Sources and data for social network analysis. Social network analysis (SNA) is becoming more and more widespread in several scientific disciplines as a method for processing social, economic, geographic, historical, digital, etc. data. Visualizations of graphs, communities and other ties are multiplying. However, there is a risk that SNA users may lose sight of the conditions under which their data are produced and thereby over-interpret or under-interpret the results. This article provides a guide to the different types of sources of network data, and the pitfalls and choices encountered in the process of producing network data. The first part provides an overview of these pitfalls and choices, and the second part focuses on the specifics of each source of data. Based on the authors’ experience in training network researchers, the article proposes a review of controlled ways of producing network data from this array of sources.
BakerWE (1984) The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology89(4) : 775–811.
2.
BarnesJA (1954) Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations7(1) : 39–58.
3.
BearmanPParigiP (2004) Cloning headless frogs and other important matters : Conversation topics and network structure. Social Forces83(2) : 535–557.
4.
BernardHRKillworthPDSailerL (1982) Informant accuracy in social-network data V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data. Social Science Research11(1) : 30–66.
5.
BèsM-P (2011) Les chaînes relationnelles entre anciens étudiants : l’usage des carnets d’adresses électroniques. Réseaux, 168/169 : 189–214.
6.
BidartCDegenneAGrossettiM (2011) La vie en réseau : dynamique des relations sociales. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.
7.
BirkettMMelvilleJJanulisPPhillipsGContractorNHoganB (2021) Network canvas : Key decisions in the design of an interviewer-assisted network data collection software suite. Social Networks66 : 114–124.
8.
BlondelVGuillaumeJ-LLambiotteRLefebvreE (2008) Identification multi-échelle de la structure communautaire de très grands graphes. In : AlgoTel’08. Available at : https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00374457(accessed 5 May 2021).
9.
BojeDMWhettenDA (1981) Effects of organizational strategies and contextual constraints on centrality and attributions of influence in interorganizational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly26(3) : 378–395.
10.
BorgattiSPMehraABrassDJLabiancaG (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science323(5916) : 892–895.
11.
BoullierD (2015) Les sciences sociales face aux traces du big data. Société, opinion ou vibrations ?Revue française de science politique65(5) : 805–828.
12.
BourdieuP (1980) Le capital social : notes provisoires. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales31(1) : 2–3.
13.
BoutierJ (2001) L’usage historien des archives. In : Corpus, sources et archives. Tunis : Institut de recherche sur le Maghreb contemporain, 9–22.
14.
BoyadjianJ (2014) Twitter, un nouveau « baromètre de l’opinion publique » ?Participations (8) : 55–74.
15.
BrashearsMEQuintaneE (2018) The weakness of tie strength. Social Networks55 : 104–115.
16.
BrightDBrewerRMorselliC (2021) Using social network analysis to study crime : Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records. Social Networks66 : 50–64.
17.
BurtRSMarsdenPVRossiPH (1985) A research agenda for survey network data. GSS Methodological Report (39) : 1–72.
18.
BurtRS (2000) The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior22 : 345–423.
19.
CarringtonPJScottJWassermanS (eds) (2005) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20.
CefaïD (2003) L’enquête de terrain. Paris : La Découverte.
21.
ChauvacN (2016) Création d’entreprises innovantes et relations professionnelles : l’apport de la méthode des narrations quantifiées. Regards croisés sur l’économie (19) : 76–86.
22.
ChauvacNCloutierLDefossezAAkermannGde FedericoA (2014) Negative ties, lost ties, latent ties. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique (121) : 5–9.
23.
CloutierL (2014) Inventeurs entrepreneurs. In : ChauvinP-MGrossettiMZalioP-P (eds) Dictionnaire sociologique de l’entrepreneuriat. Paris : Presses de Sciences Po, 380–396.
24.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94 : S95–S120.
25.
