Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-6
A Meta-analysis: The Association Between Increased Use of Communicative Technology and Parental Involvement and the Relationship with Academic Achievement
This article shares the results of a meta-analysis on the association between parent-teacher interaction using technology-based communication and parental-involvement, and its association with the academic and behavioral outcomes of urban students. This meta-analysis includes 31 quantitative studies and well over 20,000 students. The results indicated that statistically significant effects did not emerge, except to some degree at the elementary school level. The significance of these results is discussed.
Studies with an asterisk were included in the meta-analysis
2.
*AdadevahV. (2011). Impact of home-based computers and computer-based instruction and parent/guardian monitoring on the academic performance of underserved African American elementary school children in the Birmingham, Alabama public schools. Union Institute and University of Cincinnati.
3.
*AhmadZ.SoroyaM.TariqM.ChadM. S. (2001). An empirical analysis of parental involvement in leisure Reading development of children. Library Philosophy & Practice, 20(March), 1–18.
4.
*BallA.SkryzpekC. (2019). Closing the broadband gap: A technology-based student and family engagement program. Children & Schools, 41(4), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdz015
5.
*BauchJ. P. (1994, November). Voice-based technology for parent involvement: Results and effects [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of Mid-South Research Association, Nashville, TN.
6.
*BeckR. (2012). Effects of group parent-training with online parent-teacher communication on the homework performance of elementary school students [Dissertation abstracts international]. City University of New York.
7.
*BergmanP. L. S. (2015). Parent-child information frictions and human capital investment: Evidence from a field experiment. Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute.
8.
*BouffardS. M. (2007). “Virtual” parental involvement: The role of the internet in parent-school communication. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68(5B), 3471.
9.
*BoydA. C. (2018). Perceived parent involvement, and a technology-enabled workbook intervention effect analysis on summer learning loss for 6th and 7th grade students attending a Pennsylvania K-12 virtual school [Dissertation abstracts international]. George Washington University.
10.
BronfenbrennerU. (2009). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
*ChengY.ChenY. (2018). Enhancing classroom management through parental involve-ment by using social networking. South African Journal of Education, 38(Suppl 2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns2a1427
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
CowanP. A.CowanC. P.PruettM. K.PruettK.WongJ. J. (2009). Promoting father’s engagement with children: Preventative interventions for low-income families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00625.x
16.
*DardenneW. L. (2010). The internet as a tool to enhance school-to-home communication, parent involvement, and student achievement. University of Arkansas.
17.
*DavidovitchN.YavichR. (2015). Technology-related involvement: The effect of the MASHOV system on parental involvement in Israeli junior highs. Journal of International Education Research, 11(4), 243–253. ERIC: EJ1078367.
18.
*EllisA. K. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions on the impact of student academic achievement and parental involvement through the Power School program in Catholic School Dioceses [Dissertation abstracts international]. Seton Hall University.
19.
EpsteinJ. (2001). School, Family, and community partnerships. Westview Press.
20.
EpsteinJ.BeckerH. J. (1982). Teachers’ reported practices of parent involvement: Problems and possibilities. The Elementary School Journal, 83(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1086/461298
21.
ErdreichL. (2023). Mediating intimacy: Parent-teacher digital communication and perceptions of proper intimacy among early childhood educators. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 32(3), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2020.1807387
22.
FerraraM. M. (2009). Broadening the myopic vision of parental involvement. School Community Journal, 19(2), 123–142. ERIC: EJ867972.
23.
*FraserL. A. (1991). Evaluation of Chapter 1 take-home computer program report No. 7, Vol. 25, Atlanta Public Schools, Georgia Department of Research and Evaluation.
24.
GibsonD. M.JeffersonR. N. (2006). The effect of perceived parental involvement and the use of growth-fostering relationships on self-concept in adolescents participating in gear up. Adolescence, 41(161), 111–125. PMID: NLM16689445 NLM UID: 0123667.
25.
GlassG. V.McGawB.SmithM. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Sage.Coh.
