We bring together research on social networks and neighbourhood disadvantage to examine how they jointly affect unemployed individuals’ probability of re-entering employment. Data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study ‘Understanding Society’ provide information on the proportion of friends who live in the same neighbourhood, and are linked with small-scale administrative information on neighborhood employment deprivation. Results indicate that neighbourhood employment deprivation prolongs unemployment, but only for individuals who report that all of their friends live in the same neighbourhood. Living in an advantaged neighbourhood with all of one’s friends in the neighbourhood increases the chances of exiting unemployment. In contrast, neighbourhood location is not associated with unemployment exit if one’s friends do not live in the same neighbourhood. We conclude that neighbourhood effects on exiting unemployment critically depend on individuals’ social embeddedness in the neighbourhood. Not just residing in a disadvantaged neighbourhood, but actually living there with all one’s friends, prevents individuals from re-entering employment. This opens new avenues for theorising neighbourhood effects as social rather than geographic phenomena, and highlights that the effects of neighbourhood socio-economic characteristics are conditional on the level of interaction residents have within their neighbourhood.
BrattbakkIWesselT (2013) Long-term neighbourhood effects on education, income and employment among adolescents in Oslo. Urban Studies50(2): 391–406.
2.
BuckN (2001) Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion. Urban Studies38(12): 2251–2275.
3.
BunelML’HortyYPetitP (2016) Discrimination based on place of residence and access to employment. Urban Studies53(2): 267–286.
4.
BurtRS (2001) Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In: LinNCookKSBurtRS (eds) Social Capital: Theory and Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 31–56.
5.
BurtRS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology110(2): 349–399.
6.
CinganoFRosoliaA (2012) People I know: Job search and social networks. Journal of Labor Economics30(2): 291–332.
7.
ColemanJS (1986) Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology91(16): 1309–1335.
8.
ColemanJS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: 95–120.
9.
CutlerDMGlaeserEL (1997) Are ghettos good or bad?Quarterly Journal of Economics112(3): 827–872.
10.
DawkinsCJShenQSanchezTW (2005) Race, space, and unemployment duration. Journal of Urban Economics58(1): 91–113.
11.
DesmondMAnW (2015) Neighborhood and network disadvantage among urban renters. Sociological Science2: 329–349.
12.
DietzR (2002) The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research31: 539–575.
13.
ElliottJR (1999) Social isolation and labor market insulation: Network and neighborhood effects on less-educated urban workers. Sociological Quarterly40(2): 199–216.
14.
ErbringLYoungAA (1979) Individuals and social structure. Contextual effects as endogenous feedback. Sociological Methods & Research7(4): 396–430.
15.
FasangAEManginoWBrücknerH (2014) Social closure and educational attainment. Sociological Forum29: 137–164.
16.
FernandezRMSuC (2004) Space in the study of labor markets. Annual Review of Sociology30(1): 545–569.
17.
GalsterGC (2012) The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In: van HamMManleyDBaileyNSimpsonLMaclennanD (eds) Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 23–56.
18.
GalsterGCKillenSP (1995) The geography of metropolitan opportunity: A reconnaissance and conceptual framework. Housing Policy Debate6(1): 7–43.
19.
GintherDHavemanRWolfeB (2000) Neighborhood attributes as determinants of children’s outcomes: How robust are the relationships?Journal of Human Resources35(4): 603–642.
20.
GranovetterM (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
21.
GranovetterM (1995) Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
GreggPWadsworthJ (2010) Employment in the 2008–2009 recession. Economic & Labour Market Review4: 37–43.
23.
HoustonD (2005) Employability, skills mismatch and spatial mismatch in metropolitan labour markets. Urban Studies42(4): 221–243.
24.
IhlanfeldtKRSjoquistDL (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Housing Policy Debate9(4): 849–892.
25.
JencksCMayerSE (1989) Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter?Science243(4897): 1441–1445.
26.
JencksCMayerSE (1990) The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood, inner-city poverty in the United States. In: LynnLEMcGearyMFH (eds) Inner City Poverty in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 111–186.
27.
KainJF (1968) Housing segregation, Negro employment, and metropolitan decentralization. The Quarterly Journal of Economics82(2): 175–197.
28.
