Principals,Paradigms,and Possibilities: STEAM Education Reform and the Centering of Black Life

Abstract

This analysis explores how middle school principals in the southern U.S. made sense of a multiyear STEAM education reform. Principals’ retrospective and prospective accounts, conveyed in interviews (n = 9), are dominated by neoliberal paradigms and seldom reflect Black families’ everyday cultural life as a resource for learning. We conclude that without redirection, the reform stands to continue divesting from Black life in schools. In an exercise in Black specificity, we propose Black Futurity STEAM as an alternative reform imaginary that centers the creative impulses and capacities of Black children and cultural life in disciplinary learning.

Keywords

school reform principals Black students neoliberalism STEAM education critical pedagogy‌

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguilera

Ortiz-Revilla

(2021). STEM vs. STEAM education and student creativity: A systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331

Alvaré

M. A.

(2017). Gentrification and resistance. Social Justice, 44(2-3), 113-136.

Anagnostopoulos

Rutledge

S. A.

(2007). Making sense of school sanctioning policies in urban high schools. Teachers College Record, 109(5), 1261-1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900505

Anyon

(2005). What “counts” as educational policy? Notes toward a new paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.1.g1q5k721220ku176

Avolio

B. J.

Gardner

W. L.

(2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001

Bang

Medin

(2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies: Improving science learning for indigenous students. Science Education, 94(6), 1008-1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20392

Bell

(2020). “Maybe if they let us tell the story I wouldn’t have gotten suspended”: Understanding Black students’ and parents’ perceptions of school discipline. Children and Youth Services Review, 110, 104757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104757

Bell

(1995). Toward a pleasure–centered economy: Wondering a feminist aesthetics of performance. Text and Performance Quarterly, 15(2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462939509366109

Benjamin

(2017). But … there are new suns!. Palimpsest: A Journal on Women, Gender, and the Black International, 6(1), 103-105. https://doi.org/10.1353/pal.2017.0015

10.

Berry

R. Q.

Ellis

Hughes

(2014). Examining a history of failed reforms and recent stories of success: Mathematics education and Black learners of mathematics in the United States. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(4), 540-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.818534

11.

Bettache

Chiu

C. Y.

(2019). The invisible hand is an ideology: Toward a social psychology of neoliberalism. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12308

12.

Brock

(2020). Black technoculture and/as afrofuturism. Extrapolation, 61(1‐2), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.3828/extr.2020.3

13.

Bullock

(2017). Only STEM can save us?: Examining race, place, and stem education as property. Educational Studies, 53(6), 628-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2017.1369082

14.

Bullock

E. C.

Meiners

E. R.

(2019). Abolition by the numbers mathematics as a tool to dismantle the carceral state (and build alternatives). Theory Into Practice, 58(4), 338‐346.

15.

Civil

(2016). STEM Learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9648-2

16.

Coburn

C. E.

(2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(2), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023002145

17.

Coburn

C. E.

(2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143

18.

Coburn

C. E.

Woulfin

S. L.

(2012). Reading coaches and the relationship between policy and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 5-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.008

19.

DeMatthews

(2015). Making sense of social justice leadership: A case study of a principal’s experiences to create a more inclusive school. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14(2), 139-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.997939

20.

Denton

Borrego

(2021). Funds of knowledge in STEM education: A scoping review. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.19

21.

Edmonds

(1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15-24.

22.

Eglash

Bennett

(2009). Teaching with hidden capital: Agency in children's computational explorations of cornrow hairstyles. Children Youth and Environments, 19(1), 58-73.

23.

Emerson

Fretz

Shaw

(2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. The University of Chicago Press.

24.

Erickson

(2016). Making the unequal metropolis: School desegregation and its limits. University of Chicago Press.

25.

Evans

A. E.

(2007). School leaders and their sensemaking about race and demographic change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X06294575

26.

Ford

T. C.

(2015). Liberated threads: Black women, style, and the global politics of soul. UNC Press Books.

27.

Foster

(2005). The practice of educational leadership in African American communities of learning: Context, scope and meaning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04274276

28.

Fullan

(2001). The new meaning of educational change. Routledge.

29.

Gooden

M. A.

(2005). The role of an African American principal in an urban information technology high school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 630-650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04274273

30.

Gutiérrez

K. D.

Rogoff

(2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019

31.

Gutiérrez

Irving

S. E.

(2012). Latino/a and Black students and mathematics. The Students at the Center Series. Jobs for the Future.

32.

Gutstein

(2008). Connecting community, critical, and classical knowledge in teaching mathematics for social justice. In B. Sriraman (Ed.), International perspectives on social justice in mathematics education. Information Age Publishing.

33.

Hitt

D. H.

Tucker

P. D.

(2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531-569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911

34.

Howard

N. R.

Howard

K. E.

Busse

R. T.

Hunt

(2023). Let’s talk: An examination of parental involvement as a predictor of STEM achievement in math for high school girls. Urban Education, 58(4), 586-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085919877933

35.

