If They Come Here,Will They Fit? A Case Study of an Urban No-Excuses Charter Management Organization’s Teacher Hiring Process

Abstract

This case study of one “no-excuses” charter management organization (CMO) uses teacher surveys and interviews with principals, central office staff, and teachers to examine how a realistic job preview is enacted during the hiring process, and how newly hired teachers perceive their fit with the job and the organization before and after starting the position. Findings show a strong emphasis on honestly and clearly communicating expectations during the hiring process. Consequently, teachers’ perceptions of the job and the organization were initially high at the time of hire. However, these perceptions decreased most significantly in views of student discipline, a key contextual feature of the no-excuses model.

Keywords

charter school programs discipline policies subjects principals urban education school reform teacher candidates

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

J. D.

Dynarski

S. M.

Kane

T. J.

Pathak

P. A.

Walters

C. R.

(2012). Who benefits from KIPP? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 31, 837-860.

Bogler

Nir

A. E.

(2015). The contribution of perceived fit between job demands and abilities to teachers’ commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 541-560.

Bulkley

K. E.

Henig

J. R.

Levin

H. M.

(2010). Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for urban school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Cannata

Rubin

Goldring

Grissom

J. A.

Neumerski

C. M.

Drake

T. A.

Schuermann

(2017). Using teacher effectiveness data for information-rich hiring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 180-222.

Chatman

J. A.

(1989). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1989, 199-203. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1989.4980837

Cohodes

(2018, February 1). Charter schools and the achievement gap. The Future of Children. Retrieved from https://futureofchildren.princeton.edu/news/charter-schools-and-achievement-gap

Creswell

J. W.

Clark

V. L.

(2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

DeArmond

Gross

Bowen

Demeritt

Lake

(2012). Managing talent for school coherence: Learning from charter management organizations. Center on Reinventing Public Education. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/publications/managing-talent-school-coherence-learning-charter-management-organizations

Ellis

Skidmore

S. T.

Combs

J. P.

(2017). The hiring process matters: The role of person–job and person–organization fit in teacher satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 448-474. doi:10.1177/0013161X16687007

10.

Engel

(2013). Problematic preferences? A mixed method examination of principals’ preferences for teacher characteristics in Chicago. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49, 52-91.

11.

Engel

Cannata

Curran

F. C.

(2018). Principal influence in teacher hiring: Documenting decentralization over time. Journal of Educational Administration, 56, 277-296. doi:10.1108/JEA-05-2017-0061

12.

Farrell

Wohlstetter

Smith

(2012). Charter management organizations: An emerging approach to scaling up what works. Educational Policy, 26, 499-532. doi:10.1177/0895904811417587

13.

Ferrare

J. J.

Setari

R. R.

(2018). Converging on choice: The interstate flow of foundation dollars to charter school organizations. Educational Researcher, 47, 34-45.

14.

Flores

M. A.

Day

(2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219-232.

15.

Fryer

R. G.

(2014). Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 1355-1407.

16.

Furgeson

Gill

Haimson

Killewald

Nichols-Barrer

Teh

. . . Lake

(2011). Charter-school management organizations: Diverse strategies and diverse student impacts. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED528536.pdf

17.

Golann

J. W.

(2015). The paradox of success at a no-excuses school. Sociology of Education, 88, 103-119.

18.

Golann

J. W.

(2018). Conformers, adaptors, imitators, and rejecters: How no-excuses teachers’ cultural toolkits shape their responses to control. Sociology of Education, 91, 28-45.

19.

Golann

J. W.

Torres

A. C.

(2018). Do no-excuses disciplinary practices promote success? Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1427506

20.

Grissom

J. A.

Rubin

Neumerski

C. M.

Cannata

Drake

T. A.

Goldring

Schuermann

(2017). Central office supports for data-driven talent management decisions: Evidence from the implementation of new systems for measuring teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46, 21-32.

21.

Gross

DeArmond

(March 25, 2011). Investing in selection: Hiring teachers in charter schools. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Conference of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Seattle, WA.

22.

Henry

K. L.

Dixson

A. D.

(2016). “Locking the door before we got the keys”: Racial realities of the charter school authorization process in post-Katrina New Orleans. Educational Policy, 30, 218-240.

23.

Jabbar

(2015). Competitive networks and school leaders’ perceptions: The formation of an education marketplace in post-Katrina New Orleans. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 1093-1131.

24.

Jabbar

(2017). Recruiting “talent”: School choice and teacher hiring in New Orleans. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54, 115-151. doi:10.1177/0013161X17721607

25.

Johnson

S. M.

Marietta

Higgins

M. C.

Mapp

K. L.

Grossman

(2015). Achieving coherence in district improvement: Managing the relationship between the central office and schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

26.

Johnson

S. M.

, & the Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. (2004). Finders and keepers: Helping new teachers survive and thrive in our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

27.

Kershen

Weiner

Torres

A. C.

(2019). Control as care: How teachers in “no excuses” charter schools position their students and themselves. Equity & Excellence in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10665684.2018.1539359

28.

Kretchmar

Sondel

Ferrare

J. J.

(2014). Mapping the terrain: Teach for America, charter school reform, and corporate sponsorship. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 742-759.

29.

