This research takes a socio-technical approach and uses participant observation and in-depth interviews to explain how two major TV news organizations from Colombia utilize social media to distribute video and engage TV audiences in online settings. Findings show that social media, particularly Facebook, are changing how television channels think of videos and their perceptions of audience engagement at the organizational level. Social media not only play a dominant role for distributing video but they influence with their recommendations and metrics TV decisions regarding content production. Finally, this research discusses the implication of these findings for the future of TV journalism.
AnannyM. (2013). Press-public collaboration as infrastructure: Tracing news organizations and programming publics in application programming interfaces. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212469363
2.
AndersonC. W. (2011). Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms. Journalism, 12(5), 550–566. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911402451
3.
AndersonC. W. (2013). Rebuilding the news: Metropolitan journalism in the digital age. Temple University Press.
BarleyS. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2005.588.x
6.
BarleyS. R. (1998). What can we learn from the history of technology?Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 237–255.
7.
BattelleJ. (2011). The search: How Google and its rivals rewrote the rules of business and transformed our culture. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
8.
BatsellJ. (2015). Engaged journalism. Columbia University Press.
Belair-GagnonV. (2015). Social media at BBC News: The re-making of crisis reporting. Routledge.
11.
Belair-GagnonV. (2019). News on the fly: Journalist-audience online engagement success as a cultural matching process. Media, Culture and Society, 41(6), 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718813473
12.
BijkerW. E.BijsterveldK. (2000). Women walking through plans: Technology, democracy, and gender identity. Technology & Culture, 41, 485–515.
13.
BijkerW. E.HughesT. P.PinchT. (Eds.). (2012). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (Anniversary ed.). MIT Press.
14.
BlanchettN. (2020). Quantifying quality: Negotiating audience participation and the value of a digital story at NRK. Journalism Practice. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1791231
15.
BoczkowskiP. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. MIT Press.
16.
BoczkowskiP. (2011). Future avenues for research on online news production. In DomingoD.PatersonC. (Eds.), Making online news: Newsroom ethnographies in the second decade of Internet journalism (Vol. 2, pp. 161–166). Peter Lang.
17.
BoudreauM.-C.RobeyD. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18.
18.
BraunJ. (2015). This program is brought to you by . . .: Distributing television news online. Yale University Press.
19.
BroersmaM. (2019). Situating journalism in the digital: A plea for studying news flows, users, and materiality. In EldridgeS.FranklinB. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of developments in digital journalism studies (pp. 515–526). Routledge.
20.
BroersmaM.EldridgeS. A.II. (2019). Journalism and social media: Redistribution of power?Media and Communication, 7(1), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i1.2048
21.
BrunsA.NuernbergkC. (2019). Political journalists and their social media audiences: New power relations. Media and Communication, 7(1), 198–212.
22.
CarlsonM. (2017). Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era. Columbia University Press.
Djerf-PierreM.LindgrenM.BudinskiM. A. (2019). The role of journalism on YouTube: Audience engagement with “superbug” reporting. Media and Communication, 7(1), 235–247.
25.
DobeleA.LindgreenA.BeverlandM.VanhammeJ.Van WijkR. (2007). Why pass on viral messages? Because they connect emotionally. Business Horizons, 50(4), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.01.004
26.
DomingoD. (2008). Inventing online journalism: A constructivist approach to the development of online news. In PatersonD.DomingoC. (Eds.), Making online news: The ethnography of new media production (pp. 15–19). Peter Lang.
27.
DomingoD.PatersonC. (2011). Making online news: Newsroom ethnographies in the second decade of Internet journalism (Vol. 2.). Peter Lang.
28.
EdoC. (2009). Periodismo informativo e interpretativo: el impacto de la Internet en la noticia, las fuentes y los géneros [Interpretative journalism: The impact of the Internet on news, sources and genres]. Alfaomega Editores.
29.
EkströmM.WestlundO. (2019). The dislocation of news journalism: A conceptual framework for the study of epistemologies of digital journalism. Media and Communication, 7(1), 259–270.
García-PerdomoV. (2017). Colombian journalists on Twitter : Opinions, gatekeeping, and transparency in political coverage. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1574–1596.
32.
García-PerdomoV. (2019). Technical frames, flexibility, and online pressures in TV newsrooms. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657163
GrabeM. E.ZhouS.BarnettB. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(4), 635–655.
35.
HammersleyM.AtkinsonP. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practices. Routledge.
