This study examines variation in the schwar realization for an area of rural Louisiana where local French varieties previously dominated and some bilingualism persists. A generational GoldVarb analysis of African American, white, and Houma (Native American) men’s speech reveals significant variation in r-ful, r-less, and diphthongal realizations by ethnoracial identity, age, and education. Apparent-time change suggests long-term, contact-influenced accommodation in which younger generations of African American men with Creole French ancestry increasingly use the dominant nondiphthongal and r-ful variants. In addition, effects of accommodation to dominant regional patterns found in the South today are observed in increasing levels of r-fulness across ethnoracial groups.
Austin, Diane E.2006. Coastal exploitation, land loss, and hurricanes: A recipe for disaster. American Anthropologist108(4). 671-691.
2.
Becker, Kara.2009. /r/ and the construction of a place identity on New York City’s Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics13(5). 634-658.
3.
Blake, Renée, Sonya Fix, & Cara Shousterman .2009. Vowel centralization before /r/ in two AAE dialects: A case of regional variation. San Francisco: Linguistic Society of America paper.
4.
Blake, Renée, Sonya Fix, Cara Shousterman, & Simanique Moody .2008. Y’all ain’t from "round hurr": Hip-hop and a case of regional variation in AAE. Unpublished manuscript.
5.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1991. Language and symbolic power. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Brasseaux, Carl, Keith Fontenot, & Claude Oubre.1994. Creoles of color in the Bayou Country . Jackson: University Press of Mississippi .
8.
Bureau of Applied Research in Anthropology.2005. The offshore oil and gas history project. http://gulfoil.bara.arizona.edu (15 January 2010).
9.
Cajun French/English Sociolinguistic Corpus.Sylvie Dubois, Louisiana State University.
10.
Coupland, Nikolas.2008. The delicate constitution of identity in face-to-face accommodation: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society37(2). 267-270.
11.
Dominguez, Virginia.1986. White by definition: Social classification in Creole Louisiana . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
12.
Dormon, James H.1996. Ethnicity and identity: Creoles of color in twentieth-century South Louisiana. In James H. Dormon (ed.), Creoles of color in the Gulf South, 67-86. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
13.
Dubois, Sylvie.1997. Field method in Cajun communities in Louisiana. In Albert Valdman (ed.), French and Creole in Louisiana, 47-70. New York: Plenum.
14.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.1998a. From accent to marker in Cajun English: A study of dialect formation in progress. English World-Wide19. 161-188.
15.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.1998b. Let’s tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change10. 245-261.
16.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.2001. Do Cajuns speak Southern English? Morphosyntactic evidence . Penn Working Papers in Linguistics7. 27-41.
17.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.2003a. Creoles and Cajuns: A portrait in black and white. American Speech78(2). 192-207.
18.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.2003b. The English vernacular of the Creoles of Louisiana. Language Variation and Change15(3). 255-288.
19.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.2003c. Verbal morphology in Cajun Vernacular English: A comparison with other varieties of Southern English. Journal of English Linguistics31. 34-59.
20.
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath.2004. Cajun vernacular English: Phonology. In Bernd Kortmann & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English , vol. 1, 407-416. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
21.
Dubois, Sylvie & Megan Melançon.1997. Cajun is dead-Long live Cajun: Shifting from a linguistic to a cultural community. Journal of Sociolinguistics1. 63-93.
22.
Dubois, Sylvie & Megan Melançon.2000. Creole is, Creole ain’t: Diachronic and synchronic attitudes toward Creole identity in South Louisiana. Language in Society29. 237-258.
23.
Feagin, Crawford.1990. The dynamics of a sound change in Southern States English: From r-less to r-ful in three generations. In Jerold A. Edmondson, Crawford Feagin, & Peter Mühlhaüser (eds.), Development and diversity: Linguistic variation across time and space, 129-146 . Dallas: University of Texas, Arlington, Summer Institute of Linguistics.
24.
Gordon, Matthew.2004. New York, Philadelphia and other Northern Cities. In Bernd Kortmann & Edgar W. Schneider (eds.), A handbook of varieties of English , vol. 1, 282-299. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
25.
Henry, Jacques M. & Carl L. Bankston III.1998. Propositions for a structuralist analysis of Creolism. Current Anthropology39. 558-566.
26.
Henry, Jacques M. & Carl L. Bankston III.2002. Blue collar bayou: Louisiana Cajuns in the new economy of ethnicity. Westport, CT: Praeger.
27.
Holmes, Janet & Paul Kerswill.2008. Contact is not enough: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society37(2). 273-277.
28.
