Previous research on innovative quotative verbs (e.g., be like, go) has been based almost exclusively on narratives of personal experience or sociolinguistic interviews. The present study broadens our understanding of the extent to which new forms of quotatives are established in American English by looking at their use across different registers of spoken interaction. Specifically, the study investigates the frequency of use and grammatical association patterns of the quotatives be like, go, be all, and say in four registers: casual conversation, university service encounters and workplace conversation, university students’ study groups, and academic office hour consultations. The findings show that, overall, be like and go are well established across these registers, while be all is still rather uncommon. In addition, all new quotatives consistently occur more frequently in present tense, while the traditional quotative say is more frequent in the past. The analyses of the patterns of use of the quotatives with different grammatical subjects and of the discourse functions of the quotation support the hypothesis that be like is expanding in American English.
Barbieri, Federica. 2005. Revisiting the Effect of Sex and Age on Quotative Use in American English: A Corpus-Based Study. Paper presented at AAACL/ICAME joint conference, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, May 11-15.
2.
Barlow, Michael. 2000. Monoconc Pro 2.0. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
3.
Baynham, Mike. 1996. Direct Speech: What’s It Doing in Non-narrative Discourse? Journal of Pragmatics25:61-81.
4.
Biber, Douglas. 1994. An Analytical Framework for Register Studies. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, ed. D. Biber and E. Finegan, 31-56. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Biber, Douglas. 1999. A Register Perspective on Grammar and Discourse: Variability in the Form and Use of English Complement Clauses. Discourse Studies1 (2): 131-150.
6.
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2001. Register Variation: A Corpus Approach. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. E. Hamilton, 175-196. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd, and Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly36 (1): 9-48.
9.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
10.
Biber, Douglas, Randi Reppen, Victoria Clark, and Jena Walter. 2001. Representing Spoken Language in University Settings: The Design and Construction of the Spoken Component of the T2k-Swal Corpus. In Corpus Linguistics in North America, ed. R. C. Simpson and J. M. Swales, 48-57. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
Blyth, Carl, Jr., Sigrid Recktenwald, and Jenny Wang. 1990. I’m Like, “Say What?!”: A New Quotative in American Oral Narrative. American Speech65 (3): 215-227.
12.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2001. An Alternative View of Like: Its Grammaticalisation in Conversational American English and Beyond. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics11:21-41.
13.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2003. The Co-occurrence of Quotatives with Mimetic Performances. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics12:1-9.
14.
Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2004. Comparing Perception and Reality: Newcomers to the Quotative System. Edinburgh Working Papers in Applied Linguistics13:1-14.
15.
Butters, Ronald R.1980. Narrative Go ‘Say’. American Speech55:304-307.
16.
Butters, Ronald R.1982. Editor’s Note to Schourup (1982). American Speech57 (2): 149.
17.
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. Quotations as Demonstrations. Language66 (4): 764-805.
18.
Cukor-Avila, Patricia. 2002. She Say, She Go, She Be Like: Verbs of Quotation over Time in African American Vernacular English. American Speech77 (1): 3-31.
19.
Dailey-O’Cain, Jennifer. 2000. The Sociolinguistic Distribution of and Attitudes toward Focuser Like and Quotative Like. Journal of Sociolinguistics4 (1):60-80.
20.
D’Arcy, Alex. 2004. Contextualizing St. John’s Youth English within the Canadian Quotative System. Journal of English Linguistics32 (4): 323-345.
21.
Douglas, Dan, and Susan Nissan. 2001. Developing Listening Prototypes Using a Corpus of Spoken Academic English. Paper presented at Language Testing Research Colloquium, St. Louis, MO, February.
22.
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. Analysing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3-65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Eriksson, Mats. 1995. A Case of Grammaticalization in Modern Swedish: The Use of BA in Adolescent Speech. Language Sciences17 (1): 19-48.
24.
Ferrara, Kathleen, and Barbara Bell. 1995. Sociolinguistic Variation and Discourse Function of Constructed Dialogue Introducers: The Case of Be + Like. American Speech70 (3): 265-290.
25.
Golato, Andrea. 2000. An Innovative German Quotative for Reporting on Embodied Actions: Und Ich So/Und Er So ‘and I’m Like/and He’s Like’. Journal of Pragmatics32:29-54.
26.
Holt, Elizabeth. 1996. Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction29 (3): 219-245.
27.
Johnstone, Barbara. 1987. ‘He Says...So I Said’: Verb Tense Alternation and Narrative Depictions of Authority in American English. Linguistics25:33-52.
28.
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
Macaulay, Ronald. 1987. Polyphonic Monologues: Quoted Direct Speech in Oral Narratives. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics1:1-34.
30.
Macaulay, Ronald. 2001. You’re Like ‘Why Not?’ The Quotative Expressions of Glasgow Adolescents. Journal of Sociolinguistics5 (1): 3-21.
31.
Mayes, Patricia. 1990. Quotation in Spoken English. Studies in Language14 (2): 325-363.
32.
Meehan, Teresa. 1991. It’s Like, ‘What’s Happening in the Evolution of Like?’: A Theory of Grammaticalization. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics16:37-51.
33.
Myers, Greg. 1999a. Functions of Reported Speech in Group Discussions. Applied Linguistics20 (3): 376-401.
34.
Myers, Greg. 1999b. Unspoken Speech: Hypothetical Reported Speech and the Rhetoric of Everyday Talk. Text19 (4): 571-590.
35.
Romaine, Suzanne, and Deborah Lange. 1991. The Use of Like as a Marker of Reported Speech and Thought: A Case of Grammaticalization in Progress. American Speech66 (3): 227-279.
36.
Sakita, Tomoko I.2002. Dialogue-Internal and External Features Representing Mental Imagery of Speaker Attitudes. Text22 (1): 83-105.
37.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1981. Tense Variation in Narrative. Language57 (1): 44-62.
38.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Schourup, Lawrence. 1982. Quoting with Go ‘Say’. American Speech57 (2): 148-149.
40.
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common Discourse Particles in English Conversation. New York: Garland.
41.
Singler, John Victor. 2001. Why You Can’t Do a VARBRUL Study of Quotatives and What Such a Study Can Show Us. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics7 (3): 257-278.
42.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Alex D’Arcy. 2004. He’s Like, She’s Like: The quotative system in Canadian Youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics8 (4): 493-514.
43.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Rachel Hudson. 1998. Be Like et al. Beyond America: The Quotative System in Canadian and UK Youth. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa26:55-69.
44.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Rachel Hudson. 1999. Be Like et al. Beyond America: The Quotative System in British and Canadian Youth. Journal of Sociolinguistics3 (2): 147-172.
45.
Tannen, Deborah. 1986. Introducing Constructed Dialogue in Greek and American Conversational and Literary Narrative. In Direct and Indirect Speech, ed. F. Coulmas, 311-332. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
46.
Tannen, Deborah. 1988. Hearing Voices in Conversation, Fiction, and Mixed Genres. In Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, ed. D. Tannen, 89-113. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
47.
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. ‘Oh Talking Voice That Is So Sweet’: Constructing Dialogue in Conversation. In Talking Voices. Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse, by D. Tannen, 98-133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
Waksler, Rachelle. 2001. A New All in Conversation. American Speech76 (2): 128-138.
49.
Winter, Joanne. 2002. Discourse Quotatives in Australian English: Adolescents Performing Voices. Australian Journal of Linguistics22 (1): 5-21.
50.
Wolfson, Nessa. 1978. A Feature of Performed Narrative: The Conversational Historical Present. Language in Society7:215-237.
