An Analysis of the Impact of Social Networking Sites on Students’ Performance in English as a Foreign Language. The Case of Ecuadorian Polytechnic Undergraduate Students

Abstract

This article aimed to identify the usefulness of using social networking sites (SNSs) in an English as a foreign language class. One hundred sixteen undergraduate students of diverse degrees from a polytechnic state-owned university in Ecuador participated in the study, which followed a quantitative design. A descriptive analysis and a linear regression model were used to analyze the data gathered through an online survey. Results reported that participants agreed on average with all the propositions, thus confirming their perception of the usefulness of the SNSs used in class. Also, it was identified that the factors “Interaction with the teacher” (t = −0.116, p = .908) and “Engagement” (t = 1.508, p = .133) are not statistically significant predictors of student performance. Also, the factors “Interaction with peers” (t = 11.717, p < .001) and “Influence on cooperative learning” (t = 10.088, p < .001) were significant predictors in the model. The results of this investigation directly impact teachers’ practice and students who will be the first recipients of the advantages of using this tool in class.

Keywords

English as a foreign language social networking sites student performance Ecuadorian undergraduate students Ecuador

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas

Aman

Nurunnabi

Bano

(2019). The impact of social media on learning behavior for sustainable education: Evidence of students from selected universities in Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(6), 1683. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061683

Ahumada-Tello

Ravina-Ripoll

Gálvez-Albarracín

E. J.

(2020). Social networks and academic performance self-perception in business sciences students. Cuadernos De Administración, 36(66), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.25100/cdea.v36i66.7761

Al-Abdullatif

A. M.

Gameil

A. A.

(2021). The effect of digital technology integration on students’ academic performance through project-based learning in an e-learning environment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(11), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19421

Alaslani

Alandejani

(2020). Identifying factors that influence students’ performance through social networking sites: An exploratory case study. Heliyon, 6(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03686

Almanasreh

Moles

Chen

T. F.

(2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066

Alvarado-Villa

KuonYeng-Escalante

Sagñay-Pinilla

Vera Paz

Cherrez-Ojeda

(2021). Perceptions and knowledge of telemedicine in Ecuadorian practicing physicians: An instrument adaptation, validation, and translation from English to Spanish. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1781. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11826-1

Alwagait

Shahzad

Alim

(2015). Impact of social media usage on students’ academic performance in Saudi Arabia. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(2015), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.028

Asmara

(2020). Teaching English in a virtual classroom using WhatsApp during the COVID-19 pandemic. Language and Education Journal, 5(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.52237/lej.v5i1.152

Cavus

Sani

A. S.

Haruna

Lawan

A. A.

(2021). Efficacy of social networking sites for sustainable education in the era of COVID-19: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(2), 808–825. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020808

10.

Clark

J. L.

Algoe

S. B.

Green

M. C.

(2017). Social network sites and well-being: The role of social connection. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730833

11.

Collins

K. M.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Jiao

Q. G.

(2007). A mixed methods investigation of mixed methods sampling designs in social and health science research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 267–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807299526

12.

December

(1996). What is computer-mediated communication? John December. Retrieved October 10, 2022, from http://www.december.com/john/study/cmc/what.html.

13.

Del Alcázar Ponce

J. P.

(2022). (rep.). Ecuador Estado digital abr/22. Retrieved September 27, 2022, from https://www.mentinno.com/estado-digital-ecuador-abril-2022/

14.

Derakhshan

Salehi

Rahimzadeh

(2015). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL): Pedagogical pros and cons. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 4(3), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23/2015.4.3/23.3.111.120

15.

Dincer

(2020). Understanding the characteristics of English language learners’ out-of-class language learning through digital practices. IAFOR Journal of Education: Technology in Education, 8(2), 47–65. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1265678.pdf

16.

Eljarn

(2014). Computer-mediated communication, social networking sites & maintaining relationships [thesis]. Manchester Business School.

17.

Estrella

(2018). Is Facebook beneficial for writing practice? Ecuadorian polytechnic students speak up! Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 3–17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id = EJ1186369

18.

Gasaymeh

A.-M. M.

