It has often been claimed that conditionals have a special relation to modality. This study tests this claim empirically by examining the frequency of modal marking in a number of conditional and non-conditional structures using a corpus-based approach. It then seeks to provide explanations for the emerging frequency patterns in light of the tenets of two linguistic theories: Lexical Grammar and Construction Grammar. This juxtaposition was motivated by the substantial overlap in their tenets: both take into account meaning (semantic and pragmatic), as well as lexical and grammatical factors.
AdamsonGeorge W.BawdenDavid. 1981. Comparison of hierarchical cluster analysis techniques for automatic classification of chemical structures. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 21(4). 204-209.
2.
AthanasiadouAngelikiDirvenRene. 1996. Typology of if-clauses. In CasadEugene H. (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, 609-654. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
3.
AthanasiadouAngelikiDirvenRene. 1997. Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. In AthanasiadouAngelikiDirvenRene (eds.), On conditionals again, 61-96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4.
Baeza-YatesRicardoRibeiro-NetoBerthier. 1999. Modern information retrieval. London: Addison Wesley.
5.
BallCatherine N.1994. Automated text analysis: Cautionary tales. Literary and Linguistic Computing9(4). 265-302.
6.
BiberDouglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BiberDouglasConradSusanReppenRandi. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BybeeJoanPerkinsReverePagliucaWilliam. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
ChengWinnieGreavesChrisSinclairJohnWarrenMartin. 2009. Uncovering the extent of the phraseological tendency: Towards a systematic analysis of concgrams. Applied Linguistics30(2). 236-252.
10.
ChowdhuryGobinda G.2004. Introduction to modern information retrieval. 2nd edn.London: Facet.
11.
ComrieBernard. 1986. Conditionals: A typology. In TraugottElizabeth ClossMeulenAlice TerReillyJudy SnitzerFergusonCharles A. (eds.), On conditionals, 77-99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
12.
CroftWilliam D.CruseAlan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DancygierBarbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DancygierBarbaraSweetserEve. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
EverittBrian S.1993. Cluster analysis. 3rd edn.London: Edward Arnold.
16.
FillmoreCharles J.1986. Varieties of conditional sentences. In MillerAnnZhangZheng-sheng (eds.), Proceedings of the third Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 163-182. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.
17.
FillmoreCharles J.KayPaulO’ConnorMary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case oflet alone. Language 64(3). 501-538.
18.
FirthJohn R.1957. Papers in linguistics 1934-1951. London: Oxford University Press.
19.
FirthJohn R.1968. A synopsis of linguistic theory. In PalmerFrank R. (ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952-59, 168-205. London: Longman.
20.
FriedMirjamÖstmanJan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In FriedMirjamÖstmanJan-Ola (eds.), Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21.
GabrielatosCostas.2005. Elliptical and discontinuous if-conditionals: Co-text, context, inference, and intuitions. Paper given at Corpus Linguistics 2005, University of Birmingham, UK.
22.
GabrielatosCostas. 2006. Corpus-based evaluation of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Paper given at the 7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, Paris Diderot University, France.
23.
GabrielatosCostas. 2007a. Selecting query terms to build a specialized corpus from a restricted-access database. ICAME Journal31. 5-43.
GabrielatosCostas. 2010. A corpus-based examination of Englishif-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University PhD thesis.
26.
GabrielatosCostas. 2018. The lexicogrammar of be interested: Description and pedagogy. In HoffmannSebastianSandAndreaArndt-LappeSabineDillmannLisa Marie (eds.), Corpora and lexis, 240-276. Leiden: Brill.
27.
GabrielatosCostasTorgersenEivindHoffmannSebastianFoxSue. 2010. A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of indefinite article forms in London English. Journal of English Linguistics38(4). 297-334.
28.
GanGuojunMaChaoqunWuJianhong. 2007. Data clustering: Theory, algorithms and applications. Philadelphia: ASA-SIAM.
29.
GoldbergAdele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
GoldbergAdele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
GoldbergAdeleJackendoffRay. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language80(3). 532-568.
32.
GriesStefan Th. 2008. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics13(4). 403-437.
33.
GriesStefan Th.StefanowitschAnatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations.”International Journal of Corpus Linguistics9(1). 97-129.
34.