26.
GoodallJ. (2017). Narrowing the achievement gap: Parental engagement with children’s learning. Routledge.
27.
GreenhouseJ. B.IyengarS. (1994). Sensitivity analysis and diagnosis. In CooperH.IyengarS. (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 383–398). Russell Sage Foundation.
28.
HarperB. (2018). Technology and teacher-student interactions: A review of the empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
29.
*HaywardR. A.MKillopA. J.LeeS.HammockA. C.HongH.HoulinH.HouW. (2021). A text messaging intervention to increase engagement and retention of men in a community-based father-involvement program. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 39(2), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2020.1841070
HendersonA. T.CarsonJ.AballoneP.WhippleM. (2011). Making the most of school-family compacts. Educational Leadership, 68(8), 48–53.
32.
HendersonA. T.MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family, and community connections on student achievement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
33.
*Hollingsworth-LatimerM. (2001). Purposeful school-to-home communication: Impact of instrumental newsletters on self-efficacy of low-socioeconomic status parents to support mathematics learning at home. Dissertation Abstracts International, 86(6A), 28181254. Houston, TX: University of Houston. ISBN: 979-8678132512.
34.
*HookerL. (2014). Science homework with video, directions for parents: The impact on parental involvement and academic achievement. Robert Morris University.
35.
HuckC.ZhangJ. (2021). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on K-12 education: A systematic literature review. New Waves-Educational Research & Development, 24 (1), 53–84.
36.
*HurwitzL. B.LauricellaA. R.HansonA.RadenA.WartellaE. (2015). Supporting Head Start parents: The impact of a text message intervention on parent-child activities, engagement. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1373–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.996217
37.
JeynesW. (2010). The Salience of the subtle aspects of parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 112(3), 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200311
38.
JeynesW. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. Routledge.
39.
JeynesW. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects and contributions of public, public charter, and religious schools on student outcomes. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(3), 305–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2012.679542
40.
JeynesW. (2017). A meta-analysis: The relationship between parental involvement and Latino student outcomes. Education and Urban Society, 49(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124516630596
41.
JeynesW. (2023). Relational aspects of parental involvement to support educational outcomes: Parental communication, expectations, and participation for student success. Routledge.
42.
JeynesW. (2015a). A meta-analysis on the factors that best reduce the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 47(5), 523–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124514529155
43.
JeynesW. (2015b). A meta-analysis: The relationship between father involvement and student academic achievement. Urban Education, 50(4), 387–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914525789
44.
JohnsonM.SamuelsW. J.EmmettR. B.BiddleJ. (2011). Wisconsin, labor, income, and institutions: Contributions from commons and Bronfenbrenner. Emerald.
45.
JonesC.PalikaraA. (2023). Have teachers’ perceptions of parental engagement changed following COVID-19? Evidence from a mixed-methods longitudinal case study. Education Sciences, 13(7), 750. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/7/750
46.
*JordanL. L. (1994). Effects of increased opportunity for parent-teacher on student homework completion rates. Central Michigan University.
47.
KimS.ChinM. (2016). Gender differences in factors associated with how parents communicate with school in Korea. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979912
48.
*KochC. S. (2010). The function of electronic communication devises assisting parental involvement in middle schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 71(9A), 3198. ISBN: ISBN-978-1-1241-6834-0.
49.
*KraftM. A.RogersT. (2015). The underutilized potential of teacher-to-parent communication: Evidence from a field experiment. Economics of Education Review, 47, 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.04.001
LeeJ.BowenN. K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043002193
52.
LomoteyK.WeilerJ. (2021). Promoting and limiting voice: The influence of web-based platforms on public policy discourse. Urban Education, 56(4), 547–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920953884
53.
*LopachL.JensonW.DavisJ.KnorrJ.O’NeillR. (2018). The electronic home note program: An effective intervention package to improve parent program participation, on-task behavior, academic performance. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(4), 488–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0197-7
54.