Al-Tawel1

A. M.

Al-Moghrabi

K. G.

Al-Ghonmein

A. M.

(2017). University students’ perceptions of the use of digital technologies in their formal learning: A developing country perspective. International Journal of Learning and Development, 7(3), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v7i3.11666

19.

Gilakjani

A. P.

Ismail

H. N.

Ahmadi

S. M.

(2011). The effect of multimodal learning models on language teaching and learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1321–1327. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1321-1327

20.

Gliem

J. A.

Gliem

R. R.

(2003). 2003 Midwest research to practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education. In Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales (pp. 82–88). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4205511/.

21.

Ilyas

Putri

M. E.

(2020). YouTube channel: An alternative social media to enhance EFL Students’ speaking skills. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 7(1), 77–87. Retrieved October 25, 2022, from https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/jshmic/article/download/4141/2298

22.

Jadhav

K. K.

Shirode

(2022). Social media as an asset or liability: Exploring the possible avenues that social media gave rise to in education with respect to the suburban areas in the district of Palghar. Sameeksha-Shodh, 4(2021-2022), 38–43. Retrieved October 25, 2022, from https://mucollege.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Sameeksha-Shodh-2021-2022.pdf#page = 40

23.

Jasrial

(2019). Utilizing WhatsApp application for teaching English language: Why and how? In International Seminar and Annual Meeting BKS-PTN Wilayah Barat (pp. 151–157). http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semirata/article/download/1098/474.

24.

Jewel

M. R.

Alauddin

(2021). Towards creating a technology-enhanced language classroom: Some pedagogic consideration from the perspective of Bangladesh. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 11(4), 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-7137.2021.01229.5

25.

Jordan

(2019). From social networks to publishing platforms: A review of the history and scholarship of academic social network sites. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2019.00005

26.

Kaplan

A. M.

Haenlein

(2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

27.

Kheryadi

(2018). The implementation of WhatsApp as a media of English language teaching. Loquen: English Studies Journal, 10(2), 1–14. Retrieved October 25, 2022, from http://www.jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/loquen/article/view/685/567

28.

Kircaburun

Alhabash

Tosuntaş

ŞB

Griffiths

M. D.

(2018). Uses and gratifications of problematic social media use among university students: A simultaneous examination of the big five of personality traits, social media platforms, and social media use motives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(3), 525–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-018-9940-6

29.

Koranteng

F. N.

Wiafe

Kuada

(2018). An empirical study of the relationship between social networking sites and students’ engagement in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(5), 1131–1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118787528

30.

Kostikova

Miasoiedova

Razumenko

Chernenko

Pochuieva

(2019). Teaching English speaking for FCE: Using Facebook as a tool of instructional practice. AMAZONIA Investiga, 8(22), 719–727. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from https://amazoniainvestiga.info/index.php/amazonia/article/view/825

31.

Kumar

Natarajan

Acharaya

(2017). Computer-mediated communication: A pathway to analyze social media communication trajectories. Man in India, 97(4), 195–205. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316958672_Computer_mediated_communication_A_pathway_to_analyze_social_media_communication_trajectories

32.

Kuru Gönen

Sİ

(2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: Reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974

33.

Levy

(1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford University Press.

34.

Levy

. (2006). Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance. In Changing language education through call (pp. 1–18). essay, Routledge.

35.

Lim

F. P.

(2017). An analysis of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in e-learning. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 143(46), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2017.143.46

36.

Mahdi

H. S.

(2014). The impact of computer-mediated communication environments on foreign language learning: A review of the literature. World Journal of English Language, 4(1), 68–87. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v4n1p9

37.

Marín

V. I.

Carpenter

J. P.

Tur

(2020). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of social media data privacy policies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13035

38.

Meena

P. S.

Mittal

P. K.

Solanki

R. K.

(2012). Problematic use of social networking sites among urban school going teenagers. Industrial Psychiatry Journal, 21(2), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-6748.119589

39.

Mehmood

Taswir

(2013). The effects of social networking sites on the academic performance of students in college of applied sciences, Nizwa, Oman. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 2(1), 111–125. https://ijac.org.uk/images/frontImages/gallery/Vol.2_No._1/10.pdf

40.

