Although climate change concern and household habits are often strong predictors of sustainable tourist behaviors, research shows mixed effects when applied to travel-related choices. To address this complexity, the paper introduces a framework targeting two key areas of tension. First, to explain the ambiguous impact of sustainable household habits, the concept of sustainable consumption modes is proposed, which can positively or negatively affect travel behavior. Second, the conflicting role of climate change concern is explained by incorporating time preferences. Concerned individuals are less likely to engage in more sustainability-related travel patterns when they prioritize the present over the future. The framework is tested using a multilevel analysis of 32,487 individuals across 32 countries, demonstrating these qualifying effects at individual and societal levels. The findings are corroborated through a follow-up experiment (n = 277). Two tools are provided to help stakeholders develop strategies to promote sustainable travel, tailored to customer and country segments.
AkhoundoghliM.BolukK. (2025). An examination of degrowth frameworks: Localizing, socializing, and regenerative tourism. Tourism Analysis, 30(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.3727/108354224x17209729214494
2.
AlbrechtS.ZinnA. K.GrünB.DolnicarS. (2024). Does enjoyment focus prevent proenvironmental behaviour?Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103714
3.
AlcockI.WhiteM. P.TaylorT.ColdwellD. F.GribbleM. O.EvansK. L.CornerA.VardoulakisS.FlemingL. E. (2017). ‘Green’ on the ground but not in the air: Pro-environmental attitudes are related to household behaviours but not discretionary air travel. Global Environmental Change, 42, 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.11.005
4.
AlcottB. (2008). The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 770–786.
5.
AnableJ.GaterslebenB. (2005). All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 39(2–3), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.09.008
6.
BarrS.ShawG.ColesT. (2011). Times for (Un)sustainability? Challenges and opportunities for developing behaviour change policy. A case-study of consumers at home and away. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.011
7.
BarrS.ShawG.ColesT.PrillwitzJ. (2010). ‘A holiday is a holiday’: Practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 474–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.007
8.
BeckenS. (2007). Tourists’ perception of international air travel's impact on the global climate and potential climate change policies. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(4), 351–368. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost710.0
9.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
10.
BöhlerS.GrischkatS.HausteinS.HuneckeM. (2006). Encouraging environmentally sustainable holiday travel. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 40(8), 652–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.006
11.
BüchsM.SchnepfS. V. (2013). Who emits most? Associations between socio-economic factors and UK households’ home energy, transport, indirect and total CO2 emissions. Ecological Economics, 90, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.007
ChapmanL. (2007). Transport and climate change: A review. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5), 354–367.
14.
ChitnisM.SorrellS.DruckmanA.FirthS. K.JacksonT. (2013). Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy, 55, 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.008
15.
CohenS. A.HighamJ. E.CavaliereC. T. (2011). Binge flying: Behavioural addiction and climate change. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1070–1089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.013
16.
CohenS. A.HighamJ. E. S. (2011). Eyes wide shut? UK consumer perceptions on aviation climate impacts and travel decisions to New Zealand. Current Issues in Tourism, 14(4), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683501003653387
17.
CohenS. A.HighamJ. E. S.ReisA. C. (2013). Sociological barriers to developing sustainable discretionary air travel behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(7), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2013.809092
18.
DavisonL.LittlefordC.RyleyT. (2014). Air travel attitudes and behaviours: The development of environment-based segments. Journal of Air Transport Management, 36, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.12.007
19.
DickinsonJ.LumsdonL. (2010). Slow travel and tourism. Routledge.
20.
DickinsonJ. E.RobbinsD.FilimonauV.HaresA.MikaM. (2013). Awareness of tourism impacts on climate change and the implications for travel practice: A Polish perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 52(4), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513478691
21.
DolnicarS.GrünB. (2009). Environmentally friendly behavior: Can heterogeneity among individuals and contexts/environments be harvested for improved sustainable management?Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391650831944
22.
