Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Urban density policy, usually implemented through a floor area ratio (FAR) plan, may become increasingly important in achieving such goals as environmental sustainability or acting as an incentive to promote transit-orientated development. Nonetheless there seems a lack of guidance on FAR distribution. In order to provide FAR distribution guidelines, in particular with the goal of incorporating sustainability and market demand, this paper develops a step-by-step, quantitative residential FAR distribution alternative based on both the advantages of the location and the market demand for the locations. It consists of two major steps: floor area generation and FAR distribution; the latter being the focus of this paper. The methods applied involve the measurement of accessibility within geographic information systems and the hedonic price model. A simulation analysis of this FAR distribution method is conducted to develop a FAR plan for a plan area, and is then applied to demonstrate how the FAR plan can be modified if mass rapid transit stations are introduced.

Keywords

accessibility amenities density floor area ratio sustainability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bertaud

Brueckner

(2005) Analyzing building-height restriction: Predicted impacts and welfare costs. Regional Science and Urban Economics35: 109–125.

Cervero

Duncan

(2002) Residential self selection and rail commuting: A nested logit analysis. Berkeley, CA: UCTC Working Paper. Available at: http://www.uctc.net/papers/604.pdf (accessed 2011).

Cervero

Guerra

(2011) Cost of a ride: The effects of densities on fixed-guideway transit ridership and costs. Journal of the American Planning Association77(3): 267–290.

Churchman

(1999) Disentangling the concept of density. Journal of Planning Literature13(4): 389–411.

Cook

(1977) Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics19(1): 15–18.

Cui

Tang

Yan

. (2010) Evaluation of the geology-environmental capacity of buildings based on the ANFIS model of the floor area ratio. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment69(1): 111–118.

Fujita

(1989) Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gao

Asami

Katsumata

(2006) Evaluating land-use restrictions concerning the floor area ratio of lots. Environment and Planning C24: 515–532.

Geurs

van Wee

(2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies. Journal of Transport Geography12: 127–140.

10.

Gloudemans

(2002) Comparison of three residential regression models: Additive, multiplicative, and nonlinear. Assessment Journal9(4): 25–36.

11.

Gordon

Vipond

(2005) Gross density and new urbanism: Comparing conventional and new urbanist suburbs in Markham, Ontario. Journal of the American Planning Association71(1): 41–54.

12.

Guerin

(2000) MRA model development using vacant land and improved property in single valuation model. Assessment Journal7(4): 27–34.

13.

T-P

(1994) Comparative analysis of alternatives to development of floor area ratio plan. Bi-Monthly Journal of Research, Development and Evaluation Commission of Executive Yuan18(2): 33–41 (in Chinese).

14.

Knaap

Moore

(2000) Land supply and infrastructure capacity monitoring for smart urban growth. Working paper. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

15.

Kono

Kaneko

Morisugi

(2010) Necessity of minimum floor area ratio regulation: A second-best policy. Annals of Regional Science44(3): 523–539.

16.

Levine

(2005) Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Transportation-Land Use Choice. Washington DC: RFF Press.

17.

Lin

T-C

Jhen

(2009) Inequity of land valuation in the highly developed city of Taipei, Taiwan. Land Use Policy26(3): 662–668.

18.

Sunderman

Birch

(2002) Valuation of land using regression analysis. In: Wang

Wolverton

(eds) Real Estate Valuation Theory. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

19.

Taipei City Government (2001) Taipei real estate database. Taipei: Taipei Government. Available at: http://www.tred.tw/TPWS/NET/INDEX/index.htm (accessed 2008).

20.

Taipei City Government (2010) Review of Wenshan area plan. Taipei: Taipei Government. Available at: http://210.69.61.31/FileUpload/34–4158/Documents/%E8%90%AC%E5%A3%BD%E9%81%93%E5%8D%97%E6%A9%8B%E7%B4%B0%E8%A8%88%E5%85%AC%E5%91%8A.pdf (accessed 2011).

21.

Taipei City Government (2012) Census data of Taipei City. Available at: http://w2.dbas.taipei.gov.tw/NEWS_WEEKLY/express/E03.pdf (accessed 2012).

22.

Taipei Revenue Service (2000) Taipei Land Use Database. Taipei: Taipei Revenue Service.

23.

Liu

. (2010) Automated derivation of urban building density information using airborne LiDAR data and object-based method. Landscape and Urban Planning98(3–4): 210–219.

Location-demand-based residential floor area ratio distribution method

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References