Recent evidence makes clear that states public high school graduation rates are well measured using information from the Common Core of Data (CCD). This article investigates the substantive consequences for the results of empirical analyses of using different CCD-based measures of states’ public high school graduation rates. The authors show that substantive conclusions about the levels, correlates, and predictors of states’ public high school graduation rates are dependent on how those rates are measured using the CCD data. Warren’s (2005) estimated completion rate is the most conceptually and technically sound CCD-based measure, and that measure is improved in this study. The public high school graduation rate for the class of 2004 was about 76 percent, although that rate varied considerably by race/ethnicity and across states.
Barton, Paul E.2002. The Closing of the Education Frontier?Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
4.
---. 2005. One-Third of a Nation: Rising Dropout Rates and Declining Opportunities. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service.
5.
Child Trends.2003. High School Dropout Rates: The Gap Narrows Between Blacks and Whites. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://www.childtrendsdatabank.org/indicators/1HighSchoolDropout.cfm
6.
Fitzpatrick, Kevin and William Yoels.1992. ‘‘Policy, School Structure, and Sociodemographic Effects on Statewide High School Dropout Rates.’’ Sociology of Education65:76-93.
7.
Greene, Jay P. and Marcus A. Winters.2005. Public High School Graduation and College-Readiness Rates: 1991-2002. New York: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute.
8.
---. 2006. Leaving Boys Behind: Public High School Graduation Rates . New York: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute.
9.
Greene, Jay P., Marcus A. Winters, and Christopher B. Swanson.2006. ‘‘Missing the Mark on Graduation Rates: A Response to ‘The Exaggerated Dropout Crisis.’ ‘‘Education Week, March 29, pp. 39, 42.
10.
Haney, Walt.2000. ‘‘The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education.’’Education Policy Analysis Archives8 (41). Retrieved July 24, 2002, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41
11.
Haney, Walt, George Madaus, Lisa Abrams, Anne Wheelock, Jing Miao, and Ileana Gruia.2004. The Education Pipeline in the United States, 1970-2000. Chestnut Hill, MA: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy, Boston College.
12.
Heckman, James J. and Paul A. LaFontaine.2007. ‘‘The American High School Graduation Rate: Trends and Levels.’’ Discussion Paper No. 3216, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany. Retrieved April 21, 2008, from http://ftp.iza.org/dp3216.pdf
13.
Kaufman, Phillip.2001. ‘‘The National Dropout Data Collection System: Assessing Consistency.’’Presented at the Harvard Civil Rights Project, January 13, Cambridge, MA.
14.
Kominski, Robert.1990. ‘‘Estimating the National High School Dropout Rate.’’ Demography27:303-11.
15.
Miao, Jing and Walt Haney.2004. ‘‘High School Graduation Rates: Alternative Methods and Implications.’’Education Policy Analysis Archives12 (55). Retrieved April 6, 2007, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n55
16.
Mishel, Lawrence.2006. ‘‘The Exaggerated Dropout Crisis.’’Education Week, March 8, pp. 40.
17.
Mishel, Lawrence and Joydeep Roy.2006. Rethinking High School Graduation Rates and Trends. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
18.
Ruggles, Steven, Matthew Sobek, Trent Alexander, Catherine A. Fitch, Ronald Goeken, Patricia Kelly Hall, Miriam King, and Chad Ronnander.2008. ‘‘Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 4.0’’ [MRDF]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].
19.
Seastrom, Marilyn, Lee Hoffman, Chris Chapman, and Robert Stillwell .2005. The Averaged Freshman Graduation Rate for Public High Schools From the Common Core of Data: School Years 2001-02 and 2002-03. NCES 2006-601. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
20.
Swanson, Christopher.2003. Keeping Count and Losing Count: Calculating Graduation Rates for All Students Under NCLB Accountability. Washington, DC: Education Policy Center, Urban Institute.
21.
Swanson, Christopher B. and Duncan Chaplin.2003. Counting High School Graduates When Graduates Count. Washington, DC: Education Policy Center, Urban Institute .
22.
U.S. Census Bureau.2006. State and Metropolitan Area Data Book: 2006. 6th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
23.
U.S. Department of Education.2000. A Recommended Approach to Providing High School Dropout and Completion Rates at the State Level. NCES 2000-305. Washington, DC: Author.
24.
---. 2006. Digest of Education Statistics, 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
25.
Warren, John Robert.2005. ‘‘State-Level High School Completion Rates: Concepts, Measures, and Trends.’’Education Policy Analysis Archives13 (51). Retrieved March 13, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n51
26.
Warren, John Robert and Amelia Corl.2007. ‘‘State High School Exit Examinations, High School Completion, and Retention in Grade 9.’’ Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
Warren, John Robert and Andrew Halpern-Manners.2007. ‘‘Is the Glass Emptying or Filling Up? Reconciling Divergent Trends in High School Completion and Dropout.’’Educational Researcher36:335-43.
