Despite the appeal of mystery offerings in tourism, knowledge about when such tactics may benefit or backfire is limited. This research examines the role of travel context (companionship vs. solo traveling) in tourists’ choice of mystery (vs. non-mystery) offerings. Across five studies (total n = 1,335), the authors find that when traveling with companions, tourists have a higher preference for mystery offerings than when traveling solo. This effect emerges across various tourism contexts (hotel accommodations, restaurant consumption, and destination choice) and in different countries (United States and China). The findings further suggest that diffusion of responsibility mediates this effect. Importantly, this effect is mitigated for those with an independent self-construal. This study enriches our understanding of mystery offerings in tourism, and offers actionable insights for practitioners to effectively utilize mystery offering strategies.
AakerJ. L.LeeA. Y. (2001). “I” seek pleasures and “we” avoid pains: The role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/321946
2.
ArainG. A.HameedI.CrawshawJ. R. (2019). Servant leadership and follower voice: The roles of follower felt responsibility for constructive change and avoidance-approach motivation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(4), 555–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1609946
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
5.
BalážV.ChenJ. L.WilliamsA. M.LiG. (2024). Stability of risk and uncertainty preferences in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 105, 103726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2024.103726
6.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
7.
Bar-AnanY.WilsonT. D.GilbertD. T. (2009). The feeling of uncertainty intensifies affective reactions. Emotion, 9(1), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014607
BogicevicV.SeoS.KandampullyJ. A.LiuS. Q.RuddN. A. (2019). Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: The role of mental imagery. Tourism Management, 74, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.009
10.
BuechelE. C.LiR. (2023). Mysterious consumption: Preference for horizontal (vs. vertical) uncertainty and the role of surprise. Journal of Consumer Research, 49(6), 987–1013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucac039
11.
BuijsV. L.LodderG. M. A.JeronimusB. F.RiedigerM.LuongG.WrzusC. (2023). Interdependencies between family and friends in daily life: Personality differences and associations with affective well-being across the lifespan. European Journal of Personality, 37(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211072745
12.
ChouE. Y.NordgrenL. F. (2017). Safety in numbers: Why the mere physical presence of others affects risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(3), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1959
13.
ClauzelA.GuichardN.RichéC. (2019). Dining alone or together? The effect of group size on the service customer experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47, 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.11.010
FayS.XieJ. (2015). Timing of product allocation: Using probabilistic selling to enhance inventory management. Management Science, 61(2), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1948
18.
FeiX.YouY.YangX. (2020). “We” are different: Exploring the diverse effects of friend and family accessibility on consumers’ product preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 543–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1152
19.
GaoH.JiaH.GuoB. (Michael) (2023). Resources available for me versus us: Implications for mitigating consumer food waste. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 61(4), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437231162615
20.
Garcia-RadaX.AnikL.ArielyD. (2019). Consuming together (versus separately) makes the heart grow fonder. Marketing Letters, 30(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09479-7
21.
GneezyU.ListJ. A.WuG. (2006). The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1283–1309. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/121.4.1283
22.
GoldsmithK.AmirO. (2010). Can uncertainty improve promotions?JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1070
23.
GorlinM.DharR. (2012). Bridging the gap between joint and individual decisions: Deconstructing preferences in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 320–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.05.002
24.
HamiltonR.FerraroR.HawsK. L.MukhopadhyayA. (2021). Traveling with companions: The social customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920908227
25.
HaoS.PengL.WijayaW. A.LiuB. (2023). Not that into you? Lovers’ traveling desynchronicity and its effects on the traveling satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 54, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.01.013
26.
HasfordJ.KidwellB.Lopez-KidwellV. (2018). Happy wife, happy life: Food choices in romantic relationships. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1238–1256. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx093
27.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
HillK. M.FombelleP. W.SirianniN. J. (2016). Shopping under the influence of curiosity: How retailers use mystery to drive purchase motivation. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.08.015
30.
HongJ.ChangH. H. (2015). “I” follow my heart and “we” rely on reasons: The impact of self-construal on reliance on feelings versus reasons in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1392–1411. https://doi.org/10.1086/680082
31.
