A Linguistics for the Evolution and Neurobiology of Language

Abstract

This article raises questions about the kind of linguistic data that is relevant to evolutionary and neurobiological accounts of language. We would not want to demand an account of the evolution and current neurobiology of human movement provide an explanation for how an Olympic skater is able to do a triple Lutz. We also would not want to burden an account of the evolution and neurobiology of language with the necessity to explain the form of utterances made possible by writing. In both cases, the brain (nervous system) requires years of specialized training to produce the behavior. And in neither case would we have identified the evolutionary and neurobiological phenomenon we wish to understand. This article discusses problems in identifying “what evolved” in language evolution and in identifying the kind of language the brain processes today when it comprehends, produces, and acquires “what evolved.”

Keywords

conversational analysis evolution neurobiology oral language written language

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bickerton, Derek. 2001. Linguistics Plays Catch-up with Evolution. Journal of Linguistics 37:581-591.

Chafe, Wallace. 1985. Linguistic Differences Produced by Differences between Speaking and Writing. In Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, edited by David R. Olson , Nancy Torrence, and Angela Hildyard, 105-123. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Chipere, Ngoni. 1998. Real Language Users. Cogprints. ID Code 712.

Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change. NY: Longman .

Dabrowska, Ewa. 1997. The LAD Goes to School: A Cautionary Tale for Nativists . Linguistics 35:735-66.

———. 2004. Language, Mind, and Brain. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Favareau, Donald. In Press. Collapsing Wave Function for Meaning. The Epistemological Matrix of Talk-in-Interaction. In The Gregory Bateson Centennial Lectures: Bateson as a Precursor to Biosemiotics, edited by Jasper Hoffmeyer. Berlin: Springer.

Hopper, Paul. J. 1998. Emergent Grammar. In The New Psychology of Language, edited by M. Tomasello , 155-175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kalmar, I. 1985. Are There Really No Primitive Languages? In Literacy, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, edited by David R. Olson , Nancy Torrence , and Angela Hildyard , 148-166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

10.

Lee, Namhee , and John H. Schumann . 2003. The Evolution of Language and the Symbolosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems. Paper presented at the conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Arlington VA, March 22-25.

11.

McWhorter, John. 2001. The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language. New York, NY: Times Books.

12.

Sampson, Geoffrey. 2005. The “Language Instinct” Debate. NY: Continuum.

13.

Schumann, John H. , Donald Favareau, Namhee Lee , Lisa Mikesell, Hongyin Tao , Daniel Véronique , and Alison Wray. 2006. Language Evolution: What Evolved? Marges Linguistique 11:167-199.

14.

Tao, Hongyin , and Charles F. Meyer . 2006. Gapped Coordinations in English: Form, Usage, and Implications for Linguistic Theory. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2 (2): 129-163.

15.

Tarone, Elaine , and Martha Bigelow. 2005. Impact of Literacy on Oral Language Processing: Implications for Second Language Acquisition Research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2: 77-97.

16.

Thompson, Sandra A. , and Paul J. Hopper. 2001. Transitivity, Clause Structure, and Argument Structure: Evidence from Conversation. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, edited by Joan L. Bybee and Paul J. Hopper , 27-60. Amsterdam : Benjamins.