This mixed-methods study explored how leveraging student experiences through feedback can foster a more relevant academic curriculum and online content to improve technological course room delivery. Surveys were administered to online students to assess contextual elements of course relevance that are beneficial in their field. Our findings indicate that some components are useful and do not impact the learning environment. Additionally, some online components were rated favorably by students. The evaluation of the online course design revealed that a minority of participants (9.48%) strongly disagreed that the course room contains unnecessary user interface elements, while 26.72% disagreed, and 16.38% somewhat disagreed. Conversely, a smaller portion of participants (2.59%) strongly agreed, 11.21% agreed, and 12.93% somewhat agreed, with 20.69% remaining neutral.
AkpenC.AsaoluS.AtobateleS.OkagbueH.SampsonS. (2024). Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: A systematic review. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00253-0
2.
AldridgeJ. M.BianchetS. (2022). Using student feedback about the learning environment as a starting point for co-construction. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09403-9
3.
AldridgeJ. M.RijkenP. E.FraserB. J. (2020). Improving learning environments through whole-school collaborative action research. Learning Environments Research, 24(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09318-x
BraggL. A.WalshC.HeyeresM. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
6.
DengF.ChaiC. S.TsaiC.LeeM. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers' epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Educational Technology and Society, 17(2), 245–256. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.2.245
7.
FriendJ.CaruthersL. (2015). Transforming the school reform agenda: A framework for including student voice in urban school renewal. Journal of Urban Learning Teaching and Research, 11, 14–25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1071419
8.
HartC. D.BergerD.JacobB.LoebS.HillM. (2019). Online learning, offline outcomes: Online course taking and high school student performance. AERA Open, 5(1), 233285841983285. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419832852
9.
IsmailM. (2022). The impact of the academic overload on students’ well being in secondary schools in south Lebanon. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 2(2), 181–212. https://ijets.org/index.php/IJETS/article/view/47/33
10.
KathuriaH.BeckerD. (2021). Leveraging course quality checklist to improve online courses. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 10(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v10i1.31253
11.
KhatserG.KhatserM. (2022). Online learning through lmss: Comparative assessment of canvas and moodle. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 17(12), 184–200. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i12.30999
12.
KuhG. D.JankowskiN.IkenberryS. O.KinzieJ. L. (2014). Knowing what students know and can do: The current state of student learning outcomes assessment in US colleges and universities. National Institute for Higher Learning.
13.
LaiC.-H.LinH.-W.LinR.-M.ThoP. (2019). Effect of peer interaction among online learning community on learning engagement and achievement. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 17(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijdet.2019010105
14.
LeeA.LeeJ.JungE. (2023). University students’ experience of online space while engaging in synchronous learning via videoconferencing amidst the pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1083754
15.
LehtinenA.KostiainenE.NäykkiP. (2023). Co-construction of knowledge and socioemotional interaction in pre-service teachers’ video-based online collaborative learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 133, 104299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104299
16.
LimC.ChaiC. (2008). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 807–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00774.x
17.
LomosC.HofmanR. H.BoskerR. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement – a meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.550467
18.
PaulsenJ.McCormickA. C. (2020). Reassessing disparities in online learner student engagement in higher education. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x19898690
19.
PriyambodoP.HasanahE. (2021). Strategic planning in increasing quality of education. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v6i1.1138
20.
ReusserK. (2001). Co-constructivism in educational theory and practice. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (1st ed., pp. 2058–2062). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02408-6.
21.
SaloP.FranciscoS.Olin AlmqvistA. (2024). Understanding professional learning in and for practice. Professional Development in Education, 50(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2024.2311108
SilsethK.ErstadO. (2022). Exploring opportunities, complexities, and tensions when invoking students’ everyday experiences as resources in educational activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103633
24.
TrihantoyoS.HerachwatiN.PurwonoR.Supriyanto, HaqM. S.Windasari, & GalihW. P. (2024). Co-construction online learning models in early childhood education management courses. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Undiksha, 11(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.23887/paud.v11i3.63904
25.
TuretkenO.OndracekJ.IJsselsteijnW. (2017). Influential characteristics of enterprise information system user interfaces. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 59(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1339367
26.
UlumH. (2021). The effects of online education on academic success: A meta-analysis study. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10740-8
27.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Undergraduate enrollment by distance education participation. NCES. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cha
28.
WhettenD. A. (2021). Republication of “principles of effective course design: What i wish i had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago”. Journal of Management Education, 45(6), 834–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211044985
29.
Wilcox-Herzog, A. S., Ward, S. L., Wong, E. H., & McLaren, M. S. (2014). An examination of beliefs about the principles of developmentally appropriate practice. In H. Fives & M.G. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (1st ed., pp. 421-435). Routledge.