Kristof

A. L.

(1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.

30.

Lake

Bowen

Demeritt

McCullough

Haimson

Gill

(2012). Learning from charter school management organizations: Strategies for student behavior and teacher coaching. Retrieved from http://www.crpe.org/sites/default/files/pub_CMO_Strategies_mar12_0.pdf

31.

Levin

Mulhern

Schunck

(2005). Unintended consequences: The case for reforming the staffing rules in urban teachers union contracts. The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://tntp.org/assets/documents/UnintendedConsequences.pdf

32.

Levin

Quinn

(2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://tntp.org/assets/documents/MissedOpportunities.pdf

33.

Liu

Johnson

S. M.

(2006). New teachers’ experiences of hiring: Late, rushed, and information-poor. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 324-360.

34.

McEachin

A. J.

Welsh

R. O.

Brewer

D. J.

(2016). The variation in student achievement and behavior within a portfolio management model: Early results from New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38, 669-691.

35.

Merriam

S. B.

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

36.

Merseth

Cooper

K. S.

Roberts

Tieken

M. C.

Wynne

Valant

(2009). Inside urban charter schools: Promising practices and strategies in five high-performing schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

37.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oak: CA: Sage.

38.

Milner

R. H.

(2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47, 556-561. doi:10.1177/0042085912447516

39.

E. S.

Burke

R. J.

(2005). Person–organization fit and the war for talent: Does diversity management make a difference? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 1195-1210.

40.

Quinn

Oelberger

C. R.

Meyerson

(2016). Getting to scale: Ideas, opportunities, and resources in the early diffusion of the charter management organization, 1999-2006. Teachers College Record, 118, 1-44.

41.

Rutledge

S. A.

Harris

D. N.

Thompson

C. T.

Ingle

W. K.

(2008). Certify, blink, hire: An examination of the process and tools of teacher screening and selection. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7, 237-263.

42.

Simon

N. S.

Johnson

S. M.

Reinhorn

S. K.

(2015). The matchmaking process: Teacher hiring in six successful, high-poverty, urban schools (Working paper). The Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. Retrieved from http://projectngt.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-projectngt/files/the_matchmaking_process_.hiring._july_2015.pdf?m=1465278358

43.

Sondel

(2015). Raising citizens or raising test scores? Teach for America, “no excuses” charters, and the development of the neoliberal citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 289-313.

44.

Sondel

Kretchmar

Hadley Dunn

(2019). “Who do these people want teaching their children?” White saviorism, colorblind racism, and anti-blackness in “no excuses” charter schools. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085919842618

45.

Spencer Foundation and Public Agenda. (2015). Charter schools in perspective: A guide to research—Key facts about charter schools. Retrieved from http://www.in-perspective.org/files/CharterSchoolsInPerspective_GuidetoResearch.pdf

46.

Strauss

A. L.

Corbin

J. M.

(1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

47.

Stuit

D. A.

Smith

T. M.

(2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31, 268-279.

48.

Sun

(2016). Work environments and labor markets: Explaining principal turnover gap between charter schools and traditional public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 144-183.

49.

Synar

Maiden

(2012). A comprehensive model for estimating the financial impact of teacher turnover. Journal of Education Finance, 38, 130-144.

50.

Thomas

M. A.

Mockler

(2018). Alternative routes to teacher professional identity: Exploring the conflated sub-identities of Teach for America corps members. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26(6), 1-22.

51.

Torres

A. C.

(2014). “Are we architects or construction workers?” Re-examining teacher autonomy and turnover in charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(124), 1-26. doi:10.14507/epaa.v22.1614

52.

Torres

A. C.

(2016a). Is this work sustainable? Teacher turnover and perceptions of workload in charter management organizations. Urban Education, 51, 891-914.

53.

Torres

A. C.

(2016b). The uncertainty of high expectations: How principals influence relational trust and teacher turnover in no excuses charter schools. Journal of School Leadership, 26, 61-91.

54.

Torres

A. C.

(2018). Push, pull, tap and switch: Understanding the career decisions of charter school leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1-19. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2018.1513155

55.

Tough

(2009). Whatever it takes: Geoffrey Canada’s quest to change Harlem and America. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

56.

Tschannen-Moran

(2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

57.

Tuttle

C. C.

Gill

Gleason

Knechtel

Nichols-Barrer

Resch

(2013). KIPP middle schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.socialimpactexchange.org/sites/www.socialimpactexchange.org/files/KIPP_Middle_Schools_Impact_on_Achievement_and_Other_Outcomes1.pdf

58.

Weiner

Torres

A. C.

(2016). Different location or different map? Investigating charter school teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 75-86. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.006

59.

White

(2015). Charter schools: Demystifying Whiteness in a market of “no excuses” corporate-styled charter schools. In Picower

Mayorga

(Eds.), What’s race got to do with it? (pp. 121-145). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

60.

Woodworth

K. R.

David

J. L.

Guha

Wang

Lopez-Torkos

(2008). San Francisco bay area KIPP schools: A study of early implementation and achievement (Final report). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

61.

Yin

R. K.

(2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

62.

Youngs

Pogodzinski

Grogan

Perrone

(2015). Person-organization fit and research on instruction. Educational Researcher, 44, 37-45.