HayesA. S.SingerJ. B.CepposJ. (2007). Shifting roles, enduring values: The credible journalist in a digital age. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 22(4), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520701583545
38.
HedmanU. (2019). # InFlux: Journalists’ adoption of social media and journalists’ social roles. Göteborgs universitet.
39.
HeinrichA. (2011). Network journalism: Journalistic practice in interactive spheres. Routledge.
HughesT. (2004). Human-built world: How to think about technology and culture. University of Chicago Press.
45.
Ibope Media. (2020). La televisión sigue siendo la plataforma favorita [Television continues to be the favorite platform]. https://www.kantaribopemedia.com.co/
JukesS. (2019). Crossing the line between news and the business of news: Exploring journalists’ use of Twitter. Media and Communication, 7(1), 248–258.
50.
KarlssonM. (2011). The immediacy of online news, the visibility of journalistic processes and a restructuring of journalistic authority. Journalism, 12(3), 279–295.
51.
KilgoD.HarlowS.García-PerdomoV.SalaverriaR. (2016). A new sensation? An international exploration of sensationalism and social media recommendations in online news publications. Journalism, 19(11), 1497–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916683549
52.
KumpelA. S.KarnowskiV.KeylingT. (2015). News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115610141
53.
LangerJ. (1998). Tabloid television: Popular journalism and the “other news.”Routledge.
LatourB. (2005). Ressembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.
56.
LeeA. M.LewisS. C.PowersM. (2014). Audience clicks and news placement: A study of time-lagged influence in online journalism. Communication Research, 41(4), 505–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212467031
57.
LeonardiP. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147–167.
58.
LeonardiP. M.BarleyS. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 159–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.03.001
59.
LewisS. C.UsherN. (2013). Open source and journalism: Toward new frameworks for imagining news innovation. Media, Culture & Society, 35(5), 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713485494
MoeH.PoellT.Van DijckJ. (2015). Rearticulating audience engagement: Social media and television. Television & New Media, 17(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476415616194
62.
NapoliP. (2011). Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media. Columbia University Press.
63.
PatersonC.DomingoD. (2008). Making online news: The ethnography of new media production. Peter Lang.
64.
RobinsonS. (2011). Convergence crises: News work and news space in the digitally transforming newsroom. Journal of Communication, 61(6), 1122–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01603.x
65.
RubenkingB. (2019). Emotion, attitudes, norms and sources: Exploring sharing intent of disgusting online videos. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.011
66.
RussellA. (2013). Networked: A contemporary history of news in transition. Polity Press.
Schmitz WeissA. (2015). The digital and social media journalist: A comparative analysis of journalists in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. International Communication Gazette, 77(1), 74–101.
69.
Schmitz WeissA.de Macedo Higgins JoyceV.HarlowS.AlvesR. C. (2020). Defining journalism innovation in Latin America: Exploration into perceptions among educators, students, and journalists. Journalism and Mass Communication Educator, 75(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695820935327
70.
SchrøderK. (2015). Reception analysis. In MazzoleniG. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 1–9). Wiley-Blackwell.
71.
SchuttR. (2012). Investigating the social world: The process and practices of research. SAGE.
72.
SingerJ. B. (2005). The political J-blogger: “Normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism, 6(2), 173–198.
73.
SingerJ. B. (2013). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833
74.
SpradleyJ. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
StraubhaarJ.SpenceJ.JoyceV.SintaV.MoraA.GarcíaV.DuarteL. (2015). The evolution of television: An analysis of 10 years of TGI Latin America (2002–2104). University of Texas at Austin.
77.
TracyS. (2013). Qualitative research methods. Wiley-Blackwell.
78.
UlinJ. (2019). The business of the business of media distribution: Monetizing film, TV, and video content in an online world. Routledge.
79.
VosT. P. (2015). Revisiting gatekeeping theory during a time of transition. In VosT. P.HeinderyckxF. (Eds.), Gatekeeping in transition (pp. 3–24). Routledge.
WarnerM. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.
82.
WeissR. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. The Free Press.
83.
WelbersK.OpgenhaffenM. (2018). Social media gatekeeping: An analysis of the gatekeeping influence of newspapers’ public Facebook pages. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4728–4747. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818784302
84.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
85.
ZamithR. (2016). On metrics-driven homepages: Assessing the relationship between popularity and prominence. Journalism Studies, 19(8), 1116–1137.