MappK. L.JohnsonV. R.StricklandC. S.MezaC. (2008). High school family centers: Transformative spaces linking schools and families in support of student learning. Marriage & Family Review, 43(3/4), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494920802073205
55.
MartinF.XieK.BolligerD. U. (2022). Engaging learners in the emergency transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal on Technology in Education, 54, S1–S13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1991703
56.
McCarthy FoubertJ. L.RaceJ. L. (2022). “Damed if you do. Damed if you don’t:” Black parents’ racial realist school engagement. Race Ethnicity and Education, 25(5), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1631782
57.
*McCollumT. S. (2018). Math online homework videos and the impact on parental involvement, homework completion rates, and student achievement. McKendree University.
58.
*MillerS.DavisonJ.YohanisJ.SloanS.GildeaA.ThirstonA. (2017). Texting parents: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation: Washington D.C.
59.
MilnerH. R. (2012). Understanding urban education from the outside in and the inside out. Urban Education, 47(6), 1019–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912463858
*OlmsteadC. (2012). Using technology to increase parental involvement. Dissertation Abstracts International, 73(2A), 3486303. California State University Fullerton. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0699-0
62.
OrtaD.GutierrezV. (2022). Improving School-Family communication and engagement: Lessons from remote schooling during the pandemic. University of Chicago.
63.
*PakterA.ChenL. (2013). The daily text: Increasing parental involvement in education with mobile text messaging. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41(4), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.41.4.f
64.
*RadinB. T. (2013). Using email to improve parental involvement in middle school [Proquest dissertation publishing] 3550277. Lehigh University.
65.
*ReaganB. R. (1982). A descriptive study of a computer-based support system for parents to use in reinforcing Reading skills in grades 1-6. University of Nebraska.
66.
*ReddR. A. (2020). Parental involvement and its effect on student achievement of diverse learners. Dissertation Abstracts International, 81(3A)(E), 22587239. Joliet, IL: Saint Francis University. ISBN 978-1085735353.
67.
*SantanaS. M. P. (2021). Parents participating in the adolescent students learning process: A text message intervention in a math class context. Dissertation Abstracts International, 82(4A). Chile: Portificia Universidad Catolica De Chile.
68.
SarachoO. (2008). Fathers’ and young children’s literacy experiences. Early Child Development and Care, 178(7/8), 837–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802352251
69.
SchuckR. K.LambertR.WangM. (2023). Collaborating with parents during COVID-19 online teaching: Special educator perspectives. Education 3-13, 51(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1967421
70.
SelwynN.AagaardJ. (2021). Banning mobile phones from the classroom-an opportunity to advance understandings of technology addiction, distraction, and cyberbullying. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12943
71.
*ShayneP. A. (2009). Home school communication with parents of middle school students: A study on the effects of technology. Dissertation Abstracts International, 69(7)(E), 3324218. Saint Louis: Saint Louis University. ISBN978-0-549-75684-2.
72.
SmrekarC.Cohen-VogelC. (2001). The voices of parents: Rethinking the intersection of family and school. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje7602_5
73.
SnellE. K.HindmanA. H.WasikB. A. (2020). Exploring the use of texting to support family-school engagement in early childhood settings: Teacher and family perspectives. Early Child Development and Care, 190(4), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1479401
74.
SnellE. K.WasikB. A.HindmanA. (2020). Using texting to help families build their children’s vocabulary at home. The Reading Teacher, 74(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1906
TammisaloK.RotkirchA. (2022). Effects of information and communication technology on the quality of family relationships: A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(9), 2724–2765. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221087942
77.
TuckerC. (2017). 3 Tech strategies to keep parents in sync with school: Here are three easy ways to keep parents engaged and informed. Educational Leadership, 75(1), 84–85.
78.
WilligC.RogersW. S. (2017). The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. Sage Publications.
79.
*WoodG. M. (2009). Parent involvement and technologically based communications in Missouri’s top performing schools. Lindenwood University.
