Visual research is still a rather dispersed and ill-defined domain within the social sciences. Despite a heightened interest in using visuals in research, efforts toward a more unified conceptual and methodological framework for dealing vigilantly with the specifics of this (relatively) new way of scholarly thinking and doing remain sparse and limited in scope. In this article, the author proposes a more encompassing and refined analytical framework for visual methods of research. The ‘‘Integrated Framework’’ tries to account for the great variety within each of the currently discerned types or methods. It does so by moving beyond the more or less arbitrary and often very hybridly defined modes and techniques, with a clear focus on what connects or transcends them. The second part of the article discusses a number of critical issues that have been raised while unfolding the framework. These issues continue to pose a challenge to a more visual social science, but can be turned into opportunities for advancement when dealt with appropriately.
Balikci, Asen.1975. ‘‘Reconstructing Cultures on Film.’’ Pp. 191-200 in Principles of Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings.Den Hague/Paris : Mouton Publishers.
2.
Ball, Michael S. and Gregory W. H. Smith.1992. Analyzing Visual Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Banks, Marcus.2001. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
4.
Banks, Marcus.2007. Using Visual Data in Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Becker, Howard S.1986. Doing Things Together: Selected Papers. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
7.
Berger, Arthur Asa.1986. Media Analysis Techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Bogdan, Robert and Ann Marshall.1997. ‘‘Views of the Asylum: Picture Postcard Depictions of Institutions for People With Mental Disorders in the Early 20th Century .’’ Visual Sociology12:4-27.
9.
Bousé, Derek.2003. ‘‘False Intimacy: Close-ups and Viewer Involvement in Wildlife Films.’’ Visual Studies18:123-32.
10.
Brown, Brian J.2001. ‘‘Doing Drag: A Visual Case Study of Gender Performance and Gay Masculinities.’’Visual Sociology16:37-54.
11.
Burke, Caroline and Ian Grosvenor.2007. ‘‘The Progressive Image in the History of Education: Stories of Two Schools.’’ Visual Studies22:155-68.
12.
Cambrosio, Alberto, Daniel Jacobi, and Peter Keating.1993. ‘‘Ehrlich’s ’Beautiful Pictures’ and the Controversial Beginnings of Immunological Imagery .’’ ISIS84:662-99.
13.
Chalfen, Richard.1987. Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press .
14.
Chalfen, Richard.2003. ‘‘Celebrating Life After Death: The Appearance of Snapshots in Japanese Pet Gravesites.’’ Visual Studies18:144-56.
15.
Chaplin, Elisabeth.1994. Sociology and Visual Representation. London: Routledge.
16.
Clark-Ibanez, Marisol.2007. ‘‘Inner-city Children in Sharper Focus: Sociology of Childhood and Photo Elicitation Interviews.’’ Pp. 167-98 in Visual Research Methods,edited by G. Stanczak.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Collier, John. [ 1967] 1986. Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method. Revised and expanded edition with Malcolm Collier. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
18.
Corsaro, William.1982. ‘‘Something Old and Something New. The Importance of Prior Ethnography in the Collection and Analysis of Audiovisual Data. ’’ Sociological Methods & Research, 11:145-66.
19.
Curry, Timothy and Alfred Clarke. [ 1977]. 1983. Introducing Visual Sociology. 2nd ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
20.
David, Emmanuel A.2007. ‘‘Signs of Resistance: Marking Public Space Through a Renewed Cultural Activism.’’ Pp. 225-54 in Visual Research Methods, edited by G. Stanczak.London: Sage.
21.
de Heusch, Luc.1988. ‘‘The Cinema and Social Science: A Survey of Ethnographic and Sociological Films.’’Visual Anthropology1:99-156.
22.
Diem-Wille, Gertrude.2001. ‘‘A Therapeutic Perspective: The Use of Drawings in Child Psychoanalysis and Social Science.’’ Pp 157-82 in Handbook of Visual Analysis, edited by T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt.London: Sage.
23.
Edge, Sarah.1998. ‘‘The Power to Fix the Gaze: Gender and Class in Victorian Photographs of Pit-Brown Women.’’ Visual Sociology13:37-56.
24.
Edwards, Elizabeth.1990. ‘‘Photographic ‘Types’: The Pursuit of Method.’’ Visual-Anthropology3:235-58.
25.
Emmison, Michael and Philip Smith.2000. Researching the Visual: Images, Objects, Contexts and Interactions in Social and Cultural Inquiry. London: Sage.