DoranR.PallesenS.BöhmG.OgunbodeC. A. (2022). When and why do people experience flight shame?Annals of Tourism Research, 92, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2021.103254
23.
DunlapR. E.JonesR. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. Handbook of Environmental Sociology, 3(6), 482–524.
24.
Eurocontrol. (2022). Eurocontrol aviation outlook 2050. Main Report. Eurocontrol.
FalkA.BeckerA.DohmenT.HuffmanD.SundeU. (2023). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Management Science, 69(4), 1935–1950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4455
27.
FletcherR.Murray MasI.Blanco-RomeroA.Blázquez-SalomM. (2019). Tourism and degrowth: An emerging agenda for research and praxis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1745–1763. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1679822
28.
Font VivancoD.Freire-GonzálezJ.GalvinR.SantariusT.WalnumH. J.MakovT.SalaS. (2022). Rebound effect and sustainability science: A review. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(4), 1543–1563.
29.
FranzenA.MeyerR. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018
GösslingS.BredbergM.RandowA.SandströmE.SvenssonP. (2006). Tourist perceptions of climate change: A study of international tourists in Zanzibar. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(4–5), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.2167/cit265.0
32.
GösslingS.HaglundL.KallgrenH.RevahlM.HultmanJ. (2009). Swedish air travellers and voluntary carbon offsets: Towards the co-creation of environmental value?Current Issues in Tourism, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500802220687
33.
GösslingS.PeetersP. (2015). Assessing tourism’s global environmental impact 1900–2050. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(5), 639–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1008500
34.
HaresA.DickinsonJ.WilkesK. (2010). Climate change and the air travel decisions of UK tourists. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.018
35.
HickelJ.O’NeillD. W.FanningA. L.ZoomkawalaH. (2022). National responsibility for ecological breakdown: A fair-shares assessment of resource use, 1970-2017. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(4), e342–e349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00044-4
HighamJ.CohenS. A.PeetersP.GösslingS. (2013). Psychological and behavioural approaches to understanding and governing sustainable mobility. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(7), 949–967.
38.
HighamJ. E. S.CohenS. A. (2011). Canary in the coalmine: Norwegian attitudes towards climate change and extreme long-haul air travel to Aotearoa/New Zealand. Tourism Management, 32(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.04.005
39.
HighamJ. E. S.CohenS. A.CavaliereC. T. (2014). Climate change, discretionary air travel, and the “Flyers’ Dilemma. Journal of Travel Research, 53(4), 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513500393
40.
HirshJ. L.CostelloM. S.FuquaR. W. (2015). Analysis of delay discounting as a psychological measure of sustainable behavior. Behavior and Social Issues, 24, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v24i0.5906
41.
HolmesM. R.DoddsR.FrochotI. (2021). At home or abroad, does our behavior change? Examining how everyday behavior influences sustainable travel behavior and tourist clusters. Journal of Travel Research, 60(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519894070
42.
JevonsW. S. (Ed.). (1905). The coal question: An Inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines (3rd ed.). Augustus M. Kelley. (Original work published 1865).
KimS.FilimonauV.DickinsonJ. E. (2020). The technology-evoked time use rebound effect and its impact on pro-environmental consumer behaviour in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1643870
48.
KimS.FilimonauV.DickinsonJ. E. (2023). Tourist perception of the value of time on holidays: Implications for the time use rebound effect and sustainable travel practice. Journal of Travel Research, 62(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211064636
49.
KroesenM. (2013). Exploring people’s viewpoints on air travel and climate change: understanding inconsistencies. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.692686
50.
LeeM. S. W.FernandezK. V.HymanM. R. (2009). Anti-consumption: An overview and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.021
51.
LenzenM.SunY. Y.FaturayF.TingY. P.GeschkeA.MalikA. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x
52.
LiangJ.GuoL. (2021). Gratitude and sustainable consumer behavior: A moderated mediation model of time discounting and connectedness to the future self. Psychology and Marketing, 38(8), 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21502
53.