KleitR (2002) Job search networks and strategies in scattered-site public housing. Housing Studies17(1): 83–100.
29.
LinN (1999) Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology25: 467–487.
30.
LongSJFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd edn.College Station, TX: Stata Press.
31.
LynnPBorkowskaM (2018) Some indicators of sample representativeness and attrition bias for BHPS and understanding society. Working Paper Series. Understanding Society at the Institute for Social and Economic Research. University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
32.
MclennanDBarnesHNobleM, et al. (2011) The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
33.
MiltenburgEM (2015) The conditionality of neighbourhood effects upon social neighbourhood embeddedness: A critical examination of the resources and socialisation mechanisms. Housing Studies30(2): 272–294.
34.
MiltenburgEMVan de WerfhorstHG (2017) Finding a job: The role of the neighbourhood for different household configurations over the life course. European Sociological Review33(1): 30–45.
35.
MizeTD (2019) Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science6: 81–117.
36.
MoffittR (1983) An economic model of welfare stigma. The American Economic Review73(5): 1023–1035.
37.
MoodC (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review26(1): 67–82.
38.
MorganSLSorensenAB (1999) Parental networks, social closure, and mathematics learning: A test of Coleman’s social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review64(5): 661–681.
39.
MouwT (2000) Job relocation and the racial gap in unemployment in Detroit and Chicago, 1980 to 1990. American Sociological Review65(5): 730–753.
40.
MouwT (2002) Are black workers missing the connection? The effect of spatial distance and employee referrals on interfirm racial segregation. Demography39(3): 507–528.
41.
MusterdSOstendorfWde VosS (2003) Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: A longitudinal analysis. Housing Studies18(6): 877–892.
42.
OeschDvon OwA (2017) Social networks and job access for the unemployed: Work ties for the upper-middle class, communal ties for the working class. European Sociological Review33(2): 275–291.
43.
ONS (2012) 2011 Census: Population and Household Estimates for Small Areas in England and Wales, March 2011. London: Office for National Statistics.
44.
ONS (2018) Beginner’s Guide to UK Geography. London: Office for National Statistics.
45.
OreganKMQuigleyJM (1996) Teenage employment and the spatial isolation of minority and poverty households. Journal of Human Resources31(3): 692–702.
46.
PapachristosAVHureauDMBragaAA (2013) The corner and the crew: The influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review78(3): 417–447.
47.
PortesA (1998) Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology24(1): 1–24.
48.
PortesA (2014) Downsides of social capital. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA111(52): 18,407–18,408.
49.
PutnamR (1995) Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy6(1): 65–78.
50.
SampsonRJ (2008) Moving to inequality: Neighborhood effects and experiments meet social structure. American Journal of Sociology114(11): 189–231.
51.
SampsonRJMorenoffJDGannon-RowleyT (2002) Assessing “neighborhood effects”: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology28(1): 443–478.
52.
SharkeyPFaberJW (2014) Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology40: 559–579.
53.
TiggesLMBrowneIGreenGP (1998) Social isolation of the urban poor: Race, class, and neighborhood effects on social resources. Sociological Quarterly39(1): 53–77.
54.
TopaGZenouY (2015) Neighborhood and network effects. In: DurantonGHendersonJVStrangeWC (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V, pp. 561–624.
55.
TunstallRGreenALuptonR, et al. (2014) Does poor neighbourhood reputation create a neighbourhood effect on employment? The results of a field experiment in the UK. Urban Studies51(4): 763–780.
56.
University of Essex (2014) Institute for Social and Economic Research, NatCen Social Research. Understanding Society: Waves 1–4, 2009–2013 (data collection). 6th edition. UK Data Service. SN: 6931 & SN: 7249.
57.
WeinbergBAReaganPBYankowJJ (2004) Do neighborhoods affect hours worked? Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Labor Economics22(4): 891–924.
58.
WilsonWJ (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
59.
WilsonWJ (1996) When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
60.
WodtkeGTElwertFHardingDJ (2016) Neighborhood effect heterogeneity by family income and developmental period. American Journal of Sociology121(4): 1168–1222.
61.
WodtkeGTHardingDJElwertF (2011) Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: The impact of long-term exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review76(5): 713–736.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