26.
Geary, Christraud M.1990. ‘‘Impressions of the African Past: Interpreting Ethnographic Photographs From Cameroon.’’VisualAnthropology3:289-315.
27.
Godel, Margaret.2007. ‘‘Images of Stillbirth: Memory, Mourning and Memorial.’’ Visual Studies22:253-69.
28.
Goffman, Erving.1979. Gender Advertisements. New York/ London: Harper & Row.
29.
Gold, Steven J.2007. ‘‘Using Photography in Studies of Immigrant Communities: Reflecting Across Projects and Populations.’’ Pp. 141-66 in Visual Research Methods, edited by G. Stanczak.London: Sage.
30.
Goodwin, Charles.1995. ‘‘Seeing in Depth.’’Social Studies of Science25:237-74.
31.
Gordin, Douglas N. and Roy. D. Pea.1995. ‘‘Prospects for Scientific Visualization as an Educational Technology.’’Journal of the Learning Sciences4:249-79.
32.
Grady, John.1991. ‘‘The Visual Essay and Sociology. ’’ Visual Sociology6:23-38.
33.
Grady, John.2006. ‘‘Edward Tufte and the Promise of a Visual Social Science.’’ Pp. 222-65 in Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication , edited by L. Pauwels.Hannover and London: Dartmouth College Press-University Press of New England.
34.
Grady, John.2007. ‘‘Advertising Images as Social Indicators: Depictions of Blacks in LIFE Magazine, 1936-2000.’’ Visual Studies22:211-39.
35.
Grimshaw, Alan, ed. 1982. ‘‘Special Issue on Sound-Image Records in Social Interaction Research. ’’ Sociological Methods & Research11:115-255.
36.
Grimshaw, Alan and A. Ravetz , eds. 2004. Visualizing Anthropology: Experimenting With Image-Based Ethnography. Bristol, TN: Intellect Books.
37.
Hagaman, Dianne.1993. ‘‘The Joy of Victory, the Agony of Defeat: Stereotypes in Newspaper Sports Feature Photographs.’’ Visual Sociology8:48-66.
38.
Hamilton, Peter, ed. 2007. Visual Research Methods. London: Sage.
39.
Hammond, J.D.1998. ‘‘Photography and the ‘Natives’: Examining the Hidden Curriculum of Photographs in Introductory Anthropology Texts.’’ Visual Sociology13(2):57-73.
40.
Harper, Douglas.2002. ‘‘Talking About Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation.’’ Visual Studies17:13-26.
41.
Harper, Douglas and Patricia Faccioli.2000. ‘‘’Small, Silly Insults,’ Mutual Seduction and Misogyny: The Interpretation of Italian Advertising Signs. ’’ Visual Sociology15:23-49.
42.
Heider, Karl G. [ 1976] 2006. Ethnographic Film. Rev. ed. Austin: University of Texas Press.
43.
Henny, Leonard.1986. ‘‘Theory and Practice of Visual Sociology .’’ Current Sociology34(3):1-76.
44.
Hethorn, Janet and Susan Kaiser.1999. ‘‘Youth Style: Articulating Cultural Anxiety .’’ Visual Sociology14:109-25.
45.
Hockings, Paul, ed. [1975] 2003 . Principles of Visual Anthropology. 3rd ed. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
46.
Knor-Cetina, Karin.1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. New York: Pergamon.
47.
Krase, Jerome.1997. ‘‘Polish and Italian Vernacular Landscapes in Brooklyn.’’ Polish American Studies54:9-31.
48.
Lackey, Chad.2001. ‘‘Visualizing White-Collar Crime: Generic Imagery in Popular Film.’’ Visual Sociology16:75-94.
49.
Larson, Heidi.1999. ‘‘Voices of Pacific Youth: Video Research as a Tool for Youth Expression.’’ Visual Sociology14:163-72.
50.
Latour, Bruno and Steven Woolgar.1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. London: Sage.
51.
Lynch, Michael.1985. ‘‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images: An Analysis of Scientific Visibility.’’ Social Studies of Science15:37-66.
52.
MacDougall, David.1975. ‘‘Beyond Observational Cinema.’’ Pp. 109-24 in Principles of Visual Anthropology, edited by Paul Hockings.The Hague/Paris : Mouton de Gruyter.
53.
MacDougall, David and Lucien Taylor, eds. 1998. Transcultural Cinema. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
54.
