The study investigated academics’ experience using multimedia technologies for online engagements in the era of the new normal in Nigerian library schools. The study adopted a quantitative method approach using a survey design. The sample was drawn using total enumeration, which included all of the 98 respondents (researchers – the lecturers in the library school) from the six library schools chosen for the study. The questionnaire used as the data collection instrument was adapted from “Optimizing Zoom Application for Virtual Research Presentation Questionnaire” (OZAVRPQ) which contained both the closed and open-ended format. Four research questions were answered in the study. The findings revealed that the majority of respondents are quite aware of the presence and importance of Multimedia technologies for virtual research presentation, and their attitude toward the usage of Multimedia technologies for online engagement is very positive. The majority of respondents describe Multimedia technologies as very interesting and highly satisfactory platforms for collaborations; they also note that using Multimedia technologies is much more convenient and cost-effective than a face-to-face presentation, especially when the research work is to be presented outside of the presenter's geographical location. The study noted technical difficulties, network issues, the cost of data subscription, a lack of information communication technology, ICT understanding, and a lack of training as challenges.
AdeyeyeB.OjihS. E.BelloD.AdesinaE.YarteyD.Ben-EnukoraC.AdeyeyeQ. (2022). Online learning platforms and covenant university students’ academic performance in practical related courses during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(2), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020878
2.
AminF. M.SundariH. (2020). EFL Students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, LMS, or messenger application?Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929
3.
ArchibaldM. M.AmbagtsheerR. C.CaseyM. G.LawlessM. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
4.
ArlitschK.NewellB. (2017). Thriving in the age of accelerations: A brief look at the societal effects of artificial intelligence and the opportunities for libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 57(3), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2017.1362912
5.
BingimlasK. A. (2008). Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Eurasia.
6.
CerezoA.RamirezA.O'ShaughnessyT.SanchezA.MattisS.RossA. (2021). Understanding the power of social media during COVID-19: Forming social norms for drinking among sexual minority gender-expansive college women. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(4), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1868183
7.
Charbonneau-GowdyP.CechovaI. (2020, October). Zoom-ing out: The impact of international online practicum opportunities on pre-service teachers’ development. In European Conference on e-Learning (pp. 95–103). Academic Conferences International Limited.
8.
ChibuweA.MunoriyarwaA. (2023). Emerging methods and challenges associated with teaching and learning media studies during the COVID-19 Pandemic Induced Lockdowns in Zimbabwe and South Africa. SAGE Open, 13(2), 215824402311671. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231167113
9.
DavidsonC.EzehG. C. (2023). Challenges facing the use of ict in teaching computer studies in public secondary schools in awka south L.G.A. AfricArXiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/3b2160cd.03763750
10.
DharS.BoseI.KhanM. N. (2021). Digital social networks from a social capital perspective. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology, fifth edition (pp. 1106–1117). IGI Global.
11.
DorfmanD. (2022). Experimental Jurisprudence of Health and Disability Law (October 12, 2022). Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence (Kevin Tobia, ed., Forthcoming 2023), Seton Hall Law School Legal Studies Research No. Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4246118 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4246118
12.
FongB. Y. F.YeeH. H. L.NGT. K. C.LawV. T. S. (2022). The use of technology for online learning among older adults in Hong Kong. International Review of Education, 68(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-022-09957-7
13.
GetenetS.CantleR.RedmondP. (2024). Students’ digital technology attitude, literacy and self-efficacy and their effect on online learning engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology and Higher Education, 21(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00437-y
14.
HarriganP.DalyT. M.CoussementK.LeeJ. A.SoutarG. N.EversU. (2021). Identifying influencers on social media. International Journal of Information Management, 56, 102246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102246
15.
LataN.SonkarS. K. (2020). Impact of ICT on learning activities of the user by academic library services: A literature review. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–18.
16.
LobeB.MorganD.HoffmanK. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1609406920937875. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
17.
Lo IaconoV.SymondsP.BrownD. H. (2016). Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
18.
MennellaC.ManiscalcoU.De PietroG.EspositoM. (2024). Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review. Heliyon, 10(4), e26297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297
19.
MerciecaB. M. (2021). Sustaining online teacher networks. In Sustaining Communities of Practice with Early Career Teachers (pp. 65–97). Springer.
20.
