This paper addresses the need for a comprehensive, corpus-based study of the prepositional passive in the recent past. Sets of prepositional passives from 1870 to 1999 were collected from the Corpus of Historical American English and compared with a control group of “regular” passive sentences. After presenting the diachronic frequency of prepositional passives over the time period, the study explores a number of special characteristics that have been suggested as being typical of the prepositional passive: lexicalization of verb + preposition, participle + noun + preposition combinations with light verbs such as made use of, coordination with another passive verb, “affectedness,” and the perceived significance of the subject referent. The results of the corpus-based investigation add new dimensions to our understanding of the construction’s use.
AbelsKlaus. 2003. Successive cyclicity, anti-locality and adposition stranding. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut PhD dissertation.
2.
BeaversJohn. 2011. On affectedness. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory29(2). 335-370.
3.
BiberDouglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4.
BiberDouglasJohanssonStigLeechGeoffreyFineganSusan Conrad Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. New York: Longman.
5.
BolingerDwight. 1975. On the passive in English. In MakkaiAdamMakkaiValerie Becker (eds.), The First LACUS Forum 1974, 57-77. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.
6.
BolingerDwight. 1977. Transitivity and spatiality: The passive of prepositional verbs. In MakkaiAdamMakkaiValerie BeckerHeilmannLuigi (eds.), Linguistics at the crossroads, 57-78. Padova: Liviana Editrice.
7.
BosseSolveigBrueningBenjaminYamadaMasahiro. 2012. Affected experiencers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory30(4). 1185-1230.
8.
BrintonLaurel J.TraugottElizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CastilloConcha. 2010. The class of prepositional passivizable verbs in English. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia42(2). 143-174.
10.
ClaridgeClaudia. 2000. Multi-word verbs in Early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Atlanta: Rodopi.
11.
Couper-KuhlenElizabeth. 1979. The prepositional passive in English: A Semantic-syntactic analysis, with a lexicon of prepositional verbs. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
DenisonDavid. 1993. English historical syntax. London: Longman.
14.
DowtyDavid. 1991. Proto-roles and argument selection. Language67(3). 547-619.
15.
DreschlerGea. 2015. Passives and the loss of verb second: A study of syntactic and information-structural factors. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University PhD dissertation.
16.
DrijkoningenFrank. 2000. Experiencer objects: Two types of ergativity. In CoopmansPeterEveraertMartinGrimshawJane (eds.), Lexical specification and insertion, 69-89. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17.
EngdahlElisabetLaanemetsAnu. 2015. Prepositional passives in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish: A corpus study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics38(3). 285-337.
18.
FindlayJamie Y.2016. The prepositional passive in Lexical Functional Grammar. In ArnoldDougButtMiriamCrysmannBertholdKingTracy HollowayMüllerStefan (eds.), Proceedings of the joint 2016 Conference on Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, 255-275. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
19.
GohGwang-Yoon. 2001. The advent of the prepositional passive: An innovation of Middle English?English Studies82(3). 203-217.
20.
HuddlestonRodney & GeoffreyPullumK.2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HundtMarianneMairChristian. 1999. “Agile” and “uptight” genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics4(2). 221-242.
22.
KimJong-Bok. 2009. Three types of English pseudo-passives: A lexicalist perspective. Korean Journal of Linguistics34(1). 1-24.
23.
KlingvallEva. 2012. Topics in pseudo-passives. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 90. 53-80.
24.
KoopmanHilda. 1984. The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
25.
LeechGeoffrey. 2004. Recent grammatical change in English: Data, description, theory. In AijmerKarinAltenbergBengt (eds.), Advances in corpus linguistics, 61-81. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
26.
LeechGeoffreyHundtMarianneSmithChristian Mair & Nicholas. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
MairChristian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, variation and standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
PullumGeoffrey K.2010. The land of the free and the elements of style. English Today26(2). 34-44.
29.
PullumGeoffrey K.2014. Fear and loathing of the English passive. Language & Communication37. 60-64.
30.
QuirkRandolphGreenbaumSidneySvartvikGeoffrey Leech & Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English Language. New York: Longman.
31.
Rodríguez-PuentePaula. 2016. Tracking down phrasal verbs in the spoken language of the past: Late Modern English in focus. English Language and Linguistics21(1). 69-97.
SchwarzSarah. 2015. Passive voice in American soap opera dialogue. Studia Neophilologica87(2). 152-170.
34.
SchwarzSarah. 2017. “Like getting nibbled to death by a duck”: Grammaticalization of the get-passive in the TIME Magazine Corpus. English World-Wide38(3). 305-335.
35.
SchwarzSarah. 2019. Signs of grammaticalization: Tracking the get-passive through COHA. In ClaridgeClaudiaBösBirte (eds.), Developments in English historical morpho-syntax, 199-221. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
36.
SeoaneElena. 2006. Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In Dalton-PufferChristianeKastovskyDieterRittNikolausSchendlHerbert (eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000, 191-211. Bern: Peter Lang.
37.
SeoaneElenaLoureiro-PortoLucía. 2005. On the colloquialization of scientific British and American English. ESP Across Cultures2. 106-118.
38.
Seoane PosseElena. 1999. The consolidation of the indirect and prepositional passive in Early Modern English: Evidence from the Helsinki Corpus. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense7. 119-139.
39.
StrunkWilliamJr.WhiteE. B.2000. The Elements of Style. 4th edn.New York: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
SvartvikJan. 1966. On voice in the English verb. The Hague: Mouton.
41.
VisserFredericus Theodorus. 1963–1973. An historical syntax of the English language. Leiden: Brill.
42.
Yáñez-BouzaNuria. 2008. Preposition stranding in the eighteenth century:Something to talk about. In van OstadeIngrid Tieken-Boon (ed.), Grammars, grammarians and grammar-writing in Eighteenth-century England, 251–278. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