LiuA.MaE.QuH.RyanB. (2020). Daily green behavior as an antecedent and a moderator for visitors' pro-environmental behaviors. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(9), 1390–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1741598
54.
LuchsM. G.NaylorR. W.IrwinJ. R.RaghunathanR. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.0
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357.
58.
MiaoL.WeiW. (2013). Consumers’ pro-environmental behavior and the underlying motivations: A comparison between household and hotel settings. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 32, 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.04.008
59.
MillerD.MerrileesB.CoghlanA. (2015). Sustainable urban tourism: Understanding and developing visitor pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.912219
60.
MillerG.RathouseK.ScarlesC.HolmesK.TribeJ. (2010). Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.12.002
61.
MonbiotG. (2007). Heat: How we can stop the planet burning. Penguin UK.
Nieto-GarcíaM.AcutiD.VigliaG. (2024). Consumer hypocrisy and researcher myopia: A scrutiny of the intention-behaviour gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103678
PeetersP.PappB. (2024). Pathway to zero emissions in global tourism: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(9), 1784–1810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2367513
67.
PerkinsH. E.BrownP. R. (2012). Environmental values and the so-called true ecotourist. Journal of Travel Research, 51(6), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287512451133
68.
PrussiM.LonzaL. (2018). Passenger aviation and high speed rail: A comparison of emissions profiles on selected European routes. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018(1), 6205714. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6205714
69.
RandlesS.ManderS. (2009). Aviation, consumption and the climate change debate: ‘Are you going to tell me off for flying?’Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 21(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802557350
70.
RastegarR.BeckenS. (2024). Embedding justice into climate policy and practice relevant to tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2024.2377720
71.
ReimersH.JacksohnA.AppenfellerD.LasarovW.HüttelA.RehdanzK.BalderjahnI.HoffmannS. (2021). Indirect rebound effects on the consumer level: A state-of-the-art literature review. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100032
72.
ReimersH.LasarovW.HoffmannS. (2022). Moral-psychological mechanisms of rebound effects from a consumer-centered perspective: A conceptualization and research directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 886384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886384
73.
SantariusT.SolandM. (2018). How technological efficiency improvements change consumer preferences: Towards a psychological theory of rebound effects. Ecological Economics, 146, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.009
74.
SantariusT.WalnumH. J.AallC. (2016). Rethinking climate and energy policies: New Perspectives on the Rebound Phenomenon. Springer.
75.
SarstedtM.DiamantopoulosA.SalzbergerT. (2016). Should we use single items? Better not. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3199–3203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.040
76.
ScottD.HallC. M.GösslingS. (2016). A report on the Paris Climate Change Agreement and its implications for tourism: Why we will always have Paris. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(7), 933–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1187623
SorrellS. (2007, October). The Rebound Effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Center.
80.
SunY. Y.FaturayF.LenzenM.GösslingS.HighamJ. (2024). Drivers of global tourism carbon emissions. Nature Communications, 15(1), 10384–10410. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-54582-7
81.
TarasV.KirkmanB. L.SteelP. (2010). Examining the impact of Culture's consequences: a three-decade, multilevel, meta-analytic review of Hofstede's cultural value dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938
82.
ThøgersenJ. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4870(98)00043-9
83.
ThøgersenJ.ÖlanderF. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(03)00018-5
84.
TrabandtM.LasarovW.VigliaG. (2024). It’s a pleasure to stay sustainably: Leveraging hedonic appeals in tourism and hospitality. Tourism Management, 103, 104907.
WeiW.BakerM. A.OnderI. (2023). All without leaving home: building a conceptual model of virtual tourism experiences. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(4), 1284–1303. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-12-2021-1560
88.
WhiteK.HabibR.HardistyD. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
89.
WhitmarshL.O'NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
90.
WilsonM.DalyM. (2004). Do pretty women inspire men to discount the future?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, S177–S179. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2003.0134
XuF.HuangL.WhitmarshL. (2020). Home and away: Cross-contextual consistency in tourists’ pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(10), 1443–1459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1741596
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
