In present-day societies, the extent to which young people still participate in civic life is an important matter of concern. The claim of a generational “decline” in civic engagement has been contested, and interchanged with the notion of a “replacement” of traditional engagement by new types of participation, and the emergence of the “monitorial citizen” who participates in more individualized ways. Concurrently, this study explored the assumption of a “pluralization” of involvement, advancing a new concept: the “civic omnivore,” characterized by an expanded civic repertoire. Drawing data from a sample of 1,493 Belgian and Dutch university students, we identify five repertoires of participation such as, disengaged students, classical volunteers, humanitarian citizens, monitorial citizens, and civic omnivores. Our findings support the pluralization thesis, by showing that young citizens are not exclusively engaged in new monitorial ways, yet also expand their civic repertoire by combining traditional and new forms in more complex ways.
BarnesS.KaaseM. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
2.
BekkersR. (2007). Intergenerational transmission of volunteering. Acta Sociologica, 50, 99-114.
3.
BennettW. L. (1998). The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. Political Science and Politics, 31, 741-761.
4.
BrownR. (2007). Using latent class analysis to set academic performance standards. Educational Assessment, 12, 283-301.
5.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK.VerbaS. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
CaputoR. K. (2009). Capital and intergenerational transmission of volunteering as correlates of civic engagement. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 983-1002.
7.
DaltonR. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76-98.
8.
DejaeghereY.HoogheM. (2006). Op zoek naar de “monitorial citizen.” Een empirisch onderzoek naar de prevalentie van postmodern burgerschap in België [In search of the monitorial citizen: An empirical study on the prevalence of postmodern citizenship in Belgium]. Res Publica, 48, 393-420.
9.
DekkerP.de HartJ.FaulkL. (2007). Toekomstverkenning vrijwillige inzet 2015 [The future of voluntary action 2015]. Den Haag, Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
10.
de VreeseC. H. (2007). Digital renaissance: Young consumer and citizen?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 207-216.
11.
FlanaganC. A.BowesJ. M.JonssonB.SheblanovaE. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 457-475.
12.
FraserN. (Ed.). (1995). Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
HagenaarsJ. A. (1993). Loglinear models with latent variables: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
14.
HandyF.HustinxL.KangC.CnaanR.BrudneyJ.Haski-LeventhalD.. . . ZrinscakS. (2009). A cross-cultural examination of student volunteering: Is it all about résumé building?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 498-523.
15.
Haski-LeventhalD.MeijsL.HustinxL. (2010). The third party model: Enhancing volunteering through governments, corporations and educational institutes. Journal of Social Policy, 39, 139-158.
16.
HoogheM. (2003a). Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 47-69.
17.
HoogheM. (2003b). Why should we be bowling alone? Results from a Belgian survey on civic participation. Voluntas, 14, 41-59.
18.
HoogheM.DejaeghereY. (2007). Does the “monitorial citizen” exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 249-271.
19.
HoogheM.DeneckereG. (2003). La Marche Blanche en Belgique (octobre 1996), une mouvement de masse spectaculaire mais éphémère [The White march in Belgium (October 1996), a spectacular but ephemeral mass movement]. Le Mouvement Social, 202, 153-164.
20.
HustinxL. (2005). Weakening organizational ties? A classification of styles of volunteering in the Flemish Red Cross. Social Service Review, 79, 624-652.
21.
HustinxL. (2004, April13-18). Beyond the tyranny of the “new”? An explanatory model of styles of Flemish Red Cross volunteering. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops (Workshop 24: “Emerging repertoires of political action: Toward a systematic study of post-conventional forms of participation”), Uppsala, Sweden.
22.
HustinxL.LammertynF. (2003). Collective and reflexive styles of volunteering: A sociological modernization perspective. Voluntas, 14, 167-187.
23.
HustinxL.VanhoveT.DeclercqA.HermansK.LammertynF. (2005). Bifurcated commitment, priorities, and social contagion: The dynamics and correlates of volunteering within a university population. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26, 523-538.
24.
InglehartR. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
InglehartR.WelzelC. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
KnackS.KeeferP. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251-1288.
28.
MarshD.O’TooleT.JonesS. (2007). Young people and politics in the UK: Apathy or alienation?London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
McCutcheonA. L. (1987). Latent class analysis: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
McFarlandD. A.ThomasR. J. (2006). Bowling young: How youth voluntary associations influence adult political participation. American Sociological Review, 71, 401-425.
31.
MichelettiM. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism and collective action. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
MichelettiM.StolleD. (2007). Mobilizing consumers to take responsibility for global social justice. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611, 157-175.
33.
MusickM. A.WilsonJ. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
34.
NorrisP. (1996). Does television erode social capital? A reply to Putnam. PS: Political Science and Politics, 29, 474-480.
35.
NorrisP. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
NorrisP. (2003, November27-28). Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice?Report for the Council of Europe Symposium: “Young People and Democratic Institutions: From Disillusionment to Participation,”Strasbourg, France.
37.
NorrisP.WalgraveS.Van AelstP. (2005). Who demonstrates?Comparative Politics, 37, 189-205.
38.
O’TooleT.ListerM.MarshD.JonesS.McDonaghA. (2003). Tuning out or left out? Participation and non-participation among young people. Contemporary Politics, 9, 45-61.
39.
PerksT.HaanM. (2010). Youth religious involvement and adult community participation: Do levels of youth religious involvement matter?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/089976400935779410.1177/0899764009357794
40.
PetersonR. A. (1993). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21, 243-258.
41.
PetersonR. A.KernR. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American sociological Review, 61, 900-907.
42.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Touchstone.
44.
ReboussinB. A.SongE.ShresthaA.LohmanK. K.WolfsonM. (2006). A latent class analysis of underage problem drinking: Evidence from a community sample of 16-20 year olds. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 83, 199-209.
45.
SalamonL. M.SokolowskiS. W.Associates. (2004). Global civil society: Dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
46.
SampsonR. J.McAdamD.MacIndoeH.Weffer-ElizondoS. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 673-714.
47.
SchudsonM. (1998). The good citizen: A history of American public life. New York, NY: Free Press.
48.
SchudsonM. (2006). The varieties of civic experience. Citizenship Studies, 10, 591-606.
49.
StolleD.HoogheM. (2005). Inaccurate, exceptional, one-sided or irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in Western Societies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 149-167.
50.
StolleD.HoogheM.MichelettiM. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26, 245-269.
51.
StolleD.MichelettiM. (2005). The gender gap reversed. In O’NeillB.GidengilE. (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 45-72). London, UK: Routledge.
52.
SullivanC. J.ChildsK. K.O’ConnellD. (2009). Adolescent risk behavior subgroups: An empirical assessment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 541-562.
53.
Van AelstP.WalgraveS. (2001). Who is that (wo)man in the street? From the normalisation of protest to the normalisation of the protester. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 461-486.
54.
Vander SticheleA.LaermansR. (2006). Cultural participation in Flanders: Testing the cultural omnivore thesis with population data. Poetics, 34, 45-64.
55.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L.BradyH. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
VermuntJ. (1997). LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
57.
VermuntJ. K.MagidsonJ. (2002). Latent class analysis. In Lewis-BeckM.BrymanA. E.LiaoT. F. (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (pp. 549-553). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