Margolis, Eric.1994. ‘‘Images in Struggle: Photographs of Colorado Coal Camps.’’ Visual Sociology9:4-26.
55.
Margolis, Eric.2004. ‘‘Looking at Discipline, Looking at Labour: Photographic Representations of Indian Boarding Schools.’’ Visual Studies19:72-96.
56.
McAllister, Kirsten.2006. ‘‘Photographs of a Japanese Canadian Internment Camp: Mourning Loss and Invoking a Future.’’ Visual Studies21:133-56.
57.
McPhail, Clark and Ronald T. Wohlstein.1982. ‘‘Using Film to Analyze Pedestrian Behavior.’’Sociological Methods & Research10:347-75.
58.
Mead, Margaret and Gregory Bateson.1942. Balinese Character, a Photographic Analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences Press.
59.
Mead, Margaret and Gregory Bateson. [ 1941] 1985. Balinese Character: A Photographic Analysis. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
60.
Mead, Margaret.1963. ‘‘Anthropology and the Camera.’’ Pp. 166-84 in The Encyclopedia of Photography, edited by W. Morgan.New York: Greystone Press.
61.
Mead, Margaret. [ 1975] 2003. ‘‘Visual Anthropology in a Discipline of Words.’’ Pp. 3-10 in Principles of Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings.3rd ed. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton de Gruyter.
62.
Mellinger, Wayne M.1992. ‘‘Representing Blackness in the White Imagination: Images of ‘Happy Darkeys’ in Popular Culture, 1893-1917.’’Visual Sociology7:3-21.
63.
Mitchell, William J.1992. The Reconfigured Eye. Visual Truth in the Post-photographic Era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
Mizen, Phil.2005. ‘‘A Little ‘Light Work’? Children’s Images of Their Labour.’’ Visual Studies20:124-58.
65.
Musello, Christopher.1979. ‘‘Family Photography.’’ Pp. 101-18 in Images of Information, edited by J. Wagner.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
66.
Niesyto, Horst.2000. ‘‘Youth Research on Video Self-Productions: Reflections on a Social Aesthetic Approach.’’ Visual Sociology15:135-53.
67.
Page, Edwin R.2001. ‘‘Social Change at Bike Week.’’Visual Sociology16:7-35.
68.
Papson, Stephen.1991. ‘‘Looking at Nature: The Politics of Landscape Photography.’’ Visual Sociology6:4-12.
69.
Pauwels, Luc.1993. ‘‘The Visual Essay: Affinities and Divergences Between the Social Scientific and the Social Documentary Modes. ’’ Visual Anthropology6:199-210.
70.
Pauwels, Luc.1996a. De Verbeelde Samenleving: Camera, Kennisverwerving en Communicatie. Leuven/Apeldoorn: Garant.
71.
Pauwels, Luc.1996b. ‘‘Managing Impressions: On Visually Decoding the Workplace as a Symbolic Environment.’’ Visual Sociology11:62-74.
72.
Pauwels, Luc.2002. ‘‘The Video- and Multimedia-Article as a Mode of Scholarly Communication: Toward Scientifically Informed Expression and Aesthetics.’’ Visual Studies17:150-59.
73.
Pauwels, Luc.2005. ‘‘Websites as Visual and Multimodal Cultural Expressions: Opportunities and Issues of Online Hybrid Media Research.’’ Media, Culture & Society27:604-13.
74.
Pauwels, Luc.2006a. ‘‘Ethical Issues of Online (Visual) Research .’’ Visual Anthropology19:365-69.
75.
Pauwels, Luc.2006b. ‘‘Representing Moving Cultures: Expression, Multivocality and Reflexivity in Anthropological and Sociological Filmmaking.’’ Pp. 120-52 in Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, edited by L. Pauwels.Hanover and London : Dartmouth College Press-University Press of New England .
76.
Pauwels, Luc.2006c. ‘‘A Theoretical Framework for Assessing Visual Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communications.’’ Pp. 1-25 in Visual Cultures of Science: Rethinking Representational Practices in Knowledge Building and Science Communication, edited by L. Pauwels.Hanover and London : Dartmouth College Press-University Press of New England .
77.
Pauwels, Luc.2008a. ‘‘A Private Visual Practice Going Public? Social Functions and Sociological Research Opportunities of Web-Based Family Photography.’’ Visual Studies23:34-49.
78.
