The purpose of this research was to determine the effectiveness of the instruction process using the flipped classroom (FC) model within the scope of Computer Networks and Communication course. Theoretically, the community of inquiry model was taken as a reference and the effectiveness of the instruction process was evaluated accordingly. Students were preservice teachers studying Computer Education and Information Technology in the third grade in the Van region in Turkey. There were a total of 19 students, of which 12 are male and seven are female. FC process was carried out in the spring semester of 2018–2019 and lasted 11 weeks in total. A mixed-method design was used to gathering the data. Therefore, the research design was an explanatory design from mixed-methods designs. The quantitative data collection tool was the Turkish version of the Community of Inquiry Survey. The quantitative data were analyzed by dividing the students into very low, low, high, and very high levels. The qualitative data collection tool was the interview form created concerning the community of inquiry model. The qualitative data were analyzed by the use of the community of inquiry coding template's themes. At the end of the instruction process, students had a very high level of cognitive, social, and teaching presence perception. This situation was detailed and supported with the qualitative data obtained. Concerning the cognitive presence, the students firstly talked about that they started the learning process with videos. Regarding the social presence, they mentioned the motivating effect of the questions. About the teaching presence, participants firstly mentioned the direct instruction role of the videos.
AkçayırG.AkçayırM. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345.
2.
AwidiI. T.PaynterM. (2019). The impact of a flipped classroom approach on student learning experience. Computers & Education, 128, 269–283.
3.
AydınB.DemirerV. (2017). A comprehensive analysis of the studies conducted in the framework of flipped classroom model. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.288488
4.
BaklaA. (2018). Learner-generated materials in a flipped pronunciation class: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. Computers & Education, 125, 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.017
5.
BediJ. (2018). A review of students’ perceptions, engagement, and academic achievement in the flipped classroom. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.
6.
BergmannJ.SamsA. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
ChengL.RitzhauptA. D.AntonenkoP. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
9.
ChisA. E.MoldovanA. N.MurphyL.PathakP.MunteanC. H. (2018). Investigating flipped classroom and problem-based learning in a programming module for computing conversion course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2015040103
10.
ChuangH. H.WengC. Y.ChenC. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning?British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530
CukurbasiB.KiyiciM. (2018). High school students’ views on the PBL activities supported via flipped classroom and LEGO practices. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 46–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26388378
14.
FisherR.PerényiÁ.BirdthistleN. (2018). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702
15.
FreankelJ. R.WallenN. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
16.
GarrisonD. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72.
17.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
18.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
19.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2010a). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
20.
GarrisonD. R.Cleveland-InnesM.FungT. S. (2010b). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002
21.
GoedhartN. S.Blignaut-van WestrhenenN.MoserC.ZweekhorstM. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09281-2
22.
GünbatarM. S. (2019). Computational thinking within the context of professional life: Change in CT skill from the viewpoint of teachers. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 2629–2652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09919-x
23.
GuoP. J.KimJ.RubinR. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ scale Conference (pp. 41–50). ACM.
24.
HaoY. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
25.
HwangG. J.YinC.ChuH. C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: Promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 991–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1667150
26.
Karabulut-IlguA.Jaramillo CherrezN.JahrenC. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548
27.
Karaoglan-YilmazF. G. (2017). Predictors of community of inquiry in a flipped classroom model. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516686047
28.
KayR.MacDonaldT.DiGiuseppeM. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x
29.
KazanidisI.PellasN.FotarisP.TsinakosA. (2019). Can the flipped classroom model improve students’ academic performance and training satisfaction in higher education instructional media design courses?British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2014–2027. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12694
30.
KeleşE. (2018). Use of Facebook for the community services practices course: Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework. Computers & Education, 116, 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.003
31.
KilisS.YıldırımZ. (2018). Investigation of community of inquiry framework in regard to self-regulation, metacognition and motivation. Computers & Education, 126, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.032
32.
KonijnW. S.EssinkD. R.de Cock BuningT.ZweekhorstM. B. M. (2018). Flipping the classroom: An effective approach to deal with diversity at higher education. Educational Media International, 55(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439711
33.
KovanovićV.JoksimovićS.PoquetO.HennisT.VriesP.HatalaM.DawsonS.SiemensG.GaševićD. (2019). Examining communities of inquiry in massive open online courses: The role of study strategies. The Internet and Higher Education, 40, 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.001
34.
LageM. J.PlattG. J.TregliaM. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/1183338
35.