Mirabolghasemi

Iahad

N. A.

Rahim

N. Z.

(2015). Students’ perception of the potential and barriers of social network sites in higher education. In T. Issa, P. Isaias, & P. Kommers (Eds.), Social networking and education (pp. 41–49). Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17716-8_3

41.

Morse

J. M.

(1991). Strategies for sampling. In Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue, 127–145. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483349015.n16.

42.

Mukhametgaliyeva

Gura

Dudnik

Khudarova

(2022). The use of social networks in E-learning technologies in the context of distance education. Sustainability, 14(14), 8949. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148949

43.

Norhailawati

Handayani

Kalsum

H. U.

Saringat

Aidahani

Bakri

S. H.

Indra Prahmana

R. C.

(2019). The power of social networking sites: Student involvement toward education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20352

44.

Ortiz-Ospina

(2019, September 18). The rise of social media. Our World in Data. Retrieved September 27, 2022, from https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media.

45.

Osatuyi

Passerini

Ravarini

Grandhi

S. A.

(2018). “Fool me once, shame on you … then, I learn.” an examination of information disclosure in social networking sites. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.018

46.

Parmaxi

Zaphiris

(2015). Computer-mediated communication in computer-assisted language learning: Implications for culture-centered design. Universal Access in the Information Society, 15(1), 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-015-0405-4

47.

Pérez-López

Gurrea-Sarasa

Herrando

Martín-De Hoyos

M. J.

Bordonaba-Juste

Utrillas Acerete

(2020). The generation of student engagement as a cognition-affective behaviour process in a Twitter learning experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5751

48.

Rabiei

Sabaghi Nia

Sadeghi

(2022). The relationship between the use of virtual social networks in educational interactions during the COVID-19 crisis and student academic performance considering the mediating role of the quality of learning experiences. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 29(4), 475–484. http://jsums.medsab.ac.ir/article_1505.html?lang = en

49.

Saienko

Semyda

Akhmad

(2020). Using social networks in teaching ESP to engineering students. Advanced Education, 7(14), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.198083

50.

Sanchez

X. C.

Gavilanez

L. P.

Fiallos

A. M.

(2018). The effects of using ‘soundcloud’ on speaking performance of Ecuadorian students. 2018 International Conference on E-Democracy & E-Government (ICEDEG) (pp. 339–344). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icedeg.2018.8372339

51.

Solmaz

(2019). Pre-service language teachers’ use of social networking sites for language learning: A quantitative investigation. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.651394

52.

Syafiq

A. N.

Rahmawati

Anwari

Oktaviana

(2021). Increasing speaking skill through YouTube video as English learning material during online learning in pandemic COVID-19. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v3i1.6206

53.

Tafazoli

Gómez Parra

Huertas Abril

C. A.

(2018). A cross-cultural study on the attitudes of English language students towards computer-assisted language learning. Teaching English with Technology, 18(2), 34–68. Retrieved October 9, 2022, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1177704.pdf

54.

Talaue

AlSaad

AlRushaidan

AlHugail

AlFahhad

(2018). The impact of social media on academic performance of selected college students. International Journal of Advanced Information Technology, 8(4/5), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijait.2018.8503

55.

Tavakol

Dennick

(2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

56.

Thurlow

Lengel

Tomic

(2011). Computer mediated communication: Social interaction and the internet. Sage.

57.

Villafuerte

Romero

(2017). Learners’ attitudes toward foreign language practice on social network sites. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p145

58.

Wang

Lam

E. T.

Chiu

D. K. W.

Lung

M. M.-w.

K. K. W.

(2020). Supporting higher education with social networks: Trust and privacy vs perceived effectiveness. Online Information Review, 45(1), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2020-0042

59.

Wang

Y.-h.

Liao

H.-C.

(2017). Learning performance enhancement using computer-assisted language learning by collaborative learning groups. Symmetry, 9(8), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym9080141

60.

Whitehead

Ferguson

LoBiondo-Wood

Haber

(2020). Sampling data in quantitative research. In Z. Schneider, D. Whitehead, G. LoBiondo-Wood, & J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing and midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice (pp. 123–233). Elsevier.

61.

Zeinali Nejad

Golshan

Naeimi

(2021). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC) on learners’ pronunciation achievement. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1872908. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1872908