CormanSRSteinerEProulxJDDuttaAYahjaAPooleSBerishaVBlissDW (2021) Revisiting the accuracy problem in network analysis using a unique dataset. SocialNetworks66 : 1–9.
26.
CoulmontB (2013) Tenir le haut de l’affiche : analyse structurale des prétentions au charisme. Revue française de sociologie54(3) : 507.
27.
CovielloN (2005) Integrating qualitative and quantitative techniques in network analysis. Qualitative Market Research : An International Journal8(1) : 39–60.
28.
CrossleyN (2008) (Net)Working out : Social capital in a private health club. The British Journal of Sociology59(3) : 475–500.
29.
CrossleyN (2010) The Social world of the network. Combining qualitative and quantitative elements in social network analysis. Sociologica (1) : 1–34.
30.
CrossleyNBellottiEEdwardsGEverettMKoskinenJTranmerM (2015) Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets. London : SAGE.
31.
DefossezA (2014) De l’inefficacité du réseau social – Des liens sociaux non mobilisés chez les patients atteints de cancer. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique (121) : 44–58.
32.
DegenneAForséM (2004) Les réseaux sociaux. Paris : Armand Colin.
33.
DesmondM (2012) Disposable ties and the urban poor. American Journal of Sociology117(5) : 1295–1335.
34.
DoddsPSMuhamadRWattsDJ (2003) An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science301(5634) : 827–829.
35.
DuboisSFrançoisP (2013) Seeing the world through common lenses ? The case of French contemporary poetry. In : BeckertJMusselinC (eds) Constructing Quality : The Classification of Goods in Markets. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 174–193.
36.
DüringM (2013) Analysis of Support Networks for Jewish Refugees in the Third Reich. The Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. Available at : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlQ7stSU-9w (accessed 22 April 2020).
EloireFPenalva-IcherELazegaE (2011) Application de l’analyse des réseaux complets à l’échelle interorganisationnelle. Terrains & Travaux (19) : 77–98.
39.
FavreGBraillyJ (2015) Salons et définition de normes marchandes : Le cas de la distribution de programmes de télévision en Afrique sub-saharienne. L’Année sociologique65(2) : 425–456.
40.
FerrandA (2014) Les significations des zéros dans les réseaux personnels. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique (121) : 10–16.
41.
FischerCS (1982) To Dwell among Friends : Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
42.
FischerCS (2009) The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks : An artifact ?American Sociological Review74(4) : 657–669.
43.
FischerCSBayhamL (2019) Mode and interviewer effects in egocentric network research. Field Methods31(3) : 195–213.
44.
FitzhughSMButtsCT (2018) Patterns of co-membership : Techniques for identifying subgraph composition. Social Networks55 : 1–10.
45.
FreemanLC (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver : Empirical Press.
46.
GodechotO (2012) Réseaux et classes sociales : le malentendu ?Revue française de socio-économie (10). La Découverte : 265–271.
47.
GourdonV (2008) Les témoins de mariage civil dans les villes européennes du XIXe siècle : quel intérêt pour l’analyse des réseaux familiaux et sociaux ?Histoire, économie & société27(2) : 61–87.
48.
GranovetterMS (1974) Getting a Job. A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
49.
GranovetterMS (2003) Ignorance, knowledge, and outcomes in a small world. Science301(5634) : 773–774.
50.
GrossettiM (2011) Les narrations quantifiées. Une méthode mixte pour étudier des processus sociaux. Terrains & Travaux (19) : 161–182.
51.
GrossettiMBèsM-P (2001) Encastrements et découplages dans les relations science-industrie. Revue française de sociologie42(2) : 327–355.
52.
HagmanEP (1933) The companionship of preschool children. In : StoddardGD (ed.) University of Iowa Studies in Child Welfare. Iowa City : University of Iowa, 10–69.
53.
HällstenMEdlingCRydgrenJ (2015) The effects of specific occupations in position generator measures of social capital. Social Networks40 : 55–63.
