probability Sample Internet Survey Data. Working Paper.
59.
PychylTALeeJMThibodeauRBluntA (2000) Five Days of Emotion: An Experience Sampling Study of Undergraduate Student Procrastination. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality15(5): 239–254.
60.
ReineckeLMeierAAufenangerSBeutelMEDreierMQuiringOMüllerKW (2016) Permanently Online and Permanently Procrastinating? The Mediating Role of Internet Use for the Effects of Trait Procrastination on Psychological Health and Well-Being. New Media & Society20(3): 862–880.
61.
RistFEngberdingMPatzeltJBeißnerJ (2006) Aber morgen fange ich wirklich an. Fachbeiträge Personalführung6: 64–78.
62.
RommelseNNJGeurtsHMFrankeBBuitelaarJKHartmanCA (2011) A Review on Cognitive and Brain Endophenotypes that may be Common in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Facilitate the Search for Pleiotropic Genes. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews35(6): 1363–1396. DOI: 10.1007/s0078 7-010-0092-x
63.
SamejimaF (1969) Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement34(4/Pt. 2): 100.
64.
SchneideratGSchlinzigT (2012) Mobile- and Landline-Onlys in Dual-Frame-Approaches: Effects on Sample Quality. In: HäderSHäderMKühneM (eds) Telephone Surveys in Europe: Research and Practice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 121–145.
65.
SteelP (2007) The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure. Psychological Bulletin133(1): 65–94.
66.
SteelP (2010) Arousal, Avoidant and Decisional Procrastinators: Do They Exist?Personality and Individual Differences48 (8): 926–934. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.025
67.
StoopI (2005) The Hunt for the Last Respondent. Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands.
68.
SiroisFMPychylT (2013) Procrastination and the Priority of Short-Term Mood Regulation: Consequences for Future Self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass7(2): 115–127.
69.
SokolovEN (1963) Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
70.
TaurinesRSchwenckCWesterwaldESachseMSiniatchkinMFreitagC (2012) ADHD and Autism: Differential Diagnosis or Overlapping Traits? A Selective Review. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders4(3):115–139. DOI: 10.1007/s1240 2-012-0086-2
71.
TiceDMBaumeisterRF (1997) Longitudinal Study of Procrastination, Performance, Stress, and Health: The Costs and Benefits of Dawdling. Psychological Science8(6): 454–458.
72.
TuckerLLewisC (1973) A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis. Psychometrika38(1): 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291170
WilliamsDBrickM (2018) Trends in US Face-to-Face Household Survey. Nonresponse and Effort. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology6(2): 186–211.
75.
YeagerDSKrosnickJAChangLJavitzHSLevenduskyMSSimpserAWangR (2011) Comparing the Accuracy of RDD Telephone Surveys and Internet Surveys Conducted with Probability and Non-Probability Samples. Public Opinion Quarterly75(4): 709–747.
76.
YockeyRD (2016) Validation of the Short Form of the Academic Procrastination Scale. Psychological Reports118(1): 171–179.
77.
YuCY (2002) Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
78.
YuCMuthénB (2002) Evaluation of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Categorical and Continuous Outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans.
