Helping Doctoral Students Establish Long-Term Identities as Technical Communication Scholars

Abstract

This article aims to help doctoral students in technical communication prepare themselves for the academic job market and for the subsequent process of earning tenure and promotion in increasingly demanding environments. The authors propose that students do four things: (a) learn to spot and articulate research problems; (b) find their vocation—the work to which they feel a personal calling—within technical communication; (c) identify the research methods that best suit their personalities; and (d) articulate a research identity and agenda that they can explain at three different levels of abstraction: describing individual projects, naming the coherent themes that connect these projects, and defining themselves concisely as scholars. All these orienting practices involve students in stepping back, looking for larger patterns in their work and in their professional interests, and finding specific language to represent them.

Keywords

doctoral students job applications mentoring pedagogy professional identity promotion research agenda research methods research problems tenure topoi

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barton

Stygall

(2002) Discourse studies in composition, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Beach

Bridwell

L. S.

(1984) New directions in composition research, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Charney

(2015) Getting to “how do you know?” rather than “so what?” from “what’s new”? Technical Communication Quarterly 24(1): 105–108. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975965.

Conklin

Hayhoe

G. F.

(2011) Qualitative research in technical communication, New York, NY: Routledge.

Creswell

J. W.

(2015) A concise introduction to mixed methods research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fink

(2013) Crisis communications: The definitive guide to managing the message, New York, NY: McGraw Hill Education.

Gere

A. R.

(1993) Into the field: Sites of composition studies, New York, NY: Modern Language Association.

Giles

T. D.

(2016) Aristotle writing science: An application of his theory. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 59–82. doi:10.1177/0047281615600633.

Gurak

L. J.

Lay

M. M.

(2002) Research in technical communication, Wesport, CT: Praeger.

10.

Hourigan

M. M.

(1997) From dissertation to scholarly monograph: Meeting professional expectations. In: Olson

G. A.

Taylor

T. W.

(eds) Publishing in rhetoric and composition, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 75–88.

11.

Hughes

M. A.

Hayhoe

G. F.

(2008) A research primer for technical communication: Methods, exemplars, and analyses, New York, NY: Routledge.

12.

Katz

S. B.

(1992) The ethic of expediency: Classical rhetoric, technology, and the holocaust. College English 54(3): 255–275. doi:10.2307/378062.

13.

Kinkead

(2016) Researching writing, Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.

14.

Kirsch

G. E.

Maor

F. S.

Massey

Nickoson-Massey

Sheridan-Rabideau

M. P.

(2003) Feminism and composition: A critical sourcebook, Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

15.

Kirsch

G. E.

Sullivan

P. A.

(1992) Methods and methodology in composition research, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

16.

Lauer

J. M.

Asher

J. W.

(1988) Composition research: Empirical designs, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

17.

Lewis

(2016) Content management systems, bittorrent trackers, and large-scale rhetorical genres: Analyzing collective activity in participatory digital space. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 4–26. doi:10.1177/0047281615600634.

18.

Lindemann

Tate

(1991) An introduction to composition studies, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

19.

MacNealy

M. S.

(1999) Strategies for empirical research in writing, New York, NY: Longman.

20.

Meloncon

England

Ilyasova

(2016) A portrait of non-tenure-track faculty in technical and professional communication: Results of a pilot study. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(2): 206–235. doi:10.1177/0047281616633601.

21.

Mortensen

Kirsch

G. E.

(1996) Ethics & representation in qualitative studies of literacy, Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

22.

Nickoson

Sheridan

M. P.

(2012) Writing studies research in practice: Methods and methodologies, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

23.

North

S. M.

(1987) The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

24.

Olson

G. A.

(1997) Publishing scholarship in rhetoric and composition: Joining the conversation. In: Olson

G. A.

Taylor

T. W.

(eds) Publishing in rhetoric and composition, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 19–33.

25.

Olson

G. A.

(2002) Rhetoric and composition as intellectual work, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

26.

Olson

G. A.

Taylor

T. W.

(1997) Publishing in rhetoric and composition, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

27.

Phillips

G. M.

(1982) Publishing in speech communication. In: Tchudi

S. N.

(ed.) Publishing in English education, Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook, pp. 95–111.

28.

Powell

K. M.

Takayoshi

(2012) Practicing research in writing studies: Reflexive and ethically responsible research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

29.

Rivers

Soderlund

(2016) Speculative usability. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 105–124. doi:10.1177/0047281615600635.

30.

Rossman

G. B.

Rallis

S. F.

(2003) Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

31.

Scott

J. B.

(2016) Boundary work and the construction of scientific authority in the vaccines-autism controversy. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 27–58. doi:10.1177/0047281615600638.

32.

Skinnell

(2015) Developing a professional profile. In: Skinnell

Holiday

Vassett

(eds) What we wish we’d known: Negotiating graduate school, Southlake, TX: Fountainhead Press, pp. 203–208.

33.

Skinnell

Holiday

J. U.

Vassett

(2015) What we wish we’d known: Negotiating graduate school, Southlake, TX: Fountainhead Press.

34.

Swales

J. M.

(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

35.

Swales

J. M.

Feak

C. B.

(2012) Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

36.

Takayoshi

Tomlinson

Castillo

(2012) The construction of research problems and methods. In: Powell

K. M.

Takayoshi

(eds) Practicing research in writing studies: Reflexive and ethically responsible research, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 97–121.

37.

Ulmer

R. R.

Sellnow

T. L.

Seeger

M. W.

(2015) Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

38.

White

Rumsey

S. K.

Amidon

(2016) Are we ‘there’ yet? The treatment of gender and feminism in technical, business, and workplace writing studies. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 4–26. doi:10.1177/0047281615600637.

39.

Zhang

(2016) Illustrating beauty and utility: Visual rhetoric in two medical texts written in China’s Northern Song Dynasty, 960–1127. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(2): 172–205. doi:10.1177/0047281616633599.

40.

Zhu

(2016) Impact of business cultural values on web homepage design that may hinder international business. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(1): 105–124. doi:10.1177/0047281615600644.