LaiH. M.HsiaoY. L.HsiehP. J. (2018). The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers’ continuance use intention for flipped teaching. Computers & Education, 124, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.013
36.
LeeM. K. (2018). Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model?: Implications of South Korea’s social experiment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 837–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9587-9
37.
LeeY. H.KimK. J. (2018). Enhancement of student perceptions of learner-centeredness and community of inquiry in flipped classrooms. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 242. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1347-3
38.
LinY. T. (2019). Impacts of a flipped classroom with a smart learning diagnosis system on students’ learning performance, perception, and problem solving ability in a software engineering course. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.036
39.
LinC. J.HwangG. J. (2018). A learning analytics approach to investigating factors affecting EFL students’ oral performance in a flipped classroom. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(2), 205–219. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26388398
40.
LongT.CumminsJ.WaughM. (2019). Investigating the factors that influence higher education instructors’ decisions to adopt a flipped classroom instructional model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2028–2039. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12703
41.
McLeanS.AttardiS. M. (2018). Sage or guide? Student perceptions of the role of the instructor in a flipped classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418793725
42.
MohamedH.LamiaM. (2018). Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into learning process. Computers & Education, 124, 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.011
43.
Murillo-ZamoranoL. R.SánchezJ. Á. L.Godoy-CaballeroA. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141, 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
44.
NgE. M. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students. Computers & Education, 126, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.002
45.
Oliván BlázquezB.MaslukB.GasconS.Fueyo DíazR.Aguilar-LatorreA.Artola MagallónI.Magallón BotayaR. (2019). The use of flipped classroom as an active learning approach improves academic performance in social work: A randomized trial in a university. PloS One, 14(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214623
46.
ÖztürkE. (2012). An adaptation of the community of inquiry index: The study of validity and reliability. Elementary Education Online, 11(2), 408–422.
47.
PardoA.GaševićD.JovanovicJ. M.DawsonS.MirriahiN. (2018). Exploring student interactions with preparation activities in a flipped classroom experience. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. 12(3), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2858790
48.
PriceC.WalkerM. (2019). Improving the accessibility of foundation statistics for undergraduate business and management students using a flipped classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1628204
49.
QiangJ. (2019). Effects of digital flipped classroom teaching method integrated cooperative learning model on learning motivation and outcome. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2213–2220. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86130
50.
SchwarzenbergP.NavonJ.NussbaumM.Pérez-SanagustínM.CaballeroD. (2018). Learning experience assessment of flipped courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9159-8
51.
SergisS.SampsonD. G.PelliccioneL. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students’ learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
52.
SezerB.AbayE. (2019). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model in medical education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 63(6), 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2018.1452292
53.
ShyrW. J.ChenC. H. (2018). Designing a technology-enhanced flipped learning system to facilitate students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12213
54.
SinghJ. (2017). Enhancing student success in health care programs: Active learning in a hybrid format. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 18, 1–14.
SuC. Y.ChenC. H. (2018). Investigating the effects of flipped learning, student question generation, and instant response technologies on Students’ learning motivation, attitudes, and engagement: A structural equation modeling. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89938
58.
ThaiN. T. T.De WeverB.ValckeM. (2020). Face-to-face, blended, flipped, or online learning environment? Impact on learning performance and student cognitions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12423
59.
TuranZ.Akdag-CimenB. (2019). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
60.
UrfaM. (2018). Flipped classroom model and practical suggestions. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 1(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.378607
WinterJ. W. (2018). Analysis of knowledge construction during group space activities in a flipped learning course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 720–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12279
63.
WuW. C. V.HsiehJ. S. C.YangJ. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 142–157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170
64.
XiuY.MooreM. E.ThompsonP.FrenchD. P. (2019). Student perceptions of lecture-capture video to facilitate learning in a flipped classroom. TechTrends, 63(4), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0293-6
65.
YoonS.KimS.KangM. (2020). Predictive power of grit, professor support for autonomy and learning engagement on perceived achievement within the context of a flipped classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418762463
66.
ZainuddinZ. (2018). Students’ learning performance and perceived motivation in gamified flipped-class instruction. Computers & Education, 126, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.003
67.
ZainuddinZ.ZhangY.LiX.ChuS. K. W.IdrisS.KeumalaC. M. (2019). Research trends in flipped classroom empirical evidence from 2017 to 2018. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(3), 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0082
68.
ZouD. (2020). Gamified flipped EFL classroom for primary education: Student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00153-w