Irwin, Patricia & Naomi Nagy.2007. Bostonians /r/ speaking: A quantitative look at /r/ in Boston. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics13(2). Article 11. Pages 1-14.
29.
Kendall, Tyler & Walt Wolfram.2009. Local and external standards in African American English . Journal of English Linguistics37. 305-330.
30.
Labov, William.1966. The social stratification of English in New York City . Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
31.
Labov, William.1969. The logic of non-standard English. In James E. Alatis (ed.), Linguistics and the teaching of standard English to speakers of other languages or dialects (Georgetown Monographs on Language and Linguistics, vol. 22), 1-45. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
32.
Labov, William.1972. Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
33.
Labov, William.1987. Are black and white vernaculars diverging?American Speech62. 5-12.
34.
Labov, William, Sharon Ash, & Charles Boberg .2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
35.
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins, & John Lewis.1968. A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Philadelphia : U.S. Regional Survey.
36.
Labov, William, Elizabeth Dayton, Donald Hindle, Matthew Lennig, Arvilla Payne, & Deborah Schiffrin .1980. Social determinants of sound change. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.
37.
Lambert, Sage.1995. The "r-full" truth of the matter: An analysis of the constriction of /r/ in Mississippi and eastern Louisiana. Memphis, TN : University of Memphis thesis.
38.
Louisiana Creole African American Vernacular English Corpus. Sylvie Dubois, Louisiana State University.
39.
Mallinson, Christine & Walt Wolfram.2002. Dialect accommodation in a bi-ethnic mountain enclave community: More evidence on the development of AfricanAmerican English. Language in Society31(5). 743-775.
40.
McDavid, Raven.1948. Postvocalic /-r/ in South Carolina: A social analysis . American Speech23(3-4). 194-203.
41.
Melançon, Megan E.2006. Stirring the linguistic gumbo (Cajun English). In Walt Wolfram & Ben Ward (eds.), American voices, 238-243. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
42.
Myhill, John.1988. Postvocalic /r/ as an index of integration into the BEV speech community. American Speech63(3). 203-313.
43.
Nagy, Naomi & Patricia Irwin. Forthcoming. Boston (r): Neighbo(r)s nea(r) and fa(r). Language Variation and Change.
44.
Neuman, Robert W. & Nancy W. Hawkins.1993. Louisiana prehistory, 2nd edn. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Archaeological Survey and Antiquities Commission, Department of Culture, Recreation and Tourism.
45.
Pollock, Karen E. & Mary C. Berni.1996. Vocalic and postvocalic /r/ in African American Memphians . Las Vegas: New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English 25 paper.
46.
Pollock, Karen E. & Mary C. Berni.1997. Variation in vocalic and postvocalic /r/ in AAVE. Boston: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association paper.
47.
Rickford, John R.1999. African American Vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
48.
Rushton, William Faulkner.1979. The Cajuns: From Acadia to Louisiana. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
49.
Sledd, James H.1966. Breaking, umlaut, and the Southern drawl. Language42(1). 18-41.
50.
Thomas, Erik R.2001. An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English (Publication of the American Dialect Society, no. 85). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
51.
Thomas, Erik R.2007. Phonological and phonetic characteristics of African American Vernacular English. Language and Linguistics Compass1(5). 450-475.
52.
Thomas, Erik R. & Guy Bailey.1998. Some aspects of African American Vernacular English phonology . In Salikoko Mufwene (ed.), African American English: Structure, history and usage, 85-109. New York: Routledge.
53.
Trudgill, Peter.2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society37(2). 241-254.
54.
United Houma Nation.2008. Official Houma tribal website. http://www.unitedhoumanation.org (15 January 2010).
55.
White, David R. M.1997. Cultural gumbo: An ethnographic overview of Louisiana’s Mississippi River Delta and selected adjacent areas. New Orleans National Park Service report.
56.
Wolfram, Walt.2003. Language variation in the American South: An introduction . American Speech78(2). 123-129.
57.
Wolfram, Walt.2007. Sociolinguistic folklore in the study of AfricanAmerican English. Language and Linguistics Compass1(4). 292-313.
58.
Wroblewski, Michael, Thea R. Strand, & Sylvie Dubois .2010. Mapping a dialect "mixtury": Vowel phonology of African American and white men in rural southern Louisiana . In Malcah Yaeger-Dror & Erik R. Thomas (eds.), Cross-dialect evidence for convergence and divergence from a local standard, Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Pages 48-72.
59.
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah & Erik R. Thomas (eds.). 2010. Cross-dialect evidence for convergence and divergence from a local standard (Publication of the American Dialect Society, no. 94). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