MhlangaD. (2024). Digital transformation of education, the limitations and prospects of introducing the fourth industrial revolution asynchronous online learning in emerging markets. Discovery Education, 3, 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00115-9
NwangwuE.TaoufikE.ChukwuoneC.UgwuE.NwangwuC. (2024). Stakeholders’ perception of multimedia technologies and online learning in early childhood care and education during the COVID-19 era. The International Journal of Early Childhood Learning, 31(1), 25–58. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7939/CGP/v31i01/25-58
23.
OchollaD.OchollaL. (2020). Readiness of academic libraries in South Africa to research, teaching and learning support in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Library Management, 41(6/7), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-04-2020-0067
24.
OkeA.FernandesF. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
25.
PandeyD.OgunmolaG. A.EnbeyleW.AbdullahiM.PandeyB. K.PramanikS. (2021). COVID-19: A framework for effective delivering of online classes during the lockdown. Human Arenas, 6, 1–15.
26.
PetrettoD. R.CartaS. M.CataudellaS.MasalaI.MasciaM. L.PennaM. P.PirasP.PistisI.MasalaC. (2021). The use of distance learning and E-learning in students with learning disabilities: A review on the effects and some hint of analysis on the use during COVID-19 outbreak. Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health, 17, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017902117010092
27.
PurwantoA.PramonoR.AsbariM.HyunC. C.WijayantiL. M.PutriR. S. (2020). Studi eksploratif dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap proses pembelajaran online di sekolah dasar. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 1–12.
28.
RafeeqK.AliM. (2021). Opportunities and challenges in the use of ICT at tertiary level: Teachers’ perceptions. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 10(4), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6334299
29.
RattanawanP.PakdeeS. (2024). Perspectives of teachers and students on the impact of online classrooms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1335001. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1335001
30.
RomadhoniI. F.KiristiastutiD.NurlaelaL.SutiadiningsihA.AstutiN.PangesthiL. T.BaharA. (2020, November). Diverse forms of V-learning students’ acceptability during the pandemic COVID-19. In International joint conference on science and engineering (IJCSE 2020) (pp. 80–85). Atlantis Press.
31.
RynA. S.SandaranS. C. (2020). Teachers’ practices and perceptions of the use of ICT in elt classrooms in the pre-COVID 19 pandemic era and suggestions for the new normal’. LSP International Journal, 7(1), 24–35.
32.
SahaM.PrantyS.RanaS. J.HossainMd. (2022). Teaching during a pandemic: Do university teachers prefer online teaching?Heliyon, 8(1), e08663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08663
33.
SahidK. A.Akeredolu-AleB. I. (2025). Effect of multimedia technology on academic performance of undergraduates in selected universities in lagos state, Nigeria. Journal of Media and Communication Studies, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5897/JMCS2024.0837
34.
SalawuK.AjaniY. (2022). An empirical analysis on optimizing video conferencing tools for virtual collaborations: Perspectives of researchers in Nigerian library schools. University of Ibadan Journal of Library and Information Studies, 3(1), 1–19.
35.
SinghS.RoyD.SinhaK.ParveenS.SharmaG.JoshiG. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 and lockdown on mental health of children and adolescents: A narrative review with recommendations. Psychiatry research, 293, 113429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113429
36.
StojanJ.HaasM.ThammasitboonS.LanderL.EvansS.PawlikC.DanielM. (2022). Online learning developments in undergraduate medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide No. 69. Medical Teacher, 44(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1992373
37.
SuleimanY.AdeniyiS. T.KamalO.OluwaseunL. S.AbiodunO. M. (2022). An sssessment of students’ enrolment rate in University of Ilorin, Nigeria from 2019-2021: Implications for management. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 8(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1116
38.
SunW.GabelG.AkhterR.LawsonL.PlishewskyJ. (2024). Feasibility and acceptability of virtual programs for people with dementia and their caregivers. BMC Geriatrry, 24, 783. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05375-6
39.
ThunbergS.ArnellL. (2021). Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565
40.
TimotheouS.IoannouA. (2021). Learning and innovation skills in making contexts: a comprehensive analytical framework and coding scheme. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 3179–3207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10067-8
41.
VărzaruA. A.BoceanC. G. (2024). Digital transformation and innovation: The influence of digital technologies on turnover from innovation activities and types of innovation. Systems, 12(9), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090359
42.
VinagreM. (2016). Developing key competences for life-long learning through online engagement: Teaching ICT in English as a medium of instruction. In Handbook of research on foreign language education in the digital age (pp. 170–187). IGI Global.
