The primary focus of this research is to analyze university students’ perceptions of the blended learning method, particularly within the context of artificial intelligence and the post-covid learning environment. The participants in this study consist of undergraduate students in their second and third years at a private university in South Korea. To gain deeper insights into the impact of these pedagogical approaches, we conducted qualitative research, seeking answers to our research questions through students’ reflections. The findings reveal the potential benefits and limitations of blended learning before, during, and after the pandemic. Key findings underscore the influence of student motivation and engagement on learning effectiveness and efficiency. The research also advocates for the necessity of innovative teaching practices and robust student support services to optimize the implementation of the blended learning method.
AdigunO. T.MpofuN.MaphalalaM. C. (2025). Fostering self-directed learning in blended learning environments: A constructivist perspective in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 79(1), e12572. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12572
2.
AlshahraniS. M.AlmalkiJ.AlshehriW.MehmoodR.AlbaharM.JannahN.KhanN. A. (2023). Systematic survey on big data analytics and artificial intelligence for COVID-19 containment. Computer Systems Science & Engineering, 47(2), 2973. https://doi.org/10.32604/csse.2023.039648
3.
BadiozamanI. F. A.NgA. L. Y.LingV. M. (2023). “Here we go again”: Unfolding HE students’ hybrid experience and resilience during post-covid times. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2023.2238324
4.
BaroneF. (2022). Ethnographic insights across cultures: Remote futures for teaching and learning anthropology. Teaching and Learning Anthropology, 5(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.5070/T35252643
5.
BensalemE.DerakhshanA.AlenaziF. H.ThompsonA. S.HariziR. (2025). Modeling the contribution of grit, enjoyment, and boredom to predict English as a foreign language Students’ willingness to communicate in a blended learning environment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 132(1), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241289192
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
7.
CaoW.HeQ.ZhangQ.TangY.ChenC.HeY. (2025). Acceptance or satisfaction of blended learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review of the literature. Nurse Education Today, 147, 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106589
8.
CarterI.HarringtonC.AhrendtS. (2024). An examination of an inquiry-based blended online/in-person science methods course. International Journal of Science Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2300090
9.
DeNeuiD. L.DodgeT. L. (2006). Asynchronous learning networks and student outcomes: The utility of online learning components in hybrid courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256–259.
10.
DesmetO.CrimminsD.Seigfried-SpellarK.GentryM. (2021). Ame + cyber: Evaluating the online delivery of A holistic cyber-related talent development program. Gifted Education International, 1(38), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054361
11.
DhawanS. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
12.
EijaN.SariP. S.KristinaM.TiinaT.JonnaJ.Heli-MariaK. (2024). The experiences of health sciences students with blended learning in health sciences education—A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 132, 106017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.106017
13.
EssadkiS.FourtassiM. (2024). Effect of blended learning on Students’ academic performance at the higher institute of nursing professions and health techniques of oujda. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(3), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i3.48367
14.
GengX.SuY. S. (2024). Enhancing K-12 students' STEM learning through the integration of the metaverse into online and blended environments: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(5), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10484-0
15.
GravesJ. L.HasanE.Varao-SousaT. L. (2024). Understanding the blended classroom in economics: A case study. International Review of Economics Education, 45, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2023.100282
16.
HallH.DavisonB. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library & Information Science Research, 29(2), 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.04.007
17.
KazuI. Y.YalçınC. K. (2022). Investigation of the effectiveness of blended learning on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(1), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.426.14
18.
KeeT.ZhangH.KingR. B. (2024). An empirical study on immersive technology in synchronous blended learning in design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 34(3), 1243–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09855-5
19.
KniffinL. E.GreenleafJ. (2023). Blended teaching and learning in higher education: An appreciative inquiry. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 35(2), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.12806/V22/I2/A1
20.
LevyM.HadarI. (2024). Learning to empathize with users through design thinking in blended mode: Insights from two educational case studies. Journal of Systems and Software, 207, 111831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111831
21.
LiK. C.WongB. T.KwanR.WuM. M.CheungS. K. (2023). Evaluation of hybrid learning and teaching practices: The perspective of academics. Sustainability, 15(8), 6780.