Hunter-Doniger

Sydow

(2016). A journey from STEM to STEAM: A middle school case study. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 89(4‐5), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2016.1170461

36.

Khalifa

(2012). A re-new-ed paradigm in successful urban school leadership: Principal as community leader. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 424-467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11432922

37.

Kowalski

T. J.

(2010). The school principal: Visionary leadership and competent management. Routledge.

38.

Labaree

D. F.

(2010). Someone has to fail: The zero-sum game of public schooling. Harvard University Press.

39.

Legette

K. B.

Rogers

L. O.

Warren

C. A.

(2022). Humanizing student–teacher relationships for black children: Implications for teachers’ social–emotional training. Urban Education, 57(2), 278-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920933319

40.

Leithwood

(1994). Leadership for school restructuring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 498-518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X94030004006

41.

Leithwood

(2012). The Ontario leadership framework 2012. http://iel.immix.ca/storage/6/1345688978/Final_Research_Report_-_EN.pdf

42.

Leonardo

Broderick

(2011). Smartness as property: A critical exploration of intersections between whiteness and disability studies. Teachers College Record, 113(10), 2206-2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811111301008

43.

Lewis

(1966/2017). The culture of poverty. Routledge.

44.

Maitlis

Christianson

(2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57-125. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.873177

45.

Martin

D. B.

(2013). Race, racial projects, and mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 316-333. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0316

46.

Martinez

J. E.

(2017). The search for method in STEAM education. Palgrave McMillan.

47.

McGee

E. O.

White

D. T.

(2021). Afrofuturism: Reimaging STEM for black urban learners. In R. H. Milner & K. Lomotey (Eds.), Handbook of urban education (pp. 384-396). Routledge.

48.

Melamed

(2015). Racial capitalism. Critical Ethnic Studies, 1(1), 76-85. https://doi.org/10.5749/jcritethnstud.1.1.0076

49.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

50.

Milner

H. R.

IV (2006). The promise of Black teachers’ success with Black students. Educational Foundations, 20, 89-104.

51.

Milner

H. R.

(2011). Culturally relevant pedagogy in a diverse urban classroom. The Urban Review, 43, 66-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-009-0143-0

52.

Morales-Doyle

Gutstein

E. R.

(2019). Racial capitalism and STEM education in Chicago public schools. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 525-544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592840

53.

Mutegi

J. W.

(2011). The inadequacies of “Science for All” and the necessity and nature of a socially transformative curriculum approach for African American science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20410

54.

Nasir

N. I. S.

Hand

Taylor

E. V.

(2008). Culture and mathematics in school: Boundaries between “cultural” and “domain” knowledge in the mathematics classroom and beyond. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 187-240. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962

55.

Perignat

Katz-Buonincontro

(2019). STEAM In practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002

56.

Pinkard

Erete

Martin

C. K.

McKinney de Royston

(2017). Digital Youth Divas: Exploring narrative-driven curriculum to spark middle school girls’ interest in computational activities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 477-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1307199

57.

Pinkard

Martin

C. K.

Erete

(2020). Equitable approaches: Opportunities for computational thinking with emphasis on creative production and connections to community. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636070

58.

Scalzo

(2019). 100 Easy STEAM activities. Awesome hands-on projects for aspiring artist and engineers. Page Street Publishing Co.

59.

Sengupta-Irving

Vossoughi

(2019). Not in their name: Re-interpreting discourses of STEM learning through the subjective experiences of minoritized girls. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 479-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592835

60.

Spillane

J. P.

Reiser

B. J.

Reimer

(2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387-431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387

61.

Tate

W. F.

(2012). Research on schools, neighborhoods, and communities: Toward civic responsibility. Rowman & Littlefield.

62.

Taylor

J. R.

Van Every

E. J.

(2000). The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface. Routledge.

63.

Tissot

(2020). Is gentrification the result of neoliberalism? The cultural making of the real estate market in Boston’s south end, 1965–2005. In A. J. Diamond & T. J. Sugrue (Eds.) Neoliberal cities (pp. 154-172). New York University Press.

64.

Turner

E. E.

Gutiérrez

M. V.

Simic-Muller

Díez-Palomar

(2009). “Everything is math in the whole world”: Integrating critical and community knowledge in authentic mathematical investigations with elementary Latina/o students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(3), 136-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903013382

65.

Valencia

R. R.

(2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge.

66.

Vossoughi

Vakil

(2018). Toward what ends? A critical analysis of militarism, equity, and STEM education. In A. I. Ali & T. L. Buenavista (Eds.) Education at war (pp. 117-140). Fordham University Press.

67.

Warren

Vossoughi

Rosebery

A. S.

Bang

Taylor

E. V.

(2020). Multiple ways of knowing: Re-imagining disciplinary learning. In N. Nasir, C.D. Lee, R. Pea & M. McKinney de Royston (Eds.) Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning (pp. 277-294). Routledge.

68.

Warren

M. R.

(2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 75(2), 133-173. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.75.2.m718151032167438

69.

Weick

K. E.

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.

70.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

Obstfeld

(2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133