Fear of a School-to-Deportation Pipeline: How Teachers,Administrators,and Immigrant Students Respond to the Threat of Standardized Tests and Deportation
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2023
Fear of a School-to-Deportation Pipeline: How Teachers,Administrators,and Immigrant Students Respond to the Threat of Standardized Tests and Deportation
Existing studies evaluate zero tolerance policies and the school-to-prison pipeline. Additional research identifies the role of criminal justice systems in deporting immigrants. Our work bridges these two literatures by discussing how immigrant students navigate the criminal justice system within schools. Using interviews with immigrant students, teachers, and administrators, we address the question: How is the school-to-deportation pipeline maneuvered by stakeholders? Our study identifies how school authority figures react to and even use the fear of the pipeline to (1) either protect students from becoming criminalized or (2) exclude students from standardized exam participation so as to maintain funding sources.
AbregoL. J. (2006). “I can’t go to college because I don’t have papers”: Incorporation patterns of Latino undocumented youth. Latino Studies, 4(3), 212–231.
2.
AyersW.FordP. (Eds.). (2011). City kids, City teachers: Reports from the front row. The New Press.
3.
BaumJ. (2010). In the child’s best interest?: The consequences of losing a lawful immigrant parent to deportation. DIANE Publishing.
4.
BeckerH. S. (2007). Telling about society. University of Chicago Press.
5.
BeveridgeA. (2014). The development, persistence, and change of racial segregation in U.S. urban areas, 1880-2010. In GeddesI. G.GeddesA. (Eds.), Towards spatial humanities: Historical GIS and spatial history (pp. 35–61). Indiana University Press.
6.
BidwellC. E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100–114.
7.
BidwellC. E.FrankK. A.QuirozP. A. (1997). Teacher types, workplace controls, and the organization of schools. Sociology of Education, 70, 285–307.
8.
BidwellC. E.KasardaJ. D. (1975). School district organization and student achievement. American Sociological Review, 40, 55–70.
9.
BidwellC. E.KasardaJ. D. (1980). Conceptualizing and measuring the effects of school and schooling. American Journal of Education, 88(4), 401–430.
10.
BollinG. G. (2007). Preparing teachers for Hispanic immigrant children: A service learning approach. Journal of Latinos and Education, 6(2), 177–189.
11.
BosworthM.KaufmanE. (2011). Foreigners in a carceral age: Immigration and imprisonment in the United States. Stanford Law & Policy Review, 22, 429.
12.
BrownC. S.ChuH. (2012). Discrimination, ethnic identity, and academic outcomes of Mexican immigrant children: The importance of school context. Child Development, 83(5), 1477–1485.
13.
BurtR. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.
14.
BurtonL. (2007). Childhood adultification in economically disadvantaged families: A conceptual model. Family Relations, 56(4), 329–345.
15.
CarreónG. P.DrakeC.BartonA. C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 465–498.
16.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
17.
ChiswickB. R.MillerP. W. (2004). Where immigrants settle in the United States. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 6(2), 185–197.
18.
ChristleC. A.JolivetteK.NelsonC. M. (2005). Breaking the school to prison pipeline: Identifying school risk and protective factors for youth delinquency. Exceptionality, 13(2), 69–88.
19.
CoburnC. E.RussellJ. L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 203–235.
20.
De GenovaN.PeutzN. (2010). The deportation regime: Sovereignty, space, and the freedom movement. Duke University Press.
21.
DowM. (2013). Designed to punish: Immigrant detention and deportation in the US. In KretsedemasP.Capetillo-PonceJ.JacobsG. (Eds.), Migrant marginality (pp. 118–127). Routledge.
22.
DrebyJ. (2012). The burden of deportation on children in Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(4), 829–845.
23.
FergusonA. A. (2010). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of black masculinity. University of Michigan Press.
24.
GonzalesR. G. (2015). Lives in limbo: Undocumented and coming of age in America. University of California Press.
25.
GoodwinA. L. (2002). Teacher preparation and the education of immigrant children. Education and Urban Society, 34(2), 156–172.
26.
Gun Free Schools Act. (1994). 20 U.S. Code § 7961.
27.
HamannE. T.LaneB. (2004). The roles of state departments of education as policy intermediaries: Two cases. Educational Policy, 18(3), 426–455.
28.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (2010). The practice of qualitative research. Sage.
29.
JefferiesJ. (2014a). Fear of deportation in high school: Implications for breaking the circle of silence surrounding migration status. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13(4), 278–295.
30.
JefferiesJ. (2014b). The production of “illegal” subjects in Massachusetts and high school enrollment for undocumented youth. Latino Studies, 12(1), 65–87.
31.
Kang-BrownJ.TroneJ.FratelloJ.Daftary-KapurT. (2013). A generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. Vera Institute of Justice, Center of Youth Justice.
32.
KimC. Y.LosenD. J.HewittD. T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. NYU Press.
33.
