Survey data are often subject to various types of errors such as misclassification. In this article, we consider a model where interest is simultaneously in two correlated response variables and one is potentially subject to misclassification. A motivating example of a recent study of the impact of a sexual education course for adolescents is considered. A simulation-based sample size determination scheme is applied to illustrate the impact of misclassification on power and bias for the parameters of interest.
BerzofskyM. E.BiemerP. P.KalsbeekW. D.. 2014. “Local Dependence in Latent Class Analysis of Rare and Sensitive Events.” Sociological Methods & Research43:137–70.
2.
BruttiP.De SantisF.GubbiottiS.. 2008. “Robust Bayesian Sample Size Determination in Clinical Trials.” Statistics in Medicine27:2290–306.
3.
DiClementeR. J.SalesJ. M.DannerF.CrosbyR. A.. 2011. “Association between Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Young Adults’ Self-reported Abstinence.” Pediatrics127:208–13.
4.
EndersC. K.FairchildA. J.MacKinnonD. P.. 2013. “A Bayesian Approach for Estimating Mediation Effects with Missing Data.” Multivariate Behavioral Research48:340–69.
5.
FitzmauriceG. M.LairdN. M.. 1995. “Regression Models for a Bivariate Discrete and Continuous Outcome with Clustering.” Journal of the American Statistical Association90:845–52.
6.
GerlachR.StameyJ.. 2007. “Bayesian Model Selection for Logistic Regression with Misclassified Outcomes.” Statistical Modelling7:255–73.
7.
HossainS.LeN. D.Brooks-WilsonA. R.SpinelliJ. J.. 2009. “Impact of Genotype Misclassification on Genetic Association Estimates and the Bayesian Adjustment.” American Journal of Epidemiology170:994–1004.
8.
KimC.TamboriniC. R.. 2014. “Response Error in Earnings an Analysis of the Survey of Income and Program Participation Matched with Administrative Data.” Sociological Methods & Research43:39–72.
9.
LiuY.JohnsonW. O.GoldE. B.. 2004. “Bayesian Analysis of Risk Factors for Anovulation.” Statistics in Medicine23:1901–19.
10.
LunnD. J.ThomasA.BestN.SpiegelhalterD.. (2000). WinBUGS-a Bayesian modelling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and computing10(4):325–337.
11.
McInturffP.JohnsonW. O.CowlingD.GardnerI. A.. 2004. “Modelling Risk When Outcomes Are Subject to Error.” Statistics in Medicine23:1095–109.
12.
NeuhausJ. M.2002. “Analysis of Clustered and Longitudinal Binary Data Subject to Response Misclassification.” Biometrics58:675–83.
13.
RenD.StoneR. A.. 2007. “A Bayesian Adjustment for Covariate Misclassification with Correlated Binary Outcome Data.” Journal of Applied Statistics34:1019–34.
14.
RosenbaumJ. E.2009. “Truth or Consequences: The Intertemporal Consistency of Adolescent Self-report on the Youth Risk Behavior Survey.” American Journal of Epidemiology169:1388–97.
15.
SherrM. E.PoolerD.StameyJ.JonesJ.DyerP.. 2013. “A Randomized Effectiveness Trial of a Sex Education Program for Minority Youth in Miami, Florida.” Journal of Evidence-based Social Work10:53–62.
16.
StakhovychS.BijmoltT. H.WedelM.. 2012. “Spatial Dependence and Heterogeneity in Bayesian Factor Analysis: A Cross-national Investigation of Schwartz Values.” Multivariate Behavioral Research47:803–39.
17.
van WieringenW. N.2005. “On Identifiability of Certain Latent Class Models.” Statistics and Probability Letters75:211–18.
18.
WangF.GelfandA. E.. 2002. “A Simulation-based Approach to Bayesian Sample Size Determination for Performance under a Given Model and for Separating Models.” Statistical Science17:193–208.