HallidayMichael A. K.2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn.London: Arnold.
35.
HilpertMartin. 2014. Collostructional analysis: Measuring associations between constructions and lexical elements. In GlynnDylanRobinsonJustyna A. (eds.), Corpus methods for semantics: Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 391-404. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36.
HoeyMichael. 1991. Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
HoeyMichael. 1997. From concordance to text structure: New uses for computer corpora. In MeliaPatrick JamesLewandoskaBarbara (eds.), PALC ‛97: Practical Applications in Language Corpora, 2-23. Łódź: Łódź University Press.
38.
HoeyMichael. 2005. Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. London: Routledge.
39.
HoffmannSebastianEvertStefanSmithNickLeeDavidBerglund-PrytzYlva. 2008. Corpus linguistics with BNCweb—A practical guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
40.
HuddlestonRodneyPullumGeoffrey K.2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
HughesJennifer.2018. Neural evidence for a single lexicogrammatical processing system. Paper given at Corpus Approaches to Lexicogrammar2018, Edge Hill University, UK.
42.
HundtMarianneSandAndreaSiemundRainer. 1999. Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English ‘FLOB.’Freiburg: Englisches Seminar, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
43.
HunstonSusanFrancisGill. 2000. Pattern grammar: A corpus-driven approach to the lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
44.
KimMyoung-CheolChoiKey-Sun. 1999. A comparison of collocation-based similarity measures in query expansion. Information Processing & Management35(1). 19-30.
LeechGeoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. 3rd edn.London: Longman.
47.
López-CousoMaría JoséMéndez-NayaBelén. 2001. On the history of if- and though-links with declarative complement clauses. English Language and Linguistics5(1). 93-107.
48.
López-CousoMaría JoséMéndez-NayaBelén. 2014. The use of if as a declarative complementizer in English: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. In Alcaraz-SintesAlejandroValera-HernándezSalvador (eds.), Diachrony and synchrony in English corpus linguistics, 85-107. Bern: Peter Lang.
49.
López-CousoMaría JoséMéndez-NayaBelén. 2015. Secondary grammaticalization in clause combining: From adverbial subordination to complementation in English. Language Sciences47. 188-198.
50.
LyonsJohn. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
McEneryTonyHardieAndrew. 2012. Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
MitchellT. F.1971. Linguistic “goings on”: Collocations and other lexical matters arising on the syntagmatic record. Archivum Linguisticum2(1). 35-69.
53.
NuytsJan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualisation: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
54.
PalmerFrank R.1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PalmerFrank R.1987. The English verb. 2nd edn.London: Longman.
56.
PalmerFrank R.1990. Modality and the English modals. 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
PartingtonAlan. 1998. Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58.
PerkinsMichael R.1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
59.
QuirkRandolphGreenbaumSidneyLeechGeoffreySvartvikJan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
60.
RenoufAntoinetteBanerjeeJayeeta. 2007. Lexical repulsion between sense-related pairs. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics12(3). 415-444.
61.
RomesburgH. Charles. 1984. Cluster analysis for researchers. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
62.
SinclairJohn. 1991. Corpus concordance collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63.
SinclairJohn. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus9(1). 75-106.
64.
SinclairJohn. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.
65.
SneathPeter H. A.SokalRobert R.1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: Freeman.
StefanowitschAnatolGriesStefan Th.2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics8(2). 209-243.
68.
StubbsMichael. 2001. Words and phrases: Corpus studies of lexical semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
69.
StubbsMichael. 2002. Two quantitative methods of studying phraseology in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics7(2). 215-244.
70.
StubbsMichael. 2009. The search for units of meaning: Sinclair on empirical semantics. Applied Linguistics30(1). 115-137.
71.
SweetserEve E.1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
TomaselloMichael. 2003. Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73.
TurnerKen. 2003. On neo- and post-Gricean conditionals. International Journal of Pragmatics14. 135-154.
74.
WilsonAndrew. 2013. Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. In BieswangerMarkusKoll-StobbeAmei (eds.), New approaches to the study of linguistic variability, 3-11. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
75.
WulffStefanie. 2006. Go-V vs. go-and-V in English: A case of constructional synonymy? In GriesStefan Th.StefanowitschAnatol (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 101-125. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
