Leverage-saliency theory provides a seminal basis for research on the differential effects of response-facilitating techniques in surveys. In this article, a quasi-experimental design is applied to analyze the effect of follow-up procedures, taking into account the sample persons’ interest in the survey topic. The authors use multilevel logistic regression to map response on a mail questionnaire in the second step of a two-step data collection procedure. It is found that—after controlling for the effects of sociodemographic and performance-related covariates—the effect of follow-up procedures is larger for those less interested in the survey topic. As such, these findings are an empirical confirmation of the leverage-saliency theory. Some implications for survey research are discussed.
Albaum, Gerald S., Felicitas Evangelista, and Nila Medina. 1998. “Role of Response Behaviour Theory in Survey Research: A Cross-national Study.”Journal of Business Research42: 115-125.
2.
Becker, Howard S.1984. Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
Berk, Richard A.1983. “An Introduction to Sample Selection Bias in Sociological Data.”American Sociological Review48: 386-398.
4.
Blau, Peter M.1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Bogen, Karen. 1996. “The Effect of Questionnaire Length on Response Rates: A Review of the Literature.” Pp. 1020-1025 in Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
6.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La Distinction. Critique Sociale du Jugement. Paris: les editions de minuit.
7.
Brehm, John. 1993. The Phantom Respondents: Opinion Surveys and Political Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
8.
Burchell, Brendan and Catherine Marsh. 1992. “The Effect of Questionnaire Length on Survey Response.”Quality & Quantity26: 233-244.
9.
Carton, Ann and Geert Loosveldt. 1999. “How the Initial Contact Can Be a Determinant for the Final Response Rate in Face-to-Face Surveys.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse, October 28-31, Portland, OR.
10.
Childers, Terry L. and Steven J. Skinner. 1985. “Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Identification of Survey Respondents.”Journal of the Market Research Society27: 39-53.
11.
Church, Allan H.1993. “Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly57: 62-79.
12.
Couper, Mick P. and Robert M. Groves. 1996. “Social Environmental Impact on Survey Cooperation.”Quality & Quantity30: 173-188.
13.
DeMaio, Theresa J.1980. “Refusals: Who, Where and Why.”Public Opinion Quarterly44: 223-233.
14.
Dillman, Don A.1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
15.
Dillman, Don A.. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley.
16.
Edwards, Phil, Ian Roberts, Mike Clarke, Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Sarah Pratrap, Reinhard Wentz, and Irene Kwan. 2002. “Increasing Response Rates to Postal Questionnaires: Systematic Review.”British Medical Journal324: 1183-1185.
17.
Esser, Hartmut. 1986. “ Uber die Teilnahme an Befragungen.”ZUMA-Nahrichten18: 38-47.
18.
Goldstein, Harvey. 1995. Multilevel Statistical Models. London: Edward Arnold.
19.
Gouldner, Alvin W.1960. “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.”American Sociological Review25: 161-178.
20.
Goyder, John C.1987. The Silent Minority: Nonrespondents on Sample Surveys. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21.
Goyder, John C., Keith Warriner, Susan Coutts, and M. Basic. 1999. “Socio-Economic Bias in Surveys: Some Attempts at Interpretation.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse, October 28-31, Portland, OR.
22.
Groves, Robert M.1987. “Research on Survey Data Quality.”Public Opinion Quarterly51: S156-S172.
23.
Groves, Robert M.. 1989. Survey Costs and Survey Errors. New York: John Wiley.
24.
Groves, Robert M., Robert B. Cialdini, and Mick P. Couper. 1992. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey.”Public Opinion Quarterly56: 475-495.
25.
Groves, Robert M. and Mick P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: John Wiley.
26.
Groves, Robert M., Don A. Dillman, John L. Eltinge, and Roderick J. A. Little, eds. 2002. Survey Nonresponse. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
27.
Groves, Robert M., Stanley Presser, and Sarah Dipko. 2004. “The Role of Topic Interest in Survey Participation Decisions.”Public Opinion Quarterly68: 2-31.
28.
Groves, Robert M., Eleanor Singer, and Amy Corning. 2000. “Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation: Description and an Illustration.”Public Opinion Quarterly64: 299-308.
29.
Harris-Kojetin, Brian and Clyde Tucker. 1999. “Exploring the Relation of Economic and Political Conditions With Refusal Rates to a Government Survey.”Journal of Official Statistics15: 167-184.
30.
Heberlein, Thomas A. and Robert Baumgartner. 1978. “Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature.”American Sociological Review43: 447-462.
31.
