This case study of one small urban California high school enrolling predominantly low-socioeconomic status (SES) Latinx youth and many emergent bilinguals found that a college-for-all school culture, guided by leadership and school vision, was enacted in classrooms as caring, safe, productive spaces promoting college-going comportment. However, support exceeded challenge, with routine scaffolds and formulaic activity. There was less evidence of learning opportunities that challenged intellectual capacities and students’ analytic processes. Instruction overall maintained a sequential format of support, study skills, and content skills before challenging disciplinary work, with basic and intermediate academic literacies seldom embedded in activity that engaged higher order thinking, creativity, and imagination.
AchinsteinB.CurryM. W.OgawaR. T. (2015). (Re)labeling social status: Promises and tensions of developing a college going culture for Latina/o youth in an urban high school. American Journal of Education, 121, 311-345.
2.
AchinsteinB.CurryM. W.OgawaR. T.AthanasesS. Z. (2016). Organizing high schools for Latina/o youth success: Boundary crossing to access and build community wealth. Urban Education, 51, 824-854.
3.
Antrop-GonzálezR.De JesúsA. (2006). Toward a theory of critical care in urban small school reform: Examining structures and pedagogies of caring in two Latino community-based schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 409-433.
4.
ApplebeeA. N. (2013). Common Core State Standards: The promise and the peril in a national palimpsest. English Journal, 103, 25-33.
5.
ArtilesA. J. (1998). The dilemma of difference: Enriching the disproportionality discourse with theory and context. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 32-36.
6.
AthanasesS. Z.AchinsteinB.CurryM.OgawaR. (2016). The promise and limitations of a college-going culture: Toward cultures of engaged learning for low-SES Latina/o youth. Teachers College Record, 118, 1-60.
7.
AthanasesS. Z.de OliveiraL. C. (2014). Scaffolding versus routine support for Latina/o youth in an urban school: Tensions in building toward disciplinary literacy. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 263-299.
8.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108-126.
9.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
10.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 99-120.
11.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
ConchasG. Q. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino school engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 475-504.
13.
ConchasG. Q.ClarkP. A. (2002). Career academies and urban minority schooling: Forging optimism despite limited opportunity. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7, 287-311.
14.
ConchasG. Q.RodríguezL. F. (2008). Small schools and urban youth: Using the power of school culture to engage students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press/Sage Publications.
15.
ContrerasF. (2011). Strengthening the bridge to higher education for academically promising underrepresented students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22,500-526.
16.
CooperK. S. (2013). Safe, affirming, and productive spaces: Classroom engagement among Latina high school students. Urban Education, 48, 490-528.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
DuncheonJ. C. (2021). Making sense of college readiness in a low-performing urban high school: Perspectives of high-achieving first generation youth. Urban Education, 56(8) 1360-1387. doi:10.1177/0042085918756712
20.
EngeströmY. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133-156.
21.
EnrightK. A.GillilandB. (2011). Multilingual writing in an age of accountability: From policy to practice in U.S. high school classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 182-195.
22.
EnrightK. A.Torres-TorrettiD.CarreónO. (2012). Hope is the thing with metaphors: De-situating literacies and learning in English language arts classrooms. Language and Education, 26, 35-51.
23.
FaltisC.ValdésG. (2016). Preparing teachers for teaching in and advocating for linguistically diverse classrooms: A vade mecum for teacher educators. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 549-592). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
24.
Farmer-HintonR. (2011). On being college prep: Examining the implementation of a “college for all” mission in an urban charter school. Urban Review, 43, 567-596.
25.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
GándaraP.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
GarzaR. (2009). Latino and White high school students’ perceptions of caring behaviors: Are we culturally responsive to our students?Urban Education, 44, 297-321.
28.
GutiérrezK. G.MoralesP. Z.MartinezD. C. (2009). Re-mediating literacy: Culture, difference, and learning for students from nondominant communities. Review of Research in Education, 33, 212-245.
29.
GutiérrezK. G.StoneL. (2002). Hypermediating literacy activity: How learning contexts get reorganized. In SarachoO.SpodekB. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in literacy in early childhood education (pp. 25-52). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
30.
HammondJ. (2006). High challenge, high support: Integrating language and content instruction for diverse learners in an English literature classroom. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 269-283.
31.
HammondJ.GibbonsP. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect, 20, 6-30.
32.
HilbergR. S.DohertyR. W.TharpR. G.EstradaP. (2003). Standards Performance Continuum (SPC) manual for classroom observation. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence (CREDE).