54.
HarriganNMLabiancaGJAgneessensF (2020) Negative ties and signed graphs research : Stimulating research on dissociative forces in social networks. Social Networks60 : 1–10.
55.
HollandPWLeinhardtS (1973) The structural implications of measurement error in sociometry. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology3(1) : 85–111.
56.
JourdanM (2019) Les rencontres des Irlandais hors d’Irlande au VIIe siècle. Comprendre et dépasser les biais des sources par l’analyse de réseaux. Hypothèses22(1) : 263–277.
57.
KillworthPDMcCartyCBernardHRHouseM (2006) The accuracy of small world chains in social networks. Social Networks28(1) : 85–96.
58.
KittsJALealDF (2021) What is(n’t) a friend ? Dimensions of the friendship concept among adolescents. Social Networks66 : 161–170.
59.
KleinfeldJS (2002) Could it be a big world after all ? The « six degrees of separation » myth. Society (39) : 61–66.
60.
KnoxHSavageMHarveyP (2006) Social networks and the study of relations : Networks as method, metaphor and form. Economy and Society35(1) : 113–140.
61.
KorteCMilgramS (1970) Acquaintance networks between racial groups : Application of the small world method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology15(2) : 101–108.
62.
KrosMJaspersEvan ZalkM (2021) Avoidance, antipathy, and aggression : A three-wave longitudinal network study on negative networks, status, and heteromisos. Social Networks64 : 122–133.
63.
LaumannEOMardsenPVPrenskyD (1983) The boundary specification problem in network analysis. In : BurtRSMinorMJ (eds) Applied Network Analysis. Beverly Hills : SAGE, 18–34.
64.
LazegaE (2014) Réseaux sociaux et structures relationnelles. Paris : PUF.
65.
LemercierC (2006) Liens privés et régulation de l’économie : la famille et l’institution (Paris, XIXe siècle). Revue d’histoire du XIXe siècle 33(2) : 23–53.
66.
LemercierC (2015) Taking time seriously : How do we deal with change in historical networks ? In : DüringMGamperMReschkeL (eds) Knoten Und Kanten III. Soziale Netzwerkanalyse in Politik- Und Geschichtswissenschaft. Bielefeld : Transcript Verlag, 183–211.
67.
LemercierC(à paraître) Historical and archaeological network data. In : BrughmansTMillsBJMunsonJL, et al. (eds) Oxford Handbook of Archaeological Network Research. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
LinNDaytonPWGreenwaldP (1978) Analyzing the instrumental use of relations in the context of social structure. Sociological Methods & Research7(2) : 149–166.
70.
LinNFuYHsungR-M (2001) The position generator : Measurement techniques for investigations of social capital. In : LinNCookKBurtRS (eds) Social Capital. Theory and Research. New York : Routledge, 57–81.
71.
LinN (2002) Social Capital : A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
72.
MarinA (2004) Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics ? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks26(4) : 289–307.
73.
MarineauJELabiancaGJ (2021) Positive and negative tie perceptual accuracy : Pollyanna principle vs. negative asymmetry explanations. Social Networks64 : 83–98.
74.
MarsdenPV (2003) Interviewer effects in measuring network size using a single name generator. Social Networks25(1) : 1–16.
75.
MarsdenPV (2011) Survey methods for network data. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis25 : 370–388.
76.
McCallisterLFischerCS (1978) A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods & Research7(2) : 131–148.
77.
McCartyCLubbersMJVaccaRMolinaJL (2019) Conducting Personal Network Research : A Practical Guide. New York : Guilford Publications.
78.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLBrashearsME (2006) Social isolation in America : Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review71(3) : 353–375.
79.
MerckléP (2013) La « découverte » des réseaux sociaux. À propos de John A. Barnes et d’une expérience de traduction collaborative ouverte en sciences sociales. Réseaux (182) : 187–208.
80.
