While virtual reality (VR) technology can provide students with first-hand and situational learning experiences, limited studies have integrated VR in a K-12 classroom, resulting in the lack of understanding of the benefits and challenges of VR use in classroom settings. To examine the impact of VR on student learning, this study employed a mixed-methods quasi-experimental research approach and integrated a fully immersive VR (i.e., Oculus Quest) and non-immersive VR (i.e., 3D website) into 9th-grade social studies classrooms. The findings demonstrated that while the quantitative data did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement in knowledge development and classroom engagement after students use VR, qualitative data showed positive learning benefits and classroom engagement. Furthermore, statistically significant growth was observed in the development of historical empathy with VR use. The findings share critical insight into the impact of VR on student learning and the challenges of VR integration in a K-12 classroom.
BartonK. C.LevstikL. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BeckD.EnoJ. (2012). Signature Pedagogy: A literature review of social studies and technology research. Computers in the Schools, 29(1–2), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2012.658347
5.
BrooksS. (2008). Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have?Social Studies Research and Practice, 3(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-02-2008-b0008
6.
CarspeckenP. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
7.
ChenY.SmithT. J.YorkC. S.MayallH. J. (2019). Google Earth virtual reality and expository writing for young English Learners from a Funds of Knowledge perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1544151
8.
ChiodoJ. J.ByfordJ. (2004). Do they really dislike social studies? A study of middle school and high school students. Journal of Social Studies Research, 28(1), 16–26.
9.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkL. V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks Sage Publications.
10.
Di NataleA. F.RepettoC.RivaG.VillaniD. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
11.
EndacottJ.BrooksS. (2013). An updated theoretical and practical model for promoting historical empathy. Social Studies Research and Practice, 8(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/ssrp-01-2013-b0003
12.
FabianK.ToppingK. J.BarronI. G. (2016). Mobile technology and mathematics: Effects on students’ attitudes, engagement, and achievement. Journal of Computers in Education, 3(1), 77–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0048-8
13.
GascoJ.PatelA.Ortega-BarnettJ.BranchD.DesaiS.KuoY. F.LucianoC.RizziS.KaniaP.MatuyauskasM.BanerjeeP.RoitbergB. Z. (2014). Virtual reality spine surgery simulation: An empirical study of its usefulness. Neurological Research, 36(11), 968–973. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000388
14.
HuijgenT.van BoxtelC.van de GriftW.HolthuisP. (2016). Toward historical perspective taking: Students’ reasoning when contextualizing the actions of people in the past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 45(1), 110–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1208597
15.
IngramK. M.EspelageD. L.MerrinG. J.ValidoA.HeinhorstJ.JoyceM. (2019). Evaluation of a virtual reality enhanced bullying prevention curriculum pilot trial. Journal of Adolescence, 71, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.12.006
16.
JeelaniI.KevinH.AlexA. (2020). Development of virtual reality and stereo-panoramic environments for construction safety training. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(8), 1853–1876. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-07-2019-0391
17.
KavanaghS.Luxton-ReillyA.WuenscheB.PlimmerB. (2017). A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 85–119.
18.
KimH.KeF. (2016). Effects of game-based learning in an OpenSim-supported virtual environment on mathematical performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1167744
19.
KohlmeierJ. (2006). “Couldn’t she just leave?”: The relationship between consistently using class discussions and the development of historical empathy in a 9th grade world history course. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(1), 34–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2006.10473297
20.
KusumaD.AdipranataR.Erandaru (2017). Simulation of atmosphere in Trowulan during the Golden Era of Majapahit using virtual reality. 2017 International Conference on Soft Computing, Intelligent System and Information Technology (ICSIIT), (pp. 263-269). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSIIT.2017.61
21.
MetzgerS. A. (2012). The borders of historical empathy: Students encounter the Holocaust through film. Journal of Social Studies Research, 36(4), 387–410.
22.
MillicanT. (2017). Virtual reality in higher education: A case study at the Air University's Squadron Officer College. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Auburn University.
23.
MishraP.KoehlerM. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
24.
PanX.HamiltonA. F. d. C. (2018). Why and how to use virtual reality to study human social interaction: The challenges of exploring a new research landscape. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12290
25.
ParkM. J.KimD. J.LeeU.NaE. J.JeonH. J. (2019). A literature overview of virtual reality (VR) in treatment of psychiatric disorders: Recent advances and limitations. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00505
26.
PattersonT.HanI. (2019). Learning to teach with virtual reality: Lessons from one elementary teacher. TechTrends, 63(4), 463–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00401-6
27.
PellasN.KazanidisI.PalaigeorgiouG. (2019). A systematic literature review of mixed reality environments in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2481–2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10076-4
28.
RantalaJ.ManninenM.van den BergM. (2015). Stepping into other people’s shoes proves to be a difficult task for high school students: Assessing historical empathy through simulation exercise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1122092
29.
RashidT.AsgharH. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084
30.
SchugM. C. (1982). Why kids don’t like social studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council for the Social Studies. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED224765.pdf.
31.
SweeneyS. K.NewbillP.OgleT.TerryK. (2018). Using augmented reality and virtual environments in historic places to scaffold historical empathy. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 62(1), 114–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0234-9
32.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
33.
ThomsenA. S. S.Bach-HolmD.KjærboH.Højgaard-OlsenK.SubhiY.SalehG. M.ParkY. S.CourM. L.KongeL. (2017). Operating room performance improves after proficiency-based virtual reality cataract surgery training. American Academy of Ophthalmology, 124(4), 524–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.11.015
34.
TychsenL.FoellerP. (2020). Effects of immersive virtual reality headset viewing on young children: Visuomotor function, postural stability, and motion sickness. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 209, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.07.020
35.
UppinH.TimoštšukI. (2019). “We’ll be back by Christmas” – Developing historical empathy during a museum activity. Journal of Museum Education, 44(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2019.1612660
36.
YangG.ChenY. T.ZhengX. L.HwangG. J. (2020). From experiencing to expressing: A virtual reality approach to facilitating pupils’ descriptive paper writing performance and learning behavior engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13056
37.
YilmazK. (2007). Historical empathy and its implications for classroom practices in schools. The History Teacher, 40(3), 331–337.
38.
WangQ. J.Barbosa EscobarF.Alves Da MotaP.VelascoC. (2021). Getting started with virtual reality for sensory and consumer science: Current practices and future perspectives. Food Research International, 145, 110410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110410
39.
ZhangG. (2019). Virtual simulation for history education. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR) (pp. 1646-1651). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797734.