Pauwels, Luc.2008b. ‘‘Taking and Using: Ethical Issues of Photographs for Research Purposes.’’ Visual Communication Quarterly15:243-57.
79.
Peters, Jan-Marie.1977. Pictorial Communication. Claremont, CA: David Philip.
80.
Pink, Sarah.2001. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage.
81.
Pinney, Christopher.1990. ‘‘Classification and Fantasy in the Photographic Construction of Caste and Tribe.’’ Visual Anthropology3:259-88.
82.
Prosser, Jon, ed. 2000. Image-Based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers.London : Routledge.
83.
Prosser, Jon.2007. ‘‘Visual Methods and the Visual Culture of Schools.’’ Visual Studies22:13-30.
84.
Rich, Michael and Richard Chalfen.1999. ‘‘Showing and Telling Asthma: Children Teaching Physicians With Visual Narrative.’’ Visual Sociology14:51-71.
85.
Rieger, Jon H.1996. ‘‘Photographing Social Change.’’Visual Sociology11:5-49.
86.
Rieger, Jon H.2003. ‘‘A Retrospective Visual Study of Social Change: The Pulp-logging Industry in an Upper Peninsula Michigan County.’’Visual Studies18:157-78.
87.
Rollwagen, Jack, ed. 1988. Anthropological Filmmaking: Anthropological Perspectives on the Production of Film and Video for General Public Audiences. Chur/ London: Harwood Academic Publishers.
88.
Rosaldo, Renato.1989. ‘‘Grief and the Headhunter’s Rage.’’Culture and Truth: 1-21.
89.
Rose, Gillian.2006. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Methods. 2nd ed. London : Sage.
90.
Rouch, Jean.1975. ‘‘The Camera and Man.’’ Pp. 83-102 in Principles in Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings.Chicago: Aldine.
Ruby, Jay.2000. Picturing Culture: Explorations of Film and Anthropology . Chicago: University ofChicago Press.
93.
Schwartz, Donna.2002. ‘‘Pictures at a Demonstration. ’’ Visual Studies17:27-36.
94.
Smith, Ken L., Sandra Moriarty , Gretchen Barbatsis, and Keith Kenney, ed. 2005. Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95.
Sorenson, E. Richard and Allison Jablonko.1975. ‘‘Research Filming of Naturally Occurring Phenomena: Basic Strategies.’’ Pp. 151-63 in Principles in Visual Anthropology, edited by P. Hockings.Chicago: Aldine.
96.
Stanczak, Gregory C., ed. 2007. Visual Research Methods: Image, Society and Representation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97.
Suchar, Charles.1992. ‘‘Icons and Images of Gentrification: The Changed Material Culture of an Urban Community.’’ Pp. 33-55 in Gentrification and Urban Change: Research in Urban Sociology, edited by R. Hutchinson.Greenwich, CT: JAI.
98.
Suchar, Charles.1997. ‘‘Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts.’’ Qualitative Research20:33-55.
99.
Suchar, Charles.1988. ‘‘Photographing the Changing Material Culture of a Gentrified Community.’’ Visual Sociology Review3:17-22.
100.
Suonpää, Juha.2000. ‘‘Taming Predators Through Photograph. ’’ Visual Sociology15:51-64.
101.
Synnott, Anthony.1985. ‘‘Symbolic Replica: A Sociology of Cemeteries .’’ International Journal of Visual Sociology2:46-56.
102.
Tomaselli, Keyan G. and Arnold Shepperson.2002. ‘‘Where’s Shaka Zulu?: Shaka Zulu as an Intervention in Contemporary Political Discourse.’’Visual Studies17:129-40.
103.
Tufte, Edward.1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
Van Leeuwen, Theo and Carey Jewitt, eds. 2000. The Handbook of Visual Analysis . London: Sage.
107.
Wagner, Jon, ed. 1979. Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
108.
Wagner, Jon.1999. ‘‘Beyond the Body in a Box. Visualizing Contexts of Children’s Action.’’ Visual Sociology14:143-60.
109.
Worth, Sol and John Adair.1975. Through Navajo Eyes, an Exploration in Film Communication and Anthropology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
110.
Wright, Terrence.2001. ‘‘Reflections on ‘The Looking Glass War’: Photography, Espionage and the Cold War.’’ Visual Sociology16:75-88.
111.
Zube, Ervin.1979. ‘‘Pedestrians and Wind.’’ Pp. 69-83 in Images of Information: Still Photography in the Social Sciences, edited by J. W. Wagner.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