HwangY.MattilaA. S. (2018). Is it my luck or loyalty? The role of culture on customer preferences for loyalty reward types. Journal of Travel Research, 57(6), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517718353
32.
JoeS.ChoiC.BusserJ. (2021). The impact of virtual presence on willingness to book: The moderating role of self-construal and gender. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 98, 103021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103021
33.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1995). Social loafing: Research findings, implications, and future directions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772570
34.
KarlM. (2018). Risk and uncertainty in travel decision-making: Tourist and destination perspective. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516678337
35.
KhalilzadehJ.TasciA. D. A. (2017). Large sample size, significance level, and the effect size: Solutions to perils of using big data for academic research. Tourism Management, 62, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.026
36.
KimJ.SeoY. (2019). An evolutionary perspective on risk taking in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 58(8), 1235–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518807579
37.
KimM. J.LeeC.-K.JungT. (2020). Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. Journal of Travel Research, 59(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518818915
38.
KirkR. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(5), 746–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056005002
KovachevaA.NikolovaH. (2023). Uncertainty marketing tactics: An overview and a unifying framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-023-00941-7
41.
KovachevaA.NikolovaH.LambertonC. (2022). Will he buy a surprise? Gender differences in the purchase of surprise offerings. Journal of Retailing, 98(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.04.002
42.
KovachevaA.WienerH. J. D. (2023). Let’s speculate about it: When and why consumers want to discuss mystery products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(3), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1388
43.
LamS. S. K.ChenX. P.SchaubroeckJ. (2002). Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069321
44.
LeeT. H.TsengC. H. (2015). How personality and risk-taking attitude affect the behavior of adventure recreationists. Tourism Geographies, 17(3), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2014.1000955
45.
LeeY. H.QiuC. (2009). When uncertainty brings pleasure: The role of prospect imageability and mental imagery. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1086/599766
46.
LeonhardtJ. M.KellerL. R.PechmannC. (2011). Avoiding the risk of responsibility by seeking uncertainty: Responsibility aversion and preference for indirect agency when choosing for others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.001
47.
LeppA.GibsonH. (2008). Sensation seeking and tourism: Tourist role, perception of risk and destination choice. Tourism Management, 29(4), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.08.002
48.
LevingerG.SchneiderD. J. (1969). Test of the “risk is a value” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026966
49.
LinH.ZhangM.GursoyD.FuX. (2019). Impact of tourist-to-tourist interaction on tourism experience: The mediating role of cohesion and intimacy. Annals of Tourism Research, 76, 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2019.03.009
50.
LinV. S.JiangF.LiG.QinY. (2023). Impacts of risk aversion on tourism consumption: A hierarchical age-period-cohort analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 101, 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103607
51.
LitmanJ. A.SpielbergerC. D. (2003). Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16
52.
LiuB.MoyleB.KraljA.VadaS.ChangL.LuS. E. (2024). Rethinking travel companionship: An alternative conceptual model and future research agenda. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480241258084
53.
LiuP. J.DallasS. K.FitzsimonsG. J. (2019). A framework for understanding consumer choices for others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucz009
54.
MaJ.LiF. (Sam) (2023). How does self-construal shape tourists’ image perceptions of paradox destinations? The mediating roles of cognitive flexibility and destination involvement. Tourism Management, 95, 104664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104664
55.
MaldoyK.De BackerC. J. S.PoelsK. (2021). The pleasure of sharing: Can social context make healthy food more appealing?Psychology and Marketing, 38(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21396
56.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
57.
MoonA.NelsonL. D. (2020). The uncertain value of uncertainty: When consumers are unwilling to pay for what they like. Management Science, 66(10), 4686–4702. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3426
58.
NikolovaH.LambertonC.ColemanN. V. (2018). Stranger danger: When and why consumer dyads behave less ethically than individuals. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 90–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx108
59.
PiehlmaierD. M. (2023). The one-man show: The effect of joint decision-making on investor overconfidence. Journal of Consumer Research, 50(2), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucac054
60.
PizamA.JeongG.-H.ReichelA.van BoemmelH.LussonJ. M.SteynbergL.State-CostacheO.VoloS.KroesbacherC.KucerovaJ.MontmanyN. (2004). The relationship between risk-taking, sensation-seeking, and the tourist behavior of young adults: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258837
61.
