Responding to recent reports that Latina students often lack feelings of belonging at school and are dropping out in increasing numbers, this study explores how classroom environments influence engagement or disengagement among Latina students. Through case studies with five Latina 10th-grade students, this research examines how variations in the learning environment along three dimensions influence variations in classroom engagement as students travel from class to class in a given school day. Marshaling interview and observational data, the author demonstrates that Latina students experience the greatest levels of classroom engagement in learning spaces that are safe, affirming, and productive.
AlonsoG.AndersonN. S.SuC.TheoharisJ. (2009). Our schools suck: Students talk back to a segregated nation on the failures of urban education. New York, NY: New York University Press.
2.
AronsonJ.SteeleC. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In ElliotA. J.DweckC. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2010). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BakerJ. A. (1998). The social context of school satisfaction among urban, low-income, African-American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(1), 25-44.
5.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 479-529.
7.
CarawayK.TuckerC. M.ReinkeW. M.HallC. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417-427.
8.
CarterP. L. (2005). Keepin’ it real: School success beyond black and white. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
CataldiE. F.LairdJ.Kewal RamaniA.ChapmanC. (2009). High school dropout and completion rates in the united states: 2007 (NCES 2006-062). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics
10.
ChenY.LiS. X. (2009). Group identity and social preferences. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 431-457.
11.
CólonY.SánchezB. (2010). Explaining the gender disparity in Latino youth’s education: Acculturation and economic value of education. Urban Education, 45(3), 252-273.
12.
ConchasG. Q. (2001). Structuring failure and success: Understanding the variability in Latino student engagement. Harvard Educational Review, 71(3), 475-504.
13.
ConnellJ. P. (1990). Context, self, and action: A motivational analysis of self-system processes across the life-span. In CicchettiD. (Ed.), The self in transition: Infancy to childhood (pp. 61-97). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
DavidsonA. L. (1996). Making and molding identity in schools: Student narratives on race, gender, and academic engagement. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
DavidsonA. L.PhelanP. (1999). Students multiple worlds: An anthropological approach to understanding students’ engagement with school. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 11, 233-273.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
17.
DietrichL. C. (1998). Chicana adolescents: Bitches, ’ho’s, and schoolgirls. Westport, CT: Praeger.
18.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R. (2005). An examination of the sociopolitical history of Chicanos and its relationship to school performance. Urban Education, 40(6), 576-605.
19.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
20.
FairbrotherA. (2008). “They might need a little extra hand, you know.” Latino students in at-risk programs. Urban Education, 43(5), 587-611.
21.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany: State University of New York Press.
22.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117-142.
23.
Flores-GonzálezN. (2002). School kids/street kids: Identity development in Latino students. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
24.
FordM. E.SmithP. R. (2007). Thriving with social purpose: An integrative approach to the development of optimal human functioning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 153-171.
25.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
26.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
27.
GándaraP.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
GandaraP.O’HaraS.GuitierrezD. (2004). The changing shape of aspirations: Peer influence on achievement behavior. In GibsonM.GandaraP.Peterson KoyamaJ. (Eds.), School connections: US Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
GarzaR. (2009). Latino and white high school students’ perceptions of caring behaviors: Are we culturally responsive to our students?Urban Education, 44(3), 297-321.
30.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
31.
HermanK. C.TuckerC. M. (2000). Engagement in learning and academic success among at-risk Latino American students. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 33(3), 129-135.
32.
HondoC.GardinerM. E.SapienY. (2008). Latino dropouts in rural America: Realities and possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
HurdC. A. (2004). “Acting out” and being a “schoolboy”: Performance in an ELD classroom. In GibsonM.Gandara.P.Peterson KoyamaJ. (Eds.), School connections: US Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
34.
JohnsonM. K.CrosnoeR.ElderG. H. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318-340.
35.
KohlH. (1994). “I won’t learn from you” and other thoughts on creative maladjustment. New York, NY: New Press.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
MarksH. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
38.
Matute-BianchiM. E. (1986). Ethnic identities and patterns of school success and failure among Mexican-descent and Japanese-American students in a California high school: An ethnographic analysis. American Journal of Education, 95(1), 233-255.
39.
MaxwellJ. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MickelsonR. A. (1990). The attitude-achievement paradox among black adolescents. Sociology of Education, 63, 44-61.
41.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
MojeE. B.MartinezM. (2007). The role of peers, families, and ethnic-identity enactments in educational persistence and achievements of Latino and Latina youths. In FuligniA. (Ed.), Contesting stereotypes and creating identities: Social categories, social identities, and educational participation. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
43.
NakkulaM. (2008). Identity and possibility: Adolescent development and the potential of schools. In SadowskiM. (Ed.), Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education (pp. 11-21). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
44.
NasirN. S.McLaughlinM. W.JonesA. (2009). What does it mean to be African American? Constructions of race and academic identity in an urban public high school. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 73-114.
45.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NewmannF. M.WehlageG. G.Lamborn.S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In NewmannF. M. (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
48.
NietoS.BodeP. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
49.
NoddingsN. (2005). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
NunnL. M. (2011). Classrooms as racialized spaces: Dynamics of collaboration, tension, and student attitudes in urban and suburban high schools. Urban Education, 46(6), 1226-1255.
51.
OstermanK. F. (2000). Students need for relatedness in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.
PekrunR. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341.
54.
PizarroM. (2005). Chicanas and Chicanos in schools. Austin: University of Texas Press.
55.
RumbergerR. W. (2004). Graduation and dropout rates after implementation of high-stakes testing in Chicago’s elementary schools: A close look at students most vulnerable to dropping out. In OrfieldG. (Ed.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
56.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
57.
SadowskiM. (2003). Why identity matters at school. In SadowskiM. (Ed.), Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
58.
SánchezB.ColónY.EsparzaP. (2005). The role of sense of school belonging and gender in the academic adjustment of Latino adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 619-628.
59.
SkinnerE. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549-570.
60.
SleeterC. E. (2012). Confronting the marginalization of culturally responsive pedagogy. Urban Education, 47(3), 562-584.
61.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
62.
StipekD. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
63.
Suárez-OrozcoC.PimentelA.MartinJ. (2009). The significance of relationship: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 712-749.
64.
Suárez-OrozcoC.RhodesJ.MilburnM. (2009). Unraveling the immigrant paradox: Academic engagement and disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth. Youth & Society, 41(2), 151-185.
65.
Suárez-OrozcoC.Suárez-OrozcoM. (1995). Transformations: Migration, family life, and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Pres.
66.
Suárez-OrozcoCSuárez-OrozcoM.TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land: Immigrant students in American society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pres.
67.
TantiC.StukasA. A.HalloranM. J.FoddyM. (2008). Tripartite self-concept change: Shifts in the individual, relational, and collective self in adolescence. Self and Identity, 7, 360-379.
68.
TatumB. D. (1997). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?New York, NY: Basic Books.
69.
ValenciaR. R. (2002) The plight of Chicano students: An overview of schooling conditions and outcomes. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), Chicano school failure and success: Past, present, and future (2nd ed, pp. 3-41). New York, NY: Routledge.
70.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
71.
VigilJ. D. (2004). Gangs and group membership: Implications for schooling. In GibsonM.GandaraP.Peterson KoyamaJ. (Eds.), School connections: US Mexican youth, peers, and school achievement (pp. 87-106). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
72.
VoelklK. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 204-319.
73.
WhiteR. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-333.
74.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81.
75.
WilsonW. J. (1991). Studying inner-city social dislocations: The challenge of the public policy agenda. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 1-14.
76.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
77.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35(2), 151-175.
