The purpose of this study was to explore the perspectives of adult education faculty toward developing and teaching online adult education courses in their master’s programs to assist in our own transition to online adult education and to offer insight to others who may be interested in doing the same. Ten participants who work in fully online programs agreed to take part in this interpretive interview research. We coded and analyzed the data using the constant comparison and thematic analysis methods. Community of Inquiry was the framework guiding this study. Data analysis led to themes describing the contexts of these programs, meaningful benefits, noteworthy challenges, and insights and recommendations for instructors new to online adult education graduate programs. Implications and conclusions drawn from the study’s findings are presented.
AnnandD. (2011). Social presence within the Community of Inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12, 40–56. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i5.924
4.
BaackD.JordanD. R.BaackD. W. (2016). Evolution and revolution in higher education: Catastrophe theory’s applications and implications. Midwest Quarterly, 57(2), 105–125.
5.
BarberàE.LayneL.GunawardenaC. N. (2014). Designing online interaction to address disciplinary competencies: A cross-country comparison of faculty perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1418
6.
BenderT. (2012). Discussion based on-line teaching to enhance student learning: Theory, practice and assessment. Stylus Publishing.
BolingerD.InanF. (2012). Development and validation of the Online Student Connectedness Survey (OSCS). The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1171
ChangC.ShenH.LiuE. (2014). University faculty’s perspectives on the roles of e-instructors and their online instruction practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1654
11.
ChiassonK.TerrasK.SmartK. (2015). Faculty perceptions of moving a face-to-face course to online instruction. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 12(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v12i3.9315
12.
Cleveland-InnesM.GauvreauS.RichardsonG.SanjayaM.OstashewskiN. (2019). Technology-enabled learning and the benefits and challenges of using the Community of Inquiry theoretical framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1), 1–18.
13.
ConceiçãoS. C. O. (2016). Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106292247
FarberR. S. (2013). Distance education and teaching online: My journey from mystery to mastery. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 27(3), 272–279.
16.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge.
17.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
18.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM.FungT. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the Community of Inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
19.
GarrisonD. RVaughanN. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.001
20.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine Kress.
21.
GrahamD. (2019). Benefits of online teaching for face-to-face teaching at Historically Black colleges and universities. Online Learning, 23(1), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1435
HentzB. S. (2015). Sustainability and transitional learning: Exploring the influence of adult learners’ mental models on adaptive change. In HoltzJ.SpringerS.Boden-McGillC. (Eds.), Building sustainable futures (pp. 253–268). Information Age.
24.
JohnsonT.WisniewskiM. A.KuhlemeyerG.IsaacsG.KrzykowskiJ. (2012). Technology adoption in higher education: Overcoming anxiety through faculty bootcamp. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(2), 63–72. http://olc.onlinelearningconsortium.org/publications/olj_main
25.
KentnorH. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 17(1), 15–41. http://www.infoagepub.com/ctd-journal
26.
KressH.TheringA.LalondeC.KimS.CleetonL. (2012). Faculty reflections on online course development and implementation for teacher education. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge, and Society, 8(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-3669/cgp/v08i01/56263
27.
KuoY. (2015). Online learning and application of active learning strategies: Adult learners in online settings. In HoltzJ.SpringerS.Boden-McGillC. (Eds.), Building sustainable futures (pp. 157–182). Information Age.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
30.
PattonM. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd. ed.). Sage.
31.
Rogers-ShawC.Carr-ChellmanD. J.ChoiJ. (2018). Universal design for learning: Guidelines for accessible online instruction. Adult Learning, 29, 20–31.
32.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
33.
SerdyukovP. (2015). Does online education need a special pedagogy?Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 23(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.2498/cit.1002511
34.
SkinnerM. (2016). Perceptions of adult professional studies instructors regarding developing and transitioning online courses [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses global (UMI NO. 10241883)
35.
SwordT. S. (2012). The transition to online teaching as experienced by nurse educators. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(4), 269–271. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-33.4.269
36.
TisdellE. J.Redmon WrightR.TaylorE. W. (2016). Adult education faculty and programs in North America: Faculty background, work, and satisfaction. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615618781
VaillA. L.TestoriP. A. (2012). Orientation, mentoring and ongoing support: A three tiered approach to online faculty development. Online Learning, 16(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i2.256
40.
WingoN. P.PetersG. B.IvankovaN. V.GurleyD. K. (2016). Benefits and challenges of teaching nursing online: Exploring perspectives of different stakeholders. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(8), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20160715-03