MerckléP (2016) Sociologie des réseaux sociaux. Paris : La Découverte.
81.
MilardB (2011) Dynamiques relationnelles d’un article scientifique : « Roger et al. (2004) » et ses réseaux. Terrains & Travaux (21) : 141–160.
82.
MilgramS (1967) The small-world problem. Psychology Today (1) : 61–67.
83.
MischeA (2003) Cross-talk in movements : Rethinking the culture-network link. In : DianiMMcAdamD (eds), Social Movements and Networks : Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 258–280.
84.
MizruchiMS (1996) What do interlocks do ? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology22 : 271–298.
85.
MorenoJL (1953) Who Shall Survive ? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy and Sociodrama. Beacon : Beacon House.
86.
OfferSFischerCS (2018) Difficult people : Who is perceived to be demanding in personal networks and why are they there ?American Sociological Review83(1) : 111–142.
87.
OsaM (2003) Solidarity and Contention : Networks of Polish Opposition. Minneapolis, MN : University of Minnesota Press.
88.
PadgettJFAnsellCK (1993) Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology98(6) : 1259–1319.
89.
PaikASanchagrinK (2013) Social isolation in America : An artifact. American Sociological Review78(3) : 339–360.
90.
PálJStadtfeldCGrowATakácsK (2016) Status perceptions matter : Understanding disliking among adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence26(4) : 805–818.
91.
PaugamS (ed.) (2012) L’enquête sociologique. Paris : PUF.
92.
PerryBLPescosolidoBABorgattiSP (2018) Egocentric Network Analysis : Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
93.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling alone : America’s declining social capital. In : Culture and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan : New York, 223–234.
RobinsG (2015) Doing Social Network Research. Network-Based Research Design for Social Scientists. London : SAGE.
96.
RodaR (2014) On negative genesis – The role of dyadic and network attributes in the emergence of hostile relationships. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique (123) : 20–40.
97.
RoséI (2018) Autour de la reine Emma (vers 890–934). Réseaux, itinéraire biographique féminin et questions documentaires au début du Moyen Âge central. Annales HSS73(4) : 817–847.
98.
RuizÉ (2011) À propos des sources. In : Devenir historien-ne. Available at : https://devhist.hypotheses.org/849 (accessed 12 June 2020).
99.
ScottJ (2000) Social Network Analysis. London : SAGE.
100.
ScottJCarringtonPJ (eds) (2011) The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London and Thousand Oaks, CA : SAGE.
101.
ShipilovAGawerA (2020) Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals14(1) : 92–121.
102.
SinghJHansenMTPodolnyJM (2010) The world is not small for everyone : Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Science56(9) : 1415–1438.
103.
SmallML (2013) Weak ties and the core discussion network : Why people regularly discuss important matters with unimportant alters. Social networks35(3) : 470–483.
104.
SmallML (2017) Someone To Talk To. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
105.
StehléJVoirinNBarratACattutoCIsellaLPintonJFQuaggiottoMVan den BroeckWRégisCLinaBVanhemsP (2011) High-resolution measurements of face-to-face contact patterns in a primary school. PLoS ONE6(8).
106.
StevensonWDavidsonBManevIWalshK (1997) The small world of the university : A classroom exercise in the study of networks. Connections20(2) : 23–33.
107.
StoltenbergDMaierDWaldherrA (2019) Community detection in civil society online networks : Theoretical guide and empirical assessment. Social Networks59 : 120–133.
108.
TraversJMilgramS (1969) An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry32(4) : 425–443.
109.
Van Der GaagMSnijdersTAB (2005) The resource generator : Social capital quantification with concrete items. Social Networks27(1) : 1–29.
110.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
111.
WhiteHCBoormanSABreigerRL (1976) Social structure from multiple networks. I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology81(4) : 730–780.
112.
WilliamsT (2005) Cooperation by design : Structure and cooperation in interorganizational networks. Journal of Business Research58(2) : 223–231.