Helgeson, James G., Kevin E. Voss, and Willban D. Terpening. 2002. “Determinants of Mail-Survey Response: Survey Design Factors and Respondent Factors.”Psychology & Marketing19: 303-328.
32.
Hox, Joop, Edith de Leeuw, and Harrie Vorst. 1995. “Survey Participation as Reasoned Action: A Behavioral Paradigm for Survey Nonresponse.”Bulletin de M ethodologie Sociologique48: 52-67.
33.
Levy, Paul S. and Stanley Lemeshow. 1999. Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications. New York: John Wiley.
34.
Lynn, Peter. 2003. “PEDAKSI: Methodology for Collecting Data About Survey Non-Respondents.”Quality & Quantity37: 239-261.
35.
Lynn, Peter, Rachel Turner, and Patten Smith. 1998. “Assessing the Effects of an Advance Letter for a Personal Interview Survey.”Journal of the Market Research Society40: 265-272.
36.
Martin, Charles L.1994. “The Impact of Topic Interest on Mail Survey Response Behaviour.”Journal of the Market Research Society36: 327-338.
37.
Nederhof, Anton J.1985. “A Comparison of European and North American Response Patterns in Mail Surveys.”Journal of the Market Research Society27: 55-63.
38.
Osgood, Charles E., George J. Suci, and Percy H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
39.
Porst, Rolf and Christa von Briel. 1995. “Wären Sie Vielleicht Bereit, sich Gegebenfalls noch Einmal Befragen zu Lassen? Oder: Gründe für die Teilnahme an Panelbefragungen.” ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht number 95/04.
40.
Roose, Henk and Hans Waege. 2003. “Van Passant tot Connaisseur: een Empirische Studie over de Interne Gelaagdheid en de Esthetische Verwachtingen van het Hedendaagse Theaterpubliek.”Mens & Maatschappij78: 242-263.
41.
Roose, Henk, Hans Waege, and Filip Agneessens. 2003. “Respondent Related Correlates of Response Behaviour in Audience Research.”Quality & Quantity37: 411-434.
42.
Roth, Philip L. and Craig A. BeVier. 1998. “Response Rates in HRM/OB Survey Research: Norms and Correlates, 1990-1994.”Journal of Management24: 97-117.
43.
Schnell, Rainer. 1997. Nonresponse in Bevölkerungsumfragen. Ausma ß, Entwicklung und Ursachen. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
44.
Scott, John. 2000. “Rational Choice Theory.” Pp. 126-138 in Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present, edited by G. Browning, A. Halcli, and F. Webster. London: Sage.
45.
Sharp, Laure M. and Joanne Frankel. 1983. “Respondent Burden: A Test of Some Common Assumptions.”Public Opinion Quarterly47: 36-53.
46.
Singer, Eleanor. 2002. “The Use of Incentives to Reduce Nonresponse in Household Surveys.” Pp. 163-177 in Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. M. Groves, D. A. Dillman, J. L. Eltinge, and R. J. A. Little. New York: John Wiley.
47.
Singer, Eleanor. 2003. “Exploring the Meaning of Consent: Participation in Research and Beliefs About Risks and Benefits.”Journal of Official Statistics19: 273-285.
48.
Singer, Eleanor, Nancy A. Mathiowetz, and Mick P. Couper. 1993. “The Impact of Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns on Survey Participation.”Public Opinion Quarterly57: 465-482.
49.
Smith, Tom W.1983. “The Hidden 25 Percent: An Analysis of Nonresponse on the 1980 General Social Survey.”Public Opinion Quarterly47: 386-404.
50.
Snijders, Tom A. B. and Roel J. Bosker. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Mulitlevel Modeling. London: Sage.
51.
Storms, Vicky and Geert Loosveldt. 2003. “Who Is Sensitive for Incentives?” Paper presented at the 14th International Workshop on Household Survey Response, September 22-23, Leuven, Belgium.
52.
Takahashi, Nobuyuki. 2000. “The Emergence of Generalized Exchange.”American Journal of Sociology105: 1105-1134.
53.
Verba, Sidney. 1996. “The Citizen as Respondent: Sample Surveys and American Democracy. Presidential Address, American Political Science Association.”American Political Science Review90: 1-7.
54.
Yammarino, Francis J., Steven J. Skinner, and Terry L. Childers. 1991. “Understanding Mail Survey Response Behaviour: A Meta-analysis.”Public Opinion Quarterly55: 613-639.
55.
Yu, Julie and Harris Cooper. 1983. “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires.”Journal of Marketing Research20: 36-44.