PöhlmannC.CarranzaE.HannoverB.IyengarS. S. (2007). Repercussions of self-construal for self-relevant and other-relevant choice. Social Cognition, 25(2), 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.284
62.
PolmanE.EffronD. A.ThomasM. R. (2018). Other people’s money: Money’s perceived purchasing power is smaller for others than for the self. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx119
63.
PolmanE.VohsK. D. (2016). Decision fatigue, choosing for others, and self-construal. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(5), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/194855061663964
64.
PolmanE.WuK. (2020). Decision making for others involving risk: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 77, 102184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.007
65.
QuintalV. A.LeeJ. A.SoutarG. N. (2010). Risk, uncertainty and the theory of planned behavior: A tourism example. Tourism Management, 31(6), 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.08.006
66.
RuanB.HseeC. K.LuZ. Y. (2018). The teasing effect: An underappreciated benefit of creating and resolving an uncertainty. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0346
67.
RuddM.HildebrandC.VohsK. D. (2018). Inspired to create: Awe enhances openness to learning and the desire for experiential creation. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 55(5), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718802853
68.
SchlenkerB. R.BrittT. W.PenningtonJ. (1996). Impression regulation and management: Highlights of a theory of self-identification. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 118–147). The Guilford Press.
69.
SevillaJ.MeyerR. J. (2020). Leaving something for the imagination: The effect of visual concealment on preferences. Journal of Marketing, 84(4), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919899393
70.
ShenL.FishbachA.HseeC. K. (2015). The motivating-uncertainty effect: Uncertainty increases resource investment in the process of reward pursuit. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1301–1315. https://doi.org/10.1086/679418
71.
ShenL.HseeC. K.TalloenJ. H. (2019). The fun and function of uncertainty: Uncertain incentives reinforce repetition decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy062
72.
SimpsonJ. A.GriskeviciusV.RothmanA. J. (2012). Consumer decisions in relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.007
73.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 580–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167294205014
74.
SongH.WangY.SparksB. A. (2018). How do young Chinese friendship groups make travel decisions? A content and interaction process analysis. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(6), 772–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2017.1421117
75.
SteenkampJ. B. E. M.BaumgartnerH. (1992). The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1086/209313
76.
SuL.ChengJ.SwansonS. (2021). The companion effect on adventure tourists’ satisfaction and subjective well-being: The moderating role of gender. Tourism Review, 77(3), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-02-2021-0063
77.
SuL.ChengJ.SwansonS. R. (2020). The impact of tourism activity type on emotion and storytelling: The moderating roles of travel companion presence and relative ability. Tourism Management, 81, 104138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2020.104138
78.
TuY.ShawA.FishbachA. (2016). The friendly taking effect: How interpersonal closeness leads to seemingly selfish yet jointly maximizing choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 669–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv052
79.
Urumutta HewageG. S.HeX. (2022). The mysteries of mystery deals: The roles of purchase type (material vs. experiential purchases) and excitement neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 28(1), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000318
WallachM. A.KoganN.BemD. J. (1964). Diffusion of responsibility and level of risk taking in groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042190
83.
WangX.KehH. T.ChaoC. (2018). Nostalgia and consumer preference for indulgent foods: The role of social connectedness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12419
WuE. C.CutrightK. M.FitzsimonsG. J. (2011). How asking “who am I?” affects what consumers buy: The influence of self-discovery on consumption. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 48(2), 296–307. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.2.29
86.
WuE. C.MooreS. G.FitzsimonsG. J. (2019). Wine for the table: Self-construal, group size, and choice for self and others. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 508–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy082
87.
WuY.HamiltonR. W.KimN. Y. J.RatnerR. K. (2021). Navigating shared consumption experiences: Clarity about a partner’s interests increases enjoyment. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 58(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222437211002818
88.
YanH.WangL.XiongH. (2024). Would the blind box be more effective? The role of uncertainty in consumers’ post-recovery satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 59, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2024.04.006
ZhaoX.CaiF.YangZ. (2023). Are people less generous after a family member gives to charity? The interaction of self-construal and relationship type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2022.11.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