22.
LinX.SunQ. (2024). Discussion activities in asynchronous online learning: Motivating adult learners’ interactions. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 72(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2022.2119803
23.
LiuY. (2024). Using AI technology to create an inclusive environment for diverse online learners. In Designing equitable and accessible online learning environments (pp. 105–131). IGI Global.
24.
MenziesL.TickleM. (2024). Empathetic and inclusive teaching via blended learning: Lessons from teaching staff. Developing Academic Practice, 2024(Special), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.3828/dap.2024.12
25.
MeylaniR. (2024). An in-depth literature review of remote, online, and blended learning with case studies of successful and failed attempts. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science (IJSES), 5(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.87
MurphyM. P. A. (2020). COVID-19 and emergency eLearning: Consequences of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(3), 492–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749
28.
Navio-MarcoJ.Ruiz-GomezL. M.Arguedas-SanzR.López-MartínC. (2024). The student as a prosumer of educational audio–visual resources: A higher education blended learning experience. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2091604
29.
NiemiH. (2021). AI In learning: Preparing grounds for future learning. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 18344909211038105. https://doi.org/10.1177/18344909211038105
30.
OchsC.GahrmannC.SondereggerA. (2024). Learning in blended classes: The role of off-task activities. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50962-z
31.
OgumakinR. (2024). Traditional and modern system of teaching in higher education open distance learning (ODL) and blended format. International Journal of Education, Library and Information Communication Technology, 2(1), 1–19. https://ijelict.acu.edu.ng/index.php/ijelict/article/view/118/56
32.
OuyangF.ZhangL. (2024). AI-driven learning analytics applications and tools in computer-supported collaborative learning: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 44, 100616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100616
33.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261–283.
34.
PeprahE. (2024). Blended workplace: Current status, positives, negatives, challenges, and team learning. The Learning Organization, 31(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2022-0150
35.
PrestridgeS.MainK.SchmidM. (2024). Identifying how classroom teachers develop presence online: Breaking the fourth wall in online learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1357–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11714-8
36.
ŞahinF.DoğanE.İlicU. (2024). Instructors’ continuance intention to use technology in online and blended settings: Integrating psychological needs and emotions. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(2), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2309002
SukarmaI. K.IsnawanM. G.AlsulamiN. M. (2024). Research on nonroutine problems: A blended didactical design for overcoming student learning obstacles. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5552365
39.
SuryantoA.AmanL. Y.PurwantoN. A.FirdausF. M.FadhliR. (2024). Context input process product evaluation of blended learning practices in Indonesian universities. Int J Eval & Res Educ, 13(1), 475–487. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26588
40.
TangA. L.Walker-GleavesC.RattrayJ. (2024). University students’ conceptions and experiences of teacher care amidst online learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 366–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1989579
41.
TintoV. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of college student retention: Research. Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/152102511562191
42.
Wang, X., Liu, J., Jia, S., Hou, C., Jiao, R., Yan, Y., Ma, T., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Wen, H., Wang, Y. F., Zhu, H., & Liu, X. Y. (2024). Blended teaching after COVID-19: Advantages, challenges and optimization strategies. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 753. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05745-z
43.
WatsonJ. H.PerkinsA.Rockinson-SzapkiwA. J. (2024). Predicting special Educators’ use of assistive technology in virtual & blended learning environments. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 68(2), 370–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00932-7
44.
WestH.HillJ.AbzhaparovaA.CoxW.AlexanderA. (2024). Pandemic pedagogies: Reflecting on online learning using the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 48(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2023.2190962
45.
XiaoJ.Sun-LinH. Z.LinT. H.LiM.PanZ.ChengH. C. (2020). What makes learners a good fit for blended learning? Learning competences as predictors of experience and satisfaction in blended learning space. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12949
46.
YadavR.YadavM.VihariN. S. (2024). High-performance work system and learning orientation in offline, online, and blended workplaces: The mediating role of affective commitment. The Learning Organization, 31(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-10-2022-0118
47.
ZhangJ.HuangY.WuF.KanW.ZhuX. (2025). Scaling up online professional development through institution-initiated blended learning programs in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 65(2), 100988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100988