KriegerN.FeldmanJ. M.WatermanP. D.ChenJ. T.CoullB. A.HemenwayD. (2017). Local residential segregation matters: Stronger association of census tract compared to conventional city-level measures with fatal and non-fatal assaults (total and firearm related), using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE) for racial, economic, and racialized economic segregation, Massachusetts (US), 1995–2010. Journal of Urban Health, 94(2), 244–258.
34.
LevinsonB. A.SuttonM.WinsteadT. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power: Theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.
35.
LoflandJ.LoflandL. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
36.
LukesM. (2014). Pushouts, shoutouts, and holdouts: Educational experiences of Latino immigrant young adults in New York City. Urban Education, 49(7): 806–834.
37.
MairaS. (2010). Radical deportation: Alien tales from Lodi and San Francisco. In De GenovaN.PeutzN. (Eds.), The deportation regime: Sovereignty, space, and the freedom of movement (pp. 295–325). Duke University Press.
38.
MaloneyP. (n.d.). Gaming or cheating? How teachers and administrators in low-income schools adapt to high stakes tests. Under review.
39.
MarrowH. (2011). New destination dreaming: Immigration, race, and legal status in the rural American South. Stanford University Press.
40.
MartinJ.BeeseJ. (2017). Talking back at school: Using the literacy classroom as a site for resistance to the school-to-prison pipeline and recognition of students labeled ‘at-risk’. Urban Education, 52(10): 1204–1232.
41.
MasseyD. S. (Ed.). (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration. Russell Sage Foundation.
42.
MasseyD. S.SánchezM. (2010). Brokered boundaries: Immigrant identity in anti-immigrant times. Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
McLaughlinM. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.
44.
MenkenK.GarcíaO. (Eds.). (2010). Negotiating language education policies: Educators as policymakers. Routledge.
45.
MilnerH. R.IVLomoteyK. (2014). Introduction. In Milner IVH. R.LomoteyK. (Eds.), Handbook of Urban Education (pp. xv–xxiii). Routledge.
46.
MorrisE. W. (2007). “Ladies” or “loudies”? Perceptions and experiences of black girls in classrooms. Youth & Society, 38(4), 490–515.
47.
PegueroA. A.PortillosE. L.HongJ. S.GonzálezJ. C.KahleL. L.ShekarkharZ. (2013). Victimization, urbanicity, and the relevance of context: School routines, race and ethnicity, and adolescent violence. Journal of Criminology, 2013, 1–14.
48.
PiphoC. (1993). States get tough on juvenile crime. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(4), 286.
49.
RaginC. C.BeckerH. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
50.
RothmanS. (2001). School absence and student background factors: A multilevel analysis. International Education Journal, 2(1), 59–68.
51.
SchererC. W.ChoH. (2003). A social network contagion theory of risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(2), 261–267.
52.
SegoolN. K.CarlsonJ. S.GoforthA. N.EmbseN. V. D.BarterianJ. A. (2013). Heightened test anxiety among young children: Elementary school students’ anxious responses to high-stakes testing. Psychology in the Schools, 50(5), 489–499.
53.
SergiovanniT. J. (1992). Moral leadership: Getting to the heart of school improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
54.
SergiovanniT. J. (1994). Organizations or communities? Changing the metaphor changes the theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 214–226.
55.
SergiovanniT. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc.
56.
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC. G.RauschM. K.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–108.
57.
SmallM. L. (2009). How many cases do I need?: On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.
58.
SmithC. D. (2009). Deconstructing the pipeline: Evaluating school-to-prison pipeline equal protection cases through a structural racism framework. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 1009.
59.
SolórzanoR. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260–329.
60.
SteinS. J. (2001). ‘These are your Title I students’: Policy language in educational practice. Policy Sciences, 34(2), 135–156.
61.
TannersL. (1997). Immigrant students in New York City schools. Urban Education, 32(2), 233–255.
62.
TuzzoloE.HewittD. T. (2006). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to-prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59–68.
63.
VermaS. (2017). Labor policy and the global Indian diaspora. In HegdeR. S.SahooA. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the Indian diaspora. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
64.
VermaS.MaloneyP.AustinD. (2017). The school to deportation pipeline: The perspectives of immigrant students and their teachers on profiling and surveillance within the school system. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 673(1), 209–229.
65.
WaldJ.LosenD. J. (2007). Out of sight: The journey through the school-to-prison pipeline. Invisible Children in the Society and its Schools, 3, 23–38.
66.
WaltersW. (2010). Deportation, exclusion, and the international police of aliens. In De GenovaN.PeutzN. (Eds.), The deportation regime: Sovereignty, space, and the freedom movement (pp. 295–328). Duke University Press.
67.
WelchM. (2002). Detained: Immigration laws and the expanding INS jail complex. Temple University Press.
68.
WillmsJ. D. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112, 1008–1037.
69.
WinnM. T.BehizadehN. (2011). The right to be literate: Literacy, education, and the school-to-prison pipeline. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 147–173.
