Virtual and Physical Interactions in School-Based Spaces: Latinx Parent Engagement in a High-Tech Urban Elementary School

Abstract

Schools are increasingly using technology to connect with families. Yet, we still know little about how technology shapes parent engagement—particularly for low-income Latinx families. Garnering insights from the Ecologies of Parental Engagement framework and wide-ranging qualitative data, we explore Latinx engagement at an urban, high-tech elementary school. Findings suggest that technology and language independently and concurrently shaped engagement. Within school-based spaces (e.g., cafeteria, classroom), engagement also manifested differently depending on parents’ resources and the particular space’s rules and norms. In each space, parents overcame barriers to interact and invest—virtually or physically—in their children’s schooling. Implications are discussed.

Keywords

parental involvement social parent participation urban education Hispanic students language identity technology Latinx families parent engagement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attewell

Battle

(1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10.

Auerbach

(2006). “If the student is good, let him fly”: Moral support for college among Latino immigrant parents. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5(4), 275–292.

Baquedano-López

Alexander

R. A.

Hernández

S. J.

(2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 371(1), 149–182.

Barajas-López

Ishimaru

A. M.

(2016). “Darles el lugar”: A place for nondominant family knowing in educational equity. Urban Education, 55(1), 38–65.

Bourdieu

(1977). Outline of a theory of practice ( Nice

, Trans.) Cambridge University Press.

Calabrese Barton

A. C.

Drake

Perez

J. G.

St Louis

George

. (2004). Ecologies of parental engagement in urban education. Educational Researcher, 33(4), 3–12.

Christianakis

(2011). Parents as “help labor”: Inner-city teachers’ narratives of parent involvement. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38(4), 157–178.

Colina

Sykes

(2004). Educating parents in the Spanish-speaking community: A look at translated educational materials. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(3), 299–318.

Creswell

J. W.

(2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. SAGE.

10.

de Carvalho

M. E

. (2001). Rethinking family-school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. Routledge.

11.

de Gaetano

. (2007). The role of culture in engaging Latino parents’ involvement in school. Urban Education, 42(2), 145–162.

12.

Durán

Perry-Romero

Sánchez

(2001). Latino immigrant parents and children learning and publishing together in an after-school setting. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 6(1–2), 95–113.

13.

Durand

(2011). Latina mothers cultural beliefs about their children, parental roles and education: Implications for effective and empowering home-school partnerships. The Urban Review, 43(2), 255–278.

14.

Epstein

J. L.

(2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.

15.

Farlie

R. W.

(2007). Explaining differences in access to home computers and the Internet: A comparison of Latino groups to other ethnic and racial groups. Electron Commerce Research, 7, 265–291.

16.

Fine

(1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94, 682–710.

17.

Fuller

Lizárraga

J. R.

Gray

J. H.

(2015). Digital media and Latino families: New channels for learning, parenting, and local organizing. Joan Ganz Cooney Center.

18.

García

S. B.

Guerra

P. L.

(2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36(2), 150–168.

19.

Goodall

Montgomery

(2014). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review, 66(4), 399–410.

20.

Hernández

Endo

(2017). Developing and supporting critically reflective teachers: Diverse perspectives in the twenty-first century. Sense Publishers.

21.

Hollingworth

Mansaray

Allen

Rose

(2011). Parents’ perspectives on technology and children’s learning in the home: Social class and the role of the habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(4), 347–360.

22.

Holloway

S. D.

Park

Jonas

Bempechat

(2014). “My Mom tells me I should follow the rules, that’s why they have those rules”: Perceptions of parental advice giving among Mexican-heritage adolescents. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13(4), 262–277.

23.

Hong

(2011). A cord of three strands: A new approach to parent engagement in schools. Harvard Education Press.

24.

Ishimaru

A. M.

Torres

K. E.

Salvador

J. E.

Lott

Williams

D. M. C.

Tran

(2016). Reinforcing deficit, journeying toward equity: Cultural brokering in family engagement initiatives. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 850–882.

25.

Katz

V. S.

Gonzalez

(2016). Community variations in low-income Latino families’ technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(1), 59–80.

26.

Ladson-Billings

Tate

W. F.

(1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47.

27.

Lareau

(1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education, 60, 73–85.

28.

LeFevre

A. L.

Shaw

T. V.

(2012). Latino parent involvement and school success: Longitudinal effects of formal and informal support. Education and Urban Society, 44(6), 707–723.

29.

López

(2017). Altering the trajectory of the self-fulfilling prophecy: Asset-based pedagogy and classroom dynamics. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 193–212.

30.

López

G. R.

Scribner

J. D.

Mahitivanichcha

(2001). Redefining parental involvement: Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38(2), 253–288.

31.

Milner

H. R.

(2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47, 556–561.

32.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2018, May). The condition of education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144

33.

Noguerón-Liu

(2017). Expanding notions of digital access: Parents’ negotiation of school-based technology initiatives in new immigrant communities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(4), 387–399.

34.

Olmstead

(2013). Using technology to increase parent involvement in schools. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 57(6), 28–37.

35.

Olneck

(2000). Can multicultural education change what counts as cultural capital? American Educational Research Journal, 37(2), 317–348.

36.

Pavlakis

A. E.

(2018). Reaching all families: Family, school, and community partnerships amid homelessness and high mobility in an urban district. Urban Education, 538(8), 1043–1073.

37.

Pew Research Center. (2008). A profile of Hispanic public school students. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/08/26/one-in-five-and-growing-fast-a-profile-of-hispanic-public-school-students/

38.

Pollock

(2013). It takes a network to raise a child: Improving the communication infrastructure of public education to enable community cooperation in young people’s success. Teachers College Record, 115(7), 17045.

39.

Prins

Toso

B. W.

Schafft

K. A.

(2009). “It Feels Like a Little Family to Me” social interaction and support among women in adult education and family literacy. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 335–352.

40.

Rivera

(2014). Community development through technology: Studying the impact of technology infused activities among low-income Spanish-speaking immigrant families. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13, 196–211.

41.

Roushias

Calabrese Barton

Drake

(2009). The design and development of a multimedia case-based environment on parental engagement. Educational Media International, 46(1), 37–52.

42.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

43.

Sánchez

Salazar

(2012). Transnational computer use in urban Latino immigrant communities: Implications for schooling. Urban Education, 47(1), 90–116.

44.

Spillane

J. P.

Diamond

J. B.

Walker

L. J.

Halverson

Jita

(2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918–940.

45.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. SAGE.

46.

Torres

M. N.

Hurtado-Vivas

(2011). Playing fair with Latino parents as parents, not teachers: Beyond family literacy as assisting homework. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(3), 223–244.

47.

Tripp

L. M.

(2010). “The computer is not for you to be looking around, it is for schoolwork”: Challenges for digital inclusion as Latino immigrant families negotiate children’s access to the internet. New Media & Society, 13(4), 552–567.

48.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2016). Future ready plan: Reimagining the role of technology in education. http://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf

49.

Wassell

B. A.

Hawrylak

M. F.

Scantlebury

(2017). Barriers, resources, frustrations, and empathy: Teachers’ expectations for family involvement for Latino/a ELL students in urban STEM classrooms. Urban Education, 52(10), 1233–1254.

50.

Weisman

E. M.

Hansen

L. E.

(2008). Student teaching in urban and suburban schools: Perspectives of Latino preservice teachers. Urban Education, 43(6), 653–670.

51.

York

Loeb

(2017). One step at a time: The effects of an early literacy text messaging program for parents of preschoolers. https://www.nber.org/papers/w20659