33.
HollandN. E.Farmer-HintonR. L. (2009). Leave no schools behind: The importance of a college culture in urban public high schools. The High School Journal, 92(3), 24-43.
34.
HornI. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 37-79.
35.
IrizarryJ. G. (2007). Ethnic and urban intersections in the classroom: Latino students, hybrid identities, and culturally responsive pedagogy. Multicultural Perspectives, 9(3), 21-28.
36.
KnightM. G.MarcianoJ. E. (2013). College-ready: Preparing Black and Latina/o youth for higher education—A culturally relevant approach. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
37.
KolluriS. (2018). Student perspectives on the Common Core: The challenge of college readiness at urban high schools. Urban Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0042085918772630
38.
LabareeD. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 39-81.
39.
LeeC. D. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
40.
LeeV. E.SmithJ. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907-945.
41.
LucasT.VillegasA. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In LucasT. (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55-72). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
42.
Madrigal-GarciaY. I.Acevedo-GilN. (2016). The new Juan Crow in education: Revealing panoptic measures and inequitable resources that hinder Latina/o postsecondary pathways. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 15, 154-181.
43.
MartinezD. C.MoralesP. Z.AldanaU. S. (2017). Leveraging students’ communicative repertoires as a tool for equitable learning. Review of Research in Education, 41, 477-499.
44.
MartinezG. F.Deil-AmemR. (2015). College for all Latinos? The role of high school messages in facing college challenges. Teachers College Record, 117, 1-50.
45.
McKillipM. E. M.GodfreyK. E.RawlsA. (2012). Rules of engagement: Building a college-going culture in an urban school. Urban Education, 48,529-556.
46.
MehanH. (2012). In the front door: Creating a college-going culture of learning. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
47.
MilnerH. R. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 118-131.
48.
MilnerH. R. (2012). But what is urban education?Urban Education, 47, 556-561.
49.
MohanB.SlaterT. (2006). Examining the theory/practice relation in a high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 302-316.
50.
MojeE. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85, 254-278.
51.
NystrandM.GamoranA. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 261-285.
52.
OakesJ.RogersJ.LiptonM. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
53.
OakesJ.WellsA. S.JonesM.DatnowA. (1997). Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record, 98, 482-510.
54.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41, 93-97.
55.
PiagetJ.InhelderB. (1967). The psychology of the child. London, England: Routledge.
56.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.HaynesN. J.MintzS.La ParoK. M. (2006). CLASS Classroom Assessment Scoring System: Manual middle secondary version pilot. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
57.
ReidM. J.MooreJ. L.III. (2008). College readiness and academic preparation for postsecondary education: Oral histories of first-generation urban college students. Urban Education, 43, 240-261.
58.
ResnickL. B. (2010). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher, 39, 183-197.
59.
Rivera-McCutchenR. L. (2012). Caring in a small urban high school: A complicated success. Urban Education, 47, 653-680.
60.
RodgersE. M. (2004). Interactions that scaffold reading performance. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 501-532.
61.
RodriguezL. (2012). “Everybody grieves, but still nobody sees”: Toward a praxis of recognition for Latina/o students in U.S. schools. Teachers College Record, 114, 1-31.
62.
SchaeferM. B.RiveraL. M. (2020). Educational experiences that matter to seniors graduating from an urban early college high school. Urban Education, 55(3), 448-475. doi:10.1177/0042085916654526
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.—Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
65.
StillmanJ. (2011). Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record, 113, 133-180.
66.
StoneC. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
67.
SwellerJ. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
68.
ToshalisE. (2012). The rhetoric of care: Preservice teacher discourses that depoliticize, deflect, and deceive. Urban Review, 44, 1-35.
69.
ValdésG. (1999). Incipient bilingualism and the development of English language writing abilities in the secondary school. In FaltisC. J.WolfeP. M. (Eds.), So much to say: Adolescents, bilingualism and ESL in the secondary school (pp. 138-175). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
70.
ValdésG.BunchG.SnowC.LeeC.MatosL. (2005). Enhancing the development of students’ language(s). In Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 126-168). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
71.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
72.
van de PolJ.VolmanM.BeishuizenJ. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271-296.
73.
VygotskyL. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74.
WillsJ. S.SandholtzJ. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111, 1065-1114.
75.
WoodD.BrunerJ.RossG. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.
76.
YinR. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
77.
ZoharA.DeganiA.VaakninE. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about low-achieving students and higher order thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 469-485.
